Skip to content

Mirror of upstream PR #33464 #155

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 76 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Mirror of upstream PR #33464 #155

wants to merge 76 commits into from

Conversation

kushxg
Copy link
Owner

@kushxg kushxg commented Jun 6, 2025

Mirrored from facebook/react PR facebook#33464

sammy-SC and others added 30 commits May 12, 2025 17:39
This is a fix for a problem where React retains shadow nodes longer than
it needs to. The behaviour is shown in React Native test:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/main/packages/react-native/src/private/__tests__/utilities/__tests__/ShadowNodeReferenceCounter-itest.js#L169

# Problem
When React commits a new shadow tree, old shadow nodes are stored inside
`fiber.alternate.stateNode`. This is not cleared up until React clones
the node again. This may be problematic if mutation deletes a subtree,
in that case `fiber.alternate.stateNode` will retain entire subtree
until next update. In case of image nodes, this means retaining entire
images.

So when React goes from revision A: `<View><View /></View>` to revision
B: `<View />`, `fiber.alternate.stateNode` will be pointing to Shadow
Node that represents revision A..


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/076b677e-d152-4763-8c9d-4f923212b424)


# Fix
To fix this, this PR adds a new feature flag
`enableEagerAlternateStateNodeCleanup`. When enabled,
`alternate.stateNode` is proactively pointed towards finishedWork's
stateNode, releasing resources sooner.

I have verified this fixes the issue [demonstrated by React Native
tests](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/main/packages/react-native/src/private/__tests__/utilities/__tests__/ShadowNodeReferenceCounter-itest.js#L169).
All existing React tests pass when the flag is enabled.
…ook#33028)

## Summary
Our builds generate files with a `.mjs` file extension. These are
currently filtered out by `ReactFlightWebpackPlugin` so I am updating it
to support this file extension.

This fixes facebook#33155

## How did you test this change?
I built the plugin with this change and used `yalc` to test it in my
project. I confirmed the expected files now show up in
`react-client-manifest.json`
)

Enabled in experimental channel.

We know this is critical semantics to enforce at the HTML level since if
you don't then you can't add explicit boundaries after the fact.
However, this might have to go in a major release to allow for
upgrading.
…ackTrace (facebook#33143)

When we get the source location for "View source for this element" we
should be using the enclosing function of the callsite of the child. So
that we don't just point to some random line within the component.

This is similar to the technique in facebook#33136.

This technique is now really better than the fake throw technique, when
available. So I now favor the owner technique. The only problem it's
only available in DEV and only if it has a child that's owned (and not
filtered).

We could implement this same technique for the error that's thrown in
the fake throwing solution. However, we really shouldn't need that at
all because for client components we should be able to call
`inspect(fn)` at least in Chrome which is even better.
…3159)

This keeps track of the transition lane allocated for this event. I want
to be able to use the current one within sync work flushing to know
which lane needs its loading indicator cleared.

It's also a bit weird that transition work scheduled inside sync updates
in the same event aren't entangled with other transitions in that event
when `flushSync` is.

Therefore this moves it to reset after flushing.

It should have no impact. Just splitting it out into a separate PR for
an abundance of caution.

The only thing this might affect would be if the React internals throws
and it doesn't reset after. But really it doesn't really have to reset
and they're all entangled anyway.
…onLane (facebook#33188)

When we're entangled with an async action lane we use that lane instead
of the currentEventTransitionLane. Conversely, if we start a new async
action lane we reuse the currentEventTransitionLane.

So they're basically supposed to be in sync but they're not if you
resolve the async action and then schedule new stuff in the same event.
Then you end up with two transitions in the same event with different
lanes.

By stashing it like this we fix that but it also gives us an opportunity
to check just the currentEventTransitionLane to see if this event
scheduled any regular Transition updates or Async Transitions.
Stacked on facebook#33159.

This implements `onDefaultTransitionIndicator`.

The sequence is:

1) In `markRootUpdated` we schedule Transition updates as needing
`indicatorLanes` on the root. This tracks the lanes that currently need
an indicator to either start or remain going until this lane commits.
2) Track mutations during any commit. We use the same hook that view
transitions use here but instead of tracking it just per view transition
scope, we also track a global boolean for the whole root.
3) If a sync/default commit had any mutations, then we clear the
indicator lane for the `currentEventTransitionLane`. This requires that
the lane is still active while we do these commits. See facebook#33159. In other
words, a sync update gets associated with the current transition and it
is assumed to be rendering the loading state for that corresponding
transition so we don't need a default indicator for this lane.
4) At the end of `processRootScheduleInMicrotask`, right before we're
about to enter a new "event transition lane" scope, it is no longer
possible to render any more loading states for the current transition
lane. That's when we invoke `onDefaultTransitionIndicator` for any roots
that have new indicator lanes.
5) When we commit, we remove the finished lanes from `indicatorLanes`
and once that reaches zero again, then we can clean up the default
indicator. This approach means that you can start multiple different
transitions while an indicator is still going but it won't stop/restart
each time. Instead, it'll wait until all are done before stopping.

Follow ups:

- [x] Default updates are currently not enough to cancel because those
aren't flush in the same microtask. That's unfortunate. facebook#33186
- [x] Handle async actions before the setState. Since these don't
necessarily have a root this is tricky. facebook#33190
- [x] Disable for `useDeferredValue`. ~Since it also goes through
`markRootUpdated` and schedules a Transition lane it'll get a default
indicator even though it probably shouldn't have one.~ EDIT: Turns out
this just works because it doesn't go through `markRootUpdated` when
work is left behind.
- [x] Implement built-in DOM version by default. facebook#33162
…n was scheduled (facebook#33186)

Stacked on facebook#33160.

The purpose of this is to avoid calling `onDefaultTransitionIndicator`
when a Default priority update acts as the loading indicator, but still
call it when unrelated Default updates happens nearby.

When we schedule Default priority work that gets batched with other
events in the same frame more or less. This helps optimize by doing less
work. However, that batching means that we can't separate work from one
setState from another. If we would consider all Default priority work in
a frame when determining whether to show the default we might never show
it in cases like when you have a recurring timer updating something.

This instead flushes the Default priority work eagerly along with the
sync work at the end of the event, if this event scheduled any
Transition work. This is then used to determine if the default indicator
needs to be shown.
…acebook#33162)

Stacked on facebook#33160.

By default, if `onDefaultTransitionIndicator` is not overridden, this
will trigger a fake Navigation event using the Navigation API. This is
intercepted to create an on-going navigation until we complete the
Transition. Basically each default Transition is simulated as a
Navigation.

This triggers the native browser loading state (in Chrome at least). So
now by default the browser spinner spins during a Transition if no other
loading state is provided. Firefox and Safari hasn't shipped Navigation
API yet and even in the flag Safari has, it doesn't actually trigger the
native loading state.

To ensures that you can still use other Navigations concurrently, we
don't start our fake Navigation if there's one on-going already.
Similarly if our fake Navigation gets interrupted by another. We wait
for on-going ones to finish and then start a new fake one if we're
supposed to be still pending.

There might be other routers on the page that might listen to intercept
Navigation Events. Typically you'd expect them not to trigger a refetch
when navigating to the same state. However, if they want to detect this
we provide the `"react-transition"` string in the `info` field for this
purpose.
…o root associated (facebook#33190)

Stacked on facebook#33160, facebook#33162, facebook#33186 and facebook#33188.

We have a special case that's awkward for default indicators. When you
start a new async Transition from `React.startTransition` then there's
not yet any associated root with the Transition because you haven't
necessarily `setState` on anything yet until the promise resolves.
That's what `entangleAsyncAction` handles by creating a lane that
everything entangles with until all async actions are done.

If there are no sync updates before the end of the event, we should
trigger a default indicator until either the async action completes
without update or if it gets entangled with some roots we should keep it
going until those roots are done.
Not sure where this was coming from.
…sition (facebook#33191)

And that doesn't disable with `update="none"`.

The principle here is that we want the content of a Portal to animate if
other things are animating with it but if other things aren't animating
then we don't.
…ook#33200)

This is a partial revert of facebook#33094. It's true that we don't need the
server and client ViewTransition names to line up. However the server
does need to be able to generate deterministic names for itself. The
cheapest way to do that is using the useId algorithm. When it's used by
the server, the client needs to also materialize an ID even if it
doesn't use it.
…3194)

Removes the `isFallback` flag on Tasks and tracks it on the
formatContext instead.

Less memory and avoids passing and tracking extra arguments to all the
pushStartInstance branches that doesn't need it.

We'll need to be able to track more Suspense related contexts on this
for View Transitions anyway.
…facebook#33206)

Stacked on facebook#33194 and facebook#33200.

When Suspense boundaries reveal during streaming, the Fizz runtime will
be responsible for animating the reveal if necessary (not in this PR).
However, for the future runtime to know what to do it needs to know
about the `<ViewTransition>` configuration to apply.

Ofc, these are virtual nodes that disappear from the HTML. We could
model them as comments like we do with other virtual nodes like Suspense
and Activity. However, that doesn't let us target them with
querySelector and CSS (for no-JS transitions). We also don't have to
model every ViewTransition since not every combination can happen using
only the server runtime. So instead this collapses `<ViewTransition>`
and applies the configuration to the inner DOM nodes.

```js
<ViewTransition name="hi">
  <div />
  <div />
</ViewTransition>
```

Becomes:

```html
<div vt-name="hi" vt-update="auto"></div>
<div vt-name="hi_1" vt-update="auto"></div>
```

I use `vt-` prefix as opposed to `data-` to keep these virtual
attributes away from user specific ones but we're effectively claiming
this namespace.

There are four triggers `vt-update`, `vt-enter`, `vt-exit` and
`vt-share`. The server resolves which ones might apply to this DOM node.
The value represents the class name (after resolving
view-transition-type mappings) or `"auto"` if no specific class name is
needed but this is still a trigger.

The value can also be `"none"`. This is different from missing because
for example an `vt-update="none"` will block mutations inside it from
triggering the boundary where as a missing `vt-update` would bubble up
to be handled by a parent.

`vt-name` is technically only necessary when `vt-share` is specified to
find a pair. However, since an explicit name can also be used to target
specific CSS selectors, we include it even for other cases.

We want to exclude as many of these annotations as possible.

`vt-enter` can only affect the first DOM node inside a Suspense
boundary's content since the reveal would cause it to enter but nothing
deeper inside. Similarly `vt-exit` can only affect the first DOM node
inside a fallback. So for every other case we can exclude them. (For
future MPA ViewTransitions of the whole document it might also be
something we annotate to children inside the `<body>` as well.) Ideally
we'd only include `vt-enter` for Suspense boundaries that actually
flushed a fallback but since we prepare all that content earlier it's
hard to know.

`vt-share` can be anywhere inside an fallback or content. Technically we
don't have to include it outside the root most Suspense boundary or for
boundaries that are inlined into the root shell. However, this is tricky
to detect. It would also not be correct for future MPA ViewTransitions
because in that case the shared scenario can affect anything in the two
documents so it needs to be in every node everywhere which is
effectively what we do. If a `share` class is specified but it has no
explicit name, we can exclude it since it can't match anything.

`vt-update` is only necessary if something below or a sibling might
update like a Suspense boundary. However, since we don't know when
rendering a segment if it'll later asynchronously add a Suspense
boundary later we have to assume that anywhere might have a child. So
these are always included. We collapse to use the inner most one when
directly nested though since that's the one that ends up winning.

There are some weird edge cases that can't be fully modeled by the lack
of virtual nodes.
For debugging purposes, log author_association
Noop detection for xplat syncs broke because `eslint-plugin-react-hooks`
uses versions like:

- `0.0.0-experimental-d85f86cf-20250514`

But xplat expects them to be of the form:

- `19.2.0-native-fb-63d664b2-20250514`

This PR fixes the noop by ignoring
`eslint-plugin-react-hooks/package.json` changes. This means we won't
create a sync if only that package.json changes, but that should be rare
and we can follow up with better detection if needed.

[Example failed
action](https://github.com/facebook/react/actions/runs/15032346805/job/42247414406):

<img width="1031" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-15 at 11 31 17 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d902079c-1afe-4e18-af1d-25e60e28929e"
/>

I believe the regression was caused by
facebook#33104
…cebook#33295)

We decremented `allPendingTasks` after invoking `onShellReady`. Which
means that in that scope it wasn't considered fully complete.

Since the pattern for flushing in Node.js is to start piping in
`onShellReady` and that's how you can get sync behavior, this led us to
think that we had more work left to do. For example we emitted the
`writeShellTimeInstruction` in this scenario before.
…ion (facebook#33293)

When needed.

For the external runtime we always include this wrapper.

For others, we only include it if we have an ViewTransitions affecting.
If we discover the ViewTransitions late, then we can upgrade an already
emitted instruction.

This doesn't yet do anything useful with it, that's coming in a follow
up. This is just the mechanism for how it gets installed.
So they can be shared by server. Incorporates the types from definitely
typed too.
…ebook#33306)

Basically we track a `SuspenseListRow` on the task. These keep track of
"pending tasks" that block the row. A row is blocked by:

- First itself completing rendering.
- A previous row completing.
- Any tasks inside the row and before the Suspense boundary inside the
row. This is mainly because we don't yet know if we'll discover more
SuspenseBoundaries.
- Previous row's SuspenseBoundaries completing.

If a boundary might get outlined, then we can't consider it completed
until we have written it because it determined whether other future
boundaries in the row can finish.

This is just handling basic semantics. Features not supported yet that
need follow ups later:

- CSS dependencies of previous rows should be added as dependencies of
future row's suspense boundary. Because otherwise if the client is
blocked on CSS then a previous row could be blocked but the server
doesn't know it.
- I need a second pass on nested SuspenseList semantics.
- `revealOrder="together"`
- `tail="hidden"`/`tail="collapsed"`. This needs some new runtime
semantics to the Fizz runtime and to allow the hydration to handle
missing rows in the HTML. This should also be future compatible with
AsyncIterable where we don't know how many rows upfront.
- Need to double check resuming semantics.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
We were printing "Custom" instead of "hook".
We support AsyncIterable (more so when it's a cached form like in coming
from Flight) as children.

This fixes some warnings and bugs when passed to SuspenseList.

Ideally SuspenseList with `tail="hidden"` should support unblocking
before the full result has resolved but that's an optimization on top.
We also might want to change semantics for this for
`revealOrder="backwards"` so it becomes possible to stream items in
reverse order.
Follow up to facebook#33306.

If we're nested inside a SuspenseList and we have a row, then we can
point our last row to block the parent row and unblock the parent when
the last child unblocks.
For now we removed Rust from the codebase, remove this leftover script.

Also remove some dupes and Rust related files from `.gitignore`.
Stacked on facebook#33308.

For "together" mode, we can be a self-blocking row that adds all its
boundaries to the blocked set, but there's no parent row that unblocks
it.

A particular quirk of this mode is that it's not enough to just unblock
them all on the server together. Because if one boundary downloads all
its html and then issues a complete instruction it'll appear before the
others while streaming in. What we actually want is to reveal them all
in a single batch.

This implementation takes a short cut by unblocking the rows in
`flushPartialBoundary`. That ensures that all the segments of every
boundary has a chance to flush before we start emitting any of the
complete boundary instructions. Once the last one unblocks, all the
complete boundary instructions are queued. Ideally this would be a
single `<script>` tag so that they can't be split up even if we get a
chunk containing some of them.

~A downside of this approach is that we always outline these boundaries.
We could inline them if they all complete before the parent flushes.
E.g. by checking if the row is blocked only by its own boundaries and if
all the boundaries would fit without getting outlined, then we can
inline them all at once.~ I went ahead and did this because it solves an
issue with `renderToString` where it doesn't support the script runtime
so it can only handle this if inlined.
…future rows (facebook#33312)

Stacked on facebook#33311.

When a row contains Suspense boundaries that themselves depend on CSS,
they will not resolve until the CSS has loaded on the client. We need
future rows in a list to be blocked until this happens. We could do
something in the runtime but a simpler approach is to just add those CSS
dependencies to all those boundaries as well.

To do this, we first hoist the HoistableState from a completed boundary
onto its parent row. Then when the row finishes do we hoist it onto the
next row and onto any boundaries within that row.
kassens and others added 26 commits May 27, 2025 11:23
…acebook#33328)

Adding an experimental / unstable compiler config to enable custom
opt-out directives
We need to do some more testing here.

Reverts facebook#33357
fixes facebook#32449

This is my first time touching this code. There are multiple systems in
place here and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that this has to be
handled in some other areas too. I have found some other style-related
code areas but I had no time yet to double-check them.

cc @gnoff
## Summary

We completed testing on these internally, so can cleanup the separate
fast and slow paths and remove the `enableShallowPropDiffing` flag which
we're not pursuing.

## How did you test this change?

```
yarn test ReactNativeAttributePayloadFabric
```
## Summary

While investigating the root cause of facebook#33208, I noticed a clear typo for
one of the validation files.

## How did you test this change?

Inside `/react/compiler/packages/babel-plugin-react-compiler` I ran the
test script successfully:

<img width="415" alt="Screenshot at May 22 16-43-06"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3fe8c5e1-37ce-4a31-b35e-7e323e57cd9d"
/>
…acebook#33383)

This is a babel bug + edge case.

Babel compact mode produces invalid JavaScript (i.e. parse error) when
given a `NumericLiteral` with a negative value.

See https://codesandbox.io/p/devbox/5d47fr for repro.
Prettier 3.3 (which we're on) should support modern flow features
according to https://prettier.io/blog/2024/06/01/3.3.0
…pen React App (facebook#33305)

## Summary

This tool leverages DevTools to get the component tree from the
currently open React App. This gives realtime information to agents
about the state of the app.

## How did you test this change?

Tested integration with Claude Desktop
Alternative to facebook#33421. The difference is that this also adds an
underscore between the "R" and the ID.

The reason we wanted to use special characters is because we use the
full spectrum of A-Z 0-9 in our ID generation so we can basically
collide with any common word (or anyone using a similar algorithm,
base64 or even base16). It's a little less likely that someone would put
`_R_` specifically unless you generate like two IDs separated by
underscore.


![9w2ogt](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21b2d2ac-1a3a-4657-ba0b-1616e49dfdee)
This lets us track what data each Server Component depended on. This
will be used by Performance Track and React DevTools.

We use Node.js `async_hooks`. This has a number of downside. It is
Node.js specific so this feature is not available in other runtimes
until something equivalent becomes available. It's [discouraged by
Node.js docs](https://nodejs.org/api/async_hooks.html#async-hooks). It's
also slow which makes this approach only really viable in development
mode. At least with stack traces. However, it's really the only solution
that gives us the data that we need.

The [Diagnostic
Channel](https://nodejs.org/api/diagnostics_channel.html) API is not
sufficient. Not only is many Node.js built-in APIs missing but all
libraries like databases are also missing. Were as `async_hooks` covers
pretty much anything async in the Node.js ecosystem.

However, even if coverage was wider it's not actually showing the
information we want. It's not enough to show the low level I/O that is
happening because that doesn't provide the context. We need the stack
trace in user space code where it was initiated and where it was
awaited. It's also not each low level socket operation that we want to
surface but some higher level concept which can span a sequence of I/O
operations but as far as user space is concerned.

Therefore this solution is anchored on stack traces and ignore listing
to determine what the interesting span is. It is somewhat
Promise-centric (and in particular async/await) because it allows us to
model an abstract span instead of just random I/O. Async/await points
are also especially useful because this allows Async Stacks to show the
full sequence which is not supported by random callbacks. However, if no
Promises are involved we still to our best to show the stack causing
plain I/O callbacks.

Additionally, we don't want to track all possible I/O. For example,
side-effects like logging that doesn't affect the rendering performance
doesn't need to be included. We only want to include things that
actually block the rendering output. We also need to track which data
blocks each component so that we can track which data caused a
particular subtree to suspend.

We can do this using `async_hooks` because we can track the graph of
what resolved what and then spawned what.

To track what suspended what, something has to resolve. Therefore it
needs to run to completion before we can show what it was suspended on.
So something that never resolves, won't be tracked for example.

We use the `async_hooks` in `ReactFlightServerConfigDebugNode` to build
up an `ReactFlightAsyncSequence` graph that collects the stack traces
for basically all I/O and Promises allocated in the whole app. This is
pretty heavy, especially the stack traces, but it's because we don't
know which ones we'll need until they resolve. We don't materialize the
stacks until we need them though.

Once they end up pinging the Flight runtime, we collect which current
executing task that pinged the runtime and then log the sequence that
led up until that runtime into the RSC protocol. Currently we only
include things that weren't already resolved before we started rendering
this task/component, so that we don't log the entire history each time.

Each operation is split into two parts. First a `ReactIOInfo` which
represents an I/O operation and its start/end time. Basically the start
point where it was start. This is basically represents where you called
`new Promise()` or when entering an `async function` which has an
implied Promise. It can be started in a different component than where
it's awaited and it can be awaited in multiple places. Therefore this is
global information and not associated with a specific Component.

The second part is `ReactAsyncInfo`. This represents where this I/O was
`await`:ed or `.then()` called. This is associated with a point in the
tree (usually the Promise that's a direct child of a Component). Since
you can have multiple different I/O awaited in a sequence technically it
forms a dependency graph but to simplify the model these awaits as
flattened into the `ReactDebugInfo` list. Basically it contains each
await in a sequence that affected this part from unblocking.

This means that the same `ReactAsyncInfo` can appear in mutliple
components if they all await the same `ReactIOInfo` but the same Promise
only appears once.

Promises that are only resolved by other Promises or immediately are not
considered here. Only if they're resolved by an I/O operation. We pick
the Promise basically on the border between user space code and ignored
listed code (`node_modules`) to pick the most specific span but abstract
enough to not give too much detail irrelevant to the current audience.
Similarly, the deepest `await` in user space is marked as the relevant
`await` point.

This feature is only available in the `node` builds of React. Not if you
use the `edge` builds inside of Node.js.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
Stacked on facebook#33388.

This encodes the I/O entries as their own row type (`"J"`). This makes
it possible to parse them directly without first parsing the debug info
for each component. E.g. if you're just interested in logging the I/O
without all the places it was awaited.

This is not strictly necessary since the debug info is also readily
available without parsing the actual trees. (That's how the Server
Components Performance Track works.) However, we might want to exclude
this information in profiling builds while retaining some limited form
of I/O tracking.

It also allows for logging side-effects that are not awaited if we
wanted to.
…ebook#33392)

Stacked on facebook#33390.

The stack trace doesn't include the thing you called when calling into
ignore listed content. We consider the ignore listed content
conceptually the abstraction that you called that's interesting.

This extracts the name of the first ignore listed function that was
called from user space. For example `"fetch"`. So we can know what kind
of request this is.

This could be enhanced and tweaked with heuristics in the future. For
example, when you create a Promise yourself and call I/O inside of it
like my `delay` examples, then we use that Promise as the I/O node but
its stack doesn't have the actual I/O performed. It might be better to
use the inner I/O node in that case. E.g. `setTimeout`. Currently I pick
the name from the first party code instead - in my example `delay`.

Another case that could be improved is the case where your whole
component is third-party. In that case we still log the I/O but it has
no context about what kind of I/O since the whole stack is ignored it
just gets the component name for example. We could for example look at
the first name that is in a different package than the package name of
the ignored listed component. So if
`node_modules/my-component-library/index.js` calls into
`node_modules/mysql/connection.js` then we could use the name from the
inner.
Stacked on facebook#33392.

This adds another track to the Performance Track called `"Server
Requests"`.

<img width="1015" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-01 at 12 02 14 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c4d164c4-cfdf-4e14-9a87-3f011f65fd20"
/>

This logs the flat list of I/O awaited on by Server Components. There
will be other views that are more focused on what data blocks a specific
Component or Suspense boundary but this is just the list of all the I/O
basically so you can get an overview of those waterfalls without the
noise of all the Component trees and rendering. It's similar to what the
"Network" track is on the client.

I've been going back and forth on what to call this track but I went
with `"Server Requests"` for now. The idea is that the name should
communicate that this is something that happens on the server and is a
pairing with the `"Server Components"` track. Although we don't use that
feature, since it's missing granularity, it's also similar to "Server
Timings".
Stacked on facebook#33394.

This lets us create async stack traces to the owner that was in context
when the I/O was started or awaited.

<img width="615" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-01 at 12 31 52 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6ff5a146-33d6-4a4b-84af-1b57e73047d4"
/>

This owner might not be the immediate closest parent where the I/O was
awaited.
Stacked on facebook#33395.

This lets us keep track of which environment this was fetched and
awaited.

Currently the IO and await is in the same environment. It's just kept
when forwarded. Once we support forwarding information from a Promise
fetched from another environment and awaited in this environment then
the await can end up being in a different environment.

There's a question of when the await is inside Flight itself such as
when you return a promise fetched from another environment whether that
should mean that the await is in the current environment. I don't think
so since the original stack trace is the best stack trace. It's only if
you `await` it in user space in this environment first that this might
happen and even then it should only be considered if there wasn't a
better await earlier or if reading from the other environment was itself
I/O.

The timing of *when* we read `environmentName()` is a little interesting
here too.
…facebook#33402)

Stacked on facebook#33400. 

<img width="1261" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-01 at 10 27 47 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5a73ee2-49e0-4851-84ac-e0df6032efb5"
/>

This is emitted with the start/end time and stack of the "await". Which
may be different than the thing that started the I/O.

These awaits aren't quite as simple as just every await since you can
start a sequence in parallel there can actually be multiple overlapping
awaits and there can be CPU work interleaved with the await on the same
component.

```js
function getData() {
  await fetch(...);
  await fetch(...);
}
const promise = getData();
doWork();
await promise;
```

This has two "I/O" awaits but those are actually happening in parallel
with `doWork()`.

Since these also could have started before we started rendering this
sequence (e.g. a component) we have to clamp it so that we don't
consider awaits that start before the component.

What we're conceptually trying to convey is the time this component was
blocked due to that I/O resource. Whether it's blocked from completing
the last result or if it's blocked from issuing a waterfall request.
…book#33403)

Stacked on facebook#33402.

There's a bug in Chrome Performance tracking which uses the enclosing
line/column instead of the callsite in stacks.

For our fake eval:ed functions that represents functions on the server,
we can position the enclosing function body at the position of the
callsite to simulate getting the right line.

Unfortunately, that doesn't give us exactly the right callsite when it's
used for other purposes that uses the callsite like console logs and
error reporting and stacks inside breakpoints. So I don't think we want
to always do this.

For ReactAsyncInfo/ReactIOInfo, the only thing we're going to use the
fake task for is the Performance tracking, so it doesn't have any
downsides until Chrome fixes the bug and we'd have to revert it.
Therefore this PR uses that techniques only for those entries.

We could do this for Server Components too but we're going to use those
for other things too like console logs. I don't think it's worth
duplicating the Task objects. That would also make it inconsistent with
Client Components.

For Client Components, we could in theory also generate fake evals but
that would be way slower since there's so many of them and currently we
rely on the native implementation for those. So doesn't seem worth
fixing.

But since we can at least fix it for RSC I/O/awaits we can do this hack.
…ook#33424)

We want to change the defaults for `revealOrder` and `tail` on
SuspenseList. This is an intermediate step to allow experimental users
to upgrade.

To explicitly specify these options I added `revealOrder="independent"`
and `tail="visible"`.

I then added warnings if `undefined` or `null` is passed. You must now
always explicitly specify them. However, semantics are still preserved
for now until the next step.

We also want to change the rendering order of the `children` prop for
`revealOrder="backwards"`. As an intermediate step I first added
`revealOrder="unstable_legacy-backwards"` option. This will only be
temporary until all users can switch to the new `"backwards"` semantics
once we flip it in the next step.

I also clarified the types that the directional props requires iterable
children but not iterable inside of those. Rows with multiple items can
be modeled as explicit fragments.
…ok#33415)

Stacked on facebook#33403.

When a Promise is coming from React such as when it's passed from
another environment, we should forward the debug information from that
environment. We already do that when rendered as a child.

This makes it possible to also `await promise` and have the information
from that instrumented promise carry through to the next render.

This is a bit tricky because the current protocol is that we have to
read it from the Promise after it resolves so it has time to be assigned
to the promise. `async_hooks` doesn't pass us the instance (even though
it has it) when it gets resolved so we need to keep it around. However,
we have to be very careful because if we get this wrong it'll cause a
memory leak since we retain things by `asyncId` and then manually listen
for `destroy()` which can only be called once a Promise is GC:ed, which
it can't be if we retain it. We have to therefore use a `WeakRef` in
case it never resolves, and then read the `_debugInfo` when it resolves.
We could maybe install a setter or something instead but that's also
heavy.

The other issues is that we don't use native Promises in
ReactFlightClient so our instrumented promises aren't picked up by the
`async_hooks` implementation and so we never get a handle to our
thenable instance. To solve this we can create a native wrapper only in
DEV.
We highly recommend using Node Streams in Node.js because it's much
faster and it is less likely to cause issues when chained in things like
compression algorithms that need explicit flushing which the Web Streams
ecosystem doesn't have a good solution for. However, that said, people
want to be able to use the worse option for various reasons.

The `.edge` builds aren't technically intended for Node.js. A Node.js
environments needs to be patched in various ways to support it. It's
also less optimal since it can't use [Node.js exclusive
features](facebook#33388) and have to use
[the lowest common
denominator](facebook#27399) such as JS
implementations instead of native.

This adds a Web Streams build of Fizz but exclusively for Node.js so
that in it we can rely on Node.js modules. The main difference compared
to Edge is that SSR now uses `createHash` from the `"crypto"` module and
imports `TextEncoder` from `"util"`. We use `setImmediate` instead of
`setTimeout`.

The public API is just `react-dom/server` which in Node.js automatically
imports `react-dom/server.node` which re-exports the legacy bundle, Node
Streams bundle and Node Web Streams bundle. The main downside is if your
bundler isn't smart to DCE this barrel file.

With Flight the difference is larger but that's a bigger lift.
…book#33443)

This should allow us to visualize what
facebook#33438 is trying to convey.

An uncached 3rd-party component is displayed like this in the dev tools:

<img width="1072" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-05 at 12 57 32"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d418ae23-d113-4dc9-98b8-ab426710454a"
/>

However, when the component is restored from a cache, it looks like
this:

<img width="1072" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-05 at 12 56 56"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0e34379-d8c0-4b14-8b54-b5c06211232b"
/>

The `Server Components ⚛` track is missing completely here, and the
`Loading profile...` phase also took way longer than without caching the
3rd-party component.

On `main`, the `Server Components ⚛` track is not missing:

<img width="1072" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-05 at 14 31 20"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c35e405d-27ca-4b04-a34c-03bd959a7687"
/>

The cached 3rd-party component starts before the current render, and is
also not excluded here, which is of course expected without facebook#33438.
@kushxg kushxg force-pushed the upstream-pr-33464 branch 2 times, most recently from b092969 to 4883912 Compare June 6, 2025 17:26
@kushxg kushxg force-pushed the upstream-pr-33464 branch from 4883912 to 876d990 Compare June 6, 2025 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.