Skip to content

Conversation

@sstefdev
Copy link
Contributor

@sstefdev sstefdev commented Oct 21, 2024

Fixed #117

Changes:

  • Updated Input component to show error inside and take error prop
  • Added email validation
  • Changed how we show errors on payee and payer address

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced enhanced validation for email and address fields in the invoice form.
    • Added error handling for input fields, displaying error messages for invalid entries.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error state management for address and email validations.
  • Style

    • Updated input styles to visually indicate errors, including new error message displays.

@sstefdev sstefdev linked an issue Oct 21, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the validation mechanisms within the invoice form and the input component. The form.svelte file introduces a structured validationErrors object to manage error states for multiple fields, replacing previous boolean flags. New methods for validating email formats are implemented, and error handling for inputs is updated. In the input.svelte file, a new error property is added to provide visual feedback on input errors, including conditional styling and message rendering.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte Introduced validationErrors object for error handling, added validateEmail method, modified address checks.
shared/components/input.svelte Added error property for conditional error styling and message display.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Form
    participant Input

    User->>Form: Input email
    Form->>Input: Validate email
    Input-->>Form: Return validation result
    Form->>Form: Update validationErrors
    Form->>User: Display error message (if any)
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure form prevents submission on invalid email (#117)
Provide visual feedback for invalid email input (#117)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 13

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between be0ec9d and f521347.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (5 hunks)
  • shared/components/input.svelte (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
shared/components/input.svelte (4)

17-17: LGTM: New error property enhances component flexibility.

The addition of the error property allows for more granular error handling, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The type string | null is appropriate for representing either an error message or no error.


38-38: LGTM: Consistent error styling for textarea.

The conditional application of the "input-error" class is implemented correctly and consistently with the input element styling. This ensures visual feedback for errors in both input types.


51-51: LGTM: Consistent error styling for input.

The conditional application of the "input-error" class is implemented correctly and consistently with the textarea element styling. This ensures visual feedback for errors in both input types.


Line range hint 1-141: Overall, excellent implementation of error handling and display.

The changes in this file successfully implement error handling and display for the input component, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is consistent, follows Svelte best practices, and provides clear visual feedback for error states. The minor suggestions for optimization and accessibility would further enhance the component's usability.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f521347 and 092cd9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • shared/components/input.svelte (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
shared/components/input.svelte (1)

17-17: LGTM: Added 'error' prop enhances error handling

The addition of the error prop allows the component to display error messages appropriately.

Copy link
Member

@MantisClone MantisClone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving contingent on comment resolution with explanations

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 092cd9a and 90c75f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (1)
Learnt from: sstefdev
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#156
File: packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte:29-39
Timestamp: 2024-10-22T07:40:44.129Z
Learning: In `packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte`, directly mutating the `validationErrors` object triggers reactive updates in Svelte without needing to reassign the object.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (8)

30-39: Initialization of validationErrors is well-structured.

The validationErrors object is clearly defined and sets up a comprehensive structure for tracking validation states across different form fields, enhancing readability and maintainability.


47-50: validateEmail function is implemented correctly.

The validateEmail function appropriately validates email addresses using a regular expression and updates the validationErrors object accordingly.


53-53: checkPayeeAddress function correctly updates validation errors.

The function accurately sets validationErrors.payeeAddress based on the result of checkAddress, ensuring the validity of the payee address.


57-57: checkClientAddress function correctly updates validation errors.

Similarly, this function properly updates validationErrors.clientAddress to reflect the validation state of the client address.


194-200: Email validation on sellerInfo is appropriately handled.

The onBlur event triggers validateEmail, and the error prop is conditionally set based on validationErrors.sellerInfo.email, providing immediate feedback to the user.


250-252: Client address validation error is displayed correctly.

The conditional rendering of the error message for validationErrors.clientAddress ensures that users are alerted to invalid Ethereum addresses.


289-295: Email validation on buyerInfo is appropriately handled.

The implementation mirrors the seller's email validation, ensuring consistency and accurate error handling for the buyer's email field.


364-366: Payee address validation error is displayed correctly.

The conditional error message for validationErrors.payeeAddress effectively informs the user of any issues with the provided payee address.

@sstefdev sstefdev merged commit 36a6d71 into main Oct 22, 2024
1 check passed
@sstefdev sstefdev deleted the 117-create-request-form-insufficient-email-validation branch October 22, 2024 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Create Request Form] insufficient email validation

4 participants