Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
41 changes: 20 additions & 21 deletions index.bs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3459,7 +3459,7 @@ The W3C Recommendation Track</h3>
and if there is support from its Membership,
W3C publishes it as a <a href="#RecsW3C">Recommendation</a>.

In summary, the <dfn lt="W3C Recommendation Track | REC Track | Recommendation Track | Recommendation-track">W3C Recommendation Track</dfn> consists of:
In summary, the main steps of <dfn lt="W3C Recommendation Track | REC Track | Recommendation Track | Recommendation-track">W3C Recommendation Track</dfn> are:

<ol>
<li>Publication of the [=First Public Working Draft=].
Expand All @@ -3468,33 +3468,32 @@ The W3C Recommendation Track</h3>
<li>Publication as a [=W3C Recommendation=].
</ol>

A <dfn export lt="W3C Recommendation Track document | REC Track document | Recommendation Track document | Recommendation-track document">W3C Recommendation Track document</dfn>
is any document whose current status is one of the four in the numbered list above.

<figure>
<pre class=include-raw>
path: basic-rec-track.svg
</pre>
<figcaption>Non-Normative Summary of the [=Recommendation Track=]</figcaption>
</figure>

This Process defines certain [=Recommendation Track=] publications as <dfn>Patent Review Drafts</dfn>.
Under the 2004 Patent Policy (and its 2017 update) [[!PATENT-POLICY-2004]],
these correspond to “Last Call Working Draft” in the Patent Policy;
Starting from the 2020 Patent Policy [[!PATENT-POLICY-2020]],
these correspond to “Patent Review Draft” in the Patent Policy [[!PATENT-POLICY]].

W3C <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="#tr-end">end work on a technical report</a> at any time.

Only sufficiently technically mature work should be advanced.
As described in [[#transition-reqs]],
the [=Team=] will decline a request to advance in maturity stage
and return the specification to a [=Working Group=] for further work
if it determines that the requirements for advancement
have not been met.

Note: Should faster advancement to meet scheduling considerations be desired,
this can be achieved by reducing the scope of the technical report to a subset that is adequately mature and deferring
less stable features to other technical reports.

W3C <em class="rfc2119">may</em> <a href="#tr-end">end work on a technical report</a> at any time.

<h4 id="maturity-stages">
Maturity Stages on the Recommendation Track</h4>

A <dfn export lt="W3C Recommendation Track document | REC Track document | Recommendation Track document | Recommendation-track document">W3C Recommendation Track document</dfn>
is any document whose current status is one of those described in this section.

<dl>
<dt>
<dfn id="RecsWD" export lt="W3C Working Draft | Working Draft | WD">Working Draft</dfn> (<abbr>WD</abbr>)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3690,11 +3689,16 @@ Maturity Stages on the Recommendation Track</h4>

</dl>

Only sufficiently technically mature work should be advanced.
This Process defines certain [=Recommendation Track=] publications as <dfn>Patent Review Drafts</dfn>.
Under the 2004 Patent Policy (and its 2017 update) [[!PATENT-POLICY-2004]],
these correspond to “Last Call Working Draft” in the Patent Policy;
Starting from the 2020 Patent Policy [[!PATENT-POLICY-2020]],
these correspond to “Patent Review Draft” in the Patent Policy [[!PATENT-POLICY]].

Note: Should faster advancement to meet scheduling considerations be desired,
this can be achieved by reducing the scope of the technical report to a subset that is adequately mature and deferring
less stable features to other technical reports.
[=Working Groups=] and [=Interest Groups=] <em class="rfc2119">may</em> make available [=Editor's drafts=].
<dfn export lt="Editor's Draft | Editor Draft | ED">Editor's drafts</dfn> (<abbr>ED</abbr>) have no official standing whatsoever,
and do not necessarily imply consensus of a [=Working Group=] or [=Interest Group=],
nor are their contents endorsed in any way by W3C.

When publishing an updated version of an existing [=Candidate Recommendation=] or [=Recommendation=],
technical reports are expected to meet the same maturity criteria as when they are first published under that status.
Expand All @@ -3704,11 +3708,6 @@ Maturity Stages on the Recommendation Track</h4>
it is also permissible to publish an updated [=CR=] or [=REC=] following the usual process,
even if only some of these flaws have been satisfactorily addressed.

[=Working Groups=] and [=Interest Groups=] <em class="rfc2119">may</em> make available [=Editor's drafts=].
<dfn export lt="Editor's Draft | Editor Draft | ED">Editor's drafts</dfn> (<abbr>ED</abbr>) have no official standing whatsoever,
and do not necessarily imply consensus of a [=Working Group=] or [=Interest Group=],
nor are their contents endorsed in any way by W3C.

<h4 id="implementation-experience">
Implementation Experience</h4>

Expand Down