Updated form types and added builderId, createdWith to Misc #155
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Form
participant RequestHandler
User->>Form: Fill out invoice form
Form->>RequestHandler: Prepare request parameters
RequestHandler->>RequestHandler: Structure miscellaneous data
RequestHandler-->>Form: Return structured data
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/utils/prepareRequest.ts (1 hunks)
- shared/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
shared/types/index.ts (1)
18-19: LGTM! Consider updating related documentation.The addition of
builderIdandcreatedWithproperties to themiscellaneousobject in theCustomFormDatainterface is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. These new fields will enhance the metadata available for invoice creation.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any documentation or usage that might need updating:
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/utils/prepareRequest.ts (1)
62-66: Verify usage of new properties in the applicationThe addition of
builderIdandcreatedWithto themiscellaneousobject enhances the metadata capabilities of the request parameters. To ensure these changes are fully integrated:
- Verify that these new properties are being set correctly when the
formDataobject is created.- Check if any other parts of the application need to be updated to handle or display these new properties.
- Ensure that the API or services consuming this data are prepared to handle these additional fields.
To help with this verification, you can run the following script to search for usages of these new properties:
This will help identify any areas that might need updates to fully utilize these new properties.
✅ Verification successful
Usage of
builderIdandcreatedWithis correctly integrated across the applicationAll instances of the new properties
builderIdandcreatedWithhave been appropriately implemented and utilized consistently throughout the codebase. No issues were found regarding their integration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of builderId and createdWith echo "Searching for builderId usage:" rg "builderId" --type ts echo "\nSearching for createdWith usage:" rg "createdWith" --type tsLength of output: 1293
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (1)
Line range hint
1-744: Overall LGTM! Consider addingbuilderIdandcreatedWith.The changes in this file are consistent and well-implemented. The renaming from
itemstoinvoiceItemsanddescriptiontonamehas been applied consistently throughout the script, markup, and CSS sections. The structure of invoice items has been updated as per the requirements.Consider adding
builderIdandcreatedWithto this component if they are meant to be part of the form data. If they are handled elsewhere, please ensure that the documentation reflects this design decision.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- packages/create-invoice-form/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte (2 hunks)
- packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form-view.svelte (2 hunks)
- packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (4 hunks)
- packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/utils/prepareRequest.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/utils/resetForm.ts (1 hunks)
- shared/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (18)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/utils/resetForm.ts (3)
15-15: LGTM: Renamed 'items' to 'invoiceItems'This change improves clarity by providing a more specific context for the data. It's consistent with updates in other files and aligns with the PR objectives.
17-17: LGTM: Changed 'description' to 'name'This change in terminology for item identification is consistent with updates in other files and improves the overall coherence of the codebase.
Line range hint
9-13: LGTM: PR objectives implemented correctlyThe
builderIdandcreatedWithproperties have been successfully added to themiscellaneousobject, fulfilling the requirements outlined in the PR objectives and the linked issue #143.packages/create-invoice-form/package.json (2)
Line range hint
2-2: Version bump and new dependency added.The package version has been updated to 0.9.0, which is appropriate for adding new features. The new dependency
@requestnetwork/data-formathas been added, which aligns with the changes in invoice item handling mentioned in the PR objectives.Also applies to: 35-35
37-38: Dependency versions updated.The versions for
@wagmi/coreandviemhave been updated. These updates might introduce new features or bug fixes.To ensure compatibility and to check for any breaking changes, please run the following script:
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/utils/prepareRequest.ts (2)
69-70: LGTM: Consistent naming updatesThe changes from
formData.itemstoformData.invoiceItemsand fromitem.descriptiontoitem.nameimprove consistency across the codebase. These updates align well with the modifications made in other components and files.
Line range hint
1-138: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file successfully implement the required updates for handling invoice items and discounts. These changes are consistent with the PR objectives of updating form types and enhancing the functionality of the
prepareRequestParamsmethod.The renaming of properties and the improved handling of the
discountfield contribute to better consistency and robustness of the code. These updates align well with the changes made in other components and files, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.Overall, the changes in this file effectively support the goals of the pull request.
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte (2)
Line range hint
1-379: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and improve consistency.The modifications in this file successfully implement the renaming of
itemstoinvoiceItemsand update the related logic, which aligns with the PR objectives of updating type definitions and enhancing functionality. These changes contribute to a more consistent and maintainable codebase.Key improvements:
- Consistent use of
formData.invoiceItemsthroughout the component.- Updated validation logic reflecting the new structure of invoice items.
- Alignment with changes in other files mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
These updates support the goal of enhancing the overall functionality and type safety of the codebase, as stated in the PR objectives.
88-88: LGTM: Consistent renaming of invoice items.The change from
formData.itemstoformData.invoiceItemsis correct and aligns with the modifications mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This ensures consistency in how invoice items are referenced throughout the application.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Renaming of 'items' to 'invoiceItems' verified successfully.
All instances of
formData.itemshave been correctly renamed toformData.invoiceItemsacross the codebase, ensuring consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the renaming of 'items' to 'invoiceItems' across the codebase # Search for any remaining instances of 'formData.items' echo "Searching for any remaining instances of 'formData.items':" rg "formData\.items" --type svelte --type typescript # Search for new instances of 'formData.invoiceItems' echo "Searching for new instances of 'formData.invoiceItems':" rg "formData\.invoiceItems" --type svelte --type typescriptLength of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the renaming of 'items' to 'invoiceItems' across the codebase # Search for any remaining instances of 'formData.items' echo "Searching for any remaining instances of 'formData.items':" rg "formData\.items" --glob "*.svelte" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Search for new instances of 'formData.invoiceItems' echo "Searching for new instances of 'formData.invoiceItems':" rg "formData\.invoiceItems" --glob "*.svelte" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 1756
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form-view.svelte (2)
Line range hint
1-1: Verify updates tosellerInfoandbuyerInforeactive statementsThe AI-generated summary mentions updates to the reactive statements that derive
sellerInfoandbuyerInfo. However, these changes are not visible in the provided code diff. It's important to verify if these changes have been implemented correctly.Please run the following script to check for the presence and correctness of these updates:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify updates to sellerInfo and buyerInfo reactive statements echo "Checking for updates to sellerInfo and buyerInfo reactive statements:" rg "\$: \{(\s*sellerInfo|\s*buyerInfo)" packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form-view.svelte -A 5If the changes are present, please ensure they correctly use the updated
formDatastructure as mentioned in the AI-generated summary. If the changes are missing, they should be implemented to maintain consistency with the other updates in this PR.
32-35: LGTM: Consistent use ofinvoiceItemsThe change from
formData.itemstoformData.invoiceItemsaligns with the PR objectives and is consistent with the updates mentioned in other files. The reactive statement ensures that theamountfor each item is recalculated wheneverinvoiceItemschanges.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of
invoiceItems:✅ Verification successful
✅ Verification Successful:
invoiceItemsis Consistently UsedAll instances of
formData.itemshave been successfully replaced withformData.invoiceItemsacross the codebase, ensuring consistency and alignment with the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent use of 'invoiceItems' across the codebase # Search for any remaining instances of 'formData.items' echo "Checking for any remaining instances of 'formData.items':" rg "formData\.items" --type svelte --type typescript # Search for the new usage of 'formData.invoiceItems' echo "Verifying the usage of 'formData.invoiceItems':" rg "formData\.invoiceItems" --type svelte --type typescriptLength of output: 576
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent use of 'invoiceItems' across the codebase # Search for any remaining instances of 'formData.items' in .svelte and .ts files echo "Checking for any remaining instances of 'formData.items':" fd --extension svelte --extension ts | xargs rg "formData\.items" # Search for the new usage of 'formData.invoiceItems' in .svelte and .ts files echo "Verifying the usage of 'formData.invoiceItems':" fd --extension svelte --extension ts | xargs rg "formData\.invoiceItems"Length of output: 1734
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (3)
381-391: LGTM! Consistent renaming in the markup section.The changes from
itemstoinvoiceItemsanddescriptiontonamein the markup section are consistent with the changes made in the script section. This consistency helps maintain code clarity and reduces the chance of errors.
642-644: LGTM! CSS class name updated consistently.The CSS class name change from
invoice-form-table-body-descriptiontoinvoice-form-table-body-nameis consistent with the changes made in the markup section. This ensures that the styling remains correctly applied after the renaming.
Line range hint
1-744: Verify implementation ofbuilderIdandcreatedWith.The PR objectives mention adding
builderIdandcreatedWithto the miscellaneous section when creating requests. However, these properties are not visible in this form component. Please verify if these properties should be added to this component or if they are handled elsewhere in the request creation process.To check if these properties are implemented elsewhere, you can run the following script:
shared/types/index.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM: Extended CustomFormData from Invoice interfaceExtending
CustomFormDatafrom theInvoiceinterface while omitting"meta"and"creationDate"enhances type consistency and aligns with best practices.
9-10: BuilderId and createdWith added to miscellaneousIncluding
builderIdandcreatedWithin themiscellaneousobject ensures these properties are captured as per the PR objectives.
18-19: Verify compatibility after changing buyerInfo and sellerInfo to ActorInfoUpdating
buyerInfoandsellerInfoto useActorInfoenhances type alignment. Ensure that this change is compatible with all existing usages in the codebase.Use the following script to identify any potential issues:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of `buyerInfo` and `sellerInfo` to confirm compatibility. rg -A 3 'buyerInfo|sellerInfo'
17-17: Verify all references to items are updated to invoiceItemsRenaming
itemstoinvoiceItemsimproves clarity. Please verify that all instances ofitemshave been updated toinvoiceItemsthroughout the codebase to prevent any inconsistencies.You can run the following script to check for any remaining references:
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Perform a Comprehensive Search for
itemsReferencesPlease run the following script to identify all occurrences of
itemsthat may need updating toinvoiceItemsthroughout the codebase:
Action Required: Perform a Comprehensive Search for All
itemsReferencesPlease run the following script to identify any occurrences of
itemsthat may need updating toinvoiceItemsthroughout the codebase:
Verification Successful: All
itemsreferences have been updated toinvoiceItems.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find occurrences of `formData.items` that may need updating. rg -A 3 'formData\.items'Length of output: 37988
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of `items` that may need updating to `invoiceItems`. rg -w '\.items\b'Length of output: 19
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all standalone occurrences of `items` that may need updating to `invoiceItems`. rg '\bitems\b'Length of output: 4557
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…143-add-builderid-and-createdwith-to-request-invoicing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (1)
Learnt from: MantisClone PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#155 File: packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form-view.svelte:191-194 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T18:37:32.020Z Learning: When aligning with the pre-existing `rnf invoice 0.0.3` format in `packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form-view.svelte`, adding comments to explain changes from `description` to `name` is unnecessary.
sstefdev
deleted the
143-add-builderid-and-createdwith-to-request-invoicing
branch
Fixes #143
Changes:
contentData, use rnf invoice 0.0.3 types insteadbuilderIdandcreatedWithprepareRequestParams()to populate thebuilderIdandcreateWithpropertiesSummary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
miscellaneousdata structure in the invoice creation process to always includelabels,builderId, andcreatedWith, improving data consistency.CustomFormDatainterface to support the new properties related to invoice creation.invoiceItemsstructure.Bug Fixes
miscellaneousproperty to ensure it is always an object, reducing potential errors in data processing.