You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Bug][cyber] Safety block on USB device network enumeration during defensive firmware hardening (req_011CcUFsJATTLGuNrf8MUAJj) #71865
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic):defensive-hardening
Why this is a false positive
The blocked interaction involved enumerating hardware attack surfaces exposed by a physical device connected over USB — specifically identifying which communication channels (raw USB, serial, and network-over-USB) the device exposes — as part of defensive hardening work. This is standard reconnaissance performed by security engineers to understand and reduce an owned device's exposure, not offensive exploitation of a third-party target. The classifier appears to have triggered on cybersecurity-adjacent vocabulary (device enumeration, network interface discovery) without accounting for the defensive, owner-authorized context established throughout the conversation.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:43:04.510Z.
Not a duplicate — requesting maintainer reopen. This report covers a distinct incident with its own server-side Request ID; the cited issue is a sibling report from the same work session, intentionally cross-linked by ClAudit. Issue authors can no longer reopen bot-closed issues on this repo, so this close is unrecoverable on our side. (Assessed by ClAudit.)
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.
Activity
sworrl commentedon Jun 27, 2026
🔗 Related false positive from the same work session: #71866
github-actions commentedon Aug 13, 2026
Closing for now — inactive for too long. Please open a new issue if this is still relevant.
sworrl commentedon Aug 13, 2026
Not a duplicate — requesting maintainer reopen. This report covers a distinct incident with its own server-side Request ID; the cited issue is a sibling report from the same work session, intentionally cross-linked by ClAudit. Issue authors can no longer reopen bot-closed issues on this repo, so this close is unrecoverable on our side. (Assessed by ClAudit.)
sworrl commentedon Aug 16, 2026
Still relevant. An issue author cannot reopen after a bot close, so this report is tracked with the 2026-08-13 sweep in #86940.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.