Skip to content

Chore: Replace filter(array) with array.filter() in most places #6147

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
connortsui20 merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2026

replace `filter(array)` with `array.filter()` in most places

481ad96
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

Chore: Replace filter(array) with array.filter() in most places #6147

replace `filter(array)` with `array.filter()` in most places
481ad96
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Jan 27, 2026

Performance Regression: -29.49%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 9 improved benchmarks
❌ 37 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1115 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1323 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 128)] 166.7 µs 185.4 µs -10.09%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 8)] 161.9 µs 181.2 µs -10.67%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 2)] 162.1 µs 181.5 µs -10.68%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 32)] 163.2 µs 182.4 µs -10.51%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 4)] 161.8 µs 180.8 µs -10.52%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 128)] 904.2 µs 1,094.7 µs -17.4%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2048)] 1 ms 1.2 ms -15.94%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 32)] 901.5 µs 1,092.4 µs -17.48%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 4)] 900.2 µs 1,090.6 µs -17.46%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 8)] 900.2 µs 1,091 µs -17.49%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 512)] 962.4 µs 1,152.6 µs -16.5%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2)] 900.2 µs 1,090.4 µs -17.45%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(10000, 2)] 166.8 µs 186 µs -10.32%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(10000, 32)] 170.7 µs 190.4 µs -10.35%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(10000, 8)] 167 µs 186.9 µs -10.63%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 128)] 921.1 µs 1,112.2 µs -17.18%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 2048)] 1.2 ms 1.4 ms -13.52%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 4)] 904.3 µs 1,095.5 µs -17.45%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 32)] 908.7 µs 1,099.5 µs -17.35%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 8)] 905.1 µs 1,096 µs -17.42%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Comparing ct/remove-old-filter-compute (481ad96) with develop (d4d3238)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1323 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ