Run mksurfdata_esmf with the new vegetation raw data

[slevis-lmwg]

@lawrencepj1 has a new set of raw datasets for vegetation that we need to test with mksurfdata_esmf

In /glade/campaign/cesm/development/lmwg/landuse_source_data/CTSM5.2RawData there are 10 directories:

globalctsm52CCISENSBASELINEDeg025_240402  globalctsm52SSP126Deg025_231228
globalctsm52histLUH2Deg025_231228         globalctsm52SSP245Deg025_231228
globalctsm52histMKSRFDeg025_231228        globalctsm52SSP370Deg025_231228
globalctsm52histTRENDY2023Deg025_231228   globalctsm52SSP460Deg025_231228
globalctsm52SSP119Deg025_231228           globalctsm52SSP585Deg025_231228

In the above,
MKSRF contains the lai and soilcolor raw data
no need to test the contents of CCISENSBASELINE and TRENDY

• @slevis-lmwg @lawrencepj1 @olyson @wwieder tested successfully and with satisfactory results (First iteration CTSM5.3 versus CTSM5.2 (issp245clm5[2, 3]bgccrop_f09) NCAR/LMWG_dev#59) using the above raw datasets, but we have decided instead to go with the TRENDY2023 and soon TRENDY2024 data.
• @slevis-lmwg test mksurfdata_esmf with f09.
• @slevis-lmwg test with f09 offline simulations compared to current ctsm5.2 datasets (control):
  1850 spinup and historical (First iteration CTSM5.3 versus CTSM5.2 (issp245clm5[2, 3]bgccrop_f09) NCAR/LMWG_dev#59)
  SSP245 (didn't do)
• Make all fsurdat/landuse files; name them based on the branch tag used to create them (WON'T DO as part of this issue).

[slevis-lmwg]

@wwieder pinging you to make you aware of this discussion with @lawrencepj1 and @ekluzek

[lawrencepj1]

Thanks @slevis-lmwg @ekluzek and @wwieder

The new datasets have improved cropping distributions as well as the capability for reforestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (although the carbon capture will need further work). The updated crop distributions can be seen in the attached power point slides.

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1886QjkvUfYFAZRB-LPykir2We568ah1-/edit?pli=1#slide=id.p1

Cheers
Peter

[wwieder]

From talking to @lawrencepj1 this was also motived by the desire to generate smoother surface datasets for high resolution applications. Assuming this is accurate I've added this to Project Board #31

[lawrencepj1]

Thanks Sam and Will -- Dr Peter Lawrence Terrestrial Science Section National Center for Atmospheric Research 1850 Table Mesa Drive Boulder Colorado 80305 Work: 1-303-497-1727 Cell: 1-303-956-6932

…

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 3:12 PM will wieder ***@***.***> wrote: From talking to @lawrencepj1 <https://github.com/lawrencepj1> this was also motived by the desire to generate smoother surface datasets for high resolution applications. Assuming this is accurate I've added this to Project Board #31 <https://github.com/orgs/ESCOMP/projects/31> — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2452 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC3OJOJOGIRT3RSJTSKTKYTY5BE33AVCNFSM6AAAAABFVXHJWGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJSGUZTQNRYGY> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[slevis-lmwg]

@lawrencepj1 I don't remember whether we discussed this already:
In the above directories, is there a replacement file for the noanthro "PtVg" case? Or should I not worry about that for now?

[slevis-lmwg]

I generated 0.9x1.25 1850 fsurdat and 1850-2100 landuse files for all the SSPs listed above and placed here:
/glade/work/slevis/git/mksurfdata_toolchain/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/single_attempts/ssp

I will confirm whether the model runs successfully with one of them (the one that Peter plans to use for his simulations).

Created case with ctsm5.2.001:
./create_newcase --compset ISSP245Clm50BgcCrop --res f09_f09_mg17 --case ~/cases_ctsm5.3/issp245clm53bgccrop_f09 --run-unsupported
Added new fsurdat/landuse to user_nl_clm.
Changed env_run.xml to start in 1850 and cycle 1901-1920 gswp3 data.
Simulation is IN PROGRESS on derecho.

[slevis-lmwg]

@lawrencepj1 I started a simulation (described in prev. post) that seems to be working, so I think my TODOs are complete in this github issue.

[lawrencepj1]

Thanks @slevis-lmwg

This is great. In terms of the PtVg case I don't know how that works. Excellent to hear that the updated files all ran through mksurfdata_esmf and the model ran without issue. Next steps will be to look at the historical simulations once completed. Are you intending to let it run to 2100 under the SSP245 compset?

Cheers
Peter

[slevis-lmwg]

Based on the notes that we took at the top of the page, I'm letting you run the simulations that you needed. I hope you're still fine with that plan. Feel free to clone my test case from here: ~/cases_ctsm5.3/issp245clm53bgccrop_f09

Regarding PtVg: I'm realizing that your updates do not affect PtVg, so we will continue to point to the existing noanthro file:
lnd/clm2/rawdata/pftcftdynharv.0.25x0.25.LUH2.noanthro.c20230226/mksrf_landuse_ctsm52_noanthroLUH2_1.c20230226.nc

[lawrencepj1]

Thanks @slevis-lmwg

Yes I can take a look at the case and run it from there.

Cheers
Peter

[slevis-lmwg]

From meeting with @lawrencepj1 @ekluzek @mvdebolskiy

• @slevis-lmwg will continue and finish the f09 historical to 2015
• @slevis-lmwg will clone the case to run the same with the 5.2 data
• We will ask Keith Oleson to run the diag. package

[slevis-lmwg]

Reminder that this issue fits in the broader context of #2206

Also this issue is partly addressed by #2500

[slevis-lmwg]

This work has evolved beyond this issue and now appears in #2500.