Skip to content

Conversation

@mernst
Copy link
Member

@mernst mernst commented Dec 19, 2025

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Renamed the Makefile target update-plume-scripts to update-plume-scripts-in-utils, added that target to .PHONY, and made update-libs depend on it. Removed Makefile.user inclusion from java/Makefile, changed PLUMESCRIPTS default from ${DAIKONDIR}/utils/plume-scripts to ${DAIKONDIR}/.plume-scripts, and updated Javadoc post-processing to invoke ${PLUMESCRIPTS}/preplace against ${JAVADOC_DEST}. Deleted scripts/is-ci.sh. Test and utility scripts and various Makefiles now reference .plume-scripts paths, invoke unified update targets (e.g., plume-scripts-update/update-git-scripts), compute num_jobs (set to 1 on CI) and pass it to style-check/typecheck.

Possibly related PRs

  • codespecs/daikon PR 728: Makes the same renaming of update-plume-scriptsupdate-plume-scripts-in-utils, updates update-libs/.PHONY, changes PLUMESCRIPTS to ${DAIKONDIR}/.plume-scripts, and redirects is-ci.sh usages to .plume-scripts.
  • codespecs/daikon PR 702: Modifies CI-detection and CI-aware job-limit logic that overlap this PR's changes to CI detection and parallelism handling.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 836ac8f and 35c3af3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • java/Makefile (2 hunks)
  • scripts/test-misc.sh (2 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
Makefile (1)

784-791: Target renamed but maintains same directory as before.

The target has been renamed from update-plume-scripts to update-plume-scripts-in-utils to be more explicit about which directory it maintains. However, scripts/test-misc.sh line 23 calls make plume-scripts-update which doesn't exist, suggesting incomplete coordination of this refactoring.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24c78e6 and 74a9bcf.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • java/Makefile (2 hunks)
  • scripts/is-ci.sh (0 hunks)
  • scripts/test-misc.sh (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • scripts/is-ci.sh
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
java/Makefile (1)

1343-1343: Good refactoring to use the PLUMESCRIPTS variable.

Using the ${PLUMESCRIPTS} variable instead of a hard-coded path improves maintainability and consistency.

scripts/test-misc.sh (3)

24-30: Good addition of dynamic parallelism based on CI detection.

The logic to detect CI environments and adjust parallelism accordingly is a sensible approach to avoid out-of-memory errors in resource-constrained CI environments while taking advantage of available cores locally.


61-61: Path .plume-scripts/ci-lint-diff is properly initialized before use.

The .plume-scripts directory is cloned by the root Makefile (lines 324-325) during the make compile daikon.jar call at line 14, which executes before .plume-scripts/ci-lint-diff is referenced at lines 61 and 67. The dependency chain ensures the directory exists when needed. The path reference is consistent throughout the script.


25-29: No issue found with this code. The .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh script, which obtains information about a CI job, is part of the plume-scripts repository and will be available by line 25. Here's why: when make compile daikon.jar executes at line 17, it triggers immediate parsing of the main Makefile. During this parsing phase, lines 324–327 execute unconditionally: the shell clone command at line 325 populates .plume-scripts if it doesn't exist, followed by the include at line 327. This happens before any make targets are built, and therefore before the script reaches line 25. The code is safe as written.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
java/Makefile (1)

14-14: Resolve the plume-scripts directory inconsistency.

This change maintains the inconsistency flagged in previous review. The main Makefile defines PLUMESCRIPTS ?= ${DAIKONDIR}/utils/plume-scripts and has an update-plume-scripts-in-utils target, but this file overrides it to point to .plume-scripts, creating two separate plume-scripts directories in the codebase.

Per the previous review suggestion: either remove this line to inherit the canonical location from the main Makefile, or change it to match: PLUMESCRIPTS ?= ${DAIKONDIR}/utils/plume-scripts.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74a9bcf and 1f08a09.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • java/Makefile (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
java/Makefile (2)

7-9: Diagnostic output already flagged in previous review.

These diagnostic lines were already commented on in the previous review, suggesting they should be made conditional or removed after debugging.


15-15: PLUMESCRIPTS directory inconsistency already flagged.

The change to .plume-scripts was already flagged in the previous review as potentially inconsistent with the main Makefile's directory structure.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 248f288 and 2bddd8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • java/Makefile (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
java/Makefile (1)

5-5: Inconsistency between AI summary and code.

The AI summary states "Removed inclusion of Makefile.user", but line 5 still contains -include Makefile.user (unchanged, as indicated by the absence of a ~ marker). The inclusion of Makefile.user has not been removed in this PR.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
java/Makefile (2)

7-8: Diagnostic output should be conditional (duplicate of past review).

These diagnostic lines print on every Make invocation. Per previous review feedback, consider making them conditional (e.g., only when DEBUG=1) or removing them if they were temporary debugging aids.


17-17: PLUMESCRIPTS directory inconsistency (duplicate of past review).

This line sets PLUMESCRIPTS to .plume-scripts, which conflicts with the main Makefile's use of utils/plume-scripts. Per previous review feedback, this inconsistency should be resolved.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0166167 and d900402.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • java/Makefile (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
java/Makefile (1)

1348-1348: LGTM: Correctly uses variable references.

The change to use ${PLUMESCRIPTS} instead of a hardcoded path improves maintainability. Both ${JAVADOC_DEST} and ${PLUMESCRIPTS} are correctly referenced here.

Note: This assessment assumes the PLUMESCRIPTS directory inconsistency flagged at line 17 will be resolved.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
java/Makefile (1)

17-17: Duplicate: PLUMESCRIPTS directory inconsistency already flagged.

This line has already been flagged in previous review comments as creating inconsistency between .plume-scripts and utils/plume-scripts directories. Please refer to the existing review comment for details.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d900402 and 50763a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • java/Makefile (2 hunks)
  • scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh (2 hunks)
  • scripts/test-typecheck-with-latest-cf.sh (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
java/Makefile (2)

9-10: Good fix: diagnostic commands now commented out.

The previously flagged critical issue with incorrect $(set) and $(env) syntax has been resolved by commenting out these lines. If these diagnostics are needed in the future, use $(shell set) and $(shell env) instead.


1348-1348: LGTM: Correct variable usage.

The preplace invocation correctly uses ${JAVADOC_DEST} (properly spelled) and ${PLUMESCRIPTS} variables. This appears to resolve the typo issue mentioned in previous reviews.

Note: This comment assumes the PLUMESCRIPTS directory inconsistency (flagged at line 17) will be resolved separately.

scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh (1)

17-19: LGTM: Improved script organization.

Moving the SCRIPT_DIR calculation earlier in the script improves consistency with other CI-related scripts and follows bash best practices.

scripts/test-typecheck-with-latest-cf.sh (2)

32-37: LGTM: Correct parallelism logic and indentation.

The CPU-based parallelism logic correctly limits to 1 job in CI to avoid out-of-memory errors, and uses CPU count otherwise. The indentation is also correct with the make command properly outside the if/else block.


25-25: The update-git-scripts Make target exists and is properly configured.

The target is defined in the root Makefile (line 766) as a phony target and correctly maintains the utils/git-scripts directory by either pulling updates if it already exists or cloning it from the plume-lib repository if it doesn't. The implementation includes retry logic for robustness.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50763a7 and 2a968d1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh (2)

2-2: LGTM!

The updated comment accurately explains the bash requirement for set -o pipefail.


17-19: LGTM!

The SCRIPT_DIR calculation and directory change are correctly implemented with proper quoting and error suppression.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc9edde and 836ac8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh (2 hunks)
  • scripts/test-typecheck-with-latest-cf.sh (1 hunks)
  • tests/Makefile (1 hunks)
  • tests/dyncomp-tests/Makefile (1 hunks)
  • tests/kvasir-tests/Makefile (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh (1)

17-18: LGTM! Good refactoring of directory handling.

Setting up SCRIPT_DIR and immediately changing to the repository root simplifies the rest of the script by making all subsequent paths relative to the repo root. This is a clean pattern.

tests/dyncomp-tests/Makefile (1)

65-65: LGTM! Path update is correct.

The script path has been properly updated to reference the centralized .plume-scripts directory.

tests/Makefile (1)

53-53: LGTM! Path update is correct.

The script path has been properly updated to reference the centralized .plume-scripts directory, consistent with the other test Makefiles.

tests/kvasir-tests/Makefile (2)

27-27: LGTM! Path update is correct.

The script path has been properly updated to reference the centralized .plume-scripts directory.


81-81: Path is correctly updated and consistently applied.

Both regression-tests and clean-all targets use the same path to the is-ci.sh script: "${DAIKONDIR}"/.plume-scripts/is-ci.sh. This aligns with the repository's design, where the plume-scripts directory is automatically cloned from https://github.com/plume-lib/plume-scripts.git to .plume-scripts when needed (as managed by the root Makefile).

scripts/test-typecheck-with-latest-cf.sh (2)

37-37: LGTM: Proper parallelism control based on CI detection.

The typecheck invocation correctly uses the computed num_jobs value, which appropriately limits parallelism to 1 on CI environments to avoid out-of-memory errors while leveraging multiple cores locally.


32-36: The .plume-scripts directory is properly ensured by the Makefile before use.

The script relies on .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh at line 32, but this is safe because the Makefile automatically clones the plume-scripts repository into .plume-scripts when the Makefile is first evaluated (lines 324-325), which occurs when make compile daikon.jar runs at line 21.

However, the git clone operation happens in a silent Makefile variable assignment (dummy := $(shell git clone ...)), so if the clone fails, the failure is not propagated. The script would then fail with an unhelpful error when trying to execute the missing script. Consider adding explicit error handling to the Makefile's clone operation or verifying the clone succeeded.

Comment on lines +27 to +32
if [ -n "$(.plume-scripts/is-ci.sh)" ]; then
num_jobs=1
else
num_jobs="$(nproc || sysctl -n hw.ncpu || getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN || echo 1)"
make -C java --jobs="$num_jobs" typecheck
fi
make -C java --jobs="$num_jobs" typecheck
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh exists and is executable

echo "Checking for .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh..."
if [ -f .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh ]; then
  echo "✓ File exists"
  ls -lh .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh
  
  if [ -x .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh ]; then
    echo "✓ File is executable"
  else
    echo "✗ File is NOT executable"
  fi
else
  echo "✗ File does NOT exist"
  echo ""
  echo "Searching for is-ci.sh in the repository..."
  fd -t f 'is-ci.sh' 2>/dev/null || find . -name 'is-ci.sh' -type f 2>/dev/null | head -20
fi

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 166


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check directory structure and search for CI detection logic

echo "=== Checking for .plume-scripts directory ==="
if [ -d .plume-scripts ]; then
  echo "✓ .plume-scripts directory exists"
  ls -la .plume-scripts/
else
  echo "✗ .plume-scripts directory does NOT exist"
fi

echo ""
echo "=== Looking for scripts directory ==="
fd -t d 'scripts' | head -10

echo ""
echo "=== Searching for any is-ci related files ==="
fd 'is-ci' 2>/dev/null || echo "No is-ci files found"

echo ""
echo "=== Checking the actual test-typecheck script ==="
head -35 scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 1245


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check scripts directory and search for CI patterns

echo "=== Contents of scripts/ directory ==="
ls -la scripts/

echo ""
echo "=== Searching for CI environment variable patterns ==="
rg 'CI|GITHUB|GITLAB|TRAVIS|CIRCLECI' scripts/ --type sh 2>/dev/null | head -20

echo ""
echo "=== Searching for any executable scripts that might do CI detection ==="
find scripts/ -type f -executable 2>/dev/null

echo ""
echo "=== Checking for CI-related patterns in all shell scripts ==="
rg '\$CI|CI=' scripts/ --type sh 2>/dev/null | head -20

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 9951


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check other test scripts to see how they handle CI detection

echo "=== test-typecheck-with-latest-cf.sh CI detection ==="
grep -A 3 "Under CI" scripts/test-typecheck-with-latest-cf.sh

echo ""
echo "=== test-misc.sh CI detection ==="
grep -A 3 "Under CI" scripts/test-misc.sh

echo ""
echo "=== Full context around is-ci in test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh ==="
grep -B 2 -A 3 "is-ci" scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 725


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check root directory and look for any .plume scripts

echo "=== Root directory listing (looking for .plume*) ==="
ls -la | grep plume

echo ""
echo "=== All hidden directories at root ==="
ls -da .*/

echo ""
echo "=== Search entire repo for is-ci ==="
find . -name '*is-ci*' -o -name '*is_ci*' 2>/dev/null

echo ""
echo "=== Check git for any deleted or untracked .plume-scripts ==="
git ls-files | grep plume

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 347


.plume-scripts/is-ci.sh does not exist and will cause runtime failure.

The script references .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh on line 27, but this file does not exist in the repository. The .plume-scripts directory itself does not exist. When executed, this line will fail with a "command not found" error.

Either create the missing .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh script or replace the CI detection logic with standard environment variable checks (e.g., $CI, $GITHUB_ACTIONS, $GITLAB_CI, etc.).

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/test-typecheck-with-bundled-cf.sh around lines 27 to 32, the script
calls .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh which doesn't exist and will cause a runtime
failure; replace that call with standard CI environment checks (e.g., test -n
"$CI" || test -n "$GITHUB_ACTIONS" || test -n "$GITLAB_CI") or add a small
inline detection like: if [ -n "$CI" ] || [ -n "$GITHUB_ACTIONS" ] || [ -n
"$GITLAB_CI" ]; then num_jobs=1; else ... fi, ensuring no external missing
script is referenced.

Comment on lines +25 to 26
make update-git-scripts
utils/git-scripts/git-clone-related typetools checker-framework
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

# Search for update-git-scripts in Makefile
rg -n "update-git-scripts" Makefile

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 437


🏁 Script executed:

# Read the script to see lines 25-26 and surrounding context
cat -n scripts/test-typecheck-with-latest-cf.sh | sed -n '1,45p'

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 1662


🏁 Script executed:

# Check if .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh exists in the repository
fd "is-ci.sh" . --type f

Repository: codespecs/daikon

Length of output: 42


.plume-scripts/is-ci.sh does not exist in the repository.

Line 32 attempts to execute .plume-scripts/is-ci.sh, but this file is not present. With set -e on line 7, the script will fail when it reaches this line. Ensure the file exists or is created during an earlier setup step (e.g., via a plume-scripts initialization target).

@mernst mernst merged commit 18158fd into codespecs:master Dec 20, 2025
0 of 9 checks passed
@mernst mernst deleted the is-ci-2 branch December 20, 2025 07:19
This was referenced Jan 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant