Skip to content

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Jul 21, 2025

  • Switched the definition of REC track to point to the full list of maturity stages, rather than the summarized version of it.
  • Move a few paragraphs around, for ease of reading

Preview | Diff

* Switched the definition of REC track to point to the full list of
maturity stages, rather than the summarized version of it.
* Move a few paragraphs around, for ease of reading

Co-authored-by: fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net>
@frivoal frivoal added AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. Agenda+ Marks issues or pull requests that are ready for discussion or consideration at the next meeting Type: Editorial improvements Editorial improvements or errors that do not affect interpretation of the document labels Jul 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@gmail.com>
@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Editorial reorg of text defining REC statuses, and agreed to the following:

  • RESOLVED: Adopt PR 1079 with additional tweak above.
The full IRC log of that discussion <fantasai> Subtopic: Editorial reorg of text defining REC statuses
<fantasai> github: https://github.com//pull/1079
<fantasai> FLorian: Main point of this one is, one sentence (Defining "recommendation track document")
<fantasai> ... That used to be below an informal summary of 4 statuses
<fantasai> ... The core of this change is to move this sentence to the start of the list of maturity stages
<fantasai> ... A REC trackd document being one in any of those stages
<fantasai> ... The rest of the PR moves paragraphs around without changing them, to make things more readable.
<fantasai> ... (No text changes to any other sentence.)
<fantasai> ... I feel confident this is editorial
<fantasai> Ian: [projects and asks some questions about the PR changes]
<fantasai> Ian: It occurs to me that the happy path and diagram are valuable
<fantasai> ... but they don't capture all the states
<fantasai> ... I'm wondering with an additional tweak to this section might be
<fantasai> ... instead of "consists of", but "the steps to Recommendation"
<fantasai> ... "consists of" is overconstraining
<fantasai> florian: "In summary, the main steps along the Recommendation Track are ..."
<plh> +1
<fantasai> florian: I'd be happy with that. plh? Brent? fantasai?
<fantasai> fantasai: wfm
<fantasai> brent: Makes sense to me
<fantasai> florian: OK, I'll make in GH the suggested tweak, and if we like it we can resolve to adopt the whole thing.
<Ian> "In summary, the W3C Recommendation Track consists of:" -> In summary, the main steps on the W3C Recommendation Track are:"
<fantasai> ... Proposed change is that like 3462 changed to "In summary, the main steps on the W3C Recommendation Track are"
<Ian> Ian: +1
<plh> +1
<florian> +1
<fantasai> RESOLVED: Adopt PR 1079 with additional tweak above.

@css-meeting-bot css-meeting-bot removed the Agenda+ Marks issues or pull requests that are ready for discussion or consideration at the next meeting label Jul 23, 2025
@frivoal frivoal added the Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion label Jul 23, 2025
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process2025 milestone Jul 23, 2025
@frivoal frivoal merged commit d4a28c0 into w3c:main Jul 23, 2025
2 checks passed
@frivoal frivoal deleted the editorial-reorg branch July 23, 2025 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Type: Editorial improvements Editorial improvements or errors that do not affect interpretation of the document
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants