Skip to content

Conversation

@overlookmotel
Copy link
Member

@overlookmotel overlookmotel commented Jul 31, 2025

It's more conventional for methods to return a &[T] instead of a &Vec<T>.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-semantic Area - Semantic C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior labels Jul 31, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

overlookmotel commented Jul 31, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@overlookmotel overlookmotel changed the title refactor(semantic): Scoping::get_resolved_reference_ids return slice refactor(semantic)!: Scoping::get_resolved_reference_ids return slice Jul 31, 2025
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 31, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #12665 will not alter performance

Comparing 07-29-refactor_semantic_scoping_get_resolved_reference_ids_return_slice (3175aa3) with 07-29-refactor_mangler_move_nodeid_lookup_into_is_name_set_reference_node_ (77d397a)

Summary

✅ 34 untouched benchmarks

@overlookmotel overlookmotel marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2025 10:23
@overlookmotel overlookmotel requested a review from Dunqing as a code owner July 31, 2025 10:23
@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Jul 31, 2025
@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Merge activity

…ce (#12665)

It's more conventional for methods to return a `&[T]` instead of a `&Vec<T>`.
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 07-29-refactor_mangler_move_nodeid_lookup_into_is_name_set_reference_node_ branch from e2723af to 77d397a Compare July 31, 2025 15:32
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 07-29-refactor_semantic_scoping_get_resolved_reference_ids_return_slice branch from 4bc411b to 3175aa3 Compare July 31, 2025 15:33
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Jul 31, 2025
Base automatically changed from 07-29-refactor_mangler_move_nodeid_lookup_into_is_name_set_reference_node_ to main July 31, 2025 15:39
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 3175aa3 into main Jul 31, 2025
25 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 07-29-refactor_semantic_scoping_get_resolved_reference_ids_return_slice branch July 31, 2025 15:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-semantic Area - Semantic C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants