Skip to content

Conversation

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung commented Oct 29, 2025

Try spinning longer to get more ticks on flaky platforms and reduce flakiness.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2025-10-29.md

Try spinning longer to get more ticks on flaky platforms
and reduce flakiness.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Oct 29, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.56%. Comparing base (bfcf2f7) to head (a232240).
⚠️ Report is 41 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #60492      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.58%   88.56%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         704      704              
  Lines      207774   207828      +54     
  Branches    40026    40035       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits       184050   184070      +20     
- Misses      15759    15805      +46     
+ Partials     7965     7953      -12     

see 46 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we run a stress test CI?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants