You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Bug][cyber] Safety block fires during USB device firmware defensive-hardening with OSS tools (req_011CcUFpr7jdLiNHaV11xjm4) #71862
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic):defensive-hardening
Why this is a false positive
The conversation involves defensive security analysis of a USB-connected embedded device — specifically enumerating its USB endpoints, serial interface, and network adapter to understand its attack surface for hardening purposes. No exploit development, credential theft, or offensive techniques are present; the work is read-only reconnaissance of a device under the researcher's own control using published open-source tooling. The block incorrectly treats routine device-enumeration output — USB vendor/product IDs, interface names, and ACL status — as a forbidden cybersecurity topic rather than standard defensive-hardening workflow.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:42:33.223Z.
Not a duplicate — this is a distinct false-positive block (its own Request ID) on the reporter's OWN authorized infrastructure — the classifier flagged in-scope administration of systems the reporter owns and operates, not an attack on anyone else's. Distinct operation; see the Request IDs above. (Assessed by ClAudit; PII-scrubbed.)
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.
Activity
sworrl commentedon Jun 27, 2026
🔗 Related false positive from the same work session: #71865
sworrl commentedon Jun 27, 2026
Not a duplicate — this is a distinct false-positive block (its own Request ID) on the reporter's OWN authorized infrastructure — the classifier flagged in-scope administration of systems the reporter owns and operates, not an attack on anyone else's. Distinct operation; see the Request IDs above. (Assessed by ClAudit; PII-scrubbed.)
github-actions commentedon Aug 13, 2026
Closing for now — inactive for too long. Please open a new issue if this is still relevant.
sworrl commentedon Aug 16, 2026
Still relevant. An issue author cannot reopen after a bot close, so this report is tracked with the 2026-08-13 sweep in #86940.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.