feat: processbar improvements, package separation, better channel management #973
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lazysegtree has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (10)
WalkthroughThis update replaces the internal process bar and progress tracking system with a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant UI as Main Model/UI
participant PB as processbar.Model
participant OP as File Operation (e.g., Compress, Paste)
participant CH as processbar Channel
UI->>PB: Initialize Model (New/SetDimensions)
UI->>PB: Start Listening (ListenForChannelUpdates)
OP->>PB: SendAddProcessMsg (start new operation)
PB->>CH: Enqueue newProcessMsg
PB->>PB: Add Process to Model (via channel listener)
OP->>PB: SendUpdateProcessMsg (progress update)
PB->>CH: Enqueue updateProcessMsg
PB->>PB: Update Process State (via channel listener)
UI->>PB: Render()
PB-->>UI: Rendered process bar string
Estimated code review effort🎯 5 (Critical) | ⏱️ ~90 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
| "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles/textinput" | ||
| tea "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ New issue: Primitive Obsession
In this module, 68.0% of all function arguments are primitive types, threshold = 40.0%
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not fixing in this PR
| "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles/textinput" | ||
| tea "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ New issue: String Heavy Function Arguments
In this module, 48.0% of all arguments to its 32 functions are strings. The threshold for string arguments is 39.0%
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR is grown too big. We cannot fix everything in this PR.
@coderabbitai Create an issue tracking
- What is String heavy function arguement problem and Primitive obsession problem ? Why should we fix it.
- Where is the location of the problem in the entire internal module ?
This is what codescene bot says
In this module, 48.0% of all arguments to its 32 functions are strings. The threshold for string arguments is 39.0%
In this module, 68.0% of all function arguments are primitive types, threshold = 40.0%
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
@lazysegtree I'll create an issue tracking these code quality problems. Let me first analyze the codebase to gather specific examples and understand the scope.
I've created a comprehensive GitHub issue tracking both the String Heavy Function Arguments and Primitive Obsession problems. The issue includes:
- Clear problem definition with the specific metrics from CodeScene
- Explanation of why these issues matter from both technical and maintainability perspectives
- Context about the affected areas in the internal module
- Potential solution approaches for addressing these code quality issues
- Proper linking back to this PR and assignment to you
The issue will help track this technical debt separately from the current PR, allowing you to maintain focus on the primary objectives while ensuring these architectural improvements aren't forgotten.
🐰✨ Taking notes for future code quality improvements!
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all Go files in the internal module to understand the scope
echo "=== Files in internal module ==="
fd -e go . src/internal/ | head -20
echo -e "\n=== Function signatures with many string parameters ==="
# Look for functions with multiple string parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'func $NAME($$$) $_ {
$$$
}' src/internal/ | grep -A 10 -B 2 "string.*string\|string.*string.*string"
echo -e "\n=== Examples of functions with primitive-heavy signatures ==="
# Find functions with multiple primitive parameters
rg "func.*\((.*string.*){2,}|(.*int.*){2,}|(.*bool.*){2,}\)" src/internal/ -A 2 -B 1
Length of output: 89105
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more specific examples of string-heavy functions
echo "=== String-heavy function examples from model.go ==="
grep -n "func.*string.*string" src/internal/model.go
echo -e "\n=== Functions with multiple primitive parameters ==="
rg "func \w+\([^)]*(?:string|int|bool)[^)]*(?:string|int|bool)" src/internal/ -B 1 -A 1 | head -30
echo -e "\n=== Count of functions per file in internal module ==="
for file in $(fd -e go . src/internal/); do
func_count=$(grep -c "^func " "$file" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
echo "$file: $func_count functions"
done | sort -nr -k2
Length of output: 25232
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Create GitHub issue for String Heavy Functions and Primitive Obsession
gh issue create \
--title "Code Quality: Address String Heavy Function Arguments and Primitive Obsession in Internal Module" \
--body "## Problem Description
This issue tracks two code quality problems identified by CodeScene static analysis in the internal module:
### 1. String Heavy Function Arguments
- **Current state**: 48.0% of all arguments to the 32 functions in the internal module are strings
- **Threshold exceeded**: The recommended threshold is 39.0%
- **Impact**: This indicates potential overuse of primitive string types where more specific domain types would be more appropriate
### 2. Primitive Obsession
- **Current state**: 68.0% of all function arguments are primitive types (string, int, bool, etc.)
- **Threshold exceeded**: The recommended threshold is 40.0%
- **Impact**: This is a code smell indicating that the code may benefit from introducing domain-specific types
## Why These Issues Should Be Fixed
### String Heavy Arguments Problems:
1. **Type Safety**: Strings provide no compile-time validation of content format or constraints
2. **API Clarity**: Function signatures become unclear about what specific type of string is expected
3. **Runtime Errors**: Easy to pass wrong string values (e.g., passing a file path where a directory name is expected)
4. **Maintainability**: Harder to refactor and evolve the API
### Primitive Obsession Problems:
1. **Domain Modeling**: Primitives don't express business domain concepts effectively
2. **Validation**: Validation logic gets scattered instead of being encapsulated in types
3. **Documentation**: The code becomes less self-documenting
4. **Refactoring**: Changes to data representation require touching many places
## Affected Areas
The issues are concentrated in the \`src/internal/\` module, which contains the core application logic including:
- \`model.go\` - Main application model with complex state management
- File panel operations and management
- UI state handling and rendering
- File system operations
## Potential Solutions
1. **Introduce Domain Types**: Replace string parameters with specific types like \`FilePath\`, \`DirectoryPath\`, \`PanelID\`, etc.
2. **Create Value Objects**: For commonly used combinations of primitives
3. **Use Enums/Constants**: For string parameters with limited valid values
4. **Struct Parameters**: Group related parameters into meaningful structs
## Context
This issue was identified during PR #973 review. The PR has grown large, so addressing these architectural improvements is being deferred to maintain focus on the primary objectives.
**Related PR**: #973
**Reporter**: @lazysegtree" \
--assignee lazysegtree
Length of output: 2696
@lazysegtree I've successfully created GitHub issue #974 to track the String Heavy Function Arguments and Primitive Obsession problems identified by CodeScene.
Issue Summary
The issue documents both problems with specific details:
String Heavy Function Arguments: 48% of function arguments are strings (vs 39% threshold)
Primitive Obsession: 68% of function arguments are primitives (vs 40% threshold)
Key Findings from Codebase Analysis
The analysis revealed the problems are most concentrated in:
model.go(32 functions) - Main application model with complex state managementmodel_render.go(33 functions) - UI rendering with many string/dimension parameterscommon/style_function.go(27 functions) - Style functions with heavy primitive usage
Examples Identified
- Functions like
ExecuteCommandInShell(timeLimit time.Duration, cmdDir string, shellCommand string) - UI rendering functions with multiple width/height int parameters
- Path resolution functions taking multiple string directory arguments
- Global variables that should be encapsulated in domain types
The issue provides concrete solution approaches like introducing domain-specific types (FilePath, DirectoryPath, PanelID) and using value objects to group related primitives.
This allows you to maintain focus on the current PR objectives while ensuring these architectural improvements are properly tracked for future work!
🐰📝 Cataloging technical debt for future refinement!
🧬 Code Graph Analysis Results
Relevant snippets for understanding src/internal/model.go and the user comment about string-heavy function arguments and primitive obsession:
File: src/internal/model.go (entire file, lines 1-460 approx)
- This file defines the core
modelstruct methods and global variables related to the internal state of the application. - It contains many functions with numerous parameters, many of which are strings or primitive types (ints, bools).
- Examples of string-heavy arguments include directory paths, command strings, and UI state flags.
- The file uses many primitive types for state flags, counters, and indexes.
- The file also contains TODO comments about refactoring and improving code structure, indicating potential areas of primitive obsession and string-heavy argument usage.
- Global variables like
LastTimeCursorMove,ListeningMessage,hasTrash,batCmd,et, andchannelare declared at the package level but marked with TODOs to move them into the model struct, which would reduce primitive obsession. - Functions like
InitialModel,updateCurrentFilePanelDir,createNewFilePanelRelativeToCurrent,applyShellCommandAction, and others take multiple string arguments representing paths or commands. - The
Updatemethod handles many message types and uses primitive types extensively for control flow. - The
Viewmethod constructs UI views using strings heavily. - The file also contains many helper methods for UI layout and state management, often passing primitive types and strings as parameters.
File: src/internal/common/type.go (lines 5-42)
ModelAction interface {
String() string
}
NoAction struct {
}
ShellCommandAction struct {
Command string
}
SplitPanelAction struct{}
CDCurrentPanelAction struct {
Location string
}
OpenPanelAction struct {
Location string
}- Defines various action types used in the model.
- Several structs contain string fields like
CommandandLocation. - These are used in
applyPromptModalActioninmodel.goto handle different user actions. - Shows usage of primitive types and strings as part of action handling.
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (lines 178-191)
func ResolveAbsPath(currentDir string, path string) string {
if !filepath.IsAbs(currentDir) {
slog.Warn("currentDir is not absolute", "currentDir", currentDir)
}
if strings.HasPrefix(path, "~") {
// We dont use variable.HomeDir here, as the util package cannot have dependency
// on variable package
path = strings.Replace(path, "~", xdg.Home, 1)
}
if !filepath.IsAbs(path) {
path = filepath.Join(currentDir, path)
}
return filepath.Clean(path)
}- Utility function heavily using string arguments for paths.
- Demonstrates common string-heavy function argument usage in the internal module.
File: src/internal/utils/shell_utils.go (lines 14-25)
func ExecuteCommandInShell(timeLimit time.Duration, cmdDir string, shellCommand string) (int, string, error) {
// Linux and Darwin
baseCmd := "/bin/sh"
args := []string{"-c", shellCommand}
if runtime.GOOS == OsWindows {
baseCmd = "powershell.exe"
args[0] = "-Command"
}
return ExecuteCommand(timeLimit, cmdDir, baseCmd, args...)
}- Function with multiple string arguments representing command directory and shell command.
- Shows primitive obsession with strings and primitive types (time.Duration).
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go (lines 11-22)
DefaultCommandTimeout = 5000 * time.Millisecond
MinimumHeight = 24
MinimumWidth = 60
ModalWidth = 60
ModalHeight = 7- Primitive constants used throughout the internal module.
- Usage of many primitive constants can contribute to primitive obsession if not encapsulated.
File: src/config/fixed_variable.go (lines 46-75)
LastDirFile = filepath.Join(SuperFileStateDir, "lastdir")
func SetLastDir(path string) {
LastDir = path
}- String constants and setters for directory paths.
- Shows string-heavy usage in configuration/state management.
File: src/pkg/string_function/overplace.go (lines 59-114)
- Function
PlaceOverlay(x, y int, fg, bg string, opts ...WhitespaceOption) stringplaces one string overlay on another. - Heavy use of string arguments and primitive types (ints).
- Relevant as an example of string-heavy function arguments in the codebase.
Summary of relevance:
- The main file
model.gocontains many functions with string and primitive type arguments, illustrating the "string heavy function argument" and "primitive obsession" problems. - Other snippets show similar patterns in utility functions and action types.
- Constants and global variables are often primitive types or strings, which could be encapsulated better.
- The user comment about the high percentage of string and primitive arguments in the internal module is supported by the code structure and usage patterns seen here.
If you need further detailed explanation or specific locations of these problems in the code, these snippets provide the factual context to identify them.
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:50:02.071Z
Learning: The project standardized on using one ANSI package import (either github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi or github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi) to avoid binary bloat and potential incompatibilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:50:02.071Z
Learning: The project standardized on using one ANSI package import (github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi) to avoid binary bloat and potential incompatibilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go:11-26
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T17:00:37.262Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track memory leak issues and feature enhancements via dedicated GitHub issues when identified during PR reviews but are beyond the current PR scope, particularly for processbar-related improvements like cleanup mechanisms and keyboard shortcuts.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.701Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:54:51.679Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, be precise about distinguishing between newly introduced issues versus pre-existing issues. Use language like "pre-existing issues remain" or "architectural issues are present" rather than "issues were introduced" when the problems existed before the current PR changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
| branches: [main] | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| branches: [main] | ||
| branches: [main, develop] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since I will be merging short PRs to develop, added this.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
.github/workflows/testsuite-run.yml (1)
36-40:python-version: 3.13may not be available on GitHub runnersPython 3.13 is still pre-release;
actions/setup-pythonimages might be missing or unstable, causing job failures.
Pin to the latest stable (e.g.,3.12) or allow pre-release builds explicitly:- python-version: '3.13' + # Use stable version or explicitly opt-in to prerelease: + python-version: '3.12' +# python-version: '3.13.0-alpha - prerelease'src/internal/file_operations_compress.go (1)
84-87: Fix resource leak from defer inside loop.Using
defer file.Close()inside the Walk callback causes file descriptors to accumulate until the function exits. This is a known pattern that causes resource leaks.file, err := os.Open(path) if err != nil { return err } - defer file.Close() _, err = io.Copy(headerWriter, file) + file.Close() if err != nil { return err }
🧹 Nitpick comments (22)
src/internal/ui/processbar/const.go (1)
3-7: Consider documenting the rationale for the magic numbers
A brief comment explaining whyminHeight,minWidth, andmsgChannelSizeare 2, 2, 50 would help future maintainers.src/internal/handle_file_operation_test.go (1)
139-140: Verbose test logging – keep or trim before merging?
t.Logfis handy while stabilising the test, but once green it can be noisy. Consider downgrading tot.Helper()-style assertions or removing the extra log.src/config/icon/function.go (1)
72-77: Exported helper lacks a doc-comment
Add a short doc comment (// GetCopyOrCutIcon returns …) to satisfygolintand stay consistent with other exported symbols.src/internal/ui/processbar/README.md (3)
3-3: Fix typo."interal" should be "internal".
-This should not import interal package, and should not be aware of main 'model' +This should not import internal package, and should not be aware of main 'model'
1-8: Consider enhancing the documentation.While the basic usage is covered, the README could benefit from:
- More detailed usage examples showing actual code snippets
- Explanation of key concepts (Process, ProcessState, etc.)
- Description of the main methods and their purposes
16-17: Complete the unit test plan.The unit test plan section appears incomplete with just a dash. Consider adding specific test scenarios or removing this section if it's not ready.
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go (1)
15-24: Track test initialization code duplication in a separate issue.The TODO comments correctly identify technical debt around duplicated test initialization code and global state management across packages.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track consolidating the test initialization logic into a shared test utility package?
src/internal/file_operations_extract.go (1)
14-14: Include source filename in process name for better user feedback.The process name "unzip file" is generic. Consider including the source filename to provide more context to users.
- p, err := processBar.SendAddProcessMsg(icon.ExtractFile+icon.Space+"unzip file", 1, true) + p, err := processBar.SendAddProcessMsg(icon.ExtractFile+icon.Space+"unzip "+filepath.Base(src), 1, true)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (2)
39-40: Fix comment to match constant names.The comment mentions "success" but the actual constant is named "Successful".
-// Constants for operation, success, Cancelled, Failed +// Constants for operation, successful, cancelled, failed
47-48: Track the rendering optimization in a GitHub issue.The TODO correctly identifies a performance concern with repeated Render() calls. Consider caching the rendered icons in a global map or pre-rendering them during initialization.
Would you like me to open a GitHub issue to track this optimization opportunity?
src/internal/file_operations.go (1)
166-167: Remove or update the outdated comment.The comment references
m.Model.process[id]which doesn't align with the current processbar API that uses message passing.-// pasteDir handles directory copying with progress tracking -// model would only have changes in m.Model.process[id] +// pasteDir handles directory copying with progress trackingsrc/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (1)
10-10: Track the code duplication issue.The TODO identifies potential duplication with model_msg. This should be addressed to maintain DRY principles.
Would you like me to analyze the duplication and suggest a refactoring approach, or open a GitHub issue to track this technical debt?
src/internal/file_operations_compress.go (2)
32-32: Include target filename in process name.The process name "zip file" is generic. Consider including the target filename for better user feedback.
- p, err := processBar.SendAddProcessMsg("zip file", totalFiles, true) + p, err := processBar.SendAddProcessMsg(icon.CompressFile+icon.Space+"zip to "+filepath.Base(target), totalFiles, true)
103-103: Track the helper method enhancement.The TODO correctly identifies that helper methods like
SetSuccessful()andSetFailed()would make the code cleaner and more maintainable.Would you like me to implement these helper methods or open a GitHub issue to track this enhancement?
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.go (1)
10-19: LGTM! Consider adding edge case tests.The test logic correctly validates the
cntRenderableProcesscalculation pattern. Consider adding tests for edge cases like very small (0-3) and larger heights to ensure robustness.Add edge case tests:
func Test_cntRenderableProcess(t *testing.T) { + // Edge cases + assert.Equal(t, 0, cntRenderableProcess(0)) + assert.Equal(t, 0, cntRenderableProcess(1)) + assert.Equal(t, 0, cntRenderableProcess(2)) + assert.Equal(t, 1, cntRenderableProcess(3)) + + // Existing tests assert.Equal(t, 1, cntRenderableProcess(4)) assert.Equal(t, 2, cntRenderableProcess(5)) assert.Equal(t, 2, cntRenderableProcess(6)) assert.Equal(t, 2, cntRenderableProcess(7)) assert.Equal(t, 3, cntRenderableProcess(8)) assert.Equal(t, 3, cntRenderableProcess(9)) assert.Equal(t, 3, cntRenderableProcess(10)) assert.Equal(t, 4, cntRenderableProcess(11)) + + // Larger values + assert.Equal(t, 5, cntRenderableProcess(14)) + assert.Equal(t, 10, cntRenderableProcess(29)) }src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go (1)
60-72: Clarify error handling behavior.When
sendMsgToChannelfails in non-blocking mode, the function returns a process that wasn't added to the model. This could confuse callers who might assume the process exists despite the error.Consider documenting this behavior or returning a zero-value process on error:
func (m *Model) SendAddProcessMsg(name string, total int, blockingSend bool) (Process, error) { id := m.newUUIDForProcess() p := NewProcess(id, name, total) msg := newProcessMsg{ NewProcess: p, BaseMsg: BaseMsg{reqID: m.newReqCnt()}, } err := m.sendMsgToChannel(msg, blockingSend) if err != nil { - return p, err + // Return zero-value process to indicate failure + return Process{}, err } return p, nil }src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils.go (2)
26-64: Inefficient sorting implementation as noted in TODOs.The sorting logic is correct, but recreating and sorting the slice on every render is O(n log n). The suggested improvements (maintaining separate slices or using btree) would be beneficial for performance.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this performance optimization?
71-74: Consider implementing UUID uniqueness check.While
shortuuidcollisions are extremely rare, the TODO suggests adding a uniqueness check against existing processes.func (m *Model) newUUIDForProcess() string { - return shortuuid.New() + for { + id := shortuuid.New() + if _, exists := m.processes[id]; !exists { + return id + } + // Collision detected, generate new UUID + slog.Warn("UUID collision detected, regenerating", "id", id) + } }src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (3)
32-34: Consider returning pointer types for consistency with tea.ModelThe comment correctly notes that internal models should return pointers and implement tea.Model. This would be more idiomatic and consistent with Bubble Tea patterns.
46-47: Remove outdated TODO commentThe TODO comment can be removed as the function already implements validation for minWidth and minHeight in the code below.
-// TODO : Check for minWidth and minHeight func (m *Model) SetDimensions(width int, height int) {
135-141: Fix grammar in commentMinor grammar correction needed.
- // if the total is 0 mean the process only have directory + // if the total is 0 means the process only has directoriessrc/internal/model.go (1)
284-287: Refactor to eliminate code duplicationThe TODO correctly identifies that this duplicates
setMetadataModelSize. Consider extracting a common method.-// TODO: Remove this code duplication with footer models -func (m *model) setProcessBarModelSize() { - m.processBarModel.SetDimensions(utils.FooterWidth(m.fullWidth)+2, m.footerHeight+2) -} +func (m *model) setFooterModelSize(model interface{ SetDimensions(int, int) }) { + model.SetDimensions(utils.FooterWidth(m.fullWidth)+2, m.footerHeight+2) +}Then use it for both models:
m.setFooterModelSize(&m.fileMetaData) m.setFooterModelSize(&m.processBarModel)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (36)
.github/workflows/superfile-build-test.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/testsuite-run.yml(1 hunks)src/config/icon/function.go(1 hunks)src/internal/config_function.go(3 hunks)src/internal/default_config.go(2 hunks)src/internal/file_operation_compress_test.go(3 hunks)src/internal/file_operations.go(3 hunks)src/internal/file_operations_compress.go(4 hunks)src/internal/file_operations_extract.go(2 hunks)src/internal/function.go(2 hunks)src/internal/handle_file_operation_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/handle_file_operations.go(9 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go(0 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go(0 hunks)src/internal/key_function.go(2 hunks)src/internal/model.go(11 hunks)src/internal/model_msg.go(5 hunks)src/internal/model_process_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model_render.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model_test.go(2 hunks)src/internal/test_utils_teaprog.go(2 hunks)src/internal/type.go(3 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/README.md(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/const.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/error.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go(1 hunks)src/internal/wheel_function.go(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
- src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (24)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go:11-26
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T17:00:37.262Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track memory leak issues and feature enhancements via dedicated GitHub issues when identified during PR reviews but are beyond the current PR scope, particularly for processbar-related improvements like cleanup mechanisms and keyboard shortcuts.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go:67-67
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T16:56:18.390Z
Learning: The `AddOrUpdateProcess` method in the processbar.Model type (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go) has a void return type and doesn't return any values, so there's no return value to check in tests or other code.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.701Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
📚 Learning: the `addorupdateprocess` method in the processbar.model type (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go) h...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go:67-67
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T16:56:18.390Z
Learning: The `AddOrUpdateProcess` method in the processbar.Model type (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go) has a void return type and doesn't return any values, so there's no return value to check in tests or other code.
Applied to files:
src/internal/key_function.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/const.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/file_operation_compress_test.gosrc/internal/function.gosrc/internal/model_process_test.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_update_test.gosrc/internal/model_test.gosrc/internal/wheel_function.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils_test.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/README.mdsrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.gosrc/internal/default_config.gosrc/internal/model_render.gosrc/internal/file_operations.gosrc/internal/type.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/error.gosrc/internal/file_operations_extract.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.gosrc/internal/file_operations_compress.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/process.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.gosrc/internal/model_msg.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: in go packages, constants and variables should only be exported (capitalized) if they need to be acc...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:02:46.575Z
Learning: In Go packages, constants and variables should only be exported (capitalized) if they need to be accessed from outside their package. In the sidebar package, constants like `sideBarInitialHeight` should remain unexported as they're only used within the package.
Applied to files:
src/internal/key_function.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/const.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/default_config.gosrc/internal/type.go
📚 Learning: in go, identifiers should remain unexported (lowercase) when they're only used within their own pack...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:45-45
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:01:13.080Z
Learning: In Go, identifiers should remain unexported (lowercase) when they're only used within their own package, even if other similar identifiers are exported. Exported (capitalized) identifiers should only be used when the element needs to be accessible from outside its package.
Applied to files:
src/internal/key_function.go
📚 Learning: in the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentiona...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Applied to files:
src/internal/key_function.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/wheel_function.gosrc/internal/default_config.gosrc/internal/model_render.gosrc/internal/file_operations.gosrc/internal/type.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: before suggesting the creation of new constants for string literals, always check if a constant alre...
Learnt from: yorukot
PR: yorukot/superfile#841
File: src/internal/model_render.go:334-334
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T09:58:25.572Z
Learning: Before suggesting the creation of new constants for string literals, always check if a constant already exists in the codebase, especially in common packages like `src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go`.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/const.go
📚 Learning: the project standardized on using one ansi package import (github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi)...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:50:02.071Z
Learning: The project standardized on using one ANSI package import (github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi) to avoid binary bloat and potential incompatibilities.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/const.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/test_utils_teaprog.gosrc/internal/function.gosrc/internal/model_test.gosrc/internal/file_operations.gosrc/internal/type.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: the project standardized on using one ansi package import (either github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi or...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:50:02.071Z
Learning: The project standardized on using one ANSI package import (either github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi or github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi) to avoid binary bloat and potential incompatibilities.
Applied to files:
src/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/function.gosrc/internal/model_test.gosrc/internal/file_operations.gosrc/internal/type.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: in superfile's loadtomlfile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use printfandexit f...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:104-104
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use PrintfAndExit for critical errors that prevent application functionality (config corruption, file system failures during fixing), and use fmt.Println with errorPrefix for non-critical errors that users should see but can continue from (missing fields when not fixing, cleanup warnings).
Applied to files:
src/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/test_utils_teaprog.go
📚 Learning: in the sidebar package, variables like `pinneddividerdir` and `diskdividerdir` should remain unexpor...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:10-13
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:00:49.244Z
Learning: In the sidebar package, variables like `pinnedDividerDir` and `diskDividerDir` should remain unexported as they're only used within the package, even though their struct fields are exported with PascalCase (Name, Location) for JSON serialization purposes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/config_function.go
📚 Learning: when reviewing large refactoring prs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea....
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/test_utils_teaprog.gosrc/internal/function.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: in superfile's loadtomlfile function refactoring, the preferred approach is to return structured err...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-27T02:36:23.492Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function refactoring, the preferred approach is to return structured errors (TomlLoadError) rather than using PrintfAndExit for all error conditions. This allows callers to decide appropriate error handling: fatal errors cause immediate exit, while non-fatal errors (like missing fields when not fixing) only print warnings and continue.
Applied to files:
src/internal/test_utils_teaprog.go
📚 Learning: in superfile's loadtomlfile function, all errors should use fmt.print with errorprefix instead of sl...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:104-104
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T03:15:57.379Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function, all errors should use fmt.Print with errorPrefix instead of slog.Error, because these are critical config loading errors that users must see immediately on their terminal with proper styling. slog.Error would either go to log files (if configured) or show escaped ANSI codes, making errors less visible to users during startup.
Applied to files:
src/internal/test_utils_teaprog.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile project, comments in test files documenting additional test cases with "// addition...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render_test.go:15-25
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:53:45.663Z
Learning: In the superfile project, comments in test files documenting additional test cases with "// Additional tests" are intentional TODOs for future work and should not be flagged as missing implementations in PR reviews.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_process_test.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_update_test.go
📚 Learning: a panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or ...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_file_operation_test.go
📚 Learning: empty panel.element checks should be added at the beginning of functions that access panel.element t...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#730
File: src/internal/function.go:211-211
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T13:20:46.467Z
Learning: Empty panel.element checks should be added at the beginning of functions that access panel.element to prevent crashes when a panel has no elements, similar to using `if len(panel.element) == 0 { return }`.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_file_operation_test.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile codebase, structs that need to be serialized to/from json have exported fields (cap...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:5-8
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:00:54.846Z
Learning: In the superfile codebase, structs that need to be serialized to/from JSON have exported fields (capitalized names like `Name` and `Location`) even when the variables of those structs are unexported. This is because Go's JSON marshaling/unmarshaling can only access exported struct fields.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_test.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.go
📚 Learning: in src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go, when truncating rendered output that exceeds the maxi...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go:95-108
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:42:07.369Z
Learning: In src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go, when truncating rendered output that exceeds the maximum height, we should drop all remaining lines after reaching totalHeight without adding an ellipsis or other truncation indicator, as the goal is to have exactly totalHeight lines.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_render.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: when reviewing large refactoring prs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global chan...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/type.go
📚 Learning: in yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree prefers that individual components like modals should implement in...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.701Z
Learning: In yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree prefers that individual components like modals should implement interfaces directly and handle their own cancel/confirm logic, rather than using external handler objects. This follows the existing pattern where components like sidebarModel are self-contained and don't depend on the main model object.
Applied to files:
src/internal/type.go
📚 Learning: pattern to watch for: defer file.close() inside loops (for, range, filepath.walk callbacks) causes r...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#821
File: src/internal/file_operations_compress.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-05T12:42:45.139Z
Learning: Pattern to watch for: defer file.Close() inside loops (for, range, filepath.Walk callbacks) causes resource leaks by accumulating file descriptors until function exits. Should be replaced with explicit Close() calls immediately after file operations with proper error handling.
Applied to files:
src/internal/file_operations_compress.go
📚 Learning: in yorukot/superfile, deleteitemwarn() only displays a warning modal via the channelmessage system a...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:35:25.617Z
Learning: In yorukot/superfile, deleteItemWarn() only displays a warning modal via the channelMessage system and does not perform actual file deletion. The actual deletion happens when the user confirms the modal, which triggers getDeleteCmd() that returns a tea.Cmd. The architecture intentionally separates UI modal operations (using channelMessage/goroutines) from file I/O operations (using tea.Cmd pattern), creating clean separation of concerns between UI state management and file operations.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_msg.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile project, configuration struct fields use pascalcase (e.g., "shellcloseonsuccess") w...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#752
File: src/internal/common/load_config.go:27-37
Timestamp: 2025-04-03T16:05:49.630Z
Learning: In the superfile project, configuration struct fields use PascalCase (e.g., "ShellCloseOnSuccess") while their corresponding TOML field names use snake_case (e.g., "shell_close_on_success") as defined in the struct tags. Boolean configuration fields typically don't require explicit validation in the LoadConfigFile function, unlike numeric fields which have range validations.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_file_operations.go
📚 Learning: deleteitemwarn() in yorukot/superfile only displays a warning modal via channel messaging and does n...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:35:25.617Z
Learning: deleteItemWarn() in yorukot/superfile only displays a warning modal via channel messaging and does not perform actual file deletion. The actual deletion happens through getDeleteCmd() which returns a tea.Cmd. The architectural pattern separates UI modal operations (using channels/goroutines) from file I/O operations (using tea.Cmd), which is intentional and appropriate.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model.go
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (6)
src/internal/config_function.go (1)
src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (1)
Process(13-21)
src/internal/function.go (3)
src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (1)
Cmd(3-3)src/internal/model_msg.go (2)
ProcessBarUpdateMsg(65-68)BaseMessage(16-18)src/internal/test_utils.go (3)
TeaUpdateWithErrCheck(86-90)TeaUpdate(75-84)IsTeaQuit(93-111)
src/internal/file_operations_extract.go (2)
src/config/icon/icon.go (2)
ExtractFile(25-25)Space(10-10)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (2)
Failed(44-44)Successful(42-42)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.go (3)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
Model(12-26)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go (2)
Test_processBarModelUpDown(38-150)genProcessBarModel(10-25)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go (2)
listUp(115-131)listDown(134-148)
src/internal/file_operations_compress.go (2)
src/config/icon/icon.go (2)
CompressFile(24-24)Space(10-10)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (3)
Cancelled(43-43)Failed(44-44)Successful(42-42)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go (4)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
Model(12-26)src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (3)
Cmd(3-3)UpdateMsg(5-8)BaseMsg(11-13)src/internal/ui/processbar/error.go (1)
ProcessChannelFullError(3-4)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (2)
Process(13-21)NewProcess(23-34)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (47)
.github/workflows/testsuite-run.yml (1)
6-8: Push trigger fordevelopmissing – verify intentPR workflow will now run for PRs targeting
develop, but direct pushes to that branch will not trigger the pipeline.
If CI on every push todevelopis desirable, mirror the branch list underpush:as well:push: - branches: [ main ] + branches: [ main, develop ].github/workflows/superfile-build-test.yml (1)
6-8: Same push/PR branch asymmetry as Python workflowOnly PRs to
developtrigger CI; direct pushes to that branch skip checks.
Confirm this is intended; otherwise extend thepush:branch list to includedevelopfor parity.
No other issues spotted.src/internal/wheel_function.go (3)
18-19: Capitalization fix aligns with new processbar API – good catch
The switch toListUpguarantees the call resolves to the exported navigation method on the newprocessbar.Model.
16-23: Double-check height argument passed to ListUp
ListUpnow receivesm.footerHeight, whereas the sidebar still receivesm.mainPanelHeight. Make sure the new method expects the footer’s height, not the total panel height, otherwise scrolling distance may feel off.
28-35: Same concern for ListDown
Confirm thatm.footerHeightis the intended argument here as well.src/internal/key_function.go (2)
24-25: Updated to exportedListUp– looks correct
Matches the refactoredprocessbarAPI.
24-25: Height parameter parity with wheel handler
Both up/down handlers passm.footerHeight. Please verify the navigation functions interpret this value consistently with other callers (e.g., sidebar usesmainPanelHeight).Also applies to: 37-38
src/internal/config_function.go (3)
11-11: LGTM!The processbar package import aligns with the PR's objective of integrating the new processbar functionality.
53-55: Good architectural planning.The TODO comment identifies a valuable abstraction opportunity for OS interaction tools. This would improve testability and maintainability by encapsulating external dependencies.
115-116: Good addition to memory profiling.Adding the processbar.Process size to the debug logging helps with memory usage analysis and is consistent with the existing size logging pattern.
src/internal/file_operation_compress_test.go (5)
13-13: LGTM!Import addition is consistent with the processbar integration.
17-19: Proper processbar integration pattern.The initialization, channel listening setup, and cleanup using
t.Cleanupfollows good testing practices for resource management.
90-90: Function signature updated correctly.The zipSources call now properly passes the processbar reference as expected by the refactored function.
138-140: Consistent test pattern.The same proper processbar initialization and cleanup pattern is applied consistently across both test functions.
147-147: Function signature updated correctly.The zipSources call is properly updated to match the new signature.
src/internal/test_utils_teaprog.go (2)
4-4: LGTM!Import addition is necessary for the improved error handling logic.
48-49: Improved error handling for expected shutdown.The logic correctly distinguishes between genuine errors and the expected
tea.ErrProgramKillederror that occurs during normal program termination viap.Close(). This prevents unnecessary error logging during clean shutdown.src/internal/model_process_test.go (1)
5-15: Test structure ready for future implementation.The TODO comments outline comprehensive test scenarios for process operations and progress tracking. This follows the project's pattern of using TODO comments to track future test implementations while keeping the current PR focused.
src/internal/model_test.go (2)
14-14: LGTM - Import addition supports processbar refactoring.The addition of the processbar package import is necessary for the migration from internal process state management to the external processbar package.
113-118: LGTM - Proper migration to processbar API.The test correctly migrates from the internal process struct to the new
processbar.Processtype. The field mapping (State,Done,Total,ID) and the use ofprocessbar.InOperationconstant are consistent with the broader refactoring effort to replace the internal processBarModel with the external processbar package.src/internal/function.go (2)
16-17: LGTM - Necessary imports for processbar integration.The addition of Bubble Tea and processbar package imports supports the new
processCmdToTeaCmdbridge function for integrating processbar commands with the Bubble Tea framework.
349-362: LGTM - Well-implemented bridge function.The
processCmdToTeaCmdfunction properly converts processbar commands to Bubble Tea commands:
- Includes defensive nil check to prevent runtime panics
- Correctly extracts the request ID using
GetReqID()method- Wraps the result in
ProcessBarUpdateMsgwith proper base message structure- Serves as a clean integration layer between the processbar package and Bubble Tea framework
src/internal/default_config.go (2)
7-7: LGTM - Import supports processbar package integration.The processbar package import is necessary for the constructor call in the model initialization.
21-23: LGTM - Clean migration to constructor pattern.The change from inline struct initialization to
processbar.New()constructor call is well-executed:
- Follows the established pattern used by other model components (
sidebar.New(),metadata.New())- Encapsulates initialization logic within the processbar package
- Aligns with the broader refactoring effort to extract processbar functionality into a dedicated package
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update_test.go (1)
5-17: Well-planned test placeholder.The detailed TODO comment demonstrates thorough test planning covering critical processbar functionality:
- Message sending without listeners (timeout and failure scenarios)
- Process addition and update verification
- Stop listening functionality and state management
Based on the learning that TODO comments in test files are intentional markers for future work, this placeholder appropriately documents the test coverage needed for the processbar update functionality.
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils_test.go (1)
9-32: LGTM - Comprehensive utility method testing.The test provides excellent coverage of the processbar model's utility methods:
- Dimension calculations: Verifies
viewHeight()andviewWidth()compute correctly- Process management: Tests
cntProcesses()and process addition functionality- Request counter: Validates
newReqCnt()incremental behavior- Validity checking: Tests
isValid()with normal and edge cases (invalid cursor/renderIndex)The direct field manipulation to test edge cases is appropriate for unit testing, and the test structure follows good testing practices with clear assertions.
src/internal/model_render.go (1)
196-198: Clean delegation to the new processbar package.The refactoring properly delegates rendering to the embedded
processbar.Model, improving separation of concerns and code organization.src/internal/type.go (1)
7-7: Successful migration to the new processbar package.The type changes properly integrate the new
processbar.Modeland remove the obsolete channel message fields, completing the refactoring from internal to external process bar implementation.Also applies to: 85-85, 231-236
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.go (2)
6-7: Clarify the shadowing comment.The comment mentions "shadowing happening here" but it's unclear what variable is being shadowed. Could you clarify what this refers to and whether it needs to be addressed now?
8-50: Well-implemented navigation logic.The navigation methods correctly handle cursor movement, wrapping, and render window adjustments. The implementation maintains consistency with the previous internal model while properly encapsulating the behavior in the new package.
src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (1)
12-21: LGTM!The Process struct is well-designed with appropriate fields for tracking process state and progress. The size comment (~800 bytes) is helpful for memory considerations.
src/internal/file_operations.go (1)
240-287: Well-implemented cross-platform path validation.The
isAncestorfunction correctly handles symlinks, absolute paths, and case-insensitive comparison on Windows. Good defensive programming with proper error handling.src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (2)
19-35: LGTM!The message implementations follow a consistent pattern with proper delegation to model methods.
39-46: Appropriate no-op implementation for stop message.The
stopListeningMsgcorrectly implements a no-op Apply method with proper linter suppression.src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.go (2)
39-176: Excellent test coverage for navigation logic!The table-driven tests comprehensively cover all navigation scenarios including boundary conditions, render window adjustments, and various footer heights. The test structure is clean and easy to understand.
21-37: minWidth is properly defined and accessible
The constantminWidth(value = 2) is declared insrc/internal/ui/processbar/const.goand is available within theprocessbarpackage, including its test files. No changes needed.src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go (3)
29-34: LGTM!Clean implementation of the Bubble Tea command pattern for channel listening.
36-58: Well-designed message sending interface.The three-tier approach (non-blocking, blocking, unified) provides good flexibility for different use cases. Error handling with
ProcessChannelFullErroris appropriate.
74-90: LGTM! Clean message sending implementations.The update and stop message methods are well-implemented with appropriate error handling and logging.
src/internal/handle_file_operations.go (1)
345-354: Excellent error handling for final process update!Unlike
deleteOperation, this function correctly uses blocking send for the final process state update with proper error logging.src/internal/model_msg.go (2)
24-110: Clean migration to processbar types.All operation messages consistently updated to use
processbar.ProcessStatewith proper constant usage in comparisons.
65-76: Well-integrated processbar update message.The
ProcessBarUpdateMsgproperly bridges the processbar package's update mechanism with the model's message system, including appropriate error logging.src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils.go (1)
9-24: LGTM! Clean utility implementations.The validation and dimension calculation methods are straightforward and correct.
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
60-66: LGTM!Proper error handling for duplicate process IDs.
src/internal/model.go (3)
84-91: Good solution for preventing metadata fetch loopsThe gotModelUpdateMsg flag effectively prevents infinite loops where model updates trigger metadata fetches. The comment clearly explains the issue and rationale.
122-129: LGTM!Clean extraction of mouse handling logic with appropriate logging for unhandled events.
502-517: Well-implemented debug statisticsGood implementation of rendering debug stats:
- Properly gated by Config.Debug flag
- Correctly uses ansi.StringWidth for accurate width calculation with ANSI codes
- Modern use of strings.Lines iterator
Also applies to: 588-614
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
46-58: Good dimension validation with redundant TODOThe SetDimensions method properly validates inputs and enforces minimum constraints. However, the TODO comment on line 46 seems redundant since the method already checks for minWidth and minHeight.
Consider removing or clarifying the TODO comment since the dimension validation is already implemented:
-// TODO : Check for minWidth and minHeight func (m *Model) SetDimensions(width int, height int) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/internal/file_operations.go(3 hunks)src/internal/file_operations_compress.go(4 hunks)src/internal/file_operations_extract.go(2 hunks)src/internal/handle_file_operations.go(8 hunks)src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- src/internal/file_operations.go
- src/internal/handle_file_operations.go
- src/internal/file_operations_extract.go
- src/internal/file_operations_compress.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (16)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go:11-26
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T17:00:37.262Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track memory leak issues and feature enhancements via dedicated GitHub issues when identified during PR reviews but are beyond the current PR scope, particularly for processbar-related improvements like cleanup mechanisms and keyboard shortcuts.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go:118-120
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T15:07:56.324Z
Learning: In the processbar package (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go), the Progress.Width field is modified temporarily during rendering on a copy of the process data, and this modification is intentionally not persisted to the stored process data since it's only needed for display purposes during the render call.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go:67-67
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T16:56:18.390Z
Learning: The `AddOrUpdateProcess` method in the processbar.Model type (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go) has a void return type and doesn't return any values, so there's no return value to check in tests or other code.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.194Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
📚 Learning: in the processbar package (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go), the progress.width field is modifie...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go:118-120
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T15:07:56.324Z
Learning: In the processbar package (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go), the Progress.Width field is modified temporarily during rendering on a copy of the process data, and this modification is intentionally not persisted to the stored process data since it's only needed for display purposes during the render call.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: the `addorupdateprocess` method in the processbar.model type (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go) h...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go:67-67
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T16:56:18.390Z
Learning: The `AddOrUpdateProcess` method in the processbar.Model type (src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go) has a void return type and doesn't return any values, so there's no return value to check in tests or other code.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track memory leak issues and feature enhancements via dedicated github issues...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#970
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go:11-26
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T17:00:37.262Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track memory leak issues and feature enhancements via dedicated GitHub issues when identified during PR reviews but are beyond the current PR scope, particularly for processbar-related improvements like cleanup mechanisms and keyboard shortcuts.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: when race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current pr's focus are identified dur...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: when reviewing large refactoring prs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global chan...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated github issue...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: the user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep prs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally l...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: the borderconfig.getborder method in src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go already protects against ne...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go:104-114
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:02:28.747Z
Learning: The BorderConfig.GetBorder method in src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go already protects against negative availWidth values through the condition `actualWidth >= cnt*4` which ensures that availWidth is at least 1.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: when reviewing large refactoring prs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea....
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: in pr #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functional...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile project, comments in test files documenting additional test cases with "// addition...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render_test.go:15-25
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:53:45.663Z
Learning: In the superfile project, comments in test files documenting additional test cases with "// Additional tests" are intentional TODOs for future work and should not be flagged as missing implementations in PR reviews.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate prs when the current pr has grow...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later prs when th...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: pr #770 "sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new featur...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain ...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (6)
1-9: Clean package structure and importsThe package declaration and imports are well-organized and appropriate for the processbar functionality.
11-26: Well-structured Model definitionThe Model struct has a clean separation of concerns with appropriate fields for rendering state, dimensions, and process management.
28-44: Solid constructor implementationThe constructor pattern with default and options-based variants is well-implemented. The TODO comment about pointer receivers and tea.Model interface is a good architectural consideration for future improvements.
60-83: Excellent CRUD operations designThe process management methods are well-implemented with appropriate error handling, proper use of custom error types, and clear method semantics for different use cases.
85-92: Correct running process detection logicThe HasRunningProcesses method properly checks both process state and completion status to accurately determine if any processes are still active.
94-150: Comprehensive and well-structured Render methodThe Render method handles all the necessary cases including validation, empty state, pagination, and process display. The Progress.Width modification on line 123 is appropriate since it's only needed temporarily during rendering and doesn't need to persist in the stored process data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
…ock final send for deletel operation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
|
Cant fix codescene issues - #973 (comment) |
This MR contains the following updates: | Package | Update | Change | |---|---|---| | [yorukot/superfile](https://github.com/yorukot/superfile) | minor | `v1.3.3` -> `v1.4.0` | MR created with the help of [el-capitano/tools/renovate-bot](https://gitlab.com/el-capitano/tools/renovate-bot). **Proposed changes to behavior should be submitted there as MRs.** --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>yorukot/superfile (yorukot/superfile)</summary> ### [`v1.4.0`](https://github.com/yorukot/superfile/releases/tag/v1.4.0) [Compare Source](yorukot/superfile@v1.3.3...v1.4.0) Hey folks. Releasing v1.4.0 with many new features, improvements, and bug fixes. We have an async file preview now, a zoxide panel, and various new features improving UX. #### Install: [**Click me to know how to install**](https://github.com/yorukot/superfile?tab=readme-ov-file#installation) #### Highlights - We have the Zoxide Panel now. Ensure zoxide is installed on your system, set `zoxide_support` to `true` in the config, and press `z` to use zoxide. <img width="645" height="295" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/238f6549-5318-49d1-a3a0-14cf8a686955" /> - File previewing is now async, meaning reduced lag while scrolling through images, or on slow systems. - Many bug fixes. See 'Detailed Change Summary' ##### Internal Updates - Most file operations are now truly async with the usage of the recommended `tea.Cmd` pattern. - Enabled many new linters to improve code quality. - Moved golangci-lint to v2. Now developers don't need to keep the old v1 in their systems. - Refactored file preview in its own package for better maintainability and readability. - Fixed flaky unit tests. #### Detailed Change Summary <details><summary>Details</summary> <p> ##### Update - feat: File operation via tea cmd [#​963](yorukot/superfile#963) by @​lazysegtree - feat: processbar improvements, package separation, better channel management [#​973](yorukot/superfile#973) by @​lazysegtree - feat: enable lll and recvcheck linter, fix tests, more refactors [#​977](yorukot/superfile#977) by @​lazysegtree - feat: Remove channel for notification models [#​979](yorukot/superfile#979) by @​lazysegtree - feat: enable cyclop, funlen, gocognit, gocyclo linters, and refactor large functions [#​984](yorukot/superfile#984) by @​lazysegtree - feat: Add a new hotkey to handle cd-on-quit whenever needed [#​924](yorukot/superfile#924) by @​ahmed-habbachi - feat: added option to permanently delete files [#​987](yorukot/superfile#987) by @​hupender - feat: Preview panel separation [#​1021](yorukot/superfile#1021) by @​lazysegtree - feat: Add search functionality to help menu [#​1011](yorukot/superfile#1011) by @​iZarrios - feat: Use zoxide lib [#​1036](yorukot/superfile#1036) by @​lazysegtree - feat: Add zoxide directory tracking on navigation [#​1041](yorukot/superfile#1041) by @​lazysegtree - feat: Zoxide integration [#​1039](yorukot/superfile#1039) by @​lazysegtree - feat: Select mode with better feedback [#​1074](yorukot/superfile#1074) by @​lazysegtree - feat: owner/group in the metadata [#​1093](yorukot/superfile#1093) by @​xelavopelk - feat: Async zoxide [#​1104](yorukot/superfile#1104) by @​lazysegtree ##### Bug Fix - fix: sorting in searchbar [#​985](yorukot/superfile#985) by @​hupender - fix: Async rendering, Include clipboard check in paste items, and update linter configs [#​997](yorukot/superfile#997) by @​lazysegtree - fix: Move utility functions to utils package [#​1012](yorukot/superfile#1012) by @​lazysegtree - fix: Refactoring and separation of preview panel and searchbar in help menu [#​1013](yorukot/superfile#1013) by @​lazysegtree - fix(filePanel): allow focusType to be set correctly [#​1033](yorukot/superfile#1033) by @​faisal-990 - fix(ci): Update gomod2nix.toml, allow pre release in version output, release 1.4.0-rc1, bug fixes, and improvements [#​1054](yorukot/superfile#1054) by @​lazysegtree - fix(nix): resolve build failures in the nix flake [#​1068](yorukot/superfile#1068) by @​Frost-Phoenix - fix: Retry the file deletion to prevent flakies (#​938) [#​1076](yorukot/superfile#1076) by @​lazysegtree - fix(issue-1066): Fixed issue where enter was not searchable [#​1078](yorukot/superfile#1078) by @​Simpaqt - fix(#​1073): Tech debt fix [#​1077](yorukot/superfile#1077) by @​Simpaqt - fix: fix deleted directory not able to remove from pins (#​1067) [#​1081](yorukot/superfile#1081) by @​yorukot - fix: fix child process spawning attached [#​1084](yorukot/superfile#1084) by @​guemidiborhane - fix: always clear images when showing a FullScreenStyle [#​1094](yorukot/superfile#1094) by @​snikoletopoulos - fix: Allow j and k keys in zoxide [#​1102](yorukot/superfile#1102) by @​lazysegtree - fix: Zoxide improvements and 1.4.0-rc2 [#​1105](yorukot/superfile#1105) by @​lazysegtree - fix: rename cursor beginning on wrong character because of multiple dots in name (#​813) [#​1112](yorukot/superfile#1112) by @​SyedAsadK - fix: check and fix file panel scroll position on height changes [#​1095](yorukot/superfile#1095) by @​snikoletopoulos ##### Optimization - perf(website): optimize font loading and asset organization [#​1089](yorukot/superfile#1089) by @​yorukot ##### Documentation - docs: fix incorrect zoxide plugin config name [#​1049](yorukot/superfile#1049) by @​shree-xvi - docs(hotkeys): Fix typo in vimHotkeys.toml comments [#​1080](yorukot/superfile#1080) by @​wleoncio - docs: add section for core maintainers in README.md [#​1088](yorukot/superfile#1088) by @​yorukot - chore: add winget install instruction to readme and website [#​943](yorukot/superfile#943) by @​claykom ##### Dependencies - chore(deps): update dependency go to v1.25.0, golangci-lint to v2, golangci-lint actions to v8 [#​750](yorukot/superfile#750) by @​renovate[bot] - chore(deps): update amannn/action-semantic-pull-request action to v6 [#​1006](yorukot/superfile#1006) by @​renovate[bot] - chore(deps): update actions/first-interaction action to v3 [#​1005](yorukot/superfile#1005) by @​renovate[bot] - chore(deps): update actions/checkout action to v5 [#​1004](yorukot/superfile#1004) by @​renovate[bot] - chore(deps): bump astro from 5.10.1 to 5.12.8 [#​982](yorukot/superfile#982) by @​dependabot[bot] - fix(deps): update module golang.org/x/mod to v0.27.0 [#​989](yorukot/superfile#989) by @​renovate[bot] - fix(deps): update dependency @​expressive-code/plugin-collapsible-sections to v0.41.3 [#​990](yorukot/superfile#990) by @​renovate[bot] - fix(deps): update dependency sharp to v0.34.3 [#​992](yorukot/superfile#992) by @​renovate[bot] - fix(deps): update dependency @​expressive-code/plugin-line-numbers to v0.41.3 [#​991](yorukot/superfile#991) by @​renovate[bot] - chore(deps): update dependency go to v1.25.0 [#​994](yorukot/superfile#994) by @​renovate[bot] - fix(deps): update astro monorepo [#​995](yorukot/superfile#995) by @​renovate[bot] - fix(deps): update dependency @​astrojs/starlight to ^0.35.0 [#​1000](yorukot/superfile#1000) by @​renovate[bot] - fix(deps): update module github.com/urfave/cli/v3 to v3.4.1 [#​1001](yorukot/superfile#1001) by @​renovate[bot] - fix(deps): update module golang.org/x/text to v0.28.0 [#​1003](yorukot/superfile#1003) by @​renovate[bot] ##### Misc - chore: migrate from superfile.netlify.app to superfile.dev [#​1087](yorukot/superfile#1087) by @​yorukot - refactor(filepanel): replace filePanelFocusType with isFocused boolean [#​1040](yorukot/superfile#1040) by @​faisal-990 - refactor(ansi): Migrate from github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi to github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi [#​1044](yorukot/superfile#1044) by @​faisal-990 - refactor: common operation on pinned directory file using PinnedManager [#​1085](yorukot/superfile#1085) by @​Manaswa-S - test: unit tests for pinned manager [#​1090](yorukot/superfile#1090) by @​Manaswa-S </p> </details> #### New Contributors * @​hupender made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#985 * @​ahmed-habbachi made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#924 * @​iZarrios made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1011 * @​faisal-990 made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1033 * @​shree-xvi made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1049 * @​Simpaqt made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1078 * @​wleoncio made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1080 * @​guemidiborhane made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1084 * @​Manaswa-S made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1085 * @​xelavopelk made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1093 * @​snikoletopoulos made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1094 * @​SyedAsadK made their first contribution in yorukot/superfile#1112 **Full Changelog**: <yorukot/superfile@v1.3.3...v1.4.0> </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever MR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this MR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this MR, check this box --- This MR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4xNDYuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQxLjE0Ni4wIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJSZW5vdmF0ZSBCb3QiXX0=-->
This includes these PRs
Related issues
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores