Add validator.js for email validation #193
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (2)
49-49: Enhance email validation robustness and user experience.While the switch to validator.js is good, consider these improvements:
- Add null/undefined check
- Provide more specific error messages
- Consider adding real-time validation
- Configure validation rules via options
Here's a suggested implementation:
- validationErrors[`${type}`].email = !isEmail(email); + validationErrors[`${type}`].email = !email || !isEmail(email, { + allow_utf8_local_part: false, + require_tld: true + });Also consider updating the error messages in the Input components (lines 266 and 351) to be more specific:
- error={validationErrors.sellerInfo.email ? "Please enter a valid email" : ""} + error={validationErrors.sellerInfo.email ? "Please enter a valid email (e.g., user@example.com)" : ""}
Migration to validator.js is incomplete
The email validation in
packages/payment-widget/src/lib/components/buyer-info-form.sveltestill uses regex-based validation instead of validator.js. This needs to be updated for consistency with the new implementation in the invoice form.
packages/payment-widget/src/lib/components/buyer-info-form.svelte: Replace regex-basedvalidateEmailfunction with validator.js implementation🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
20-49: Verify complete migration to validator.jsLet's ensure all email validation instances have been migrated from regex to validator.js.
Let me check the implementation of the remaining email validation in the buyer-info-form.svelte file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining regex-based email validation # Search for email-related regex patterns echo "Checking for email-related regex patterns..." rg -i "email.*regex|regex.*email|\b[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}\b" # Search for other uses of email validation echo "Checking for other email validation implementations..." rg -i "validateEmail|email.*valid|valid.*email" -g "!{node_modules,dist,build}/*"Length of output: 2025
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of validateEmail in buyer-info-form.svelte echo "Content of validateEmail function in buyer-info-form.svelte:" rg -A 5 "function validateEmail" packages/payment-widget/src/lib/components/buyer-info-form.svelteLength of output: 418
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/create-invoice-form/package.json(1 hunks)packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/create-invoice-form/package.json (2)
44-44: LGTM! Types are properly aligned
The @types/validator version (13.12.2) correctly matches the major.minor version of the runtime dependency (13.12.0).
39-39: Verify the validator.js version and security implications
The addition of validator.js is appropriate for improving email validation. However, let's verify the version and security status.
✅ Verification successful
Validator.js version is up-to-date and secure
The validator.js version 13.12.0 specified in package.json is the latest available version from NPM. The vulnerability scan shows no direct security issues with the validator package itself - all reported vulnerabilities are from other dependencies in the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check validator.js versions and security advisories
# Check NPM for latest versions
echo "Latest version from NPM:"
npm view validator versions --json | jq -r '.[-1]'
# Check for known vulnerabilities
echo -e "\nVulnerability scan:"
npm audit --package-lock-only --audit-level=low <<EOF
{
"dependencies": {
"validator": "13.12.0"
}
}
EOF
Length of output: 13928
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/invoice/form.svelte (1)
20-20: LGTM! Clean import statement.
The import statement correctly uses ES modules path and imports only the required function, which is good for tree-shaking.
Fixes: PR
Proposed Solution
Replace the existing regex-based validation with the isEmail method from validator.js. This library provides robust and widely accepted email validation.
Changes
validateEmailfunction to use validatorSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
validatorlibrary.Bug Fixes