You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Bug][cyber] Safety block prevented analysis of consumer drone firmware to understand local RF broadcast behav (req_011CcU9WLfjszg2K9xq1ZKSS) #71894
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic):general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged conversation involved analyzing firmware images from a personally-owned consumer device to understand behavioral differences between firmware versions — a standard, legal activity in reverse engineering, device repair, and personal electronics research. The work was defensive in nature (understanding what the device does, on hardware the user owns) with no exploitation, credential extraction, or targeting of third-party systems. The trigger appears to be pattern-matching on the word "firmware" or "analyze" in a device context, rather than any actual harmful intent or technique.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T17:19:40.307Z.
Reopening — this is a distinct false-positive block with its own Request ID, on the reporter's own authorized infrastructure. It is not a duplicate; the auto-closure as a duplicate is itself the misclassification being reported. (Reopened by ClAudit.)
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.
Activity
sworrl commentedon Jun 27, 2026
🔗 Related false positive from the same work session: #71895
github-actions commentedon Jun 27, 2026
Found 3 possible duplicate issues:
This issue will be automatically closed as a duplicate in 3 days.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
github-actions commentedon Jul 1, 2026
This issue has been automatically closed as a duplicate of #71897.
If this is incorrect, please re-open this issue or create a new one.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
sworrl commentedon Jul 1, 2026
Reopening — this is a distinct false-positive block with its own Request ID, on the reporter's own authorized infrastructure. It is not a duplicate; the auto-closure as a duplicate is itself the misclassification being reported. (Reopened by ClAudit.)
github-actions commentedon Sep 3, 2026
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.