Chore: Replace filter(array) with array.filter() in most places#6147
Merged
connortsui20 merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom Jan 27, 2026
Merged
Chore: Replace filter(array) with array.filter() in most places#6147connortsui20 merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
filter(array) with array.filter() in most places#6147connortsui20 merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
Conversation
8abe15d to
52e8194
Compare
ac91262 to
48d1a81
Compare
52e8194 to
146bfad
Compare
581a7e9 to
703fcba
Compare
146bfad to
02b1cf1
Compare
703fcba to
4940e77
Compare
connortsui20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
I also removed some benchmarks (3) that now no longer benchmark anything useful. We'll soon want a way to benchmark the execution of arbitrary arrays, and they should all share similar benchmarking logic. In a follow up PR (#6147) I will remove every occurrence of the old `filter` compute function! mwa ha ha --------- Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
02b1cf1 to
481ad96
Compare
connortsui20
commented
Jan 27, 2026
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
| // SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright the Vortex contributors | ||
|
|
||
| // TODO(connor): REMOVE THIS FILE! |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Eventually we will be able to remove this file completely, but only after we figure out how to deal with the 8 or so stray filter arrays
Contributor
Author
|
Note that develop is currently broken because of an issue with |
Contributor
Benchmarks: FineWeb NVMeSummary
Detailed Results Table
|
Contributor
Benchmarks: TPC-H SF=1 on NVMESummary
Detailed Results Table
|
Contributor
Benchmarks: TPC-H SF=1 on S3Summary
Detailed Results Table
|
Contributor
Benchmarks: TPC-DS SF=1 on NVMESummary
Detailed Results Table
|
Contributor
Benchmarks: TPC-H SF=10 on NVMESummary
Detailed Results Table
|
Contributor
Benchmarks: FineWeb S3Summary
Detailed Results Table
|
Contributor
Benchmarks: Statistical and Population GeneticsSummary
Detailed Results Table
|
Contributor
Benchmarks: TPC-H SF=10 on S3Summary
Detailed Results Table
|
connortsui20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2026
This is a mostly cosmetic change to remove the old filter compute kernels from the `FilterArray` implementation, placing the code in `vortex-array/src/arrays/filter/execute` instead of dispersed everywhere. The non-cosmetic changes are trivial, just making some things cleaner to understand. This is based on top of #6147, which is also based on top of #6146 --------- Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
danking
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
I also removed some benchmarks (3) that now no longer benchmark anything useful. We'll soon want a way to benchmark the execution of arbitrary arrays, and they should all share similar benchmarking logic. In a follow up PR (#6147) I will remove every occurrence of the old `filter` compute function! mwa ha ha --------- Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
danking
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
…6147) This is based on top of #6146, that needs to merge first. Simply changes the syntax so that we use the new `FilterArray`, so this is purely a cosmetic change after #6146. Note that I only made the change when this gets called inside one of the old compute functions, and the code for all of the old filter compute are going to be moved around soon so this is fine. There are just a few places (around 8) where we call the old `filter` _outside_ of the old compute kernels. I've left those as is so it's easy to search for them later. We still have to figure out what to do with them. Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
danking
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
This is a mostly cosmetic change to remove the old filter compute kernels from the `FilterArray` implementation, placing the code in `vortex-array/src/arrays/filter/execute` instead of dispersed everywhere. The non-cosmetic changes are trivial, just making some things cleaner to understand. This is based on top of #6147, which is also based on top of #6146 --------- Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is based on top of #6146, that needs to merge first.
Simply changes the syntax so that we use the new
FilterArray, so this is purely a cosmetic change after #6146.Note that I only made the change when this gets called inside one of the old compute functions, and the code for all of the old filter compute are going to be moved around soon so this is fine.
There are just a few places (around 8) where we call the old
filteroutside of the old compute kernels. I've left those as is so it's easy to search for them later. We still have to figure out what to do with them.