-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release v0.39.0 - RC0 #6707
Release v0.39.0 - RC0 #6707
Conversation
`keys parse` uses the global configuration before before client applications have had a chance to apply their settings. This change adds a `GetSealedConfig()` helper that waits for the config to be sealed before returning it. Fixes: #5091 Origin: 4e328d7 Author: Adam Bozanich <adam.boz@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alessio Treglia <alessio@tendermint.com>
* launchpad: bump tendermint to v0.33.6 * cha-cha-cha
* launchpad: backport cliCtx.QueryABCI * add prove flag
Include changes from PR #6283 Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze <31522760+fedekunze@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alessio Treglia <alessio@tendermint.com>
Does this need a testnet to do testnet before release? |
@marbar3778 dixit:
I would agree to that, yes. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v0.39.0 #6707 +/- ##
==================================================
Coverage ? 51.60%
==================================================
Files ? 337
Lines ? 20643
Branches ? 0
==================================================
Hits ? 10653
Misses ? 9182
Partials ? 808 |
Launchpad's Stable Release Managers team's current composition as approved by @okwme (ICF): * @alessio * @clevinson * @ethanfrey
.github/CODEOWNERS
Outdated
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
# CODEOWNERS: https://help.github.com/articles/about-codeowners/ | |||
|
|||
# Primary repo maintainers | |||
* @rigelrozanski @alexanderbez @jackzampolin @alessio @fedekunze | |||
* @alessio @clevinson @ethanfrey |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't believe this does what you would like. You should set these codeowners to the 0.39 line. so you three would be code owners for the backport branches only.
This won't change anything as the codeowners need to be on the default branch...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I originally intended to use the CODEOWNERS
hip thingy as a way to automatically notify the people listed there on PRs that was meant to be merged against launchpad-specific branches (cause when you are in CODEOWNERS you get the notification automatically every time a PR is opened). But I think you're right, maybe this is not the best way of doing it - and it's not effective at all either. Can you help me please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(meanwhile, I've reverted the respective commit)
This reverts commit f384592.
Launchpad fix for #6287
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comment on release notes, otherwise looks good!
NEWS.md
Outdated
|
||
## Regression in the signature verification when multiple transactions in the same block are sent from the same account | ||
|
||
When multiple transactions in the same block are sent (and correctly signed) by the same account, chances are that some of them could be rejected and the error `unauthorized: signature verification failed` would be returned due to the account's sequence (*nonce*) getting stuck and not being incremented by the ante handler. This behaviour was [a regression](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/issues/6287) introduced in the `v0.38` release series and did not occur in the `v0.37` release series. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we be more explicit in this section that the regression has been fixed in 0.39? This section currently outlines the problem, but does not really state whether or not it has been fixed in 0.39.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, please see c0fe624
Launchpad v0.39.0
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
)godoc
comments.Unreleased
section inCHANGELOG.md
Files changed
in the Github PR explorerCodecov Report
in the comment section below once CI passes