Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge 0.39.0 RC0 to 0.39.0 #6725

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Jul 20, 2020
Merged

Merge 0.39.0 RC0 to 0.39.0 #6725

merged 40 commits into from
Jul 20, 2020

Conversation

alessio
Copy link
Contributor

@alessio alessio commented Jul 15, 2020

Release v0.39.0


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

Alessio Treglia and others added 29 commits June 9, 2020 15:46
`keys parse` uses the global configuration before
before client applications have had a chance to
apply their settings.

This change adds a `GetSealedConfig()` helper
that waits for the config to be sealed before
returning it.

Fixes: #5091
Origin: 4e328d7
Author: Adam Bozanich <adam.boz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alessio Treglia <alessio@tendermint.com>
* launchpad: bump tendermint to v0.33.6

* cha-cha-cha
ChainAnteDecorators() panics when no arguments are supplied.
This change its behaviour and the function now returns a nil
AnteHandler in case no AnteDecorator instances are supplied.

Closes: #5741
* launchpad: backport cliCtx.QueryABCI

* add prove flag
Include changes from PR #6283

Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze <31522760+fedekunze@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alessio Treglia <alessio@tendermint.com>
Launchpad's Stable Release Managers team's current composition as
approved by @okwme (ICF):

* @alessio
* @clevinson
* @ethanfrey
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2020

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release/v0.39.0@5f6e499). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##             release/v0.39.0    #6725   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage                   ?   51.50%           
==================================================
  Files                      ?      337           
  Lines                      ?    20619           
  Branches                   ?        0           
==================================================
  Hits                       ?    10619           
  Misses                     ?     9197           
  Partials                   ?      803           

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
NEWS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
NEWS.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
# Cosmos-SDK v0.39.0 Release Notes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't you just call this file RELEASE_NOTES.md?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The filename was inspired by a naming convention that is wide spread across open source projects https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#NEWS-File

If you feel particularly strongly in favour of renaming this to RELEASE_NOTES.md (or strongly against keeping it as it is), then I'll happily rename it. @clevinson @ethanfrey any thoughts on this?

Please do note that I'm planning to copy and paste the contents in the release I'll publish in Github too anyway :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine either way. Don't have a strong preference. If we are making use of a NEWS file a standard, i would suggest documenting it somewhere in our release procedure, README.md, or CONTRIBUTING.md, so that its clear to users where to find this info.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've renamed NEWS.md to RELEASE_NOTES.md. A self-explanatory name is worth 1000s additional lines in CONTRIBUTING.md. Thanks @clevinson!

Co-authored-by: Alexander Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
NEWS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alessio alessio marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2020 16:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@fedekunze fedekunze left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marcotradenet
Copy link

We tested it. It works!

@alessio
Copy link
Contributor Author

alessio commented Jul 20, 2020

@clevinson ACKed via private message. Releasing now.

@alessio alessio merged commit 89ceb62 into release/v0.39.0 Jul 20, 2020
@alessio alessio deleted the rc0/v0.39.0 branch July 20, 2020 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants