Skip to content

Replace 'X->points[' with '(*X)[' #4221

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 5, 2020

Conversation

kunaltyagi
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi added the needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet label Jun 23, 2020
@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi added the priority: gsoc Reason for prioritization label Jun 23, 2020
@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi force-pushed the sed-points4 branch 2 times, most recently from 736e9cb to faf9d86 Compare June 24, 2020 11:55
@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho added needs: author reply Specify why not closed/merged yet and removed needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet labels Jun 29, 2020
@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi added needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet and removed needs: author reply Specify why not closed/merged yet labels Jul 3, 2020
Copy link
Member

@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feel free to merge is CI is green.

@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho dismissed their stale review July 3, 2020 21:07

There's conflicting files everywhere :x

@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho merged commit 5d0f227 into PointCloudLibrary:master Jul 5, 2020
@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho removed the needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet label Jul 5, 2020
@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi deleted the sed-points4 branch July 5, 2020 04:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: gsoc Reason for prioritization
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants