refactor(behavior_velocity_planner): new framework for creating virtual wall markers

[maxime-clem]

Description

Implement a new framework for managing virtual wall markers in the behavior_velocity_planner.
This simplifies the creation of the markers, moving the responsibility of (1) assigning unique IDs and (2) creating DELETE markers from scene modules to scene managers.

Before	After
Each scene directly creates markers using the VirtualWallMarkerCreator class	Each scene creates VirtualWall objects and each manager creates the markers using the VirtualWallMarkerCreator class

Tests performed

Test by visualizing virtual walls in the simple planning simulator.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 19.90% and project coverage change: -0.95 ⚠️

Comparison is base (527aaf7) 15.09% compared to head (39c9409) 14.14%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3851      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   15.09%   14.14%   -0.95%     
==========================================
  Files        1332     1441     +109     
  Lines       94938   101617    +6679     
  Branches    27063    27123      +60     
==========================================
+ Hits        14330    14376      +46     
- Misses      64920    71493    +6573     
- Partials    15688    15748      +60     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	18.15% <19.90%> (?)
total	14.13% <ø> (-0.97%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 164fcd6

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
common/motion_utils/src/marker/marker_helper.cpp	55.00% <ø> (+27.41%)	⬆️
.../behavior_velocity_blind_spot_module/src/debug.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../behavior_velocity_blind_spot_module/src/scene.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...g/behavior_velocity_crosswalk_module/src/debug.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...avior_velocity_detection_area_module/src/debug.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ehavior_velocity_intersection_module/src/debug.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ity_intersection_module/src/scene_intersection.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ior_velocity_no_stopping_area_module/src/debug.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...avior_velocity_occlusion_spot_module/src/debug.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ocity_out_of_lane_module/src/scene_out_of_lane.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 12 more

... and 107 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[kyoichi-sugahara]

@maxime-clem
Thank you so much!!
I will check the behavior.

[kyoichi-sugahara]

LGTM

[soblin]

I really appreciate for you PR ! And adding gtests is really nice !

[TakaHoribe]

LGTM!!! Thank you!