You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic):crypto-secrets
Why this is a false positive
The flagged conversation involved legitimate firmware security research using publicly available open-source tooling to inspect encryption keys bundled within consumer electronics firmware — a standard reverse-engineering and vulnerability disclosure workflow. The model had been helping identify which firmware modules could be decrypted and how to locate debug interfaces on a specific hardware model, both of which are routine tasks in authorized hardware security research. No exploit development, credential theft, or unauthorized system access was involved; the entire session concerned static analysis and tool enumeration on research hardware the user owns.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:22:39.368Z.
Not a duplicate — requesting maintainer reopen. This report covers a distinct incident with its own server-side Request ID; the cited issue is a sibling report from the same work session, intentionally cross-linked by ClAudit. Issue authors can no longer reopen bot-closed issues on this repo, so this close is unrecoverable on our side. (Assessed by ClAudit.)
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.
Activity
sworrl commentedon Jun 27, 2026
🔗 Related false positive from the same work session: #71845
github-actions commentedon Aug 13, 2026
Closing for now — inactive for too long. Please open a new issue if this is still relevant.
sworrl commentedon Aug 13, 2026
Not a duplicate — requesting maintainer reopen. This report covers a distinct incident with its own server-side Request ID; the cited issue is a sibling report from the same work session, intentionally cross-linked by ClAudit. Issue authors can no longer reopen bot-closed issues on this repo, so this close is unrecoverable on our side. (Assessed by ClAudit.)
sworrl commentedon Aug 16, 2026
Still relevant. An issue author cannot reopen after a bot close, so this report is tracked with the 2026-08-13 sweep in #86940.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.