-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Speedup VariableOrdering.append from O(N^2) to O(N) #657
Speedup VariableOrdering.append from O(N^2) to O(N) #657
Conversation
Hi @ahojnnes! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
CI failures seem unrelated to the changes in this PR. |
Thanks so much for this fix. It's unfortunate how such a careless but small oversight had so large of an impact. I'll make another PR first to fix the CI errors. Then we can merge. |
@ahojnnes Ci should be fixed now if you rebase on top of latest main. |
01070c8
to
0780cfe
Compare
@luisenp Thanks for fixing the CI. I rebased on latest master. Cheers. |
@luisenp Another (seemingly transient) CI failure. Might need a retrigger of the build, which I don't have permission for. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks for the fix!
Motivation and Context
When specifying the ordering for larger problems with many thousands of variables, the current implementation becomes very slow due to the O(N^2) complexity caused by the O(N) complexity of checking existence of
var
in the_var_order
list. For small problems, the new implementation is a little slower but the difference is negligible. For large problems, the speed goes down from multiple 10s of seconds toHow Has This Been Tested
The runtime has been tested on various bundle adjustment problems. The functionality should be covered by existing unit tests with unchanged behavior.
Types of changes
Checklist