Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(release): Bump to version 0.2.0 #4896

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
May 12, 2022
Merged

chore(release): Bump to version 0.2.0 #4896

merged 30 commits into from
May 12, 2022

Conversation

niheaven
Copy link
Member

@niheaven niheaven commented May 3, 2022

CHANGELOG

BREAKING CHANGES

Features

Bug Fixes

Performance Improvements

Code Refactoring

Builds

Documentation

Close Issues

Credits

Thanks to the following contributors (ordered by PR merging time):

@niheaven @rashil2000 @chawyehsu @e6c31d @tech189 @tmsmith @astelmachonak-nydig @kingster @kiennq @CrendKing @cskrisz @lewis-yeung

niheaven and others added 26 commits March 10, 2022 00:30
* fix(update): Skip logs starting with `(chore)`

* Update CHANGELOG.md
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-nan Cheung <niheaven@gmail.com>
* scoop-download failure check, aria2 warn if uninstalled

* Revert core.ps1

* Update CHANGELOG.md
* Update README.md

* Update CHANGELOG.md
* added ability to use private github repositories

To do this, define a gh_api_token in the sccop config, if the repository is private it will use the apis to get and use the asset id

* corrected inherited linting error

* updated url to pull filename

* inlined get_headers and get-members functions and updated changelog

* simplified host headers and switched to checkver_token from: astelmachonak-nydig

* added ability to use private github repositories

To do this, define a gh_api_token in the sccop config, if the repository is private it will use the apis to get and use the asset id

* updated url to pull filename

* inlined get_headers and get-members functions and updated changelog

* simplified host headers and switched to checkver_token from: astelmachonak-nydig

* Update lib/core.ps1

Co-authored-by: Rashil Gandhi <46838874+rashil2000@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update lib/core.ps1

Co-authored-by: Rashil Gandhi <46838874+rashil2000@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix RegEx

* Some tweaks

* optimize

Co-authored-by: Rashil Gandhi <46838874+rashil2000@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-nan Cheung <niheaven@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rashil Gandhi <rashil2000@gmail.com>
…KEN to SCOOP_GH_TOKEN (#4832)

* Properly filtering null input in dl function when private_hosts is not set in config

* Rename checkver_token to gh_token and SCOOP_CHECKVER_TOKEN to SCOOP_GH_TOKEN
* Update scoop-shim.ps1

* Update CHANGELOG.md
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-nan Cheung <niheaven@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rashil Gandhi <rashil2000@gmail.com>
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 3, 2022

I created PR to GithubActions repo, needed for the new version due to the breaking change with config parameter rename: ScoopInstaller/GithubActions#7

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rasa
Copy link
Member

rasa commented May 4, 2022

Can we consider merging either #4870 or #4892 to dual license with MIT, per the discussion in #4868?

@niheaven
Copy link
Member Author

niheaven commented May 4, 2022

Can we consider merging either #4870 or #4892 to dual license with MIT, per the discussion in #4868?

That's what I'm thinking of, and should we vote for which one is to be merged?

@rasa
Copy link
Member

rasa commented May 5, 2022

That's what I'm thinking of, and should we vote for which one is to be merged?

Sure. #4870 is mergable once the strikeout text is cleaned up. I tried fixing #4870 but GitHub's UI wouldn't let me, which spurred me to create #4892, not to negate @Tyler887's work, but simply to express a preference.

Here's the poll:


@chawyehsu
Copy link
Member

chawyehsu commented May 5, 2022

I saw there are insignificant commits adding to #4870 which make no sense to me at all. If @Tyler887 has no intention of fixing them, including the strikeout problem, I would vote #4892 but it needs tweaks. Basically I prefer one merged license file over two seperated licenses at this point.

@niheaven
Copy link
Member Author

niheaven commented May 5, 2022

Reimplement #4870 via #4903, if one file is better, we could edit there, merge it and move on.

@rasa
Copy link
Member

rasa commented May 5, 2022

#4903 works for me, thx!

@niheaven niheaven marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2022 10:34
@niheaven niheaven requested a review from a team May 8, 2022 10:35
@niheaven niheaven merged commit aaa726c into master May 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment