Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update config.yml #2240

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Update config.yml #2240

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

didimitrie
Copy link
Member

Bumps resource class to large for build jobs. See conversation on discord

Description & motivation

Changes:

To-do before merge:

Screenshots:

Validation of changes:

Checklist:

  • My pull request follows the guidelines in the Contributing guide?
  • My pull request does not duplicate any other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • My commits are related to the pull request and do not amend unrelated code or documentation.
  • My code follows a similar style to existing code.
  • I have added appropriate tests.
  • I have updated or added relevant documentation.

References

Bumps resource class to large for build jobs
gjedlicska
gjedlicska previously approved these changes May 2, 2024
now using same resource class as the test job
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ jobs:

docker-build: &build-job
docker: *docker-base-image
resource_class: medium
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we bump it for build-frontend-2 only?

  docker-build-frontend-2:
    <<: *build-job
    resource_class: xlarge # I think this should override the referenced resource_class 🤞
    environment:
      SPECKLE_SERVER_PACKAGE: frontend-2

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would be cheaper, true :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like the job specific override does what I hoped it would do. I like when guesses like that work out 😄

@didimitrie
Copy link
Member Author

closing as it was just a symptom of the real problem, see #2241 (review)

@didimitrie didimitrie closed this May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants