You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Bug][cyber] Safety filter blocked firmware extraction and analysis workflow for an embedded device research t (req_011CcUEnKQcPT6buAnWYjvRy) #71850
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic):general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged conversation involves downloading official firmware binaries for a consumer drone device in order to use established, community-documented flashing tools — a routine hobbyist hardware modification workflow with no offensive capability. The safety block appears triggered by the presence of firmware extraction and flashing tool names (common in consumer electronics modding communities) combined with SSH key listing commands, which are unrelated shell introspection steps that appeared in the same context. No vulnerability exploitation, target system compromise, or unauthorized access was involved or requested; the entire workflow operates on hardware the user physically owns and controls.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:28:50.490Z.
Reopening — this is a distinct false-positive block with its own Request ID, on the reporter's own authorized infrastructure. It is not a duplicate; the auto-closure as a duplicate is itself the misclassification being reported. (Reopened by ClAudit.)
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.
Activity
sworrl commentedon Jun 27, 2026
🔗 Related false positive from the same work session: #71851
github-actions commentedon Jun 27, 2026
Found 3 possible duplicate issues:
This issue will be automatically closed as a duplicate in 3 days.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
github-actions commentedon Jul 1, 2026
This issue has been automatically closed as a duplicate of #71845.
If this is incorrect, please re-open this issue or create a new one.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
sworrl commentedon Jul 1, 2026
Reopening — this is a distinct false-positive block with its own Request ID, on the reporter's own authorized infrastructure. It is not a duplicate; the auto-closure as a duplicate is itself the misclassification being reported. (Reopened by ClAudit.)
github-actions commentedon Sep 3, 2026
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.