-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deps: cherry-pick 1f53e42 from v8 upstream #7612
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LGTM |
java.io.IOException on pi3-raspbian-jessie but otherwise green. V8 test suite is green. |
LGTM |
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See nodejs#7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#37597} Fixes: nodejs#7536
Apologies, something went wrong while pushing to master. Landed in 5cdbbdf, thanks for the reviews. |
bnoordhuis
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See #7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: #7536 PR-URL: #7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
@bnoordhuis Does this need to land in v6.x? If so, mind sending a backport PR? Thanks! |
bnoordhuis
added a commit
to bnoordhuis/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See nodejs#7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#37597} Fixes: nodejs#7536 PR-URL: nodejs#7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
#7789 - v6.x |
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See #7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: #7536 PR-URL: #7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
to ibmruntimes/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See nodejs/node#7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: nodejs/node#7536 PR-URL: nodejs/node#7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
ofrobots
pushed a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See nodejs#7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#37597} Fixes: nodejs#7536 PR-URL: nodejs#7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See #7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: #7536 PR-URL: #7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See #7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: #7536 PR-URL: #7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See #7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: #7536 PR-URL: #7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See #7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: #7536 PR-URL: #7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
Closed
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
to ibmruntimes/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2016
Original commit message: Handle symbols in FrameMirror#invocationText(). Fix a TypeError when putting together the invocationText for a symbol method's stack frame. See nodejs/node#7536. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2122793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37597} Fixes: nodejs/node#7536 PR-URL: nodejs/node#7612 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com>
ofrobots
added a commit
to ofrobots/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2017
The cherry-pick of nodejs#7612 to v4.x (4369055) added in nodejs#9298 wasn't quite correct as it depends on a runtime function %SymbolDescriptiveString that doesn't exist on v4.x. We can use %SymbolDescription instead. Ref: nodejs#7612 Ref: nodejs#9298
2 tasks
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2017
The cherry-pick of #7612 to v4.x (4369055) added in #9298 wasn't quite correct as it depends on a runtime function %SymbolDescriptiveString that doesn't exist on v4.x. We can use %SymbolDescription instead. Ref: #7612 Ref: #9298 PR-URL: #10732 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
The cherry-pick of #7612 to v4.x (4369055) added in #9298 wasn't quite correct as it depends on a runtime function %SymbolDescriptiveString that doesn't exist on v4.x. We can use %SymbolDescription instead. Ref: #7612 Ref: #9298 PR-URL: #10732 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2017
The cherry-pick of #7612 to v4.x (4369055) added in #9298 wasn't quite correct as it depends on a runtime function %SymbolDescriptiveString that doesn't exist on v4.x. We can use %SymbolDescription instead. Ref: #7612 Ref: #9298 PR-URL: #10732 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
gibfahn
pushed a commit
to ibmruntimes/node
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2017
The cherry-pick of nodejs#7612 to v4.x (4369055) added in nodejs#9298 wasn't quite correct as it depends on a runtime function %SymbolDescriptiveString that doesn't exist on v4.x. We can use %SymbolDescription instead. Ref: nodejs/node#7612 Ref: nodejs/node#9298 PR-URL: nodejs/node#10732 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original commit message:
Fixes: #7536
R=@nodejs/v8
Word from upstream is that 5.1 is abandoned so I haven't requested a back-port. (Well, I did, but it's unlikely to happen. I did request back-ports to 5.2 and 5.3.)
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/3218/
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/183/