feat: processbar improvements, package separation, better channel management #970
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis change migrates the application's process tracking and progress bar management from custom, internal implementations to a new modular Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant UI as Main Model/UI
participant PB as processbar.Model
participant OP as File Operation (e.g., zipSources, pasteDir)
participant CH as processbar.MsgChan
UI->>PB: Initialize Model (New/SetDimensions)
UI->>PB: Start ListenForChannelUpdates()
OP->>PB: SendAddProcessMsg(name, total, blocking)
PB->>CH: Add process message
PB->>PB: Add process to model
OP->>PB: SendUpdateProcessNameMsg(process, blocking)
PB->>CH: Update process message
PB->>PB: Update process state/progress
UI->>PB: Render(processBarFocussed)
PB-->>UI: Rendered process bar string
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~40 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.36 | Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/internal/wheel_function.go (1)
18-30: Correct use of exportedListUp/ListDown; add nil-action guard to avoid panicsThe switch now calls the exported navigation helpers with the correct
footerHeight– good catch.However, if
m.focusPanelsomehow falls outside the handled cases,actionremainsniland the loop at Line 41 will panic when invokingaction().
A minimal safety net avoids a hard crash without changing behaviour for valid states:- for range common.WheelRunTime { - action() - } + if action == nil { + return + } + for range common.WheelRunTime { + action() + }src/internal/model.go (1)
568-576: Critical: Goroutine leak in channel listening mechanismThe refactored
listenForChannelMessagehas a race condition.ListeningMessageis set to false inside the command function, but the check happens before spawning the command. This causes multiple goroutines to be spawned on every Update() call.The existing comment (lines 103-107) already identifies this as Issue #946. This needs immediate attention as it will cause memory leaks and performance degradation over time.
Consider moving the channel to the model struct and removing the
ListeningMessagevariable entirely, as suggested in the comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (21)
src/internal/config_function.go (2)
11-11: Wrap heavy reflection metrics behind the debug flag to avoid needless deps & work
processbaris imported solely for thereflect.TypeOf(processbar.Process{}).Size()call.
Whencommon.Config.Debugis false the program still pays the compile-time and run-time cost of the import and reflection.- slog.Debug("Object sizes", - …, - "process_size_bytes", reflect.TypeOf(processbar.Process{}).Size()) + if common.Config.Debug { + slog.Debug("Object sizes", + …, + "process_size_bytes", reflect.TypeOf(processbar.Process{}).Size()) + }This removes the unused-import risk in non-debug builds and keeps the binary leaner.
Also applies to: 115-117
53-55: Track the “manager abstraction” TODO in an issueThe TODO about introducing dedicated managers (ExifTool, Zoxide, etc.) is architectural and out-of-scope for this PR.
Creating a GitHub issue prevents it from being forgotten and keeps this file clean.Would you like me to open the issue text?
src/config/icon/function.go (1)
72-77: Add doc comment for exportedGetCopyIconExported identifiers need a package-level comment to satisfy
golintand improve discoverability.+// GetCopyIcon returns the clipboard icon. When `cut` is true it returns the +// “Cut” icon, otherwise the regular “Copy” icon. func GetCopyIcon(cut bool) string { if cut { return Cut } return Copy }src/internal/ui/processbar/README.md (1)
1-17: Good documentation structure with minor improvements needed.The README provides essential information about the processbar package and follows good practices by documenting design constraints and usage patterns.
Fix the typo and complete the documentation:
-This should not import interal package, and should not be aware of main 'model' +This should not import internal package, and should not be aware of main 'model'## Unit test plan -- +- Test model initialization and basic operations +- Test process lifecycle management +- Test concurrent update handlingConsider adding a brief code example in the Usage section to demonstrate the typical workflow.
src/internal/model_process_test.go (1)
5-15: Good test planning with comprehensive TODO comments.The placeholder test function outlines a thorough testing strategy covering success cases, failure scenarios, and the challenging aspect of progress tracking validation. This shows good forward planning for the process testing requirements.
Consider creating a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these test cases, ensuring they don't get forgotten as the processbar package matures.
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go (3)
15-16: TODO: Address test setup code duplication.The comment indicates this initialization code is duplicated across multiple test packages. Consider creating a shared test utilities package to avoid duplication.
Would you like me to help create a shared test utilities package or open an issue to track this technical debt?
20-24: Consider dependency injection to avoid global state in tests.The comments correctly identify that modifying global state in tests is problematic. This can lead to test interference and prevent parallel test execution. Consider refactoring to use dependency injection or test-specific configuration instances.
94-103: Fix typo in test name.The test function name has a typo: "SetDimenstions" should be "SetDimensions".
-func TestModelSetDimenstions(t *testing.T) { +func TestModelSetDimensions(t *testing.T) {src/internal/file_operations.go (2)
166-166: Clarify or remove ambiguous comment.The comment "model would only have changes in m.Model.process[id]" is unclear and doesn't provide useful context about the function's behavior or constraints.
Consider either clarifying what this means or removing it if it's no longer relevant.
214-216: Use consistent Go error variable naming.The error variable
pSendErrdoesn't follow Go naming conventions. Consider usingerrorsendErr.- pSendErr := processBarModel.SendUpdateProcessNameMsg(*p, true) - if pSendErr != nil { - slog.Error("Error sending process udpate", "error", pSendErr) + if err := processBarModel.SendUpdateProcessNameMsg(*p, true); err != nil { + slog.Error("Error sending process update", "error", err)Also fixed the typo "udpate" → "update".
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.go (1)
6-7: Clarify the shadowing comment.The comment mentions "shadowing happening here" but there's no apparent variable shadowing in this code. Please clarify what is being shadowed or remove this comment if it's outdated.
src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (1)
47-62: Address the performance TODO for Icon rendering.The TODO correctly identifies that calling Render() on each Icon() invocation is expensive. Consider implementing a cache or pre-rendering these icons during initialization.
Would you like me to implement a caching solution for the rendered icons or open an issue to track this performance optimization?
src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (3)
10-13: Track the duplication concern in a dedicated issue.The TODO comment indicates potential duplication with
model_msg. Since you prefer to track such technical debt in dedicated GitHub issues, consider creating one to investigate and potentially consolidate these base message structures if they serve similar purposes.
19-31: Consider more descriptive field names to distinguish message intent.Both
newProcessMsgandupdateProcessMsguse the field nameNewProcess, which could be confusing:
- For
newProcessMsg, considerProcessorProcessToAdd- For
updateProcessMsg, considerUpdatedProcessorProcessUpdateThis would make the intent clearer when reading the code.
type newProcessMsg struct { BaseMsg - NewProcess Process + Process Process } func (msg newProcessMsg) Apply(m *Model) (Cmd, error) { - return m.GetListenCmd(), m.AddProcess(msg.NewProcess) + return m.GetListenCmd(), m.AddProcess(msg.Process) } type updateProcessMsg struct { BaseMsg - NewProcess Process + UpdatedProcess Process } func (msg updateProcessMsg) Apply(m *Model) (Cmd, error) { - return m.GetListenCmd(), m.UpdateExistingProcess(msg.NewProcess) + return m.GetListenCmd(), m.UpdateExistingProcess(msg.UpdatedProcess) }
37-37: Consider removing or clarifying the construction comment.The comment suggests future plans for builder-style construction methods. If this is planned for a future PR, consider either:
- Converting it to a TODO comment with more context
- Removing it to avoid confusion
- Creating a GitHub issue to track this enhancement
src/internal/file_operations_extract.go (1)
39-39: Fix typo in error message.- slog.Error("Error sending process udpate", "error", pSendErr) + slog.Error("Error sending process update", "error", pSendErr)src/internal/file_operations_compress.go (2)
43-43: Fix typos in error messages.- slog.Error("Error sending process udpate", "error", pSendErr) + slog.Error("Error sending process update", "error", pSendErr)Also applies to: 110-110
103-103: Track the API improvement suggestion.The TODO suggests a cleaner API with methods like
p.SetSuccessful()andp.SetFailed(). This would indeed be a better design pattern than direct state assignment. Consider creating a GitHub issue to track this API enhancement for a future PR.src/internal/handle_file_operations.go (1)
351-351: Fix capitalization in error message.- slog.Error("Could not send final update for process Bar", "error", err) + slog.Error("Could not send final update for process bar", "error", err)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils.go (1)
71-74: Address TODO: Ensure UUID uniquenessThe TODO comment indicates a need to check for existing UUIDs to guarantee uniqueness.
Would you like me to implement the uniqueness check or open an issue to track this enhancement?
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
20-26: Address TODO: Memory leak from unbounded process mapThe processes map will grow indefinitely without cleanup, potentially causing memory issues in long-running applications.
This is a significant issue that needs addressing. Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track implementing a cleanup mechanism (TTL, max size, or periodic cleanup)?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
src/config/icon/function.go(1 hunks)src/internal/config_function.go(3 hunks)src/internal/default_config.go(2 hunks)src/internal/file_operation_compress_test.go(3 hunks)src/internal/file_operations.go(3 hunks)src/internal/file_operations_compress.go(4 hunks)src/internal/file_operations_extract.go(2 hunks)src/internal/function.go(2 hunks)src/internal/handle_file_operations.go(9 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go(0 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go(0 hunks)src/internal/key_function.go(2 hunks)src/internal/model.go(6 hunks)src/internal/model_msg.go(5 hunks)src/internal/model_process_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model_render.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model_test.go(2 hunks)src/internal/type.go(3 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/README.md(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/const.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/error.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go(1 hunks)src/internal/wheel_function.go(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go
- src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (19)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.ps1:25-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:13.055Z
Learning: In the superfile PowerShell installer (website/public/install.ps1), lazysegtree prefers that users supply correct environment variable values (like SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the principle that users should provide properly formatted values.
📚 Learning: in the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentiona...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Applied to files:
src/internal/wheel_function.gosrc/internal/key_function.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/default_config.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.gosrc/internal/type.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model_render.gosrc/internal/file_operations.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.go
📚 Learning: in go packages, constants and variables should only be exported (capitalized) if they need to be acc...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:02:46.575Z
Learning: In Go packages, constants and variables should only be exported (capitalized) if they need to be accessed from outside their package. In the sidebar package, constants like `sideBarInitialHeight` should remain unexported as they're only used within the package.
Applied to files:
src/internal/key_function.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/const.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/type.go
📚 Learning: when reviewing large refactoring prs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea....
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/function.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: the project standardized on using one ansi package import (github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi)...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:50:02.071Z
Learning: The project standardized on using one ANSI package import (github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi) to avoid binary bloat and potential incompatibilities.
Applied to files:
src/internal/function.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/const.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/type.gosrc/internal/model_test.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/file_operations.go
📚 Learning: the project standardized on using one ansi package import (either github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi or...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:50:02.071Z
Learning: The project standardized on using one ANSI package import (either github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi or github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/term/ansi) to avoid binary bloat and potential incompatibilities.
Applied to files:
src/internal/function.gosrc/internal/config_function.gosrc/internal/type.gosrc/internal/model_test.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/file_operations.go
📚 Learning: before suggesting the creation of new constants for string literals, always check if a constant alre...
Learnt from: yorukot
PR: yorukot/superfile#841
File: src/internal/model_render.go:334-334
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T09:58:25.572Z
Learning: Before suggesting the creation of new constants for string literals, always check if a constant already exists in the codebase, especially in common packages like `src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go`.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/const.go
📚 Learning: the borderconfig.getborder method in src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go already protects against ne...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go:104-114
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:02:28.747Z
Learning: The BorderConfig.GetBorder method in src/internal/ui/rendering/border.go already protects against negative availWidth values through the condition `actualWidth >= cnt*4` which ensures that availWidth is at least 1.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/const.go
📚 Learning: in superfile's loadtomlfile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use printfandexit f...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:104-104
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use PrintfAndExit for critical errors that prevent application functionality (config corruption, file system failures during fixing), and use fmt.Println with errorPrefix for non-critical errors that users should see but can continue from (missing fields when not fixing, cleanup warnings).
Applied to files:
src/internal/config_function.go
📚 Learning: in the sidebar package, variables like `pinneddividerdir` and `diskdividerdir` should remain unexpor...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:10-13
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:00:49.244Z
Learning: In the sidebar package, variables like `pinnedDividerDir` and `diskDividerDir` should remain unexported as they're only used within the package, even though their struct fields are exported with PascalCase (Name, Location) for JSON serialization purposes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/config_function.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile project, comments in test files documenting additional test cases with "// addition...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/model_render_test.go:15-25
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:53:45.663Z
Learning: In the superfile project, comments in test files documenting additional test cases with "// Additional tests" are intentional TODOs for future work and should not be flagged as missing implementations in PR reviews.
Applied to files:
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update_test.go
📚 Learning: when reviewing large refactoring prs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global chan...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/type.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go
📚 Learning: pr #770 "sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new featur...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Applied to files:
src/internal/type.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile codebase, structs that need to be serialized to/from json have exported fields (cap...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/consts.go:5-8
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T14:00:54.846Z
Learning: In the superfile codebase, structs that need to be serialized to/from JSON have exported fields (capitalized names like `Name` and `Location`) even when the variables of those structs are unexported. This is because Go's JSON marshaling/unmarshaling can only access exported struct fields.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_test.gosrc/internal/handle_file_operations.go
📚 Learning: in yorukot/superfile, deleteitemwarn() only displays a warning modal via the channelmessage system a...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:35:25.617Z
Learning: In yorukot/superfile, deleteItemWarn() only displays a warning modal via the channelMessage system and does not perform actual file deletion. The actual deletion happens when the user confirms the modal, which triggers getDeleteCmd() that returns a tea.Cmd. The architecture intentionally separates UI modal operations (using channelMessage/goroutines) from file I/O operations (using tea.Cmd pattern), creating clean separation of concerns between UI state management and file operations.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model_msg.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: in the superfile project, configuration struct fields use pascalcase (e.g., "shellcloseonsuccess") w...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#752
File: src/internal/common/load_config.go:27-37
Timestamp: 2025-04-03T16:05:49.630Z
Learning: In the superfile project, configuration struct fields use PascalCase (e.g., "ShellCloseOnSuccess") while their corresponding TOML field names use snake_case (e.g., "shell_close_on_success") as defined in the struct tags. Boolean configuration fields typically don't require explicit validation in the LoadConfigFile function, unlike numeric fields which have range validations.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_file_operations.go
📚 Learning: deleteitemwarn() in yorukot/superfile only displays a warning modal via channel messaging and does n...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:35:25.617Z
Learning: deleteItemWarn() in yorukot/superfile only displays a warning modal via channel messaging and does not perform actual file deletion. The actual deletion happens through getDeleteCmd() which returns a tea.Cmd. The architectural pattern separates UI modal operations (using channels/goroutines) from file I/O operations (using tea.Cmd), which is intentional and appropriate.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_file_operations.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: in src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go, when truncating rendered output that exceeds the maxi...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#825
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go:95-108
Timestamp: 2025-05-22T04:42:07.369Z
Learning: In src/internal/ui/rendering/renderer_core.go, when truncating rendered output that exceeds the maximum height, we should drop all remaining lines after reaching totalHeight without adding an ellipsis or other truncation indicator, as the goal is to have exactly totalHeight lines.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_render.gosrc/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation.go
📚 Learning: pattern to watch for: defer file.close() inside loops (for, range, filepath.walk callbacks) causes r...
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#821
File: src/internal/file_operations_compress.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-05T12:42:45.139Z
Learning: Pattern to watch for: defer file.Close() inside loops (for, range, filepath.Walk callbacks) causes resource leaks by accumulating file descriptors until function exits. Should be replaced with explicit Close() calls immediately after file operations with proper error handling.
Applied to files:
src/internal/file_operations_compress.go
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (11)
src/internal/wheel_function.go (1)
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go (1)
Test_processBarModelUpDown(38-150)
src/internal/function.go (2)
src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (1)
Cmd(3-3)src/internal/model_msg.go (2)
ProcessBarUpdateMsg(65-68)BaseMessage(16-18)
src/internal/config_function.go (1)
src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (1)
Process(13-21)
src/internal/file_operation_compress_test.go (1)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
New(28-30)
src/internal/default_config.go (3)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
New(28-30)src/internal/ui/metadata/model.go (1)
New(21-23)src/internal/ui/sidebar/sidebar.go (1)
New(110-122)
src/internal/model_render.go (3)
src/internal/ui/spf_renderers.go (1)
ProcessBarRenderer(111-115)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go (2)
genProcessBarModel(10-25)Test_processBarModelUpDown(38-150)src/internal/handle_panel_navigation.go (1)
focusOnProcessBar(166-178)
src/internal/model_msg.go (3)
src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (3)
ProcessState(37-37)Failed(44-44)Successful(42-42)src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (2)
UpdateMsg(5-8)Cmd(3-3)src/internal/test_utils.go (2)
TeaUpdate(75-84)TeaUpdateWithErrCheck(86-90)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go (4)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
Model(12-26)src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (3)
Cmd(3-3)UpdateMsg(5-8)BaseMsg(11-13)src/internal/ui/processbar/error.go (1)
ProcessChannelFullError(3-4)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (2)
Process(13-21)NewProcess(23-34)
src/internal/model.go (1)
src/internal/utils/ui_utils.go (1)
FooterWidth(6-8)
src/internal/file_operations_compress.go (4)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (2)
Model(12-26)New(28-30)src/config/icon/icon.go (2)
CompressFile(24-24)Space(10-10)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (3)
Cancelled(43-43)Failed(44-44)Successful(42-42)src/internal/handle_file_operation_test.go (1)
TestCompressSelectedFiles(15-178)
src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go (2)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
Model(12-26)src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go (2)
NewProcess(23-34)Process(13-21)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
src/internal/key_function.go (1)
24-37: Navigation method rename applied correctlyThe key-handling path now calls the exported
ListUp/ListDownwithfooterHeight; compilation and behaviour stay consistent with the new process-bar API.src/internal/ui/processbar/const.go (1)
3-7: Constant definitions look goodReasonable defaults, unexported names keep the surface area minimal.
src/internal/file_operation_compress_test.go (5)
13-13: LGTM! Import addition for new processbar package.The import is necessary for the processbar integration in the test functions.
17-19: Excellent test setup pattern for process bar integration.The setup follows best practices:
- Fresh process bar model for each test
- Proper async listener initialization
- Guaranteed cleanup using
t.Cleanup()This ensures tests are isolated and don't leak resources.
90-90: Function call updated correctly for new processbar integration.The
&processBarparameter aligns with the refactoredzipSourcesfunction signature that now accepts a processbar model for progress tracking.
138-140: Consistent test setup pattern maintained.The process bar setup is identical to the previous test function, maintaining consistency and following the same resource management pattern.
147-147: Function call consistently updated.Both test functions now correctly pass the process bar model to
zipSources, maintaining consistency across the test suite.src/internal/model_test.go (2)
14-14: Import addition for processbar integration.The import is necessary for using the new processbar API in the test function.
113-118: Correct migration to processbar public API.The test properly uses the new
AddOrUpdateProcessmethod with theprocessbar.Processstruct, replacing direct internal state manipulation. The process configuration maintains the test's original intent while using the proper public API.src/internal/default_config.go (2)
7-7: Import addition for processbar package.The import is necessary for using the
processbar.New()constructor in the model initialization.
21-21: Clean migration to processbar constructor pattern.Using
processbar.New()is consistent with the other model initializations (sidebar.New(),metadata.New()) and follows good encapsulation practices by delegating initialization to the package's constructor function.src/internal/function.go (1)
349-362: LGTM! Clean adapter function for Bubble Tea integration.The
processCmdToTeaCmdfunction provides a clean bridge between the processbar package and Bubble Tea framework. The nil safety check prevents potential panics, and the message wrapping correctly includes both the update message and request ID.src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update_test.go (1)
5-17: Well-planned test coverage for update message handling.The TODO comments outline comprehensive test scenarios including edge cases like channel limits, timeouts, and concurrency handling. This provides a clear roadmap for implementing thorough tests for the processbar update messaging system.
src/internal/model_render.go (1)
196-198: Excellent refactoring to delegate rendering responsibility.The simplification of
processBarRender()to delegate toprocessbar.Model.Render()is a great example of separation of concerns. The main model no longer needs to handle the complexity of process bar rendering, state validation, and cursor management - all of which are now encapsulated in the dedicated processbar package.src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils_test.go (1)
9-32: Comprehensive test coverage for model utility methods.The test thoroughly validates the utility methods including:
- Dimension calculations and initial state verification
- Process counting and management
- Request counter behavior
- Model validation logic including edge cases with invalid cursor positions
The test structure is clean and covers both normal operation and boundary conditions effectively.
src/internal/ui/processbar/error.go (1)
3-24: Well-designed custom error types with clear context.The error types are properly implemented with descriptive messages and relevant context:
ProcessChannelFullErrorfor channel capacity issuesNoProcessFoundErrorandProcessAlreadyExistsErrorinclude process IDs for debugging- All follow Go error handling conventions with clear, actionable messages
src/internal/ui/processbar/model_navigation_test.go (1)
10-176: Well-structured navigation tests!The test coverage is comprehensive with good use of table-driven tests. All edge cases including wrapping behavior and render window adjustments are properly tested.
src/internal/type.go (1)
7-7: Clean migration to the processbar package.The changes correctly replace the local process bar implementation with the new modular
processbarpackage. The simplification of thechannelMessagestruct by removingprocessNewStatealigns well with the new architecture where process state management is encapsulated within the processbar package.Also applies to: 85-85, 231-236
src/internal/file_operations_extract.go (1)
14-17: Good error handling pattern.The distinction between critical errors (process spawn failure) that return early and non-critical errors (process update failures) that are logged but don't affect the operation result is appropriate. This ensures the extraction operation can complete even if UI updates fail.
Also applies to: 37-42
src/internal/file_operations_compress.go (1)
93-94: Good use of non-blocking progress updates.Using
TrySendingUpdateProcessNameMsgduring the file walking loop is appropriate - it ensures progress updates don't block the compression operation if the UI is slow to process updates.src/internal/handle_file_operations.go (1)
121-154: Excellent refactoring to the new processbar model.Both
deleteOperationandexecutePasteOperationhave been cleanly refactored to use the new processbar package. The error handling is comprehensive, state transitions are appropriate, and the use of non-blocking updates during operations ensures UI responsiveness.Also applies to: 234-355
src/internal/model_msg.go (1)
70-76: Consider propagating errors from process bar updatesErrors from applying process bar updates are only logged, not propagated. This could hide critical failures.
Consider whether silently logging errors is appropriate here, or if errors should be propagated to trigger UI notifications or recovery mechanisms.
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (1)
115-118: No issue with Progress.Width modification
The width assignment is applied to the localcurProcesscopy immediately before rendering. Since you use that modified copy for output, there’s no need to persist the change back to the map or slice.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
lazysegtree
added
refactoring
high priority
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Complex Method, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 3 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 7.84 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 7.84 | Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
| "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles/textinput" | ||
| tea "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am sorry, I cannot fix all code issues in one PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (3)
28-45: Remove redundant SetDimensions call and consider pointer return type.Two optimization opportunities:
Redundant call: Line 43 calls
SetDimensions(width, height)after already settingm.width = widthandm.height = heightin lines 37-38. This is unnecessary.Return type: The comment on line 32 correctly notes that returning a pointer would be more efficient for this struct.
-func NewModelWithOptions(width int, height int) Model { +func NewModelWithOptions(width int, height int) *Model { m := Model{ renderIndex: 0, cursor: 0, - width: width, - height: height, processes: make(map[string]Process), msgChan: make(chan UpdateMsg, msgChannelSize), reqCnt: 0, } m.SetDimensions(width, height) - return m + return &mPlease verify that constants
minWidth,minHeight, andmsgChannelSizeare properly defined in the package.
47-56: Improve dimension validation specificity.The current validation resets both dimensions to defaults even if only one is invalid. Consider more granular validation:
func (m *Model) SetDimensions(width int, height int) { - if height < minHeight || width < minWidth { - slog.Warn("Invalid width or height, ignoring passed values", "height", height, "width", width) - width = minWidth - height = minHeight - } + if width < minWidth { + slog.Warn("Invalid width, using minimum", "provided", width, "minimum", minWidth) + width = minWidth + } + if height < minHeight { + slog.Warn("Invalid height, using minimum", "provided", height, "minimum", minHeight) + height = minHeight + } m.width = width m.height = height }This provides more specific feedback and only corrects the invalid dimension.
83-90: LGTM! Correct logic with performance consideration.The method correctly identifies running processes using appropriate state and progress checks.
Note that this has O(n) complexity which could become a performance concern as the processes map grows (related to the memory leak issue documented in the struct). Consider caching this result or maintaining a counter if called frequently.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/internal/model.go(9 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go(1 hunks)src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils_test.go(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/internal/ui/processbar/model_test.go
- src/internal/model.go
- src/internal/ui/processbar/model_utils_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#906
File: src/internal/file_panel.go:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T05:32:53.131Z
Learning: lazysegtree is concerned about the efficiency impact of adding bounds checking to frequently called methods like getSelectedItem() in file panels, preferring to defer such changes to consider performance implications.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
PR: yorukot/superfile#953
File: website/public/install.ps1:25-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T08:49:13.055Z
Learning: In the superfile PowerShell installer (website/public/install.ps1), lazysegtree prefers that users supply correct environment variable values (like SPF_INSTALL_VERSION without leading 'v') rather than adding validation code to handle malformed input, following the principle that users should provide properly formatted values.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/internal/ui/processbar/model.go (2)
1-9: LGTM! Clean package structure and appropriate imports.The package name and imports are well-organized and serve the model's functionality appropriately.
58-81: LGTM! Well-designed process management API.The process management methods provide clear semantics:
AddProcess: Prevents duplicates with proper error handlingAddOrUpdateProcess: Upsert behavior for convenienceUpdateExistingProcess: Safe updates with existence validationGetByID: Standard Go idiom with ok booleanThe error handling with custom error types is appropriate and the API design follows Go conventions.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
processbar_improv
branch
from
15c86ec to
981862f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Complex Method, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 3 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 7.84 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 7.84 | Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Complex Method, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 3 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 7.84 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 7.84 | Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
| "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles/textinput" | ||
| tea "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am sorry, I cannot fix all code issues in one PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Complex Method, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 3 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 7.84 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 7.84 | Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Complex Method, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 3 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 7.83 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 7.83 | Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 7.89 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 7.89 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
| "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles/textinput" | ||
| tea "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ New issue: Primitive Obsession
In this module, 68.0% of all function arguments are primitive types, threshold = 40.0%
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cant fix that in this PR
| "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles/textinput" | ||
| tea "github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss" | ||
| "github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ New issue: String Heavy Function Arguments
In this module, 48.0% of all arguments to its 32 functions are strings. The threshold for string arguments is 39.0%
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cant fix that in this PR
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
processbar_improv
branch
from
477f563 to
6496b64
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
processbar_improv
branch
from
92a5c15 to
9fb2354
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(5 files improve in Code Health)
Gates Failed
(1 hotspot with Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments)
Gates Passed
See analysis details in CodeScene
Reason for failure
| Prevent hotspot decline | Violations | Code Health Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| model.go | 2 rules in this hotspot | 7.62 → 8.02 | Suppress |
View Improvements
| File | Code Health Impact | Categories Improved |
|---|---|---|
| file_operations.go | no change | Complex Method, Overall Code Complexity, Primitive Obsession, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| function.go | no change | Overall Code Complexity, String Heavy Function Arguments |
| handle_file_operations.go | 7.55 → 7.89 | Bumpy Road Ahead, Overall Code Complexity |
| handle_panel_up_down.go | 9.24 → 9.84 | Code Duplication |
| handle_panel_up_down_test.go | 8.78 → 9.35 | Large Method |
| model.go | 7.62 → 8.02 | Complex Method, Complex Conditional, Overall Code Complexity |
| model_render.go | 7.30 → 7.53 | Complex Method |
Absence of Expected Change Pattern
- superfile/src/config/icon/function.go is usually changed with: superfile/src/config/icon/icon.go
Quality Gate Profile: The Bare Minimum
Want more control? Customize Code Health rules or catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
…agement (#973) This includes these PRs - #970 Related issues - #819 - #946 (This PR fixes unsafe access to channel ) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Introduced a new process bar UI component for tracking and displaying progress of concurrent operations. * Added navigation and interaction capabilities for the process bar, including cursor movement and process selection. * Enhanced operation feedback with state icons and progress indicators. * **Improvements** * Unified and streamlined progress reporting and state management across file operations (copy, paste, compress, extract, delete) using the new process bar model. * Improved debug logging and UI rendering statistics for main and footer panels. * Enhanced error handling and user feedback for process-related actions. * Simplified and refactored internal progress update mechanisms and message handling. * **Bug Fixes** * Fixed capitalization of navigation methods for process bar controls. * **Documentation** * Added a README for the process bar component with usage instructions and testing plans. * **Tests** * Added comprehensive unit tests for process bar model utilities, navigation, and process management. * Updated and removed obsolete tests to align with the new process bar implementation. * **Chores** * Updated workflow configurations to run CI on both main and develop branches. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores