Skip to content

Conversation

@pierreozoux
Copy link
Contributor

The way it was written, I understood that if I enable it, then each user has to verify their email.

The way it was written, I understood that if I enable it, then each user has to verify their email.
I think it is better written this way.
@sampaiodiego
Copy link
Member

thanks @pierreozoux . I agree with the change. I was wondering if we should also remove the translation of the old value from other languages, since they can potentially be misinterpreted as well.

@pierreozoux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thought about it, but honestly I dont know the translation process. I thought it would just be updated little by little, but if you have a faster process? You mean removing the translation of this sentence on all translated file? If so I can also do it.

Your call

@sampaiodiego
Copy link
Member

since the translation process is currently very organic, I'm not sure our translation community will notice that the translation source changed as they're still very similar..

so if you can set the key Accounts_Verify_Email_For_External_Accounts to null in other languages, that would help by making sure the translation for other languages are being removed. thx again

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 17, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@dougfabris dougfabris changed the title [IMPROVE] Makes the text less ambiguous Chore: Makes the text less ambiguous Jul 28, 2022
@ggazzo ggazzo added this to the 5.1.0 milestone Jul 29, 2022
@sampaiodiego sampaiodiego merged commit b11bab5 into RocketChat:develop Jul 29, 2022
@sampaiodiego sampaiodiego changed the title Chore: Makes the text less ambiguous i18n: Makes the text less ambiguous Jul 29, 2022
gabriellsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2022
…ctor/locationModal

* 'develop' of github.com:RocketChat/Rocket.Chat:
  i18n: Makes the text less ambiguous (#20895)
  Chore: Missing some English translation keywords (#20131)
  Chore: Exclude private/public folders from typecheck (#26399)
  [NEW] Marketplace apps page new list view layout (#26181)
  Chore: Rewrite custom OAuth Modals to react (#26204)
  i18n: Manual sync from LingoHub (#26397)
  Chore: Options in BaseRaw model could possibly be undefined (#26395)
  [IMPROVE] Use single change stream to watch DB changes (#26336)
  [IMPROVE] Remove public and node_modules folders from TypeScript server watcher (#26391)
@pierreozoux pierreozoux deleted the patch-1 branch August 1, 2022 15:00
gabriellsh added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2022
…history

* 'develop' of github.com:RocketChat/Rocket.Chat:
  Chore: Cache playwright (#26432)
  [FIX] Empty results on `im.list` endpoint (#26438)
  [IMPROVE] Upgrade nivo and React Query (#26338)
  Chore: Upgrade Fuselage packages to next dist-tag (#26435)
  Chore: Omnichannel endpoints e2e tests (#26376)
  Chore: Refactor UserInfo to typescript (#26323)
  Chore: Rewrite Location modal to React (#26196)
  Chore: Rewrite SaveToWebdav Modal to React Component (#24365)
  [IMPROVE] validateParams to accept different validators per request method (#26357)
  Regression: Fix spacing problem on AppStatus component (#26421)
  Chore: Convert client/views/account/security folder to ts (#26413)
  i18n: Makes the text less ambiguous (#20895)
  Chore: Missing some English translation keywords (#20131)
  Chore: Exclude private/public folders from typecheck (#26399)
  [NEW] Marketplace apps page new list view layout (#26181)
  Chore: Rewrite custom OAuth Modals to react (#26204)
  i18n: Manual sync from LingoHub (#26397)
  Chore: Options in BaseRaw model could possibly be undefined (#26395)
  [IMPROVE] Use single change stream to watch DB changes (#26336)
carlosrodrigues94 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2022
Co-authored-by: dougfabris <devfabris@gmail.com>
@murtaza98 murtaza98 mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants