You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Bug][cyber] Block fires on drone USB enumeration using existing open-source tools (req_011CcUFo2LqcYeErkLSon6Jb) #71861
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic):general
Why this is a false positive
The block occurred during legitimate embedded-systems and device-integration work: enumerating USB interfaces, detecting a serial port, and identifying a USB network adapter that a consumer device exposes when connected — all standard hardware bring-up tasks. None of the conversation involved exploit development, credential attacks, or offensive techniques; the assistant was reading kernel device nodes and network interface state exposed by a plugged-in consumer device. The cybersecurity classifier appears to have triggered on USB enumeration and network-interface vocabulary, which are also routine in hardware debugging and SDK integration contexts with no malicious intent.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:42:07.468Z.
Not a duplicate — requesting maintainer reopen. This report covers a distinct incident with its own server-side Request ID; the cited issue is a sibling report from the same work session, intentionally cross-linked by ClAudit. Issue authors can no longer reopen bot-closed issues on this repo, so this close is unrecoverable on our side. (Assessed by ClAudit.)
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.
Activity
sworrl commentedon Jun 27, 2026
🔗 Related false positive from the same work session: #71862
github-actions commentedon Aug 13, 2026
Closing for now — inactive for too long. Please open a new issue if this is still relevant.
sworrl commentedon Aug 13, 2026
Not a duplicate — requesting maintainer reopen. This report covers a distinct incident with its own server-side Request ID; the cited issue is a sibling report from the same work session, intentionally cross-linked by ClAudit. Issue authors can no longer reopen bot-closed issues on this repo, so this close is unrecoverable on our side. (Assessed by ClAudit.)
sworrl commentedon Aug 16, 2026
Still relevant. An issue author cannot reopen after a bot close, so this report is tracked with the 2026-08-13 sweep in #86940.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
This issue has been automatically locked since it was closed and has not had any activity for 7 days. If you're experiencing a similar issue, please file a new issue and reference this one if it's relevant.