-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
linux: workaround to avoid deadlock inside dl_iterate_phdr in glibc #57035
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Extend the fix for #43578 on Darwin to also cover the same bug in Glibc (and just assume other libc have the same bug). We cannot use the same atfork trick, since the atfork implementation of this in Glibc makes this unsafe to use this after fork, just like Darwin (though for different basic concurrency mistakes in each of their respective codes). Fix #57017
Sounds like this introduced a deadlock elsewhere: #57058. FreeBSD tests timed out also on this branch: https://buildkite.com/julialang/julia-master/builds/43702#019461a2-569c-45b2-b720-8acf560eb139 |
Removing the backport label as this shouldn't be backported as-is given that it introduces a regression |
ararslan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2025
This is Jameson's proposed amendment to the changes made in #57035 that introduced a deadlock on FreeBSD, amusingly in service of fixing a deadlock on Linux. On Linux and (non-macOS) BSD, instead of acquiring and releasing a lock on the profiler in `jl_with_stackwalk_lock`, we're just blocking the thread from receiving the profiler's `SIGUSR2` signal at all. This should fix #57058; I don't get the deadlock locally on FreeBSD with this change, but it's AArch64 instead of x86-64 like on CI, so let's see if this also makes CI happy. If so, closes #57059. Co-authored-by: Jameson Nash <vtjnash@gmail.com>
Closed
Re-added the backport label, should only be backported in conjunction with #57089. |
vtjnash
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Restores #57035, undo #57089 for non-FreeBSD. While I suggested doing this change for all platforms, I forgot that means non-FreeBSD platforms become vulnerable again to the very deadlock problems that #57035 was required to prevent. That fix seems to not be viable on FreeBSD due to known libc implementation problems on that platform. However, upon closer inspection of the questionable design implementation decisions they seem to have made here, the platform is likely not currently vulnerable to this libunwind bug in the first place: https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld_lock.c#L120
vtjnash
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Restores #57035, undo #57089 for non-FreeBSD. While I suggested doing this change for all platforms, I forgot that means non-FreeBSD platforms become vulnerable again to the very deadlock problems that #57035 was required to prevent. That fix seems to not be viable on FreeBSD due to known libc implementation problems on that platform. However, upon closer inspection of the questionable design implementation decisions they seem to have made here, the platform is likely not currently vulnerable to this libunwind bug in the first place: https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld_lock.c#L120
vtjnash
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2025
Restores #57035, undo #57089 for non-FreeBSD. While I suggested doing this change for all platforms, I forgot that means non-FreeBSD platforms become vulnerable again to the very deadlock problems that #57035 was required to prevent. That fix seems to not be viable on FreeBSD due to known libc implementation problems on that platform. However, upon closer inspection of the questionable design implementation decisions they seem to have made here, the platform is likely not currently vulnerable to this libunwind bug in the first place: https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld_lock.c#L120
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
Restores #57035, undo #57089 for non-FreeBSD. While I suggested doing this change for all platforms, I forgot that means non-FreeBSD platforms become vulnerable again to the very deadlock problems that #57035 was required to prevent. That fix seems to not be viable on FreeBSD due to known libc implementation problems on that platform. However, upon closer inspection of the questionable design implementation decisions they seem to have made here, the platform is likely not currently vulnerable to this libunwind bug in the first place: https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld_lock.c#L120 (cherry picked from commit 2f0a523)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
Restores #57035, undo #57089 for non-FreeBSD. While I suggested doing this change for all platforms, I forgot that means non-FreeBSD platforms become vulnerable again to the very deadlock problems that #57035 was required to prevent. That fix seems to not be viable on FreeBSD due to known libc implementation problems on that platform. However, upon closer inspection of the questionable design implementation decisions they seem to have made here, the platform is likely not currently vulnerable to this libunwind bug in the first place: https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld_lock.c#L120 (cherry picked from commit 2f0a523)
71 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Extend the fix for #43578 on Darwin to also cover the same bug in Glibc (and just assume other libc have the same bug). We cannot use the same atfork trick, since the atfork implementation of this in Glibc makes this unsafe to use this after fork, just like Darwin (though for different basic concurrency mistakes in each of their respective codes).
Fix #57017