[pull] master from torvalds:master #4
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![pull[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12910?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Request for color processing blocks only if they are available in the display hw catalog and they are sufficient in number for the selection. Signed-off-by: Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@codeaurora.org> Fixes: e47616d ("drm/msm/dpu: add support for color processing Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
In function msm_submitqueue_create, the queue is a local variable, in return -EINVAL branch, queue didn`t add to ctx`s list yet, and also didn`t kfree, this maybe bring in potential memleak. Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com> [trivial commit msg fixup] Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Fix to return negative error code -ENOMEM with the use of ERR_PTR from dpu_encoder_init. Fixes: 25fdd59 ("drm/msm: Add SDM845 DPU support") Signed-off-by: Chen Tao <chentao107@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
In the current implementation, mutex initialization for encoder mutex locks are done during encoder setup. This can lead to scenarios where the lock is used before it is initialized. Move mutex_init to dpu_encoder_init to avoid this. Signed-off-by: Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
This week I started seeing GPU crashes on my DragonBoard 845c which I narrowed down to being caused by commit ccac7ce ("drm/msm: Refactor address space initialization"). Looking through the patch, Jordan and I couldn't find anything obviously wrong, so I ended up breaking that change up into a number of smaller logical steps so I could figure out which part was causing the trouble. Ends up, visually counting 'f's is hard, esp across a number of lines: 0xfffffff != 0xffffffff This patch corrects the end value we pass in to msm_gem_address_space_create() in adreno_iommu_create_address_space() so that it matches the value used before the problematic patch landed. With this change, I no longer see the GPU crashes that were affecting me. Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org> Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Fixes: ccac7ce ("drm/msm: Refactor address space initialization") Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
_PLANE_CTL_3_A, _PLANE_CTL_3_B and _PLANE_SURF_3_A are handled, but miss _PLANE_SURF_3_B. Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200601030457.14002-1-colin.xu@intel.com
D_CFL was incorrectly removed for: GAMT_CHKN_BIT_REG GEN9_CTX_PREEMPT_REG V2: Update commit message. V3: Rebase and split Fixes and mis-handled MMIO. Fixes: 43226e6 (drm/i915/gvt: replaced register address with name) Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200601030638.16002-1-colin.xu@intel.com
Using _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE macro to set mask register bits is straight forward and not likely to go wrong. However when checking which bit(s) is(are) enabled, simply bitwise AND value and _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE() won't output expected result. Suppose the register write is disabling bit 1 by setting 0xFFFF0000, however "& _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(1)" outputs 0x00010000, and the non-zero check will pass which cause the old code consider the new value set as an enabling operation. We found guest set 0x80008000 on boot, and set 0xffff8000 during resume. Both are legal settings but old code will block latter and force vgpu enter fail-safe mode. Introduce two new macro and make proper masked bit check in mmio handler: IS_MASKED_BITS_ENABLED() IS_MASKED_BITS_DISABLED() V2: Rebase. Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200601030721.17129-1-colin.xu@intel.com
GFP_KERNEL flag specifies a normal kernel allocation in which executing in process context without any locks and can sleep. mmio_diff takes sometime to finish all the diff compare and it has locks, continue using GFP_KERNEL will output below trace if LOCKDEP enabled. Use GFP_ATOMIC instead. V2: Rebase. ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 5.7.0-rc2 #400 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- is trying to acquire: ffffffffb47bea20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x0/0x30 and this task is already holding: ffff88845b85cc90 (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xcf/0x2e0 which would create a new lock dependency: (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} -> (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x40 shadow_context_status_change+0xfe/0x2f0 notifier_call_chain+0x6a/0xa0 __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xf0 execlists_schedule_out+0x42a/0x820 process_csb+0xe7/0x3e0 execlists_submission_tasklet+0x5c/0x1d0 tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0xeb/0x260 __do_softirq+0x11d/0x56f irq_exit+0xf6/0x100 do_IRQ+0x7f/0x160 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a cpuidle_enter_state+0xcd/0x5b0 cpuidle_enter+0x37/0x60 do_idle+0x337/0x3f0 cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 start_kernel+0x58b/0x5c5 secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290 alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0 init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0 workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325 kernel_init+0x8/0x116 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); local_irq_disable(); lock(&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock); lock(fs_reclaim); <Interrupt> lock(&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cat/1439: #0: ffff888444a23698 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read+0x49/0x680 #1: ffff88845b858068 (&gvt->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xc7/0x2e0 #2: ffff88845b85cc90 (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xcf/0x2e0 the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} ops: 31 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x2f/0x40 vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xcf/0x2e0 seq_read+0x242/0x680 full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0 vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0 ksys_read+0xc4/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x40 shadow_context_status_change+0xfe/0x2f0 notifier_call_chain+0x6a/0xa0 __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xf0 execlists_schedule_out+0x42a/0x820 process_csb+0xe7/0x3e0 execlists_submission_tasklet+0x5c/0x1d0 tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0xeb/0x260 __do_softirq+0x11d/0x56f irq_exit+0xf6/0x100 do_IRQ+0x7f/0x160 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a cpuidle_enter_state+0xcd/0x5b0 cpuidle_enter+0x37/0x60 do_idle+0x337/0x3f0 cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 start_kernel+0x58b/0x5c5 secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x40 shadow_context_status_change+0xfe/0x2f0 notifier_call_chain+0x6a/0xa0 __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xf0 execlists_schedule_in+0x2c8/0x690 __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x1303/0x1930 execlists_submit_request+0x1e7/0x230 submit_notify+0x105/0x2a4 __i915_sw_fence_complete+0xaa/0x380 __engine_park+0x313/0x5a0 ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x3e/0x90 intel_gt_resume+0x41e/0x440 intel_gt_init+0x283/0xbc0 i915_gem_init+0x197/0x240 i915_driver_probe+0xc2d/0x12e0 i915_pci_probe+0xa2/0x1e0 local_pci_probe+0x6f/0xb0 pci_device_probe+0x171/0x230 really_probe+0x17a/0x380 driver_probe_device+0x70/0xf0 device_driver_attach+0x82/0x90 __driver_attach+0x60/0x100 bus_for_each_dev+0xe4/0x140 bus_add_driver+0x257/0x2a0 driver_register+0xd3/0x150 i915_init+0x6d/0x80 do_one_initcall+0xb8/0x3a0 kernel_init_freeable+0x2b4/0x325 kernel_init+0x8/0x116 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 } __key.77812+0x0/0x40 ... acquired at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x260 mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150 intel_gvt_for_each_tracked_mmio+0x7b/0x140 vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0x111/0x2e0 seq_read+0x242/0x680 full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0 vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0 ksys_read+0xc4/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 the dependencies between the lock to be acquired and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: -> (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0} ops: 1999031 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290 alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0 init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0 workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325 kernel_init+0x8/0x116 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290 alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0 init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0 workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325 kernel_init+0x8/0x116 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290 alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0 init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0 workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325 kernel_init+0x8/0x116 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 } __fs_reclaim_map+0x0/0x60 ... acquired at: lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x260 mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150 intel_gvt_for_each_tracked_mmio+0x7b/0x140 vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0x111/0x2e0 seq_read+0x242/0x680 full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0 vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0 ksys_read+0xc4/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 stack backtrace: CPU: 5 PID: 1439 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.7.0-rc2 #400 Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7BEH/NUC8BEB, BIOS BECFL357.86A.0056.2018.1128.1717 11/28/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x97/0xe0 check_irq_usage.cold+0x428/0x434 ? check_usage_forwards+0x2c0/0x2c0 ? class_equal+0x11/0x20 ? __bfs+0xd2/0x2d0 ? in_any_class_list+0xa0/0xa0 ? check_path+0x22/0x40 ? check_noncircular+0x150/0x2b0 ? print_circular_bug.isra.0+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? mark_lock+0x13d/0xc50 ? __lock_acquire+0x1e32/0x39b0 __lock_acquire+0x1e32/0x39b0 ? timerqueue_add+0xc1/0x130 ? register_lock_class+0xa60/0xa60 ? mark_lock+0x13d/0xc50 lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0 ? __zone_pcp_update+0x80/0x80 ? check_flags.part.0+0x210/0x210 ? mark_held_locks+0x65/0x90 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x40 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x190/0x290 ? fwtable_read32+0x163/0x480 ? mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30 ? __zone_pcp_update+0x80/0x80 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x260 mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150 ? vgpu_mmio_diff_open+0x30/0x30 intel_gvt_for_each_tracked_mmio+0x7b/0x140 vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0x111/0x2e0 ? mmio_diff_handler+0x150/0x150 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa0/0xb0 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xc0/0xc0 ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x33/0x40 ? __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xc2/0xd0 seq_read+0x242/0x680 ? debugfs_locked_down.isra.0+0x70/0x70 full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0 vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0 ksys_read+0xc4/0x160 ? kernel_write+0xb0/0xb0 ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 RIP: 0033:0x7ffbe3e6efb2 Code: c0 e9 c2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d ca cb 0a 00 e8 f5 19 02 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 RSP: 002b:00007ffd021c08a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007ffbe3e6efb2 RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007ffbe34cd000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffbe34cd000 R08: 00007ffbe34cc010 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000562b6f0a11f0 R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000 ------------[ cut here ]------------ Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200601035556.19999-1-colin.xu@intel.com
Previously the address space went from 16M to ~0u, but with the refactor one of the 'f's was dropped, limiting us to 256MB. Additionally, the new interface takes a start and size, not start and end, so we can't just copy and paste. Fixes regressions in dEQP-VK.memory.allocation.random.* Fixes: ccac7ce ("drm/msm: Refactor address space initialization") Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
We don't want it under CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE, we need it all the time (like the other GPUs do). Fixes: ccac7ce ("drm/msm: Refactor address space initialization") Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
msm_gem_address_space_create() changed to take a start/length instead of a start/end for the iova space but all of the callers were just cut and pasted from the old usage. Most of the mistakes have been fixed up so just catch up the rest. Fixes: ccac7ce ("drm/msm: Refactor address space initialization") Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
xlog_wait() on the CIL context can reference a freed context if the
waiter doesn't get scheduled before the CIL context is freed. This
can happen when a task is on the hard throttle and the CIL push
aborts due to a shutdown. This was detected by generic/019:
thread 1 thread 2
__xfs_trans_commit
xfs_log_commit_cil
<CIL size over hard throttle limit>
xlog_wait
schedule
xlog_cil_push_work
wake_up_all
<shutdown aborts commit>
xlog_cil_committed
kmem_free
remove_wait_queue
spin_lock_irqsave --> UAF
Fix it by moving the wait queue to the CIL rather than keeping it in
in the CIL context that gets freed on push completion. Because the
wait queue is now independent of the CIL context and we might have
multiple contexts in flight at once, only wake the waiters on the
push throttle when the context we are pushing is over the hard
throttle size threshold.
Fixes: 0e7ab7e ("xfs: Throttle commits on delayed background CIL push")
Reported-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Charan Teja reported a 'use-after-free' in dmabuffs_dname [1], which happens if the dma_buf_release() is called while the userspace is accessing the dma_buf pseudo fs's dmabuffs_dname() in another process, and dma_buf_release() releases the dmabuf object when the last reference to the struct file goes away. I discussed with Arnd Bergmann, and he suggested that rather than tying the dma_buf_release() to the file_operations' release(), we can tie it to the dentry_operations' d_release(), which will be called when the last ref to the dentry is removed. The path exercised by __fput() calls f_op->release() first, and then calls dput, which eventually calls d_op->d_release(). In the 'normal' case, when no userspace access is happening via dma_buf pseudo fs, there should be exactly one fd, file, dentry and inode, so closing the fd will kill of everything right away. In the presented case, the dentry's d_release() will be called only when the dentry's last ref is released. Therefore, lets move dma_buf_release() from fops->release() to d_ops->d_release() Many thanks to Arnd for his FS insights :) [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1238278/ Fixes: bb2bb90 ("dma-buf: add DMA_BUF_SET_NAME ioctls") Reported-by: syzbot+3643a18836bce555bff6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.3+] Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reported-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Tested-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611114418.19852-1-sumit.semwal@linaro.org
I updated my system with Radeon VII from kernel 5.6 to kernel 5.7, and following started to happen on each boot: ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000128 ... CPU: 9 PID: 1940 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G E 5.7.2-200.im0.fc32.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X570-P, BIOS 1407 04/02/2020 RIP: 0010:lock_bus+0x42/0x60 [amdgpu] ... Call Trace: i2c_smbus_xfer+0x3d/0xf0 i2c_default_probe+0xf3/0x130 i2c_detect.isra.0+0xfe/0x2b0 ? kfree+0xa3/0x200 ? kobject_uevent_env+0x11f/0x6a0 ? i2c_detect.isra.0+0x2b0/0x2b0 __process_new_driver+0x1b/0x20 bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0x90 ? 0xffffffffc0f34000 i2c_register_driver+0x73/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x46/0x200 ? _cond_resched+0x16/0x40 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x167/0x220 ? do_init_module+0x23/0x260 do_init_module+0x5c/0x260 __do_sys_init_module+0x14f/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 ... Error appears when some i2c device driver tries to probe for devices using adapter registered by `smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init()`. Code supporting this adapter requires `adev->psp.ras.ras` to be not NULL, which is true only when `amdgpu_ras_init()` detects HW support by calling `amdgpu_ras_check_supported()`. Before 9015d60, adapter was registered by -> amdgpu_device_ip_init() -> amdgpu_ras_recovery_init() -> amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init() -> smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init() after verifying that `adev->psp.ras.ras` is not NULL in `amdgpu_ras_recovery_init()`. Currently it is registered unconditionally by -> amdgpu_device_ip_init() -> pp_sw_init() -> hwmgr_sw_init() -> vega20_smu_init() -> smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init() Fix simply adds HW support check (ras == NULL => no support) before calling `smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_{init,fini}()`. Please note that there is a chance that similar fix is also required for CHIP_ARCTURUS. I do not know whether any actual Arcturus hardware without RAS exist, and whether calling `smu_i2c_eeprom_init()` makes any sense when there is no HW support. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 9015d60 ("drm/amdgpu: Move EEPROM I2C adapter to amdgpu_device") Signed-off-by: Ivan Mironov <mironov.ivan@gmail.com> Tested-by: Bjorn Nostvold <bjorn.nostvold@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
platform_get_irq() will call dev_err() itself on failure, so there is no need for the driver to also do this. This is detected by coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Tamseel Shams <m.shams@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Propagate the proper error codes from the called functions instead of unconditionally returning 0. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Merge conflict so merged it manually. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
in mic_pre_enable, pm_runtime_get_sync is called which increments the counter even in case of failure, leading to incorrect ref count. In case of failure, decrement the ref count before returning. Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
…into drm-intel-fixes gvt-fixes-2020-06-17 - Two missed MMIO handler fixes for SKL/CFL (Colin) - Fix mask register bits check (Colin) - Fix one lockdep error for debugfs entry access (Colin) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200617043418.GQ5687@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com
Alexandre Oliva has recently removed these files from Linux Libre
with concerns that the sources weren't available.
The sources are available on IGT repository, and only open source
tools are used to generate the {ivb,hsw}_clear_kernel.c files.
However, the remaining concern from Alexandre Oliva was around
GPL license and the source not been present when distributing
the code.
So, it looks like 2 alternatives are possible, the use of
linux-firmware.git repository to store the blob or making sure
that the source is also present in our tree. Since the goal
is to limit the i915 firmware to only the micro-controller blobs
let's make sure that we do include the asm sources here in our tree.
Btw, I tried to have some diligence here and make sure that the
asms that these commits are adding are truly the source for
the mentioned files:
igt$ ./scripts/generate_clear_kernel.sh -g ivb \
-m ~/mesa/build/src/intel/tools/i965_asm
Output file not specified - using default file "ivb-cb_assembled"
Generating gen7 CB Kernel assembled file "ivb_clear_kernel.c"
for i915 driver...
igt$ diff ~/i915/drm-tip/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/ivb_clear_kernel.c \
ivb_clear_kernel.c
< * Generated by: IGT Gpu Tools on Fri 21 Feb 2020 05:29:32 AM UTC
> * Generated by: IGT Gpu Tools on Mon 08 Jun 2020 10:00:54 AM PDT
61c61
< };
> };
\ No newline at end of file
igt$ ./scripts/generate_clear_kernel.sh -g hsw \
-m ~/mesa/build/src/intel/tools/i965_asm
Output file not specified - using default file "hsw-cb_assembled"
Generating gen7.5 CB Kernel assembled file "hsw_clear_kernel.c"
for i915 driver...
igt$ diff ~/i915/drm-tip/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/hsw_clear_kernel.c \
hsw_clear_kernel.c
5c5
< * Generated by: IGT Gpu Tools on Fri 21 Feb 2020 05:30:13 AM UTC
> * Generated by: IGT Gpu Tools on Mon 08 Jun 2020 10:01:42 AM PDT
61c61
< };
> };
\ No newline at end of file
Used IGT and Mesa master repositories from Fri Jun 5 2020)
IGT: 53e8c878a6fb ("tests/kms_chamelium: Force reprobe after replugging
the connector")
Mesa: 5d13c7477eb1 ("radv: set keep_statistic_info with
RADV_DEBUG=shaderstats")
Mesa built with: meson build -D platforms=drm,x11 -D dri-drivers=i965 \
-D gallium-drivers=iris -D prefix=/usr \
-D libdir=/usr/lib64/ -Dtools=intel \
-Dkulkan-drivers=intel && ninja -C build
v2: Header clean-up and include build instructions in a readme (Chris)
Modified commit message to respect check-patch
Reference: http://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/2020-June/003374.html
Reference: http://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/2020-June/003375.html
Fixes: 47f8253 ("drm/i915/gen7: Clear all EU/L3 residual contexts")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <lxoliva@fsfla.org>
Cc: Prathap Kumar Valsan <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com>
Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200610201807.191440-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 5a7eeb8)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add DPTF battery participant ACPI ID for platforms based on the Intel TigerLake SoC. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The HPD sense mechanism in Allwinner's old HDMI encoder hardware is more or less an input-only GPIO. Other GPIO-based HPD implementations directly return the current state, instead of polling for a specific state and returning the other if that times out. Remove the I/O polling from sun4i_hdmi_connector_detect() and directly return a known state based on the current reading. This also gets rid of excessive CPU usage by kworker as reported on Stack Exchange [1] and Armbian forums [2]. [1] https://superuser.com/questions/1515001/debian-10-buster-on-cubietruck-with-bug-in-sun4i-drm-hdmi [2] https://forum.armbian.com/topic/14282-headless-systems-and-sun4i_drm_hdmi-a10a20/ Fixes: 9c56810 ("drm/sun4i: Add HDMI support") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200629060032.24134-1-wens@kernel.org
Callers expect gfs2_inode_lookup to return an inode pointer or ERR_PTR(error). Commit b66648a caused it to return NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ESTALE) in some cases. Fix that. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Fixes: b66648a ("gfs2: Move inode generation number check into gfs2_inode_lookup") Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Log flush operations (gfs2_log_flush()) can target a specific transaction. But if the function encounters errors (e.g. io errors) and withdraws, the transaction was only freed it if was queued to one of the ail lists. If the withdraw occurred before the transaction was queued to the ail1 list, function ail_drain never freed it. The result was: BUG gfs2_trans: Objects remaining in gfs2_trans on __kmem_cache_shutdown() This patch makes log_flush() add the targeted transaction to the ail1 list so that function ail_drain() will find and free it properly. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+ Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
In flush_delete_work, instead of flushing each individual pending delayed work item, cancel and re-queue them for immediate execution. The waiting isn't needed here because we're already waiting for all queued work items to complete in gfs2_flush_delete_work. This makes the code more efficient, but more importantly, it avoids sleeping during a rhashtable walk, inside rcu_read_lock(). Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Tiger Lake's new unique ACPI device ID for Fan is not valid because of missing 'C' in the ID. Use correct fan device ID. Fixes: c248dfe ("ACPI: fan: Add Tiger Lake ACPI device ID") Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com> Cc: 5.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.6+ [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 6ae72bf ("PCI: Unify pcie_find_root_port() and pci_find_pcie_root_port()") broke acpi_pci_bridge_d3() because calling pcie_find_root_port() on a Root Port returned NULL when it should return the Root Port, which in turn broke power management of PCIe hierarchies. Rework pcie_find_root_port() so it returns its argument when it is already a Root Port. [bhelgaas: test device only once, test for PCIe] Fixes: 6ae72bf ("PCI: Unify pcie_find_root_port() and pci_find_pcie_root_port()") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200622161248.51099-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
[Why] Changes that are fast don't require updating DLG parameters making this call unnecessary. Considering this is an expensive call it should not be done on every flip. DML touches clocks, p-state support, DLG params and a few other DC internal flags and these aren't expected during fast. A hang has been reported with this change when called on every flip which suggests that modifying these fields is not recommended behavior on fast updates. [How] Guard the validation to only happen if update type isn't FAST. Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1191 Fixes: a24eaa5 ("drm/amd/display: Revalidate bandwidth before commiting DC updates") Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Roman Li <Roman.Li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
…g/drm/msm into drm-fixes A few fixes, mostly fallout from the address space refactor and dpu color processing. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ <CAF6AEGv0SSXArdYs=mOLqJPJdkvk8CpxaJGecqgbOGazQ2n5og@mail.gmail.com
…/scm/linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos into drm-fixes Two fixups - It fixes wrong return value by returing proper error value instead of fixed one. - It fixes ref count leak in mic_pre_enable. One cleanup - It removes dev_err() call on platform_get_irq() failure because platform_get_irq() call dev_err() itself on failure. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1593395988-4612-1-git-send-email-inki.dae@samsung.com
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
Attempt to enable IPsec packet offload in tunnel mode in debug kernel generates the following kernel panic, which is happening due to two issues: 1. In SA add section, the should be _bh() variant when marking SA mode. 2. There is not needed flush_workqueue in SA delete routine. It is not needed as at this stage as it is removed from SADB and the running work will be canceled later in SA free. ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.12.0+ #4 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- charon/1337 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire: ffff88810f365020 (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] and this task is already holding: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 which would create a new lock dependency: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); local_irq_disable(); lock(&x->lock); lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); <Interrupt> lock(&x->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by charon/1337: #0: ffffffff87f8f858 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x5e/0x90 #1: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ops: 29 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffff87f9cd20>] __key.18+0x0/0x40 the dependencies between the lock to be acquired and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ops: 9 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffffa078ff60>] __key.48+0x0/0xfffffffffff210a0 [mlx5_core] ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1337 Comm: charon Not tainted 6.12.0+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x74/0xd0 check_irq_usage+0x12e8/0x1d90 ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies_backwards+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? __lockdep_reset_lock+0x180/0x180 ? check_path.constprop.0+0x24/0x50 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_circular_bug+0x9b0/0x9b0 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_usage_bug.part.0+0x670/0x670 ? check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? __xfrm_state_delete+0x5f0/0xae0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 ? xfrm_get_sa+0x250/0x250 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? netlink_ack+0xd90/0xd90 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0xcd/0xb60 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 ? netlink_attachskb+0x730/0x730 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 ? __might_fault+0xbb/0x170 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 ? fdget+0x163/0x1d0 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 ? __x64_sys_getpeername+0xb0/0xb0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x856/0xe30 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0x117/0x410 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x284/0x400 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f7d31291ba4 Code: 7d e8 89 4d d4 e8 4c 42 f7 ff 44 8b 4d d0 4c 8b 45 c8 89 c3 44 8b 55 d4 8b 7d e8 b8 2c 00 00 00 48 8b 55 d8 48 8b 75 e0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 34 89 df 48 89 45 e8 e8 99 42 f7 ff 48 8b 45 RSP: 002b:00007f7d2ccd94f0 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f7d31291ba4 RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 RDI: 000000000000000a RBP: 00007f7d2ccd9530 R08: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R09: 000000000000000c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000028 R13: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R14: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 R15: 00000000000000e1 </TASK> Fixes: 4c24272 ("net/mlx5e: Listen to ARP events to update IPsec L2 headers in tunnel mode") Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2025
irq_chip functions may be called in raw spinlock context. Therefore, we must also use a raw spinlock for our own internal locking. This fixes the following lockdep splat: [ 5.349336] ============================= [ 5.353349] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 5.357361] 6.13.0-rc5+ #69 Tainted: G W [ 5.363031] ----------------------------- [ 5.367045] kworker/u17:1/44 is trying to lock: [ 5.371587] ffffff88018b02c0 (&chip->gpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.380079] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5.385138] context-{5:5} [ 5.387762] 5 locks held by kworker/u17:1/44: [ 5.392123] #0: ffffff8800014958 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3204) [ 5.402260] #1: ffffffc082fcbdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3205) [ 5.411528] #2: ffffff880172c900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach (drivers/base/dd.c:1006) [ 5.419929] #3: ffffff88039c8268 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/internals.h:156 kernel/irq/manage.c:1596) [ 5.428331] #4: ffffff88039c80c8 (lock_class#2){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1614) [ 5.436472] stack backtrace: [ 5.439359] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u17:1 Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc5+ #69 [ 5.448690] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 5.451656] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) [ 5.455845] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 5.461699] Call trace: [ 5.464147] show_stack+0x18/0x24 C [ 5.467821] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) [ 5.471501] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130) [ 5.474824] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4828 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176) [ 5.478758] lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5814) [ 5.482429] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162) [ 5.486797] xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.490737] irq_enable (kernel/irq/internals.h:236 kernel/irq/chip.c:170 kernel/irq/chip.c:439 kernel/irq/chip.c:432 kernel/irq/chip.c:345) [ 5.494060] __irq_startup (kernel/irq/internals.h:241 kernel/irq/chip.c:180 kernel/irq/chip.c:250) [ 5.497645] irq_startup (kernel/irq/chip.c:270) [ 5.501143] __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1807) [ 5.504728] request_threaded_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:2208) Fixes: a32c7ca ("gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support") Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250110163354.2012654-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2025
Hou Tao says:
====================
The use of migrate_{disable|enable} pair in BPF is mainly due to the
introduction of bpf memory allocator and the use of per-CPU data struct
in its internal implementation. The caller needs to disable migration
before invoking the alloc or free APIs of bpf memory allocator, and
enable migration after the invocation.
The main users of bpf memory allocator are various kind of bpf maps in
which the map values or the special fields in the map values are
allocated by using bpf memory allocator.
At present, the running context for bpf program has already disabled
migration explictly or implictly, therefore, when these maps are
manipulated in bpf program, it is OK to not invoke migrate_disable()
and migrate_enable() pair. Howevers, it is not always the case when
these maps are manipulated through bpf syscall, therefore many
migrate_{disable|enable} pairs are added when the map can either be
manipulated by BPF program or BPF syscall.
The initial idea of reducing the use of migrate_{disable|enable} comes
from Alexei [1]. I turned it into a patch set that archives the goals
through the following three methods:
1. remove unnecessary migrate_{disable|enable} pair
when the BPF syscall path also disables migration, it is OK to remove
the pair. Patch #1~#3 fall into this category, while patch #4~#5 are
partially included.
2. move the migrate_{disable|enable} pair from inner callee to outer
caller
Instead of invoking migrate_disable() in the inner callee, invoking
migrate_disable() in the outer caller to simplify reasoning about when
migrate_disable() is needed. Patch #4~#5 and patch #6~#19 belongs to
this category.
3. add cant_migrate() check in the inner callee
Add cant_migrate() check in the inner callee to ensure the guarantee
that migration is disabled is not broken. Patch #1~#5, #13, #16~#19 also
belong to this category.
Please check the individual patches for more details. Comments are
always welcome.
Change Log:
v2:
* sqaush the ->map_free related patches (#10~#12, #15) into one patch
* remove unnecessary cant_migrate() checks.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250106081900.1665573-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250108010728.207536-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2025
Hou Tao says: ==================== The patch set continues the previous work [1] to move all the freeings of htab elements out of bucket lock. One motivation for the patch set is the locking problem reported by Sebastian [2]: the freeing of bpf_timer under PREEMPT_RT may acquire a spin-lock (namely softirq_expiry_lock). However the freeing procedure for htab element has already held a raw-spin-lock (namely bucket lock), and it will trigger the warning: "BUG: scheduling while atomic" as demonstrated by the selftests patch. Another motivation is to reduce the locked scope of bucket lock. However, the patch set doesn't move all freeing of htab element out of bucket lock, it still keep the free of special fields in pre-allocated hash map under the protect of bucket lock in htab_map_update_elem(). The patch set is structured as follows: * Patch #1 moves the element freeing out of bucket lock for htab_lru_map_delete_node(). However the freeing is still in the locked scope of LRU raw spin lock. * Patch #2~#3 move the element freeing out of bucket lock for __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() * Patch #4 cancels the bpf_timer in two steps to fix the locking problem in htab_map_update_elem() for PREEMPT_PRT. * Patch #5 adds a selftest for the locking problem Please see individual patches for more details. Comments are always welcome. --- v3: * patch #1: update the commit message to state that the freeing of special field is still in the locked scope of LRU raw spin lock * patch #4: cancel the bpf_timer in two steps only for PREEMPT_RT (suggested by Alexei) v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250109061901.2620825-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com * cancels the bpf timer in two steps instead of breaking the reuse the refill of per-cpu ->extra_elems into two steps v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250107085559.3081563-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241106063542.357743-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241106084527.4gPrMnHt@linutronix.de ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250117101816.2101857-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2025
When kernel is built without debuginfo, running 'perf record' with --off-cpu results in segfault as below: ./perf record --off-cpu -e dummy sleep 1 libbpf: kernel BTF is missing at '/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux', was CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF enabled? libbpf: failed to find '.BTF' ELF section in /lib/modules/6.13.0-rc3+/build/vmlinux libbpf: failed to find valid kernel BTF Segmentation fault (core dumped) The backtrace pointed to: #0 0x00000000100fb17c in btf.type_cnt () #1 0x00000000100fc1a8 in btf_find_by_name_kind () #2 0x00000000100fc38c in btf.find_by_name_kind () #3 0x00000000102ee3ac in off_cpu_prepare () #4 0x000000001002f78c in cmd_record () #5 0x00000000100aee78 in run_builtin () #6 0x00000000100af3e4 in handle_internal_command () #7 0x000000001001004c in main () Code sequence is: static void check_sched_switch_args(void) { struct btf *btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf(); const struct btf_type *t1, *t2, *t3; u32 type_id; type_id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, "btf_trace_sched_switch", BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF); btf__load_vmlinux_btf() fails when CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is not enabled. Here bpf__find_by_name_kind() calls btf__type_cnt() with NULL btf value and results in segfault. To fix this, add a check to see if btf is not NULL before invoking bpf__find_by_name_kind(). Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241223135813.8175-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2025
If the uvc_status_init() function fails to allocate the int_urb, it will free the dev->status pointer but doesn't reset the pointer to NULL. This results in the kfree() call in uvc_status_cleanup() trying to double-free the memory. Fix it by resetting the dev->status pointer to NULL after freeing it. Fixes: a31a405 ("V4L/DVB:usbvideo:don't use part of buffer for USB transfer #4") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107235130.31372-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof #19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
libtraceevent parses and returns an array of argument fields, sometimes
larger than RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM (6) because it includes "__syscall_nr",
idx will traverse to index 6 (7th element) whereas sc->fmt->arg holds 6
elements max, creating an out-of-bounds access. This runtime error is
found by UBsan. The error message:
$ sudo UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1 ./perf trace -a --max-events=1
builtin-trace.c:1966:35: runtime error: index 6 out of bounds for type 'syscall_arg_fmt [6]'
#0 0x5c04956be5fe in syscall__alloc_arg_fmts /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:1966
#1 0x5c04956c0510 in trace__read_syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2110
#2 0x5c04956c372b in trace__syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2436
#3 0x5c04956d2f39 in trace__init_syscalls_bpf_prog_array_maps /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:3897
#4 0x5c04956d6d25 in trace__run /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:4335
#5 0x5c04956e112e in cmd_trace /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:5502
#6 0x5c04956eda7d in run_builtin /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:351
#7 0x5c04956ee0a8 in handle_internal_command /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:404
#8 0x5c04956ee37f in run_argv /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:448
#9 0x5c04956ee8e9 in main /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:556
#10 0x79eb3622a3b7 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
#11 0x79eb3622a47a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
#12 0x5c04955422d4 in _start (/home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf+0x4e02d4) (BuildId: 5b6cab2d59e96a4341741765ad6914a4d784dbc6)
0.000 ( 0.014 ms): Chrome_ChildIO/117244 write(fd: 238, buf: !, count: 1) = 1
Fixes: 5e58fcf ("perf trace: Allow allocating sc->arg_fmt even without the syscall tracepoint")
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2025
This fixes the following hard lockup in isolate_lru_folios() during memory reclaim. If the LRU mostly contains ineligible folios this may trigger watchdog. watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 173 RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x255/0x2a0 Call Trace: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x31/0x40 folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x5f/0x90 folio_batch_move_lru+0x91/0x150 lru_add_drain_per_cpu+0x1c/0x40 process_one_work+0x17d/0x350 worker_thread+0x27b/0x3a0 kthread+0xe8/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 lruvec->lru_lock owner： PID: 2865 TASK: ffff888139214d40 CPU: 40 COMMAND: "kswapd0" #0 [fffffe0000945e60] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffffa567a555 #1 [fffffe0000945e68] nmi_handle at ffffffffa563b171 #2 [fffffe0000945eb0] default_do_nmi at ffffffffa6575920 #3 [fffffe0000945ed0] exc_nmi at ffffffffa6575af4 #4 [fffffe0000945ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffa6601dde [exception RIP: isolate_lru_folios+403] RIP: ffffffffa597df53 RSP: ffffc90006fb7c28 RFLAGS: 00000002 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffc90006fb7c60 RCX: ffffea04a2196f88 RDX: ffffc90006fb7c60 RSI: ffffc90006fb7c60 RDI: ffffea04a2197048 RBP: ffff88812cbd3010 R8: ffffea04a2197008 R9: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffea04a2197008 R13: ffffea04a2197048 R14: ffffc90006fb7de8 R15: 0000000003e3e937 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 <NMI exception stack> #5 [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53 #6 [ffffc90006fb7cf8] shrink_active_list at ffffffffa597f788 #7 [ffffc90006fb7da8] balance_pgdat at ffffffffa5986db0 #8 [ffffc90006fb7ec0] kswapd at ffffffffa5987354 #9 [ffffc90006fb7ef8] kthread at ffffffffa5748238 crash> Scenario: User processe are requesting a large amount of memory and keep page active. Then a module continuously requests memory from ZONE_DMA32 area. Memory reclaim will be triggered due to ZONE_DMA32 watermark alarm reached. However pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from the ZONE_NORMAL area. Reproduce: Terminal 1: Construct to continuously increase pages active(anon). mkdir /tmp/memory mount -t tmpfs -o size=1024000M tmpfs /tmp/memory dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/memory/block bs=4M tail /tmp/memory/block Terminal 2: vmstat -a 1 active will increase. procs ---memory--- ---swap-- ---io---- -system-- ---cpu--- ... r b swpd free inact active si so bi bo 1 0 0 1445623076 45898836 83646008 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 43450228 86094616 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 41003480 88541364 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 38557088 90987756 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 36109688 93435156 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619552 33663256 95881632 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 31217140 98327792 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 28769988 100774944 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 26322348 103222584 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 23875592 105669340 0 0 0 cat /proc/meminfo | head Active(anon) increase. MemTotal: 1579941036 kB MemFree: 1445618500 kB MemAvailable: 1453013224 kB Buffers: 6516 kB Cached: 128653956 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 118110812 kB Inactive: 11436620 kB Active(anon): 115345744 kB Inactive(anon): 945292 kB When the Active(anon) is 115345744 kB, insmod module triggers the ZONE_DMA32 watermark. perf record -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_lru_isolate -aR perf script isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=2 nr_skipped=2 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844 nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844 nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=29 nr_skipped=29 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon See nr_scanned=28835844. 28835844 * 4k = 115343376KB approximately equal to 115345744 kB. If increase Active(anon) to 1000G then insmod module triggers the ZONE_DMA32 watermark. hard lockup will occur. In my device nr_scanned = 0000000003e3e937 when hard lockup. Convert to memory size 0x0000000003e3e937 * 4KB = 261072092 KB. [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53 ffffc90006fb7c30: 0000000000000020 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c40: ffffc90006fb7d40 ffff88812cbd3000 ffffc90006fb7c50: ffffc90006fb7d30 0000000106fb7de8 ffffc90006fb7c60: ffffea04a2197008 ffffea0006ed4a48 ffffc90006fb7c70: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c90: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7ca0: 0000000000000000 0000000003e3e937 ffffc90006fb7cb0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7cc0: 8d7c0b56b7874b00 ffff88812cbd3000 About the Fixes: Why did it take eight years to be discovered? The problem requires the following conditions to occur: 1. The device memory should be large enough. 2. Pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from the ZONE_NORMAL area. 3. The memory in ZONE_DMA32 needs to reach the watermark. If the memory is not large enough, or if the usage design of ZONE_DMA32 area memory is reasonable, this problem is difficult to detect. notes: The problem is most likely to occur in ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_NORMAL, but other suitable scenarios may also trigger the problem. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241119060842.274072-1-liuye@kylinos.cn Fixes: b2e1875 ("mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis") Signed-off-by: liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2025
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()). However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers"). So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search(). The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline] lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870 up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693 btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351 btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline] btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330 btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline] btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224 __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline] __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline] __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); rlock(btrfs-tree-01); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335: #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559 #1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183 #2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086 #3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659 #4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 #7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29 Code: ff ff c3 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29 RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88 </TASK> Reported-by: syzbot+63913e558c084f7f8fdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/677b3014.050a0220.3b53b0.0064.GAE@google.com/ Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
We have several places across the kernel where we want to access another
task's syscall arguments, such as ptrace(2), seccomp(2), etc., by making
a call to syscall_get_arguments().
This works for register arguments right away by accessing the task's
`regs' member of `struct pt_regs', however for stack arguments seen with
32-bit/o32 kernels things are more complicated. Technically they ought
to be obtained from the user stack with calls to an access_remote_vm(),
but we have an easier way available already.
So as to be able to access syscall stack arguments as regular function
arguments following the MIPS calling convention we copy them over from
the user stack to the kernel stack in arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S, in
handle_sys(), to the current stack frame's outgoing argument space at
the top of the stack, which is where the handler called expects to see
its incoming arguments. This area is also pointed at by the `pt_regs'
pointer obtained by task_pt_regs().
Make the o32 stack argument space a proper member of `struct pt_regs'
then, by renaming the existing member from `pad0' to `args' and using
generated offsets to access the space. No functional change though.
With the change in place the o32 kernel stack frame layout at the entry
to a syscall handler invoked by handle_sys() is therefore as follows:
$sp + 68 -> | ... | <- pt_regs.regs[9]
+---------------------+
$sp + 64 -> | $t0 | <- pt_regs.regs[8]
+---------------------+
$sp + 60 -> | $a3/argument #4 | <- pt_regs.regs[7]
+---------------------+
$sp + 56 -> | $a2/argument #3 | <- pt_regs.regs[6]
+---------------------+
$sp + 52 -> | $a1/argument #2 | <- pt_regs.regs[5]
+---------------------+
$sp + 48 -> | $a0/argument #1 | <- pt_regs.regs[4]
+---------------------+
$sp + 44 -> | $v1 | <- pt_regs.regs[3]
+---------------------+
$sp + 40 -> | $v0 | <- pt_regs.regs[2]
+---------------------+
$sp + 36 -> | $at | <- pt_regs.regs[1]
+---------------------+
$sp + 32 -> | $zero | <- pt_regs.regs[0]
+---------------------+
$sp + 28 -> | stack argument #8 | <- pt_regs.args[7]
+---------------------+
$sp + 24 -> | stack argument #7 | <- pt_regs.args[6]
+---------------------+
$sp + 20 -> | stack argument #6 | <- pt_regs.args[5]
+---------------------+
$sp + 16 -> | stack argument #5 | <- pt_regs.args[4]
+---------------------+
$sp + 12 -> | psABI space for $a3 | <- pt_regs.args[3]
+---------------------+
$sp + 8 -> | psABI space for $a2 | <- pt_regs.args[2]
+---------------------+
$sp + 4 -> | psABI space for $a1 | <- pt_regs.args[1]
+---------------------+
$sp + 0 -> | psABI space for $a0 | <- pt_regs.args[0]
+---------------------+
holding user data received and with the first 4 frame slots reserved by
the psABI for the compiler to spill the incoming arguments from $a0-$a3
registers (which it sometimes does according to its needs) and the next
4 frame slots designated by the psABI for any stack function arguments
that follow. This data is also available for other tasks to peek/poke
at as reqired and where permitted.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2025
Use raw_spinlock in order to fix spurious messages about invalid context
when spinlock debugging is enabled. The lock is only used to serialize
register access.
[ 4.239592] =============================
[ 4.239595] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[ 4.239599] 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f #35 Not tainted
[ 4.239603] -----------------------------
[ 4.239606] kworker/u8:5/76 is trying to lock:
[ 4.239609] ffff0000091898a0 (&p->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
[ 4.239641] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 4.239643] context-{5:5}
[ 4.239646] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:5/76:
[ 4.239651] #0: ffff0000080fb148 ((wq_completion)async){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x190/0x62c
[ 4.250180] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@0/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
[ 4.254094] #1: ffff80008299bd80 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x62c
[ 4.254109] #2: ffff00000920c8f8
[ 4.258345] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'bitclock-master' with a value.
[ 4.264803] (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0x3c/0xdc
[ 4.264820] #3: ffff00000a50ca40 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0xa0/0x690
[ 4.264840] #4:
[ 4.268872] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
[ 4.273275] ffff00000a50c8c8 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xc4/0x690
[ 4.296130] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.mmc: mmc1 base at 0x00000000ee100000, max clock rate 200 MHz
[ 4.304082] stack backtrace:
[ 4.304086] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 76 Comm: kworker/u8:5 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f #35
[ 4.304092] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT)
[ 4.304097] Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
[ 4.304106] Call trace:
[ 4.304110] show_stack+0x14/0x20 (C)
[ 4.304122] dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90
[ 4.304131] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
[ 4.304138] __lock_acquire+0xdfc/0x1584
[ 4.426274] lock_acquire+0x1c4/0x33c
[ 4.429942] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x80
[ 4.434307] gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
[ 4.440061] gpio_rcar_irq_set_type+0xd4/0xd8
[ 4.444422] __irq_set_trigger+0x5c/0x178
[ 4.448435] __setup_irq+0x2e4/0x690
[ 4.452012] request_threaded_irq+0xc4/0x190
[ 4.456285] devm_request_threaded_irq+0x7c/0xf4
[ 4.459398] ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries
[ 4.460902] mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq+0x68/0xe0
[ 4.470660] mmc_start_host+0x50/0xac
[ 4.474327] mmc_add_host+0x80/0xe4
[ 4.477817] tmio_mmc_host_probe+0x2b0/0x440
[ 4.482094] renesas_sdhi_probe+0x488/0x6f4
[ 4.486281] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_probe+0x60/0x78
[ 4.491509] platform_probe+0x64/0xd8
[ 4.495178] really_probe+0xb8/0x2a8
[ 4.498756] __driver_probe_device+0x74/0x118
[ 4.503116] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x154
[ 4.507303] __device_attach_driver+0xd4/0x160
[ 4.511750] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0
[ 4.515588] __device_attach_async_helper+0xb0/0xdc
[ 4.520470] async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0xd8
[ 4.524481] process_one_work+0x210/0x62c
[ 4.528494] worker_thread+0x1ac/0x340
[ 4.532245] kthread+0x10c/0x110
[ 4.535476] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250121135833.3769310-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2025
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.14, take #4 - Fix a couple of bugs affecting pKVM's PSCI relay implementation when running in the hVHE mode, resulting in the host being entered with the MMU in an unknown state, and EL2 being in the wrong mode.
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2025
…cal section
A circular lock dependency splat has been seen involving down_trylock():
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-41.el10.s390x+debug
------------------------------------------------------
dd/32479 is trying to acquire lock:
0015a20accd0d4f8 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: down_trylock+0x26/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
000000017e461698 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #3 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #2 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
-> #0 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
The console_sem -> pi_lock dependency is due to calling try_to_wake_up()
while holding the console_sem raw_spinlock. This dependency can be broken
by using wake_q to do the wakeup instead of calling try_to_wake_up()
under the console_sem lock. This will also make the semaphore's
raw_spinlock become a terminal lock without taking any further locks
underneath it.
The hrtimer_bases.lock is a raw_spinlock while zone->lock is a
spinlock. The hrtimer_bases.lock -> zone->lock dependency happens via
the debug_objects_fill_pool() helper function in the debugobjects code.
-> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
__lock_acquire+0xe86/0x1cc0
lock_acquire.part.0+0x258/0x630
lock_acquire+0xb8/0xe0
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb4/0x120
rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0
__rmqueue_pcplist+0x580/0x830
rmqueue_pcplist+0xfc/0x470
rmqueue.isra.0+0xdec/0x11b0
get_page_from_freelist+0x2ee/0xeb0
__alloc_pages_noprof+0x2c2/0x520
alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x1fc/0x4d0
alloc_pages_noprof+0x8c/0xe0
allocate_slab+0x320/0x460
___slab_alloc+0xa58/0x12b0
__slab_alloc.isra.0+0x42/0x60
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x304/0x350
fill_pool+0xf6/0x450
debug_object_activate+0xfe/0x360
enqueue_hrtimer+0x34/0x190
__run_hrtimer+0x3c8/0x4c0
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x1b2/0x260
hrtimer_interrupt+0x316/0x760
do_IRQ+0x9a/0xe0
do_irq_async+0xf6/0x160
Normally a raw_spinlock to spinlock dependency is not legitimate
and will be warned if CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING is enabled,
but debug_objects_fill_pool() is an exception as it explicitly
allows this dependency for non-PREEMPT_RT kernel without causing
PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING lockdep splat. As a result, this dependency is
legitimate and not a bug.
Anyway, semaphore is the only locking primitive left that is still
using try_to_wake_up() to do wakeup inside critical section, all the
other locking primitives had been migrated to use wake_q to do wakeup
outside of the critical section. It is also possible that there are
other circular locking dependencies involving printk/console_sem or
other existing/new semaphores lurking somewhere which may show up in
the future. Let just do the migration now to wake_q to avoid headache
like this.
Reported-by: yzbot+ed801a886dfdbfe7136d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250307232717.1759087-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
In recent kernels, there are lockdep splats around the struct request_queue::io_lockdep_map, similar to [1], but they typically don't show up until reclaim with writeback happens. Having multiple kernel versions released with a known risc of kernel deadlock during reclaim writeback should IMHO be addressed and backported to -stable with the highest priority. In order to have these lockdep splats show up earlier, preferrably during system initialization, prime the struct request_queue::io_lockdep_map as GFP_KERNEL reclaim- tainted. This will instead lead to lockdep splats looking similar to [2], but without the need for reclaim + writeback happening. [1]: [ 189.762244] ====================================================== [ 189.762432] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 189.762441] 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #6 Tainted: G U [ 189.762450] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 189.762459] kswapd0/119 is trying to acquire lock: [ 189.762467] ffff888110ceb710 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#26){++++}-{0:0}, at: __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.762485] but task is already holding lock: [ 189.762494] ffffffff834c97c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xbe/0xb00 [ 189.762507] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 189.762519] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 189.762529] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 189.762540] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc5/0x100 [ 189.762548] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x4a/0x480 [ 189.762558] alloc_inode+0xaa/0xe0 [ 189.762566] iget_locked+0x157/0x330 [ 189.762573] kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x110 [ 189.762582] kernfs_get_tree+0x1b0/0x2e0 [ 189.762590] sysfs_get_tree+0x1f/0x60 [ 189.762597] vfs_get_tree+0x2a/0xf0 [ 189.762605] path_mount+0x4cd/0xc00 [ 189.762613] __x64_sys_mount+0x119/0x150 [ 189.762621] x64_sys_call+0x14f2/0x2310 [ 189.762630] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 189.762637] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 189.762647] -> #1 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 189.762659] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [ 189.762667] kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 189.762676] sysfs_remove_dir+0x4f/0x60 [ 189.762685] __kobject_del+0x33/0xa0 [ 189.762709] kobject_del+0x13/0x30 [ 189.762716] elv_unregister_queue+0x52/0x80 [ 189.762725] elevator_switch+0x68/0x360 [ 189.762733] elv_iosched_store+0x14b/0x1b0 [ 189.762756] queue_attr_store+0x181/0x1e0 [ 189.762765] sysfs_kf_write+0x49/0x80 [ 189.762773] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x250 [ 189.762781] vfs_write+0x281/0x540 [ 189.762790] ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 189.762798] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 [ 189.762807] x64_sys_call+0x2a3/0x2310 [ 189.762815] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 189.762823] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 189.762833] -> #0 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#26){++++}-{0:0}: [ 189.762845] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 189.762854] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 189.762861] blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a2/0xba0 [ 189.762870] __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.762878] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x323/0x430 [ 189.762888] submit_bio_noacct+0x2cc/0x620 [ 189.762896] submit_bio+0x38/0x110 [ 189.762904] __swap_writepage+0xf5/0x380 [ 189.762912] swap_writepage+0x3c7/0x600 [ 189.762920] shmem_writepage+0x3da/0x4f0 [ 189.762929] pageout+0x13f/0x310 [ 189.762937] shrink_folio_list+0x61c/0xf60 [ 189.763261] evict_folios+0x378/0xcd0 [ 189.763584] try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x1b0/0x360 [ 189.763946] shrink_one+0x10e/0x200 [ 189.764266] shrink_node+0xc02/0x1490 [ 189.764586] balance_pgdat+0x563/0xb00 [ 189.764934] kswapd+0x1e8/0x430 [ 189.765249] kthread+0x10b/0x260 [ 189.765559] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 189.765889] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 189.766198] other info that might help us debug this: [ 189.767089] Chain exists of: &q->q_usage_counter(io)#26 --> &root->kernfs_rwsem --> fs_reclaim [ 189.767971] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 189.768555] CPU0 CPU1 [ 189.768849] ---- ---- [ 189.769136] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 189.769421] lock(&root->kernfs_rwsem); [ 189.769714] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 189.770016] rlock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#26); [ 189.770305] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 189.771167] 1 lock held by kswapd0/119: [ 189.771453] #0: ffffffff834c97c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xbe/0xb00 [ 189.771770] stack backtrace: [ 189.772351] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 119 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G U 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #6 [ 189.772353] Tainted: [U]=USER [ 189.772354] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [ 189.772354] Call Trace: [ 189.772355] <TASK> [ 189.772356] dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 [ 189.772359] dump_stack+0x10/0x18 [ 189.772360] print_circular_bug.cold+0x17a/0x1b7 [ 189.772363] check_noncircular+0x13a/0x150 [ 189.772365] ? __pfx_stack_trace_consume_entry+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772368] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 189.772368] ? ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 189.772371] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 189.772372] ? __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.772375] ? lock_release+0xd5/0x2c0 [ 189.772376] blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a2/0xba0 [ 189.772378] ? __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.772380] __submit_bio+0x76/0x230 [ 189.772382] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1e/0xe0 [ 189.772384] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x323/0x430 [ 189.772386] ? submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x323/0x430 [ 189.772387] ? __might_sleep+0x58/0xa0 [ 189.772390] submit_bio_noacct+0x2cc/0x620 [ 189.772391] ? count_memcg_events+0x68/0x90 [ 189.772393] submit_bio+0x38/0x110 [ 189.772395] __swap_writepage+0xf5/0x380 [ 189.772396] swap_writepage+0x3c7/0x600 [ 189.772397] shmem_writepage+0x3da/0x4f0 [ 189.772401] pageout+0x13f/0x310 [ 189.772406] shrink_folio_list+0x61c/0xf60 [ 189.772409] ? isolate_folios+0xe80/0x16b0 [ 189.772410] ? mark_held_locks+0x46/0x90 [ 189.772412] evict_folios+0x378/0xcd0 [ 189.772414] ? evict_folios+0x34a/0xcd0 [ 189.772415] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130 [ 189.772417] try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x1b0/0x360 [ 189.772420] shrink_one+0x10e/0x200 [ 189.772421] shrink_node+0xc02/0x1490 [ 189.772423] ? shrink_node+0xa08/0x1490 [ 189.772424] ? shrink_node+0xbd8/0x1490 [ 189.772425] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x366/0x480 [ 189.772427] balance_pgdat+0x563/0xb00 [ 189.772428] ? balance_pgdat+0x563/0xb00 [ 189.772430] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1e/0xe0 [ 189.772431] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xcb/0x330 [ 189.772433] ? __switch_to_asm+0x33/0x70 [ 189.772437] kswapd+0x1e8/0x430 [ 189.772438] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772440] ? __pfx_kswapd+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772441] kthread+0x10b/0x260 [ 189.772443] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772444] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 189.772446] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 189.772447] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 189.772450] </TASK> [2]: [ 8.760253] ====================================================== [ 8.760254] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 8.760255] 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #7 Tainted: G U [ 8.760256] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 8.760257] (udev-worker)/674 is trying to acquire lock: [ 8.760259] ffff888100e39148 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760265] but task is already holding lock: [ 8.760266] ffff888110dc7680 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x12/0x30 [ 8.760272] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 8.760272] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 8.760273] -> #2 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27){++++}-{0:0}: [ 8.760276] blk_alloc_queue+0x30a/0x350 [ 8.760279] blk_mq_alloc_queue+0x6b/0xe0 [ 8.760281] scsi_alloc_sdev+0x276/0x3c0 [ 8.760284] scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x22a/0x440 [ 8.760286] __scsi_scan_target+0x109/0x230 [ 8.760288] scsi_scan_channel+0x65/0xc0 [ 8.760290] scsi_scan_host_selected+0xff/0x140 [ 8.760292] do_scsi_scan_host+0xa7/0xc0 [ 8.760293] do_scan_async+0x1c/0x160 [ 8.760295] async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x150 [ 8.760299] process_one_work+0x224/0x5f0 [ 8.760302] worker_thread+0x1d4/0x3e0 [ 8.760304] kthread+0x10b/0x260 [ 8.760306] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 8.760309] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 8.760312] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 8.760315] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc5/0x100 [ 8.760317] kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x4a/0x480 [ 8.760319] alloc_inode+0xaa/0xe0 [ 8.760322] iget_locked+0x157/0x330 [ 8.760323] kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x110 [ 8.760325] kernfs_get_tree+0x1b0/0x2e0 [ 8.760327] sysfs_get_tree+0x1f/0x60 [ 8.760329] vfs_get_tree+0x2a/0xf0 [ 8.760332] path_mount+0x4cd/0xc00 [ 8.760334] __x64_sys_mount+0x119/0x150 [ 8.760336] x64_sys_call+0x14f2/0x2310 [ 8.760338] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 8.760340] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 8.760342] -> #0 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 8.760345] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 8.760347] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 8.760348] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [ 8.760350] kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760351] sysfs_remove_dir+0x4f/0x60 [ 8.760353] __kobject_del+0x33/0xa0 [ 8.760355] kobject_del+0x13/0x30 [ 8.760356] elv_unregister_queue+0x52/0x80 [ 8.760358] elevator_switch+0x68/0x360 [ 8.760360] elv_iosched_store+0x14b/0x1b0 [ 8.760362] queue_attr_store+0x181/0x1e0 [ 8.760364] sysfs_kf_write+0x49/0x80 [ 8.760366] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x250 [ 8.760367] vfs_write+0x281/0x540 [ 8.760370] ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 8.760372] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 [ 8.760374] x64_sys_call+0x2a3/0x2310 [ 8.760376] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 8.760377] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 8.760380] other info that might help us debug this: [ 8.760380] Chain exists of: &root->kernfs_rwsem --> fs_reclaim --> &q->q_usage_counter(io)#27 [ 8.760384] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 8.760384] CPU0 CPU1 [ 8.760385] ---- ---- [ 8.760385] lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27); [ 8.760387] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 8.760388] lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27); [ 8.760390] lock(&root->kernfs_rwsem); [ 8.760391] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 8.760391] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/674: [ 8.760392] #0: ffff8881209ac420 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 8.760398] #1: ffff88810c80f488 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x136/0x250 [ 8.760402] #2: ffff888125d1d330 (kn->active#101){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x13f/0x250 [ 8.760406] #3: ffff888110dc7bb0 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: queue_attr_store+0x148/0x1e0 [ 8.760411] #4: ffff888110dc7680 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#27){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x12/0x30 [ 8.760416] #5: ffff888110dc76b8 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#27){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x12/0x30 [ 8.760421] stack backtrace: [ 8.760422] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 674 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G U 6.14.0-rc6-xe+ #7 [ 8.760424] Tainted: [U]=USER [ 8.760425] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [ 8.760426] Call Trace: [ 8.760427] <TASK> [ 8.760428] dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 [ 8.760431] dump_stack+0x10/0x18 [ 8.760433] print_circular_bug.cold+0x17a/0x1b7 [ 8.760437] check_noncircular+0x13a/0x150 [ 8.760441] ? save_trace+0x54/0x360 [ 8.760445] __lock_acquire+0x1525/0x2760 [ 8.760446] ? irqentry_exit+0x3a/0xb0 [ 8.760448] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0 [ 8.760452] lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 8.760453] ? kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760457] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [ 8.760459] ? kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760460] kernfs_remove+0x32/0x60 [ 8.760462] sysfs_remove_dir+0x4f/0x60 [ 8.760464] __kobject_del+0x33/0xa0 [ 8.760466] kobject_del+0x13/0x30 [ 8.760467] elv_unregister_queue+0x52/0x80 [ 8.760470] elevator_switch+0x68/0x360 [ 8.760472] elv_iosched_store+0x14b/0x1b0 [ 8.760475] queue_attr_store+0x181/0x1e0 [ 8.760479] ? lock_acquire+0xca/0x310 [ 8.760480] ? kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x13f/0x250 [ 8.760482] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130 [ 8.760485] sysfs_kf_write+0x49/0x80 [ 8.760487] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x17d/0x250 [ 8.760489] vfs_write+0x281/0x540 [ 8.760494] ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 [ 8.760497] __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 [ 8.760499] x64_sys_call+0x2a3/0x2310 [ 8.760502] do_syscall_64+0x91/0x180 [ 8.760504] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x5d/0xe0 [ 8.760506] ? handle_softirqs+0x479/0x4d0 [ 8.760508] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x13f/0x280 [ 8.760511] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x8b/0x260 [ 8.760513] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 8.760515] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 8.760516] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 8.760518] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 8.760520] RIP: 0033:0x7aa3bf2f5504 [ 8.760522] Code: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d c5 8b 10 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 [ 8.760523] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1e3697d8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 8.760526] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007aa3bf2f5504 [ 8.760527] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 00007ffc1e369ae0 RDI: 000000000000001c [ 8.760528] RBP: 00007ffc1e369800 R08: 00007aa3bf3f51c8 R09: 00007ffc1e3698b0 [ 8.760528] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [ 8.760529] R13: 00007ffc1e369ae0 R14: 0000613ccf21f2f0 R15: 00007aa3bf3f4e80 [ 8.760533] </TASK> v2: - Update a code comment to increase readability (Ming Lei). Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318095548.5187-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
The commit '245618f8e45f ("block: protect wbt_lat_usec using q->
elevator_lock")' introduced q->elevator_lock to protect updates
to blk-wbt parameters when writing to the sysfs attribute wbt_
lat_usec and the cgroup attribute io.cost.qos. However, both
these attributes also acquire q->rq_qos_mutex, leading to the
following lockdep warning:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.14.0-rc5+ #138 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
bash/5902 is trying to acquire lock:
c000000085d495a0 (&q->rq_qos_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: wbt_init+0x164/0x238
but task is already holding lock:
c000000085d498c8 (&q->elevator_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: queue_wb_lat_store+0xb0/0x20c
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&q->elevator_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock+0xf0/0xa58
ioc_qos_write+0x16c/0x85c
cgroup_file_write+0xc4/0x32c
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b8/0x29c
vfs_write+0x410/0x584
ksys_write+0x84/0x140
system_call_exception+0x134/0x360
system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
-> #0 (&q->rq_qos_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__lock_acquire+0x1b6c/0x2ae0
lock_acquire+0x140/0x430
__mutex_lock+0xf0/0xa58
wbt_init+0x164/0x238
queue_wb_lat_store+0x1dc/0x20c
queue_attr_store+0x12c/0x164
sysfs_kf_write+0x6c/0xb0
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b8/0x29c
vfs_write+0x410/0x584
ksys_write+0x84/0x140
system_call_exception+0x134/0x360
system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&q->elevator_lock);
lock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
lock(&q->elevator_lock);
lock(&q->rq_qos_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
6 locks held by bash/5902:
#0: c000000051122400 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x84/0x140
#1: c00000007383f088 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x174/0x29c
#2: c000000008550428 (kn->active#182){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x180/0x29c
#3: c000000085d493a8 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#5){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x28/0x40
#4: c000000085d493e0 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#5){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_freeze_queue_nomemsave+0x28/0x40
#5: c000000085d498c8 (&q->elevator_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: queue_wb_lat_store+0xb0/0x20c
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 UID: 0 PID: 5902 Comm: bash Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5+ #138
Hardware name: IBM,9043-MRX POWER10 (architected) 0x800200 0xf000006 of:IBM,FW1060.00 (NM1060_028) hv:phyp pSeries
Call Trace:
[c0000000721ef590] [c00000000118f8a8] dump_stack_lvl+0x108/0x18c (unreliable)
[c0000000721ef5c0] [c00000000022563c] print_circular_bug+0x448/0x604
[c0000000721ef670] [c000000000225a44] check_noncircular+0x24c/0x26c
[c0000000721ef740] [c00000000022bf28] __lock_acquire+0x1b6c/0x2ae0
[c0000000721ef870] [c000000000229240] lock_acquire+0x140/0x430
[c0000000721ef970] [c0000000011cfbec] __mutex_lock+0xf0/0xa58
[c0000000721efaa0] [c00000000096c46c] wbt_init+0x164/0x238
[c0000000721efaf0] [c0000000008f8cd8] queue_wb_lat_store+0x1dc/0x20c
[c0000000721efb50] [c0000000008f8fa0] queue_attr_store+0x12c/0x164
[c0000000721efc60] [c0000000007c11cc] sysfs_kf_write+0x6c/0xb0
[c0000000721efca0] [c0000000007bfa4c] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b8/0x29c
[c0000000721efcf0] [c0000000006a281c] vfs_write+0x410/0x584
[c0000000721efdc0] [c0000000006a2cc8] ksys_write+0x84/0x140
[c0000000721efe10] [c000000000031b64] system_call_exception+0x134/0x360
[c0000000721efe50] [c00000000000cedc] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
>From the above log it's apparent that method which writes to sysfs attr
wbt_lat_usec acquires q->elevator_lock first, and then acquires q->rq_
qos_mutex. However the another method which writes to io.cost.qos,
acquires q->rq_qos_mutex first, and then acquires q->rq_qos_mutex. So
this could potentially cause the deadlock.
A closer look at ioc_qos_write shows that correcting the lock order is
non-trivial because q->rq_qos_mutex is acquired in blkg_conf_open_bdev
and released in blkg_conf_exit. The function blkg_conf_open_bdev is
responsible for parsing user input and finding the corresponding block
device (bdev) from the user provided major:minor number.
Since we do not know the bdev until blkg_conf_open_bdev completes, we
cannot simply move q->elevator_lock acquisition before blkg_conf_open_
bdev. So to address this, we intoduce new helpers blkg_conf_open_bdev_
frozen and blkg_conf_exit_frozen which are just wrappers around blkg_
conf_open_bdev and blkg_conf_exit respectively. The helper blkg_conf_
open_bdev_frozen is similar to blkg_conf_open_bdev, but additionally
freezes the queue, acquires q->elevator_lock and ensures the correct
locking order is followed between q->elevator_lock and q->rq_qos_mutex.
Similarly another helper blkg_conf_exit_frozen in addition to unfreezing
the queue ensures that we release the locks in correct order.
By using these helpers, now we maintain the same locking order in all
code paths where we update blk-wbt parameters.
Fixes: 245618f ("block: protect wbt_lat_usec using q->elevator_lock")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202503171650.cc082b66-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250319105518.468941-3-nilay@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
We have recently seen report of lockdep circular lock dependency warnings on platforms like Skylake and Kabylake: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc6-CI_DRM_16276-gca2c04fe76e8+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8360ee48 (iommu_probe_device_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iommu_probe_device+0x1d/0x70 but task is already holding lock: ffff888102c7efa8 (&device->physical_node_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: intel_iommu_init+0xe75/0x11f0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&device->physical_node_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 intel_iommu_init+0xe75/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #5 (dmar_global_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x43/0x1d0 enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x21/0x110 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x4c6/0x870 cpuhp_issue_call+0xbf/0x1f0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x111/0x320 __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 irq_remap_enable_fault_handling+0x3f/0xa0 apic_intr_mode_init+0x5c/0x110 x86_late_time_init+0x24/0x40 start_kernel+0x895/0xbd0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> #4 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x67/0x320 __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 page_alloc_init_cpuhp+0x2d/0x60 mm_core_init+0x18/0x2c0 start_kernel+0x576/0xbd0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> #3 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __cpuhp_state_add_instance+0x4f/0x220 iova_domain_init_rcaches+0x214/0x280 iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x1a4/0x710 iommu_device_register+0x17d/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #2 (&domain->iova_cookie->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x16b/0x710 iommu_device_register+0x17d/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 __iommu_probe_device+0x24c/0x4e0 probe_iommu_group+0x2b/0x50 bus_for_each_dev+0x7d/0xe0 iommu_device_register+0xe1/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 (iommu_probe_device_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1637/0x2810 lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300 __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 iommu_probe_device+0x1d/0x70 intel_iommu_init+0xe90/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: iommu_probe_device_lock --> dmar_global_lock --> &device->physical_node_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&device->physical_node_lock); lock(dmar_global_lock); lock(&device->physical_node_lock); lock(iommu_probe_device_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** This driver uses a global lock to protect the list of enumerated DMA remapping units. It is necessary due to the driver's support for dynamic addition and removal of remapping units at runtime. Two distinct code paths require iteration over this remapping unit list: - Device registration and probing: the driver iterates the list to register each remapping unit with the upper layer IOMMU framework and subsequently probe the devices managed by that unit. - Global configuration: Upper layer components may also iterate the list to apply configuration changes. The lock acquisition order between these two code paths was reversed. This caused lockdep warnings, indicating a risk of deadlock. Fix this warning by releasing the global lock before invoking upper layer interfaces for device registration. Fixes: b150654 ("iommu/vt-d: Fix suspicious RCU usage") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/SJ1PR11MB612953431F94F18C954C4A9CB9D32@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ Tested-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250317035714.1041549-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
Chia-Yu Chang says: ==================== AccECN protocol preparation patch series Please find the v7 v7 (03-Mar-2025) - Move 2 new patches added in v6 to the next AccECN patch series v6 (27-Dec-2024) - Avoid removing removing the potential CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE in ack_ev_flags of patch #1 (Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>) - Add reviewed-by tag in patches #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #12, #14 - Foloiwng 2 new pathces are added after patch #9 (Patch that adds SKB_GSO_TCP_ACCECN) * New patch #10 to replace exisiting SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN with SKB_GSO_TCP_ACCECN in the driver to avoid CWR flag corruption * New patch #11 adds AccECN for virtio by adding new negotiation flag (VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST/GUEST_ACCECN) in feature handshake and translating Accurate ECN GSO flag between virtio_net_hdr (VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ACCECN) and skb header (SKB_GSO_TCP_ACCECN) - Add detailed changelog and comments in #13 (Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>) - Move patch #14 to the next AccECN patch series (Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>) v5 (5-Nov-2024) - Add helper function "tcp_flags_ntohs" to preserve last 2 bytes of TCP flags of patch #4 (Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>) - Fix reverse X-max tree order of patches #4, #11 (Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>) - Rename variable "delta" as "timestamp_delta" of patch #2 fo clariety - Remove patch #14 in this series (Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>) v4 (21-Oct-2024) - Fix line length warning of patches #2, #4, #8, #10, #11, #14 - Fix spaces preferred around '|' (ctx:VxV) warning of patch #7 - Add missing CC'ed of patches #4, #12, #14 v3 (19-Oct-2024) - Fix build error in v2 v2 (18-Oct-2024) - Fix warning caused by NETIF_F_GSO_ACCECN_BIT in patch #9 (Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>) The full patch series can be found in https://github.com/L4STeam/linux-net-next/commits/upstream_l4steam/ The Accurate ECN draft can be found in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-28 ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
Tariq Toukan says: ==================== mlx5e: Support recovery counter in reset This series by Yael adds a recovery counter in ethtool, for any recovery type during port reset cycle. Series starts with some cleanup and refactoring patches. New counter is added and exposed to ethtool stats in patch #4. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1742112876-2890-1-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2025
…-bridge-ports'
Petr Machata says:
====================
mlxsw: Add VXLAN to the same hardware domain as physical bridge ports
Amit Cohen writes:
Packets which are trapped to CPU for forwarding in software data path
are handled according to driver marking of skb->offload_{,l3}_fwd_mark.
Packets which are marked as L2-forwarded in hardware, will not be flooded
by the bridge to bridge ports which are in the same hardware domain as the
ingress port.
Currently, mlxsw does not add VXLAN bridge ports to the same hardware
domain as physical bridge ports despite the fact that the device is able
to forward packets to and from VXLAN tunnels in hardware. In some
scenarios this can result in remote VTEPs receiving duplicate packets.
To solve such packets duplication, add VXLAN bridge ports to the same
hardware domain as other bridge ports.
One complication is ARP suppression which requires the local VTEP to avoid
flooding ARP packets to remote VTEPs if the local VTEP is able to reply on
behalf of remote hosts. This is currently implemented by having the device
flood ARP packets in hardware and trapping them during VXLAN encapsulation,
but marking them with skb->offload_fwd_mark=1 so that the bridge will not
re-flood them to physical bridge ports.
The above scheme will break when VXLAN bridge ports are added to the same
hardware domain as physical bridge ports as ARP packets that cannot be
suppressed by the bridge will not be able to egress the VXLAN bridge ports
due to hardware domain filtering. This is solved by trapping ARP packets
when they enter the device and not marking them as being forwarded in
hardware.
Patch set overview:
Patch #1 sets hardware to trap ARP packets at layer 2
Patches #2-#4 are preparations for setting hardwarwe domain of VXLAN
Patch #5 sets hardware domain of VXLAN
Patch #6 extends VXLAN flood test to verify that this set solves the
packets duplication
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/cover.1742224300.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2025
…ate_pagetables' This commit addresses a circular locking dependency in the svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables function. The function previously held a lock while determining whether to perform an unmap or eviction operation, which could lead to deadlocks. Fixes the below: [ 223.418794] ====================================================== [ 223.418820] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 223.418845] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G U OE [ 223.418869] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 223.418889] kfdtest/3939 is trying to acquire lock: [ 223.418906] ffff8957552eae38 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.419302] but task is already holding lock: [ 223.419303] ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.419447] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25 [ 223.419477] [IGT] amd_basic: executing [ 223.419599] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 223.419611] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 223.419621] -> #2 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 223.419636] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 223.419647] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.419656] svm_range_validate_and_map+0x2f1/0x15b0 [amdgpu] [ 223.419954] svm_range_set_attr+0xe8c/0x1710 [amdgpu] [ 223.420236] svm_ioctl+0x46/0x50 [amdgpu] [ 223.420503] kfd_ioctl_svm+0x50/0x90 [amdgpu] [ 223.420763] kfd_ioctl+0x409/0x6d0 [amdgpu] [ 223.421024] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0 [ 223.421036] x64_sys_call+0x1205/0x20d0 [ 223.421047] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140 [ 223.421056] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 223.421068] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 223.421084] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xab/0x1560 [ 223.421095] ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90 [ 223.421103] amdgpu_amdkfd_alloc_gtt_mem+0xcc/0x2b0 [amdgpu] [ 223.421361] add_queue_mes+0x3bc/0x440 [amdgpu] [ 223.421623] unhalt_cpsch+0x1ae/0x240 [amdgpu] [ 223.421888] kgd2kfd_start_sched+0x5e/0xd0 [amdgpu] [ 223.422148] amdgpu_amdkfd_start_sched+0x3d/0x50 [amdgpu] [ 223.422414] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x132/0x270 [amdgpu] [ 223.422662] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 223.422673] worker_thread+0x190/0x330 [ 223.422682] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 223.422690] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 223.422699] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 223.422708] -> #0 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 223.422723] __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810 [ 223.422734] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 223.422742] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 223.422751] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.422760] evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.423025] kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 223.423285] kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu] [ 223.423540] svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.423807] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250 [ 223.423819] copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0 [ 223.423829] copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0 [ 223.423839] kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0 [ 223.423847] __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 [ 223.423856] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30 [ 223.423864] x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0 [ 223.423872] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140 [ 223.423880] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 223.423891] other info that might help us debug this: [ 223.423903] Chain exists of: &dqm->lock_hidden --> reservation_ww_class_mutex --> &prange->lock [ 223.423926] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 223.423935] CPU0 CPU1 [ 223.423942] ---- ---- [ 223.423949] lock(&prange->lock); [ 223.423958] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 223.423970] lock(&prange->lock); [ 223.423981] lock(&dqm->lock_hidden); [ 223.423990] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 223.423999] 5 locks held by kfdtest/3939: [ 223.424006] #0: ffffffffb82b4fc0 (dup_mmap_sem){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: copy_process+0x1387/0x2ad0 [ 223.424026] #1: ffff89575eda81b0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13a8/0x2ad0 [ 223.424046] #2: ffff89575edaf3b0 (&mm->mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13e4/0x2ad0 [ 223.424066] #3: ffffffffb82e76e0 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: copy_page_range+0x1cea/0x1ea0 [ 223.424088] #4: ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.424365] stack backtrace: [ 223.424374] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3939 Comm: kfdtest Tainted: G U OE 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 [ 223.424392] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 223.424401] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS PRO WIFI/X570 AORUS PRO WIFI, BIOS F36a 02/16/2022 [ 223.424416] Call Trace: [ 223.424423] <TASK> [ 223.424430] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 223.424441] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 223.424449] print_circular_bug+0x275/0x350 [ 223.424460] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 223.424469] ? __bfs+0xfd/0x2c0 [ 223.424481] __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810 [ 223.424490] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.424505] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 223.424514] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.424783] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 223.424792] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.425058] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.425067] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 223.425076] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.425339] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.425350] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.425358] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.425367] evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.425631] kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 223.425893] kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu] [ 223.426156] svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.426423] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426436] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250 [ 223.426450] copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0 [ 223.426461] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426474] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426484] ? lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 223.426494] ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0 [ 223.426502] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426510] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10 [ 223.426519] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0 [ 223.426528] ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0 [ 223.426537] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426550] copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0 [ 223.426569] kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0 [ 223.426577] ? __schedule+0x4c9/0x1b00 [ 223.426586] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426594] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10 [ 223.426602] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426610] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0 [ 223.426619] ? schedule+0x107/0x1a0 [ 223.426629] __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 [ 223.426643] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30 [ 223.426652] x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0 [ 223.426661] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140 [ 223.426671] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426679] ? common_nsleep+0x44/0x50 [ 223.426690] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426698] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0 [ 223.426709] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426717] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200 [ 223.426727] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426736] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140 [ 223.426748] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426756] ? up_write+0x1c/0x1e0 [ 223.426765] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426775] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426783] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0 [ 223.426792] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426800] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200 [ 223.426810] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426818] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140 [ 223.426826] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200 [ 223.426836] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426844] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140 [ 223.426853] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426861] ? irqentry_exit+0x6b/0x90 [ 223.426869] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426877] ? exc_page_fault+0xa7/0x2c0 [ 223.426888] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 223.426898] RIP: 0033:0x7f46758eab57 [ 223.426906] Code: ba 04 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 45 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 bf 11 00 20 01 4c 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 b8 38 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 41 89 c0 85 c0 75 2c 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00 [ 223.426930] RSP: 002b:00007fff5c3e5188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000038 [ 223.426943] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4675f8c040 RCX: 00007f46758eab57 [ 223.426954] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000001200011 [ 223.426965] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 223.426975] R10: 00007f4675e81a50 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 223.426986] R13: 00007fff5c3e5470 R14: 00007fff5c3e53e0 R15: 00007fff5c3e5410 [ 223.427004] </TASK> v2: To resolve this issue, the allocation of the process context buffer (`proc_ctx_bo`) has been moved from the `add_queue_mes` function to the `pqm_create_queue` function. This change ensures that the buffer is allocated only when the first queue for a process is created and only if the Micro Engine Scheduler (MES) is enabled. (Felix) v3: Fix typo s/Memory Execution Scheduler (MES)/Micro Engine Scheduler in commit message. (Lijo) Fixes: 438b39a ("drm/amdkfd: pause autosuspend when creating pdd") Cc: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@amd.com> Cc: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@amd.com> Cc: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
…uctions
Add several ./test_progs tests:
- arena_atomics/load_acquire
- arena_atomics/store_release
- verifier_load_acquire/*
- verifier_store_release/*
- verifier_precision/bpf_load_acquire
- verifier_precision/bpf_store_release
The last two tests are added to check if backtrack_insn() handles the
new instructions correctly.
Additionally, the last test also makes sure that the verifier
"remembers" the value (in src_reg) we store-release into e.g. a stack
slot. For example, if we take a look at the test program:
#0: r1 = 8;
/* store_release((u64 *)(r10 - 8), r1); */
#1: .8byte %[store_release];
#2: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);
#3: r2 = r10;
#4: r2 += r1;
#5: r0 = 0;
#6: exit;
At #1, if the verifier doesn't remember that we wrote 8 to the stack,
then later at #4 we would be adding an unbounded scalar value to the
stack pointer, which would cause the program to be rejected:
VERIFIER LOG:
=============
...
math between fp pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed
For easier CI integration, instead of using built-ins like
__atomic_{load,store}_n() which depend on the new
__BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL pre-defined macro, manually craft
load-acquire/store-release instructions using __imm_insn(), as suggested
by Eduard.
All new tests depend on:
(1) Clang major version >= 18, and
(2) ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS is defined (currently implies -mcpu=v3 or
v4), and
(3) JIT supports load-acquire/store-release (currently arm64 and
x86-64)
In .../progs/arena_atomics.c:
/* 8-byte-aligned */
__u8 __arena_global load_acquire8_value = 0x12;
/* 1-byte hole */
__u16 __arena_global load_acquire16_value = 0x1234;
That 1-byte hole in the .addr_space.1 ELF section caused clang-17 to
crash:
fatal error: error in backend: unable to write nop sequence of 1 bytes
To work around such llvm-17 CI job failures, conditionally define
__arena_global variables as 64-bit if __clang_major__ < 18, to make sure
.addr_space.1 has no holes. Ideally we should avoid compiling this file
using clang-17 at all (arena tests depend on
__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST, and are skipped for llvm-17 anyway), but
that is a separate topic.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1b46c6feaf0f1b6984d9ec80e500cc7383e9da1a.1741049567.git.yepeilin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
perf test 11 hwmon fails on s390 with this error
# ./perf test -Fv 11
--- start ---
---- end ----
11.1: Basic parsing test : Ok
--- start ---
Testing 'temp_test_hwmon_event1'
Using CPUID IBM,3931,704,A01,3.7,002f
temp_test_hwmon_event1 -> hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/
FAILED tests/hwmon_pmu.c:189 Unexpected config for
'temp_test_hwmon_event1', 292470092988416 != 655361
---- end ----
11.2: Parsing without PMU name : FAILED!
--- start ---
Testing 'hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/'
FAILED tests/hwmon_pmu.c:189 Unexpected config for
'hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/',
292470092988416 != 655361
---- end ----
11.3: Parsing with PMU name : FAILED!
#
The root cause is in member test_event::config which is initialized
to 0xA0001 or 655361. During event parsing a long list event parsing
functions are called and end up with this gdb call stack:
#0 hwmon_pmu__config_term (hwm=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
term=0x168db60, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/hwmon_pmu.c:623
#1 hwmon_pmu__config_terms (pmu=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/hwmon_pmu.c:662
#2 0x00000000012f870c in perf_pmu__config_terms (pmu=0x168dfd0,
attr=0x3ffffff5ee8, terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, zero=false,
apply_hardcoded=false, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/pmu.c:1519
#3 0x00000000012f88a4 in perf_pmu__config (pmu=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
head_terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, apply_hardcoded=false, err=0x3ffffff81c8)
at util/pmu.c:1545
#4 0x00000000012680c4 in parse_events_add_pmu (parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
list=0x168dc00, pmu=0x168dfd0, const_parsed_terms=0x3ffffff6090,
auto_merge_stats=true, alternate_hw_config=10)
at util/parse-events.c:1508
#5 0x00000000012684c6 in parse_events_multi_pmu_add (parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
event_name=0x168ec10 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", hw_config=10,
const_parsed_terms=0x0, listp=0x3ffffff6230, loc_=0x3ffffff70e0)
at util/parse-events.c:1592
#6 0x00000000012f0e4e in parse_events_parse (_parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
scanner=0x16878c0) at util/parse-events.y:293
#7 0x00000000012695a0 in parse_events__scanner (str=0x3ffffff81d8
"temp_test_hwmon_event1", input=0x0, parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8)
at util/parse-events.c:1867
#8 0x000000000126a1e8 in __parse_events (evlist=0x168b580,
str=0x3ffffff81d8 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", pmu_filter=0x0,
err=0x3ffffff81c8, fake_pmu=false, warn_if_reordered=true,
fake_tp=false) at util/parse-events.c:2136
#9 0x00000000011e36aa in parse_events (evlist=0x168b580,
str=0x3ffffff81d8 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", err=0x3ffffff81c8)
at /root/linux/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h:41
#10 0x00000000011e3e64 in do_test (i=0, with_pmu=false, with_alias=false)
at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:164
#11 0x00000000011e422c in test__hwmon_pmu (with_pmu=false)
at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:219
#12 0x00000000011e431c in test__hwmon_pmu_without_pmu (test=0x1610368
<suite.hwmon_pmu>, subtest=1) at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:23
where the attr::config is set to value 292470092988416 or 0x10a0000000000
in line 625 of file ./util/hwmon_pmu.c:
attr->config = key.type_and_num;
However member key::type_and_num is defined as union and bit field:
union hwmon_pmu_event_key {
long type_and_num;
struct {
int num :16;
enum hwmon_type type :8;
};
};
s390 is big endian and Intel is little endian architecture.
The events for the hwmon dummy pmu have num = 1 or num = 2 and
type is set to HWMON_TYPE_TEMP (which is 10).
On s390 this assignes member key::type_and_num the value of
0x10a0000000000 (which is 292470092988416) as shown in above
trace output.
Fix this and export the structure/union hwmon_pmu_event_key
so the test shares the same implementation as the event parsing
functions for union and bit fields. This should avoid
endianess issues on all platforms.
Output after:
# ./perf test -F 11
11.1: Basic parsing test : Ok
11.2: Parsing without PMU name : Ok
11.3: Parsing with PMU name : Ok
#
Fixes: 531ee0f ("perf test: Add hwmon "PMU" test")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250131112400.568975-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
Ian told me that there are many memory leaks in the hierarchy mode. I
can easily reproduce it with the follwing command.
$ make DEBUG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fsanitize=leak
$ perf record --latency -g -- ./perf test -w thloop
$ perf report -H --stdio
...
Indirect leak of 168 byte(s) in 21 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f3414c16c65 in malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:75
#1 0x55ed3602346e in map__get util/map.h:189
#2 0x55ed36024cc4 in hist_entry__init util/hist.c:476
#3 0x55ed36025208 in hist_entry__new util/hist.c:588
#4 0x55ed36027c05 in hierarchy_insert_entry util/hist.c:1587
#5 0x55ed36027e2e in hists__hierarchy_insert_entry util/hist.c:1638
#6 0x55ed36027fa4 in hists__collapse_insert_entry util/hist.c:1685
#7 0x55ed360283e8 in hists__collapse_resort util/hist.c:1776
#8 0x55ed35de0323 in report__collapse_hists /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:735
#9 0x55ed35de15b4 in __cmd_report /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1119
#10 0x55ed35de43dc in cmd_report /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1867
#11 0x55ed35e66767 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:351
#12 0x55ed35e66a0e in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:404
#13 0x55ed35e66b67 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:448
#14 0x55ed35e66eb0 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:556
#15 0x7f340ac33d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
...
$ perf report -H --stdio 2>&1 | grep -c '^Indirect leak'
93
I found that hist_entry__delete() missed to release child entries in the
hierarchy tree (hroot_{in,out}). It needs to iterate the child entries
and call hist_entry__delete() recursively.
After this change:
$ perf report -H --stdio 2>&1 | grep -c '^Indirect leak'
0
Reported-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Tested-by Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250307061250.320849-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
The env.pmu_mapping can be leaked when it reads data from a pipe on AMD.
For a pipe data, it reads the header data including pmu_mapping from
PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE runtime. But it's already set in:
perf_session__new()
__perf_session__new()
evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw()
evlist__has_amd_ibs()
perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings()
Then it'll overwrite that when it processes the HEADER_FEATURE record.
Here's a report from address sanitizer.
Direct leak of 2689 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fed8f814596 in realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
#1 0x5595a7d416b1 in strbuf_grow util/strbuf.c:64
#2 0x5595a7d414ef in strbuf_init util/strbuf.c:25
#3 0x5595a7d0f4b7 in perf_env__read_pmu_mappings util/env.c:362
#4 0x5595a7d12ab7 in perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings util/env.c:517
#5 0x5595a7d89d2f in evlist__has_amd_ibs util/amd-sample-raw.c:315
#6 0x5595a7d87fb2 in evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw util/sample-raw.c:23
#7 0x5595a7d7f893 in __perf_session__new util/session.c:179
#8 0x5595a7b79572 in perf_session__new util/session.h:115
#9 0x5595a7b7e9dc in cmd_report builtin-report.c:1603
#10 0x5595a7c019eb in run_builtin perf.c:351
#11 0x5595a7c01c92 in handle_internal_command perf.c:404
#12 0x5595a7c01deb in run_argv perf.c:448
#13 0x5595a7c02134 in main perf.c:556
#14 0x7fed85833d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
Let's free the existing pmu_mapping data if any.
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311000416.817631-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
When a bio with REQ_PREFLUSH is submitted to dm, __send_empty_flush()
generates a flush_bio with REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_SYNC,
which causes the flush_bio to be throttled by wbt_wait().
An example from v5.4, similar problem also exists in upstream:
crash> bt 2091206
PID: 2091206 TASK: ffff2050df92a300 CPU: 109 COMMAND: "kworker/u260:0"
#0 [ffff800084a2f7f0] __switch_to at ffff80004008aeb8
#1 [ffff800084a2f820] __schedule at ffff800040bfa0c4
#2 [ffff800084a2f880] schedule at ffff800040bfa4b4
#3 [ffff800084a2f8a0] io_schedule at ffff800040bfa9c4
#4 [ffff800084a2f8c0] rq_qos_wait at ffff8000405925bc
#5 [ffff800084a2f940] wbt_wait at ffff8000405bb3a0
#6 [ffff800084a2f9a0] __rq_qos_throttle at ffff800040592254
#7 [ffff800084a2f9c0] blk_mq_make_request at ffff80004057cf38
#8 [ffff800084a2fa60] generic_make_request at ffff800040570138
#9 [ffff800084a2fae0] submit_bio at ffff8000405703b4
#10 [ffff800084a2fb50] xlog_write_iclog at ffff800001280834 [xfs]
#11 [ffff800084a2fbb0] xlog_sync at ffff800001280c3c [xfs]
#12 [ffff800084a2fbf0] xlog_state_release_iclog at ffff800001280df4 [xfs]
#13 [ffff800084a2fc10] xlog_write at ffff80000128203c [xfs]
#14 [ffff800084a2fcd0] xlog_cil_push at ffff8000012846dc [xfs]
#15 [ffff800084a2fda0] xlog_cil_push_work at ffff800001284a2c [xfs]
#16 [ffff800084a2fdb0] process_one_work at ffff800040111d08
#17 [ffff800084a2fe00] worker_thread at ffff8000401121cc
#18 [ffff800084a2fe70] kthread at ffff800040118de4
After commit 2def284 ("xfs: don't allow log IO to be throttled"),
the metadata submitted by xlog_write_iclog() should not be throttled.
But due to the existence of the dm layer, throttling flush_bio indirectly
causes the metadata bio to be throttled.
Fix this by conditionally adding REQ_IDLE to flush_bio.bi_opf, which makes
wbt_should_throttle() return false to avoid wbt_wait().
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Tianxiang Peng <txpeng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Peng <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2025
v2:
- Created a single error handling unlock and exit in veth_pool_store
- Greatly expanded commit message with previous explanatory-only text
Summary: Use rtnl_mutex to synchronize veth_pool_store with itself,
ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open, preventing multiple calls in a row to
napi_disable.
Background: Two (or more) threads could call veth_pool_store through
writing to /sys/devices/vio/30000002/pool*/*. You can do this easily
with a little shell script. This causes a hang.
I configured LOCKDEP, compiled ibmveth.c with DEBUG, and built a new
kernel. I ran this test again and saw:
Setting pool0/active to 0
Setting pool1/active to 1
[ 73.911067][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
Setting pool1/active to 1
Setting pool1/active to 0
[ 73.911367][ T4366] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
[ 73.916056][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close complete
[ 73.916064][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: open starting
[ 110.808564][ T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
[ 230.808495][ T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
[ 243.683786][ T123] INFO: task stress.sh:4365 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[ 243.683827][ T123] Not tainted 6.14.0-01103-g2df0c02dab82-dirty #8
[ 243.683833][ T123] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 243.683838][ T123] task:stress.sh state:D stack:28096 pid:4365 tgid:4365 ppid:4364 task_flags:0x400040 flags:0x00042000
[ 243.683852][ T123] Call Trace:
[ 243.683857][ T123] [c00000000c38f690] [0000000000000001] 0x1 (unreliable)
[ 243.683868][ T123] [c00000000c38f840] [c00000000001f908] __switch_to+0x318/0x4e0
[ 243.683878][ T123] [c00000000c38f8a0] [c000000001549a70] __schedule+0x500/0x12a0
[ 243.683888][ T123] [c00000000c38f9a0] [c00000000154a878] schedule+0x68/0x210
[ 243.683896][ T123] [c00000000c38f9d0] [c00000000154ac80] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x30/0x50
[ 243.683904][ T123] [c00000000c38fa00] [c00000000154dbb0] __mutex_lock+0x730/0x10f0
[ 243.683913][ T123] [c00000000c38fb10] [c000000001154d40] napi_enable+0x30/0x60
[ 243.683921][ T123] [c00000000c38fb40] [c000000000f4ae94] ibmveth_open+0x68/0x5dc
[ 243.683928][ T123] [c00000000c38fbe0] [c000000000f4aa20] veth_pool_store+0x220/0x270
[ 243.683936][ T123] [c00000000c38fc70] [c000000000826278] sysfs_kf_write+0x68/0xb0
[ 243.683944][ T123] [c00000000c38fcb0] [c0000000008240b8] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x198/0x2d0
[ 243.683951][ T123] [c00000000c38fd00] [c00000000071b9ac] vfs_write+0x34c/0x650
[ 243.683958][ T123] [c00000000c38fdc0] [c00000000071bea8] ksys_write+0x88/0x150
[ 243.683966][ T123] [c00000000c38fe10] [c0000000000317f4] system_call_exception+0x124/0x340
[ 243.683973][ T123] [c00000000c38fe50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
...
[ 243.684087][ T123] Showing all locks held in the system:
[ 243.684095][ T123] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/123:
[ 243.684099][ T123] #0: c00000000278e370 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x50/0x248
[ 243.684114][ T123] 4 locks held by stress.sh/4365:
[ 243.684119][ T123] #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
[ 243.684132][ T123] #1: c000000041aea888 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
[ 243.684143][ T123] #2: c0000000366fb9a8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
[ 243.684155][ T123] #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_enable+0x30/0x60
[ 243.684166][ T123] 5 locks held by stress.sh/4366:
[ 243.684170][ T123] #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
[ 243.684183][ T123] #1: c00000000aee2288 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
[ 243.684194][ T123] #2: c0000000366f4ba8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
[ 243.684205][ T123] #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_disable+0x30/0x60
[ 243.684216][ T123] #4: c0000003ff9bbf18 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __schedule+0x138/0x12a0
From the ibmveth debug, two threads are calling veth_pool_store, which
calls ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open. Here's the sequence:
T4365 T4366
----------------- ----------------- ---------
veth_pool_store veth_pool_store
ibmveth_close
ibmveth_close
napi_disable
napi_disable
ibmveth_open
napi_enable <- HANG
ibmveth_close calls napi_disable at the top and ibmveth_open calls
napi_enable at the top.
https://docs.kernel.org/networking/napi.html]] says
The control APIs are not idempotent. Control API calls are safe
against concurrent use of datapath APIs but an incorrect sequence of
control API calls may result in crashes, deadlocks, or race
conditions. For example, calling napi_disable() multiple times in a
row will deadlock.
In the normal open and close paths, rtnl_mutex is acquired to prevent
other callers. This is missing from veth_pool_store. Use rtnl_mutex in
veth_pool_store fixes these hangs.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 860f242 ("[PATCH] ibmveth change buffer pools dynamically")
Reviewed-by: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250402154403.386744-1-davemarq@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2025
Commit 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context start") removes the FP context protection of dml2_create(), and it said "All the DC_FP_START/END should be used before call anything from DML2". However, dml2_validate()/dml21_validate() are not protected from their callers, causing such errors: do_fpu invoked from kernel context![#1]: CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 331 Comm: kworker/10:1H Not tainted 6.14.0-rc6+ #4 Workqueue: events_highpri dm_irq_work_func [amdgpu] pc ffff800003191eb0 ra ffff800003191e60 tp 9000000107a94000 sp 9000000107a975b0 a0 9000000140ce4910 a1 0000000000000000 a2 9000000140ce49b0 a3 9000000140ce49a8 a4 9000000140ce49a8 a5 0000000100000000 a6 0000000000000001 a7 9000000107a97660 t0 ffff800003790000 t1 9000000140ce5000 t2 0000000000000001 t3 0000000000000000 t4 0000000000000004 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000000 t8 0000000100000000 u0 ffff8000031a3b9c s9 9000000130bc0000 s0 9000000132400000 s1 9000000140ec0000 s2 9000000132400000 s3 9000000140ce0000 s4 90000000057f8b88 s5 9000000140ec0000 s6 9000000140ce4910 s7 0000000000000001 s8 9000000130d45010 ra: ffff800003191e60 dml21_map_dc_state_into_dml_display_cfg+0x40/0x1140 [amdgpu] ERA: ffff800003191eb0 dml21_map_dc_state_into_dml_display_cfg+0x90/0x1140 [amdgpu] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 000f0000 [FPD] (IS= ECode=15 EsubCode=0) PRID: 0014d010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C6000/S) Process kworker/10:1H (pid: 331, threadinfo=000000007bf9ddb0, task=00000000cc4ab9f3) Stack : 0000000100000000 0000043800000780 0000000100000001 0000000100000001 0000000000000000 0000078000000000 0000000000000438 0000078000000000 0000000000000438 0000078000000000 0000000000000438 0000000100000000 0000000100000000 0000000100000000 0000000100000000 0000000100000000 0000000000000001 9000000140ec0000 9000000132400000 9000000132400000 ffff800003408000 ffff800003408000 9000000132400000 9000000140ce0000 9000000140ce0000 ffff800003193850 0000000000000001 9000000140ec0000 9000000132400000 9000000140ec0860 9000000140ec0738 0000000000000001 90000001405e8000 9000000130bc0000 9000000140ec02a8 ffff8000031b5db8 0000000000000000 0000043800000780 0000000000000003 ffff8000031b79cc ... Call Trace: [<ffff800003191eb0>] dml21_map_dc_state_into_dml_display_cfg+0x90/0x1140 [amdgpu] [<ffff80000319384c>] dml21_validate+0xcc/0x520 [amdgpu] [<ffff8000031b8948>] dc_validate_global_state+0x2e8/0x460 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002e94034>] create_validate_stream_for_sink+0x3d4/0x420 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002e940e4>] amdgpu_dm_connector_mode_valid+0x64/0x240 [amdgpu] [<900000000441d6b8>] drm_connector_mode_valid+0x38/0x80 [<900000000441d824>] __drm_helper_update_and_validate+0x124/0x3e0 [<900000000441ddc0>] drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x2e0/0x620 [<90000000044050dc>] drm_client_modeset_probe+0x23c/0x1780 [<9000000004420384>] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x44/0x5a0 [<9000000004403acc>] drm_client_dev_hotplug+0xcc/0x140 [<ffff800002e9ab50>] handle_hpd_irq_helper+0x1b0/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [<90000000038f5da0>] process_one_work+0x160/0x300 [<90000000038f6718>] worker_thread+0x318/0x440 [<9000000003901b8c>] kthread+0x12c/0x220 [<90000000038b1484>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x8/0xa4 Unfortunately, protecting dml2_validate()/dml21_validate() out of DML2 causes "sleeping function called from invalid context", so protect them with DC_FP_START() and DC_FP_END() inside. Fixes: 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context start") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> Tested-by: Dongyan Qian <qiandongyan@loongson.cn> Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2025
If we finds a vq without a name in our input array in
virtio_ccw_find_vqs(), we treat it as "non-existing" and set the vq pointer
to NULL; we will not call virtio_ccw_setup_vq() to allocate/setup a vq.
Consequently, we create only a queue if it actually exists (name != NULL)
and assign an incremental queue index to each such existing queue.
However, in virtio_ccw_register_adapter_ind()->get_airq_indicator() we
will not ignore these "non-existing queues", but instead assign an airq
indicator to them.
Besides never releasing them in virtio_ccw_drop_indicators() (because
there is no virtqueue), the bigger issue seems to be that there will be a
disagreement between the device and the Linux guest about the airq
indicator to be used for notifying a queue, because the indicator bit
for adapter I/O interrupt is derived from the queue index.
The virtio spec states under "Setting Up Two-Stage Queue Indicators":
... indicator contains the guest address of an area wherein the
indicators for the devices are contained, starting at bit_nr, one
bit per virtqueue of the device.
And further in "Notification via Adapter I/O Interrupts":
For notifying the driver of virtqueue buffers, the device sets the
bit in the guest-provided indicator area at the corresponding
offset.
For example, QEMU uses in virtio_ccw_notify() the queue index (passed as
"vector") to select the relevant indicator bit. If a queue does not exist,
it does not have a corresponding indicator bit assigned, because it
effectively doesn't have a queue index.
Using a virtio-balloon-ccw device under QEMU with free-page-hinting
disabled ("free-page-hint=off") but free-page-reporting enabled
("free-page-reporting=on") will result in free page reporting
not working as expected: in the virtio_balloon driver, we'll be stuck
forever in virtballoon_free_page_report()->wait_event(), because the
waitqueue will not be woken up as the notification from the device is
lost: it would use the wrong indicator bit.
Free page reporting stops working and we get splats (when configured to
detect hung wqs) like:
INFO: task kworker/1:3:463 blocked for more than 61 seconds.
Not tainted 6.14.0 #4
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/1:3 [...]
Workqueue: events page_reporting_process
Call Trace:
[<000002f404e6dfb2>] __schedule+0x402/0x1640
[<000002f404e6f22e>] schedule+0x3e/0xe0
[<000002f3846a88fa>] virtballoon_free_page_report+0xaa/0x110 [virtio_balloon]
[<000002f40435c8a4>] page_reporting_process+0x2e4/0x740
[<000002f403fd3ee2>] process_one_work+0x1c2/0x400
[<000002f403fd4b96>] worker_thread+0x296/0x420
[<000002f403fe10b4>] kthread+0x124/0x290
[<000002f403f4e0dc>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[<000002f404e77272>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x38
There was recently a discussion [1] whether the "holes" should be
treated differently again, effectively assigning also non-existing
queues a queue index: that should also fix the issue, but requires other
workarounds to not break existing setups.
Let's fix it without affecting existing setups for now by properly ignoring
the non-existing queues, so the indicator bits will match the queue
indexes.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1720611677.git.mst@redhat.com/
Fixes: a229989 ("virtio: don't allocate vqs when names[i] = NULL")
Reported-by: Chandra Merla <cmerla@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250402203621.940090-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation to hang forever, blocking the write path. Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc1 #252 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 but task is already holding lock: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}: blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500 blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0 scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80 sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470 sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60 blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0 btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs] btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs] btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs] btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs] kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}: down_read+0x9b/0x470 btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs] btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360 btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16); lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16); lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by modprobe/1110: #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0 #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 #252 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90 print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274 check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0 ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650 ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0 ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10 ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10 ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50 ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot]. Want to support this open source service? Please star it : )