Skip to content

Conversation

@legobeat
Copy link
Contributor

@legobeat legobeat commented Apr 17, 2024

Description

The runtime dependencies eth-json-rpc-filters and json-rpc-engine are both deprecated. This replaces them with their successors @metamask/eth-json-rpc-filters and @metamask/json-rpc-engine, respectively.

Related issues

Manual testing steps

n/a

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

n/a

After

n/a

Pre-merge author checklist

  • I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
  • I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
  • I’ve included tests if applicable
  • I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
  • I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@legobeat legobeat changed the title Deps eth json rpc filters fix(deps): upgrade eth-json-rpc-filters, eth-json-rpc-engine Apr 17, 2024
@socket-security
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Apr 17, 2024

👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored.

View full report↗︎

@legobeat legobeat added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file team-application-security Application security team labels Apr 17, 2024
@legobeat legobeat force-pushed the deps-eth-json-rpc-filters branch from b3da306 to 27ade1b Compare April 17, 2024 04:30
@legobeat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SocketSecurity ignore npm/@metamask/eth-json-rpc-infura@9.1.0

@socket-security
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Apr 17, 2024

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@metamask/eth-json-rpc-filters@7.0.0 None 0 24.6 kB lgbot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/eth-json-rpc-filters@4.2.2

View full report↗︎

@legobeat legobeat force-pushed the deps-eth-json-rpc-filters branch 4 times, most recently from 53c8a35 to 69be175 Compare April 18, 2024 21:09
@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@legobeat legobeat force-pushed the deps-eth-json-rpc-filters branch 3 times, most recently from a443778 to 9b7463f Compare April 18, 2024 22:03
@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

🔄🔄🔄 pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline started on Bitrise...🔄🔄🔄

Commit hash: 8920824
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/53b4eec6-1e48-4c84-8fd7-aaa5dcf16513

Note

  • This comment will auto-update when build completes
  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 8920824
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/53b4eec6-1e48-4c84-8fd7-aaa5dcf16513

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

3 similar comments
@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 8920824
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/53b4eec6-1e48-4c84-8fd7-aaa5dcf16513

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 8920824
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/53b4eec6-1e48-4c84-8fd7-aaa5dcf16513

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 8920824
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/53b4eec6-1e48-4c84-8fd7-aaa5dcf16513

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

@Mrtenz Mrtenz removed their request for review July 4, 2024 09:12
@legobeat
Copy link
Contributor Author

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
…^8.0.0 (#12024)

## **Description**

Replace deprecated `eth-json-rpc-filters` with
`@metamask/eth-json-rpc-filters`.

## **Related issues**

- Part of: #12047
- Broken out from: #9274, #11952
- Follow-up to: #11980


## **Manual testing steps**


## **Screenshots/Recordings**

### **Before**

### **After**

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
@mcmire mcmire removed their request for review November 20, 2024 16:22
@NicolasMassart NicolasMassart self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2025

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 90 days. It will be closed in 7 days. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Issues that have not had activity in the last 90 days label Mar 3, 2025
@legobeat legobeat closed this Mar 10, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs more work from the author to Merged, Closed or Archived in PR review queue Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file DO-NOT-MERGE Pull requests that should not be merged stale Issues that have not had activity in the last 90 days team-application-security Application security team

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants