6.5: mm patches#2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
What watermark boosting does is preemptively fire up kswapd to free memory when there hasn't been an allocation failure. It does this by increasing kswapd's high watermark goal and then firing up kswapd. The reason why this causes freezes is because, with the increased high watermark goal, kswapd will steal memory from processes that need it in order to make forward progress. These processes will, in turn, try to allocate memory again, which will cause kswapd to steal necessary pages from those processes again, in a positive feedback loop known as page thrashing. When page thrashing occurs, your system is essentially livelocked until the necessary forward progress can be made to stop processes from trying to continuously allocate memory and trigger kswapd to steal it back. This problem already occurs with kswapd *without* watermark boosting, but it's usually only encountered on machines with a small amount of memory and/or a slow CPU. Watermark boosting just makes the existing problem worse enough to notice on higher spec'd machines. Disable watermark boosting by default since it's a total dumpster fire. I can't imagine why anyone would want to explicitly enable it, but the option is there in case someone does. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
Keeping kswapd running when all the failed allocations that invoked it are satisfied incurs a high overhead due to unnecessary page eviction and writeback, as well as spurious VM pressure events to various registered shrinkers. When kswapd doesn't need to work to make an allocation succeed anymore, stop it prematurely to save resources. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
The page allocator wakes all kswapds in an allocation context's allowed nodemask in the slow path, so it doesn't make sense to have the kswapd- waiter count per each NUMA node. Instead, it should be a global counter to stop all kswapds when there are no failed allocation requests. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
Throttled direct reclaimers will wake up kswapd and wait for kswapd to satisfy their page allocation request, even when the failed allocation lacks the __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM flag in its gfp mask. As a result, kswapd may think that there are no waiters and thus exit prematurely, causing throttled direct reclaimers lacking __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to stall on waiting for kswapd to wake them up. Incrementing the kswapd_waiters counter when such direct reclaimers become throttled fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
On-demand compaction works fine assuming that you don't have a need to spam the page allocator nonstop for large order page allocations. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
There is noticeable scheduling latency and heavy zone lock contention stemming from rmqueue_bulk's single hold of the zone lock while doing its work, as seen with the preemptoff tracer. There's no actual need for rmqueue_bulk() to hold the zone lock the entire time; it only does so for supposed efficiency. As such, we can relax the zone lock and even reschedule when IRQs are enabled in order to keep the scheduling delays and zone lock contention at bay. Forward progress is still guaranteed, as the zone lock can only be relaxed after page removal. With this change, rmqueue_bulk() no longer appears as a serious offender in the preemptoff tracer, and system latency is noticeably improved. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
Allocating pages with __get_free_page is slower than going through the
slab allocator to grab free pages out from a pool.
These are the results from running the code at the bottom of this
message:
[ 1.278602] speedtest: __get_free_page: 9 us
[ 1.278606] speedtest: kmalloc: 4 us
[ 1.278609] speedtest: kmem_cache_alloc: 4 us
[ 1.278611] speedtest: vmalloc: 13 us
kmalloc and kmem_cache_alloc (which is what kmalloc uses for common
sizes behind the scenes) are the fastest choices. Use kmalloc to speed
up sg list allocation.
This is the code used to produce the above measurements:
static int speedtest(void *data)
{
static const struct sched_param sched_max_rt_prio = {
.sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1
};
volatile s64 ctotal = 0, gtotal = 0, ktotal = 0, vtotal = 0;
struct kmem_cache *page_pool;
int i, j, trials = 1000;
volatile ktime_t start;
void *ptr[100];
sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, SCHED_FIFO, &sched_max_rt_prio);
page_pool = kmem_cache_create("pages", PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, SLAB_PANIC,
NULL);
for (i = 0; i < trials; i++) {
start = ktime_get();
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++)
while (!(ptr[j] = kmem_cache_alloc(page_pool, GFP_KERNEL)));
ctotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start);
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++)
kmem_cache_free(page_pool, ptr[j]);
start = ktime_get();
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++)
while (!(ptr[j] = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL)));
gtotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start);
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++)
free_page((unsigned long)ptr[j]);
start = ktime_get();
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++)
while (!(ptr[j] = __kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL)));
ktotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start);
for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++)
kfree(ptr[j]);
start = ktime_get();
*ptr = vmalloc(ARRAY_SIZE(ptr) * PAGE_SIZE);
vtotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start);
vfree(*ptr);
}
kmem_cache_destroy(page_pool);
printk("%s: __get_free_page: %lld us\n", __func__, gtotal / trials);
printk("%s: __kmalloc: %lld us\n", __func__, ktotal / trials);
printk("%s: kmem_cache_alloc: %lld us\n", __func__, ctotal / trials);
printk("%s: vmalloc: %lld us\n", __func__, vtotal / trials);
complete(data);
return 0;
}
static int __init start_test(void)
{
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
BUG_ON(IS_ERR(kthread_run(speedtest, &done, "malloc_test")));
wait_for_completion(&done);
return 0;
}
late_initcall(start_test);
Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
The RCU read lock isn't necessary in list_lru_count_one() when the condition that requires RCU (CONFIG_MEMCG && !CONFIG_SLOB) isn't met. The highly-frequent RCU lock and unlock adds measurable overhead to the shrink_slab() path when it isn't needed. As such, we can simply omit the RCU read lock in this case to improve performance. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com> Signed-off-by: Kazuki Hashimoto <kazukih@tuta.io>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
… delayed items
When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then
we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the
delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example,
btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent
buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the
delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the
delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported
by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline]
lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781
up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625
btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline]
btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239
search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376
btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline]
btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline]
__btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153
flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078
process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600
worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751
kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
__mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
__btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
__do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
__se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
__x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-tree-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-tree-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257:
#0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline]
#0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287
#1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
#2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
__mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
__btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
__do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
__se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
__x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8
</TASK>
------------[ cut here ]------------
Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the
error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items().
Reported-by: syzbot+a379155f07c134ea9879@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000abba27060403b5bd@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
The following warning was reported when running "./test_progs -a link_api -a linked_list" on a RISC-V QEMU VM: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 261 at kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:342 bpf_mem_refill Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) CPU: 3 PID: 261 Comm: test_progs- ... 6.5.0-rc5-01743-gdcb152bb8328 #2 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : bpf_mem_refill+0x1fc/0x206 ra : irq_work_single+0x68/0x70 epc : ffffffff801b1bc4 ra : ffffffff8015fe84 sp : ff2000000001be20 gp : ffffffff82d26138 tp : ff6000008477a800 t0 : 0000000000046600 t1 : ffffffff812b6ddc t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ff2000000001be70 s1 : ff5ffffffffe8998 a0 : ff5ffffffffe8998 a1 : ff600003fef4b000 a2 : 000000000000003f a3 : ffffffff80008250 a4 : 0000000000000060 a5 : 0000000000000080 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000735049 s2 : ff5ffffffffe8998 s3 : 0000000000000022 s4 : 0000000000001000 s5 : 0000000000000007 s6 : ff5ffffffffe8570 s7 : ffffffff82d6bd30 s8 : 000000000000003f s9 : ffffffff82d2c5e8 s10: 000000000000ffff s11: ffffffff82d2c5d8 t3 : ffffffff81ea8f28 t4 : 0000000000000000 t5 : ff6000008fd28278 t6 : 0000000000040000 [<ffffffff801b1bc4>] bpf_mem_refill+0x1fc/0x206 [<ffffffff8015fe84>] irq_work_single+0x68/0x70 [<ffffffff8015feb4>] irq_work_run_list+0x28/0x36 [<ffffffff8015fefa>] irq_work_run+0x38/0x66 [<ffffffff8000828a>] handle_IPI+0x3a/0xb4 [<ffffffff800a5c3a>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xa4/0x1f8 [<ffffffff8009fafa>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36 [<ffffffff800ae570>] ipi_mux_process+0xac/0xfa [<ffffffff8000a8ea>] sbi_ipi_handle+0x2e/0x88 [<ffffffff8009fafa>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36 [<ffffffff807ee70e>] riscv_intc_irq+0x36/0x4e [<ffffffff812b5d3a>] handle_riscv_irq+0x54/0x86 [<ffffffff812b6904>] do_irq+0x66/0x98 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The warning is due to WARN_ON_ONCE(tgt->unit_size != c->unit_size) in free_bulk(). The direct reason is that a object is allocated and freed by bpf_mem_caches with different unit_size. The root cause is that KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE is 64 and there is no 96-bytes slab cache in the specific VM. When linked_list test allocates a 72-bytes object through bpf_obj_new(), bpf_global_ma will allocate it from a bpf_mem_cache with 96-bytes unit_size, but this bpf_mem_cache is backed by 128-bytes slab cache. When the object is freed, bpf_mem_free() uses ksize() to choose the corresponding bpf_mem_cache. Because the object is allocated from 128-bytes slab cache, ksize() returns 128, bpf_mem_free() chooses a 128-bytes bpf_mem_cache to free the object and triggers the warning. A similar warning will also be reported when using CONFIG_SLAB instead of CONFIG_SLUB in a x86-64 kernel. Because CONFIG_SLUB defines KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE as 8 but CONFIG_SLAB defines KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE as 32. An alternative fix is to use kmalloc_size_round() in bpf_mem_alloc() to choose a bpf_mem_cache which has the same unit_size with the backing slab cache, but it may introduce performance degradation, so fix the warning by adjusting the indexes in size_index according to the value of KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE just like setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table() does. Fixes: 822fb26 ("bpf: Add a hint to allocated objects.") Reported-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87jztjmmy4.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908133923.2675053-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
Hou Tao says: ==================== Fix the unmatched unit_size of bpf_mem_cache From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Hi, The patchset aims to fix the reported warning [0] when the unit_size of bpf_mem_cache is mismatched with the object size of underly slab-cache. Patch #1 fixes the warning by adjusting size_index according to the value of KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE, so bpf_mem_cache with unit_size which is smaller than KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE or is not aligned with KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE will be redirected to bpf_mem_cache with bigger unit_size. Patch #2 doesn't do prefill for these redirected bpf_mem_cache to save memory. Patch #3 adds further error check in bpf_mem_alloc_init() to ensure the unit_size and object_size are always matched and to prevent potential issues due to the mismatch. Please see individual patches for more details. And comments are always welcome. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87jztjmmy4.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908133923.2675053-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
macb_set_tx_clk() is called under a spinlock but itself calls clk_set_rate() which can sleep. This results in: | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580 | pps pps1: new PPS source ptp1 | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 40, name: kworker/u4:3 | preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 | RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 | 4 locks held by kworker/u4:3/40: | #0: ffff000003409148 | macb ff0c000.ethernet: gem-ptp-timer ptp clock registered. | ((wq_completion)events_power_efficient){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x14c/0x51c | #1: ffff8000833cbdd8 ((work_completion)(&pl->resolve)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x14c/0x51c | #2: ffff000004f01578 (&pl->state_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: phylink_resolve+0x44/0x4e8 | #3: ffff000004f06f50 (&bp->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: macb_mac_link_up+0x40/0x2ac | irq event stamp: 113998 | hardirqs last enabled at (113997): [<ffff800080e8503c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x64 | hardirqs last disabled at (113998): [<ffff800080e84478>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xac/0xc8 | softirqs last enabled at (113608): [<ffff800080010630>] __do_softirq+0x430/0x4e4 | softirqs last disabled at (113597): [<ffff80008001614c>] ____do_softirq+0x10/0x1c | CPU: 0 PID: 40 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 6.5.0-11717-g9355ce8b2f50-dirty #368 | Hardware name: ... ZynqMP ... (DT) | Workqueue: events_power_efficient phylink_resolve | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x98/0xf0 | show_stack+0x18/0x24 | dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xac | dump_stack+0x18/0x24 | __might_resched+0x144/0x24c | __might_sleep+0x48/0x98 | __mutex_lock+0x58/0x7b0 | mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30 | clk_prepare_lock+0x4c/0xa8 | clk_set_rate+0x24/0x8c | macb_mac_link_up+0x25c/0x2ac | phylink_resolve+0x178/0x4e8 | process_one_work+0x1ec/0x51c | worker_thread+0x1ec/0x3e4 | kthread+0x120/0x124 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 The obvious fix is to move the call to macb_set_tx_clk() out of the protected area. This seems safe as rx and tx are both disabled anyway at this point. It is however not entirely clear what the spinlock shall protect. It could be the read-modify-write access to the NCFGR register, but this is accessed in macb_set_rx_mode() and macb_set_rxcsum_feature() as well without holding the spinlock. It could also be the register accesses done in mog_init_rings() or macb_init_buffers(), but again these functions are called without holding the spinlock in macb_hresp_error_task(). The locking seems fishy in this driver and it might deserve another look before this patch is applied. Fixes: 633e98a ("net: macb: use resolved link config in mac_link_up()") Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908112913.1701766-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
After commit 50f3034 ("igb: Enable SR-IOV after reinit"), removing the igb module could hang or crash (depending on the machine) when the module has been loaded with the max_vfs parameter set to some value != 0. In case of one test machine with a dual port 82580, this hang occurred: [ 232.480687] igb 0000:41:00.1: removed PHC on enp65s0f1 [ 233.093257] igb 0000:41:00.1: IOV Disabled [ 233.329969] pcieport 0000:40:01.0: AER: Multiple Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) err0 [ 233.340302] igb 0000:41:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fata) [ 233.352248] igb 0000:41:00.0: device [8086:1516] error status/mask=00100000 [ 233.361088] igb 0000:41:00.0: [20] UnsupReq (First) [ 233.368183] igb 0000:41:00.0: AER: TLP Header: 40000001 0000040f cdbfc00c c [ 233.376846] igb 0000:41:00.1: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fata) [ 233.388779] igb 0000:41:00.1: device [8086:1516] error status/mask=00100000 [ 233.397629] igb 0000:41:00.1: [20] UnsupReq (First) [ 233.404736] igb 0000:41:00.1: AER: TLP Header: 40000001 0000040f cdbfc00c c [ 233.538214] pci 0000:41:00.1: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback) [ 233.538401] igb 0000:41:00.0: removed PHC on enp65s0f0 [ 233.546197] pcieport 0000:40:01.0: AER: device recovery failed [ 234.157244] igb 0000:41:00.0: IOV Disabled [ 371.619705] INFO: task irq/35-aerdrv:257 blocked for more than 122 seconds. [ 371.627489] Not tainted 6.4.0-dirty #2 [ 371.632257] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this. [ 371.641000] task:irq/35-aerdrv state:D stack:0 pid:257 ppid:2 f0 [ 371.650330] Call Trace: [ 371.653061] <TASK> [ 371.655407] __schedule+0x20e/0x660 [ 371.659313] schedule+0x5a/0xd0 [ 371.662824] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x11/0x20 [ 371.667983] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x372/0x6c0 [ 371.673237] ? __pfx_aer_root_reset+0x10/0x10 [ 371.678105] report_error_detected+0x25/0x1c0 [ 371.682974] ? __pfx_report_normal_detected+0x10/0x10 [ 371.688618] pci_walk_bus+0x72/0x90 [ 371.692519] pcie_do_recovery+0xb2/0x330 [ 371.696899] aer_process_err_devices+0x117/0x170 [ 371.702055] aer_isr+0x1c0/0x1e0 [ 371.705661] ? __set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x54/0xa0 [ 371.710723] ? __pfx_irq_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 [ 371.715496] irq_thread_fn+0x20/0x60 [ 371.719491] irq_thread+0xe6/0x1b0 [ 371.723291] ? __pfx_irq_thread_dtor+0x10/0x10 [ 371.728255] ? __pfx_irq_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 371.732731] kthread+0xe2/0x110 [ 371.736243] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 371.740430] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 [ 371.744428] </TASK> The reproducer was a simple script: #!/bin/sh for i in `seq 1 5`; do modprobe -rv igb modprobe -v igb max_vfs=1 sleep 1 modprobe -rv igb done It turned out that this could only be reproduce on 82580 (quad and dual-port), but not on 82576, i350 and i210. Further debugging showed that igb_enable_sriov()'s call to pci_enable_sriov() is failing, because dev->is_physfn is 0 on 82580. Prior to commit 50f3034 ("igb: Enable SR-IOV after reinit"), igb_enable_sriov() jumped into the "err_out" cleanup branch. After this commit it only returned the error code. So the cleanup didn't take place, and the incorrect VF setup in the igb_adapter structure fooled the igb driver into assuming that VFs have been set up where no VF actually existed. Fix this problem by cleaning up again if pci_enable_sriov() fails. Fixes: 50f3034 ("igb: Enable SR-IOV after reinit") Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
Fix an error detected by memory sanitizer:
```
==4033==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x55fb0fbedfc7 in read_alias_info tools/perf/util/pmu.c:457:6
#1 0x55fb0fbea339 in check_info_data tools/perf/util/pmu.c:1434:2
#2 0x55fb0fbea339 in perf_pmu__check_alias tools/perf/util/pmu.c:1504:9
#3 0x55fb0fbdca85 in parse_events_add_pmu tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:1429:32
#4 0x55fb0f965230 in parse_events_parse tools/perf/util/parse-events.y:299:6
#5 0x55fb0fbdf6b2 in parse_events__scanner tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:1822:8
#6 0x55fb0fbdf8c1 in __parse_events tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:2094:8
#7 0x55fb0fa8ffa9 in parse_events tools/perf/util/parse-events.h:41:9
#8 0x55fb0fa8ffa9 in test_event tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c:2393:8
#9 0x55fb0fa8f458 in test__pmu_events tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c:2551:15
#10 0x55fb0fa6d93f in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:242:9
#11 0x55fb0fa6d93f in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:271:8
#12 0x55fb0fa6d082 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:442:5
#13 0x55fb0fa6d082 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:564:9
#14 0x55fb0f942720 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:322:11
#15 0x55fb0f942486 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:375:8
#16 0x55fb0f941dab in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:419:2
#17 0x55fb0f941dab in main tools/perf/perf.c:535:3
```
Fixes: 7b723db ("perf pmu: Be lazy about loading event info files from sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914022425.1489035-1-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior says: ==================== net: hsr: Properly parse HSRv1 supervisor frames. this is a follow-up to https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230825153111.228768-1-lukma@denx.de/ replacing https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230914124731.1654059-1-lukma@denx.de/ by grabing/ adding tags and reposting with a commit message plus a missing __packed to a struct (#2) plus extending the testsuite to sover HSRv1 which is what broke here (#3-#5). HSRv0 is (was) not affected. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
Specific stress involving frequent CPU-hotplug operations, such as running rcutorture for example, may trigger the following message: NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending, handler #2!!!" This happens in the CPU-down hotplug process, after CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS whose teardown callback parks ksoftirqd, and before the target CPU shuts down through CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD. In this fragile intermediate state, softirqs waiting for threaded handling may be forever ignored and eventually reported by the idle task as in the above example. However some vectors are known to be safe as long as the corresponding subsystems have teardown callbacks handling the migration of their events. The above error message reports pending timers softirq although this vector can be considered as hotplug safe because the CPUHP_TIMERS_PREPARE teardown callback performs the necessary migration of timers after the death of the CPU. Hrtimers also have a similar hotplug handling. Therefore this error message, as far as (hr-)timers are concerned, can be considered spurious and the relevant softirq vectors can be marked as hotplug safe. Fixes: 0345691 ("tick/rcu: Stop allowing RCU_SOFTIRQ in idle") Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912104406.312185-6-frederic@kernel.org
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
…es_lock [ Upstream commit fb5a431 ] __dma_entry_alloc_check_leak() calls into printk -> serial console output (qcom geni) and grabs port->lock under free_entries_lock spin lock, which is a reverse locking dependency chain as qcom_geni IRQ handler can call into dma-debug code and grab free_entries_lock under port->lock. Move __dma_entry_alloc_check_leak() call out of free_entries_lock scope so that we don't acquire serial console's port->lock under it. Trimmed-down lockdep splat: The existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (free_entries_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x80 dma_entry_alloc+0x38/0x110 debug_dma_map_page+0x60/0xf8 dma_map_page_attrs+0x1e0/0x230 dma_map_single_attrs.constprop.0+0x6c/0xc8 geni_se_rx_dma_prep+0x40/0xcc qcom_geni_serial_isr+0x310/0x510 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x110/0x244 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x54 handle_irq_event+0x50/0x88 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0xcc handle_irq_desc+0x28/0x40 generic_handle_domain_irq+0x24/0x30 gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x148 do_interrupt_handler+0xa4/0xb0 el1_interrupt+0x34/0x64 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 arch_local_irq_enable+0x4/0x8 ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24 ... -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x80 qcom_geni_serial_console_write+0x184/0x1dc console_flush_all+0x344/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc _printk+0x68/0x90 register_console+0x230/0x38c uart_add_one_port+0x338/0x494 qcom_geni_serial_probe+0x390/0x424 platform_probe+0x70/0xc0 really_probe+0x148/0x280 __driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x114 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100 __device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc bus_for_each_drv+0xb0/0xd8 __device_attach+0xe4/0x140 device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 bus_probe_device+0x44/0xb0 device_add+0x538/0x668 of_device_add+0x44/0x50 of_platform_device_create_pdata+0x94/0xc8 of_platform_bus_create+0x270/0x304 of_platform_populate+0xac/0xc4 devm_of_platform_populate+0x60/0xac geni_se_probe+0x154/0x160 platform_probe+0x70/0xc0 ... -> #0 (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c lock_acquire+0x234/0x284 console_flush_all+0x330/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc _printk+0x68/0x90 dma_entry_alloc+0xb4/0x110 debug_dma_map_sg+0xdc/0x2f8 __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xac/0xe4 dma_map_sgtable+0x30/0x4c get_pages+0x1d4/0x1e4 [msm] msm_gem_pin_pages_locked+0x38/0xac [msm] msm_gem_pin_vma_locked+0x58/0x88 [msm] msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xde4/0x13ac [msm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe0/0x15c drm_ioctl+0x2e8/0x3f4 vfs_ioctl+0x30/0x50 ... Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> free_entries_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(free_entries_lock); lock(&port_lock_key); lock(free_entries_lock); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xb4/0xf0 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x84 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x1cc/0x234 check_noncircular+0x78/0xac __lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c lock_acquire+0x234/0x284 console_flush_all+0x330/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc _printk+0x68/0x90 dma_entry_alloc+0xb4/0x110 debug_dma_map_sg+0xdc/0x2f8 __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xac/0xe4 dma_map_sgtable+0x30/0x4c get_pages+0x1d4/0x1e4 [msm] msm_gem_pin_pages_locked+0x38/0xac [msm] msm_gem_pin_vma_locked+0x58/0x88 [msm] msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xde4/0x13ac [msm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe0/0x15c drm_ioctl+0x2e8/0x3f4 vfs_ioctl+0x30/0x50 ... Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
commit 1a6a464 upstream. Specific stress involving frequent CPU-hotplug operations, such as running rcutorture for example, may trigger the following message: NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending, handler #2!!!" This happens in the CPU-down hotplug process, after CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS whose teardown callback parks ksoftirqd, and before the target CPU shuts down through CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD. In this fragile intermediate state, softirqs waiting for threaded handling may be forever ignored and eventually reported by the idle task as in the above example. However some vectors are known to be safe as long as the corresponding subsystems have teardown callbacks handling the migration of their events. The above error message reports pending timers softirq although this vector can be considered as hotplug safe because the CPUHP_TIMERS_PREPARE teardown callback performs the necessary migration of timers after the death of the CPU. Hrtimers also have a similar hotplug handling. Therefore this error message, as far as (hr-)timers are concerned, can be considered spurious and the relevant softirq vectors can be marked as hotplug safe. Fixes: 0345691 ("tick/rcu: Stop allowing RCU_SOFTIRQ in idle") Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912104406.312185-6-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2023
Fix the deadlock by refactoring the MR cache cleanup flow to flush the workqueue without holding the rb_lock. This adds a race between cache cleanup and creation of new entries which we solve by denied creation of new entries after cache cleanup started. Lockdep: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 2785.326074 ] 6.2.0-rc6_for_upstream_debug_2023_01_31_14_02 #1 Not tainted [ 2785.339778 ] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 2785.340848 ] devlink/53872 is trying to acquire lock: [ 2785.341701 ] ffff888124f8c0c8 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xc8/0x900 [ 2785.343403 ] [ 2785.343403 ] but task is already holding lock: [ 2785.344464 ] ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.346273 ] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.347720 ] [ 2785.347720 ] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 2785.349003 ] [ 2785.349003 ] -> #1 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 2785.350160 ] __mutex_lock+0x14c/0x15c0 [ 2785.350962 ] delayed_cache_work_func+0x2d1/0x610 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.352044 ] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1310 [ 2785.352879 ] worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 [ 2785.353636 ] kthread+0x28f/0x330 [ 2785.354370 ] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 2785.355135 ] [ 2785.355135 ] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 2785.356515 ] __lock_acquire+0x2d8a/0x5fe0 [ 2785.357349 ] lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x540 [ 2785.358121 ] __flush_work+0xe8/0x900 [ 2785.358852 ] __cancel_work_timer+0x2c7/0x3f0 [ 2785.359711 ] mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0xfb/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.360781 ] mlx5_ib_stage_pre_ib_reg_umr_cleanup+0x16/0x30 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.361969 ] __mlx5_ib_remove+0x68/0x120 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.362960 ] mlx5r_remove+0x63/0x80 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.363870 ] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x52/0x70 [ 2785.364715 ] device_release_driver_internal+0x3c1/0x600 [ 2785.365695 ] bus_remove_device+0x2a5/0x560 [ 2785.366525 ] device_del+0x492/0xb80 [ 2785.367276 ] mlx5_detach_device+0x1a9/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.368615 ] mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x5a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.369934 ] mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x292/0x580 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.371292 ] devlink_reload+0x439/0x590 [ 2785.372075 ] devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0xaef/0xff0 [ 2785.372973 ] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x1bd/0x290 [ 2785.374011 ] genl_rcv_msg+0x3ca/0x6c0 [ 2785.374798 ] netlink_rcv_skb+0x12c/0x360 [ 2785.375612 ] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [ 2785.376295 ] netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710 [ 2785.377121 ] netlink_sendmsg+0x7a1/0xca0 [ 2785.377926 ] sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 [ 2785.378668 ] __sys_sendto+0x1bc/0x290 [ 2785.379440 ] __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 [ 2785.380255 ] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [ 2785.381031 ] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.381967 ] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.383448 ] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 2785.383448 ] [ 2785.384544 ] CPU0 CPU1 [ 2785.385383 ] ---- ---- [ 2785.386193 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.386940 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.388327 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.389425 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.390414 ] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.391579 ] 6 locks held by devlink/53872: [ 2785.392341 ] #0: ffffffff84c17a50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 [ 2785.393630 ] #1: ffff888142280218 (&devlink->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_get_from_attrs_lock+0x12d/0x2d0 [ 2785.395324 ] #2: ffff8881422d3c38 (&dev->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x4a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.397322 ] #3: ffffffffa0e59068 (mlx5_intf_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_detach_device+0x60/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.399231 ] #4: ffff88810e3cb0e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8d/0x600 [ 2785.400864 ] #5: ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] Fixes: b958451 ("RDMA/mlx5: Change the cache structure to an RB-tree") Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2023
The following call trace shows a deadlock issue due to recursive locking of mutex "device_mutex". First lock acquire is in target_for_each_device() and second in target_free_device(). PID: 148266 TASK: ffff8be21ffb5d00 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "iscsi_ttx" #0 [ffffa2bfc9ec3b18] __schedule at ffffffffa8060e7f #1 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ba0] schedule at ffffffffa8061224 #2 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bb8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa80615ee #3 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bc8] __mutex_lock at ffffffffa8062fd7 #4 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c40] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa80631d3 #5 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c50] mutex_lock at ffffffffa806320c #6 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c68] target_free_device at ffffffffc0935998 [target_core_mod] #7 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c90] target_core_dev_release at ffffffffc092f975 [target_core_mod] #8 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ca0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d250f #9 [ffffa2bfc9ec3cd0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d2583 #10 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ce0] target_devices_idr_iter at ffffffffc0933f3a [target_core_mod] #11 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d00] idr_for_each at ffffffffa803f6fc #12 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d60] target_for_each_device at ffffffffc0935670 [target_core_mod] #13 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d98] transport_deregister_session at ffffffffc0946408 [target_core_mod] #14 [ffffa2bfc9ec3dc8] iscsit_close_session at ffffffffc09a44a6 [iscsi_target_mod] #15 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df0] iscsit_close_connection at ffffffffc09a4a88 [iscsi_target_mod] #16 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df8] finish_task_switch at ffffffffa76e5d07 #17 [ffffa2bfc9ec3e78] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit at ffffffffc0991c23 [iscsi_target_mod] #18 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ea0] iscsi_target_tx_thread at ffffffffc09a403b [iscsi_target_mod] #19 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f08] kthread at ffffffffa76d8080 #20 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffa8200364 Fixes: 36d4cb4 ("scsi: target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands trigger lock inversion") Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918225848.66463-1-junxiao.bi@oracle.com Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
[ Upstream commit a154f5f ] The following call trace shows a deadlock issue due to recursive locking of mutex "device_mutex". First lock acquire is in target_for_each_device() and second in target_free_device(). PID: 148266 TASK: ffff8be21ffb5d00 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "iscsi_ttx" #0 [ffffa2bfc9ec3b18] __schedule at ffffffffa8060e7f #1 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ba0] schedule at ffffffffa8061224 #2 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bb8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa80615ee #3 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bc8] __mutex_lock at ffffffffa8062fd7 #4 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c40] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa80631d3 #5 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c50] mutex_lock at ffffffffa806320c #6 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c68] target_free_device at ffffffffc0935998 [target_core_mod] #7 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c90] target_core_dev_release at ffffffffc092f975 [target_core_mod] #8 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ca0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d250f #9 [ffffa2bfc9ec3cd0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d2583 #10 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ce0] target_devices_idr_iter at ffffffffc0933f3a [target_core_mod] #11 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d00] idr_for_each at ffffffffa803f6fc #12 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d60] target_for_each_device at ffffffffc0935670 [target_core_mod] #13 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d98] transport_deregister_session at ffffffffc0946408 [target_core_mod] #14 [ffffa2bfc9ec3dc8] iscsit_close_session at ffffffffc09a44a6 [iscsi_target_mod] #15 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df0] iscsit_close_connection at ffffffffc09a4a88 [iscsi_target_mod] #16 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df8] finish_task_switch at ffffffffa76e5d07 #17 [ffffa2bfc9ec3e78] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit at ffffffffc0991c23 [iscsi_target_mod] #18 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ea0] iscsi_target_tx_thread at ffffffffc09a403b [iscsi_target_mod] #19 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f08] kthread at ffffffffa76d8080 #20 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffa8200364 Fixes: 36d4cb4 ("scsi: target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands trigger lock inversion") Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918225848.66463-1-junxiao.bi@oracle.com Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
commit 374012b upstream. Fix the deadlock by refactoring the MR cache cleanup flow to flush the workqueue without holding the rb_lock. This adds a race between cache cleanup and creation of new entries which we solve by denied creation of new entries after cache cleanup started. Lockdep: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 2785.326074 ] 6.2.0-rc6_for_upstream_debug_2023_01_31_14_02 #1 Not tainted [ 2785.339778 ] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 2785.340848 ] devlink/53872 is trying to acquire lock: [ 2785.341701 ] ffff888124f8c0c8 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xc8/0x900 [ 2785.343403 ] [ 2785.343403 ] but task is already holding lock: [ 2785.344464 ] ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.346273 ] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.347720 ] [ 2785.347720 ] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 2785.349003 ] [ 2785.349003 ] -> #1 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 2785.350160 ] __mutex_lock+0x14c/0x15c0 [ 2785.350962 ] delayed_cache_work_func+0x2d1/0x610 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.352044 ] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1310 [ 2785.352879 ] worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 [ 2785.353636 ] kthread+0x28f/0x330 [ 2785.354370 ] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 2785.355135 ] [ 2785.355135 ] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 2785.356515 ] __lock_acquire+0x2d8a/0x5fe0 [ 2785.357349 ] lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x540 [ 2785.358121 ] __flush_work+0xe8/0x900 [ 2785.358852 ] __cancel_work_timer+0x2c7/0x3f0 [ 2785.359711 ] mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0xfb/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.360781 ] mlx5_ib_stage_pre_ib_reg_umr_cleanup+0x16/0x30 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.361969 ] __mlx5_ib_remove+0x68/0x120 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.362960 ] mlx5r_remove+0x63/0x80 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.363870 ] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x52/0x70 [ 2785.364715 ] device_release_driver_internal+0x3c1/0x600 [ 2785.365695 ] bus_remove_device+0x2a5/0x560 [ 2785.366525 ] device_del+0x492/0xb80 [ 2785.367276 ] mlx5_detach_device+0x1a9/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.368615 ] mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x5a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.369934 ] mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x292/0x580 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.371292 ] devlink_reload+0x439/0x590 [ 2785.372075 ] devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0xaef/0xff0 [ 2785.372973 ] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x1bd/0x290 [ 2785.374011 ] genl_rcv_msg+0x3ca/0x6c0 [ 2785.374798 ] netlink_rcv_skb+0x12c/0x360 [ 2785.375612 ] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [ 2785.376295 ] netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710 [ 2785.377121 ] netlink_sendmsg+0x7a1/0xca0 [ 2785.377926 ] sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 [ 2785.378668 ] __sys_sendto+0x1bc/0x290 [ 2785.379440 ] __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 [ 2785.380255 ] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [ 2785.381031 ] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.381967 ] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.383448 ] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 2785.383448 ] [ 2785.384544 ] CPU0 CPU1 [ 2785.385383 ] ---- ---- [ 2785.386193 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.386940 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.388327 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.389425 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.390414 ] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.391579 ] 6 locks held by devlink/53872: [ 2785.392341 ] #0: ffffffff84c17a50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 [ 2785.393630 ] #1: ffff888142280218 (&devlink->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_get_from_attrs_lock+0x12d/0x2d0 [ 2785.395324 ] #2: ffff8881422d3c38 (&dev->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x4a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.397322 ] #3: ffffffffa0e59068 (mlx5_intf_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_detach_device+0x60/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.399231 ] #4: ffff88810e3cb0e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8d/0x600 [ 2785.400864 ] #5: ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] Fixes: b958451 ("RDMA/mlx5: Change the cache structure to an RB-tree") Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2023
The following panic can happen when mmap is called before the pmu add callback which sets the hardware counter index: this happens for example with the following command `perf record --no-bpf-event -n kill`. [ 99.461486] CPU: 1 PID: 1259 Comm: perf Tainted: G E 6.6.0-rc4ubuntu-defconfig #2 [ 99.461669] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [ 99.461748] epc : pmu_sbi_set_scounteren+0x42/0x44 [ 99.462337] ra : smp_call_function_many_cond+0x126/0x5b0 [ 99.462369] epc : ffffffff809f9d24 ra : ffffffff800f93e0 sp : ff60000082153aa0 [ 99.462407] gp : ffffffff82395c98 tp : ff6000009a218040 t0 : ff6000009ab3a4f0 [ 99.462425] t1 : 0000000000000004 t2 : 0000000000000100 s0 : ff60000082153ab0 [ 99.462459] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ff60000098869528 a1 : 0000000000000000 [ 99.462473] a2 : 000000000000001f a3 : 0000000000f00000 a4 : fffffffffffffff8 [ 99.462488] a5 : 00000000000000cc a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000735049 [ 99.462502] s2 : 0000000000000001 s3 : ffffffff809f9ce2 s4 : ff60000098869528 [ 99.462516] s5 : 0000000000000002 s6 : 0000000000000004 s7 : 0000000000000001 [ 99.462530] s8 : ff600003fec98bc0 s9 : ffffffff826c5890 s10: ff600003fecfcde0 [ 99.462544] s11: ff600003fec98bc0 t3 : ffffffff819e2558 t4 : ff1c000004623840 [ 99.462557] t5 : 0000000000000901 t6 : ff6000008feeb890 [ 99.462570] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003 [ 99.462658] [<ffffffff809f9d24>] pmu_sbi_set_scounteren+0x42/0x44 [ 99.462979] Code: 1060 4785 97bb 00d7 8fd9 9073 1067 6422 0141 8082 (9002) 0013 [ 99.463335] Kernel BUG [#2] To circumvent this, try to enable userspace access to the hardware counter when it is selected in addition to when the event is mapped. And vice-versa when the event is stopped/unmapped. Fixes: cc4c07c ("drivers: perf: Implement perf event mmap support in the SBI backend") Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006082010.11963-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2023
…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.6, take #2 - Fix the handling of the phycal timer offset when FEAT_ECV and CNTPOFF_EL2 are implemented. - Restore the functionnality of Permission Indirection that was broken by the Fine Grained Trapping rework - Cleanup some PMU event sharing code
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
[ Upstream commit 4428399 ] The lt8912b driver, in its bridge detach function, calls drm_connector_unregister() and drm_connector_cleanup(). drm_connector_unregister() should be called only for connectors explicitly registered with drm_connector_register(), which is not the case in lt8912b. The driver's drm_connector_funcs.destroy hook is set to drm_connector_cleanup(). Thus the driver should not call either drm_connector_unregister() nor drm_connector_cleanup() in its lt8912_bridge_detach(), as they cause a crash on bridge detach: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000006 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000858f3000 [0000000000000000] pgd=0800000085918003, p4d=0800000085918003, pud=0800000085431003, pmd=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: tidss(-) display_connector lontium_lt8912b tc358768 panel_lvds panel_simple drm_dma_helper drm_kms_helper drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks CPU: 3 PID: 462 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G W 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Hardware name: Toradex Verdin AM62 on Verdin Development Board (DT) pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : drm_connector_cleanup+0x78/0x2d4 [drm] lr : lt8912_bridge_detach+0x54/0x6c [lontium_lt8912b] sp : ffff800082ed3a90 x29: ffff800082ed3a90 x28: ffff0000040c1940 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: dead000000000122 x24: dead000000000122 x23: dead000000000100 x22: ffff000003fb6388 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff000003fb6260 x18: fffffffffffe56e8 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0010000000000000 x15: 0000000000000038 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800081914b48 x12: 000000000000040e x11: 000000000000015a x10: ffff80008196ebb8 x9 : ffff800081914b48 x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffff0000040c1940 x6 : ffff80007aa649d0 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : ffff80008159e008 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: drm_connector_cleanup+0x78/0x2d4 [drm] lt8912_bridge_detach+0x54/0x6c [lontium_lt8912b] drm_bridge_detach+0x44/0x84 [drm] drm_encoder_cleanup+0x40/0xb8 [drm] drmm_encoder_alloc_release+0x1c/0x30 [drm] drm_managed_release+0xac/0x148 [drm] drm_dev_put.part.0+0x88/0xb8 [drm] devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x14/0x24 [drm] devm_action_release+0x14/0x20 release_nodes+0x5c/0x90 devres_release_all+0x8c/0xe0 device_unbind_cleanup+0x18/0x68 device_release_driver_internal+0x208/0x23c driver_detach+0x4c/0x94 bus_remove_driver+0x70/0xf4 driver_unregister+0x30/0x60 platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x20 tidss_platform_driver_exit+0x18/0xb2c [tidss] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1a0/0x2b4 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x60/0x10c do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x40/0xac el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 Code: 9104a276 f2fbd5b7 aa0203e1 91008af8 (f85c0420) Fixes: 30e2ae9 ("drm/bridge: Introduce LT8912B DSI to HDMI bridge") Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230804-lt8912b-v1-2-c542692c6a2f@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
[ Upstream commit a84fbf2 ] Generating metrics llc_code_read_mpi_demand_plus_prefetch, llc_data_read_mpi_demand_plus_prefetch, llc_miss_local_memory_bandwidth_read, llc_miss_local_memory_bandwidth_write, nllc_miss_remote_memory_bandwidth_read, memory_bandwidth_read, memory_bandwidth_write, uncore_frequency, upi_data_transmit_bw, C2_Pkg_Residency, C3_Core_Residency, C3_Pkg_Residency, C6_Core_Residency, C6_Pkg_Residency, C7_Core_Residency, C7_Pkg_Residency, UNCORE_FREQ and tma_info_system_socket_clks would trigger an address sanitizer heap-buffer-overflows on a SkylakeX. ``` ==2567752==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x5020003ed098 at pc 0x5621a816654e bp 0x7fffb55d4da0 sp 0x7fffb55d4d98 READ of size 4 at 0x5020003eee78 thread T0 #0 0x558265d6654d in aggr_cpu_id__is_empty tools/perf/util/cpumap.c:694:12 #1 0x558265c914da in perf_stat__get_aggr tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:1490:6 #2 0x558265c914da in perf_stat__get_global_cached tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:1530:9 #3 0x558265e53290 in should_skip_zero_counter tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:947:31 #4 0x558265e53290 in print_counter_aggrdata tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:985:18 #5 0x558265e51931 in print_counter tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:1110:3 #6 0x558265e51931 in evlist__print_counters tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:1571:5 #7 0x558265c8ec87 in print_counters tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:981:2 #8 0x558265c8cc71 in cmd_stat tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:2837:3 #9 0x558265bb9bd4 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:323:11 #10 0x558265bb98eb in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:377:8 #11 0x558265bb9389 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:421:2 #12 0x558265bb9389 in main tools/perf/perf.c:537:3 ``` The issue was the use of testing a cpumap with NULL rather than using empty, as a map containing the dummy value isn't NULL and the -1 results in an empty aggr map being allocated which legitimately overflows when any member is accessed. Fixes: 8a96f45 ("perf stat: Avoid SEGV if core.cpus isn't set") Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906003912.3317462-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2023
[ Upstream commit ede72dc ] Fuzzing found that an invalid tracepoint name would create a memory leak with an address sanitizer build: ``` $ perf stat -e '*:o/' true event syntax error: '*:o/' \___ parser error Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events Usage: perf stat [<options>] [<command>] -e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events ================================================================= ==59380==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f38ac07077b in __interceptor_strdup ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:439 #1 0x55f2f41be73b in str util/parse-events.l:49 #2 0x55f2f41d08e8 in parse_events_lex util/parse-events.l:338 #3 0x55f2f41dc3b1 in parse_events_parse util/parse-events-bison.c:1464 #4 0x55f2f410b8b3 in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:1822 #5 0x55f2f410d1b9 in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2094 #6 0x55f2f410e57f in parse_events_option util/parse-events.c:2279 #7 0x55f2f4427b56 in get_value tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:251 #8 0x55f2f4428d98 in parse_short_opt tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:351 #9 0x55f2f4429d80 in parse_options_step tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:539 #10 0x55f2f442acb9 in parse_options_subcommand tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:654 #11 0x55f2f3ec99fc in cmd_stat tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:2501 #12 0x55f2f4093289 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:322 #13 0x55f2f40937f5 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:375 #14 0x55f2f4093bbd in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:419 #15 0x55f2f409412b in main tools/perf/perf.c:535 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 4 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ``` Fix by adding the missing destructor. Fixes: 865582c ("perf tools: Adds the tracepoint name parsing support") Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914164028.363220-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2023
This allows it to break the following circular locking dependency.
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ======================================================
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: 6.4.0-rc7+ #10 Not tainted
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ------------------------------------------------------
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: wireplumber/2236 is trying to acquire lock:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ffff8fca5320da18 (&fctx->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
but task is already holding lock:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ffff8fca41208610 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
which lock already depends on the new lock.
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
-> #3 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
-> #2 (&device->intr.lock){-...}-{2:2}:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_inth_allow+0x2c/0x80 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_state+0x181/0x250 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_allow+0x63/0xd0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_uevent_mthd+0x4d/0x70 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_ioctl+0x10b/0x250 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_object_mthd+0xa8/0x1f0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_event_allow+0x2a/0xa0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_enable_signaling+0x78/0x80 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __dma_fence_enable_signaling+0x5e/0x100
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dma_fence_add_callback+0x4b/0xd0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_cli_work_queue+0xae/0x110 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_gem_object_close+0x1d1/0x2a0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_gem_handle_delete+0x70/0xe0 [drm]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa5/0x150 [drm]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl+0x256/0x490 [drm]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_drm_ioctl+0x5a/0xb0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
-> #1 (&event->refs_lock#4){....}-{2:2}:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_state+0x37/0x250 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_allow+0x63/0xd0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_uevent_mthd+0x4d/0x70 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_ioctl+0x10b/0x250 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_object_mthd+0xa8/0x1f0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_event_allow+0x2a/0xa0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_enable_signaling+0x78/0x80 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __dma_fence_enable_signaling+0x5e/0x100
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dma_fence_add_callback+0x4b/0xd0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_cli_work_queue+0xae/0x110 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_gem_object_close+0x1d1/0x2a0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_gem_handle_delete+0x70/0xe0 [drm]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa5/0x150 [drm]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl+0x256/0x490 [drm]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_drm_ioctl+0x5a/0xb0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
-> #0 (&fctx->lock){-...}-{2:2}:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __lock_acquire+0x14e3/0x2240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_client_event+0xf/0x20 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x9b/0xf0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
other info that might help us debug this:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Chain exists of:
&fctx->lock --> &device->intr.lock --> &event->list_lock#2
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Possible unsafe locking scenario:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: CPU0 CPU1
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ---- ----
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&event->list_lock#2);
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&device->intr.lock);
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&event->list_lock#2);
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&fctx->lock);
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
*** DEADLOCK ***
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: 2 locks held by wireplumber/2236:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: #0: ffff8fca53177bf8 (&device->intr.lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_intr+0x29/0x240 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: #1: ffff8fca41208610 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel:
stack backtrace:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: CPU: 6 PID: 2236 Comm: wireplumber Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7+ #10
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI/Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF, BIOS F8 11/05/2021
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Call Trace:
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: <TASK>
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: check_noncircular+0xe2/0x110
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __lock_acquire+0x14e3/0x2240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_client_event+0xf/0x20 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x9b/0xf0 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau]
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fb66174d700
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Code: c1 e2 05 29 ca 8d 0c 10 0f be 07 84 c0 75 eb 89 c8 c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa e9 d7 0f fc ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 <f3> 0f 1e fa e9 c7 0f fc>
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffdd3c48438 EFLAGS: 00000206
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RAX: 000055bb758763c0 RBX: 000055bb758752c0 RCX: 00000000000028b0
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RDX: 000055bb758752c0 RSI: 000055bb75887490 RDI: 000055bb75862950
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RBP: 00007ffdd3c48490 R08: 000055bb75873b10 R09: 0000000000000001
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 000055bb7587f000 R12: 000055bb75887490
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: R13: 000055bb757f6280 R14: 000055bb758875c0 R15: 000055bb757f6280
Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: </TASK>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231107053255.2257079-1-airlied@gmail.com
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2023
[ Upstream commit 265f3ed ] All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the locking scenario of function B such as in the following model: long A(void *arg) { mutex_lock(&mutex); mutex_unlock(&mutex); } long B(void *arg) { } void launchA(void) { work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL); } void launchB(void) { mutex_lock(&mutex); work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL); mutex_unlock(&mutex); } launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock. However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as belonging to the same locking class. The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x83/0x4e0 work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0 rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0 rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80 rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0 rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0 percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200 _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 __cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20 work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20 process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500 worker_thread+0x173/0x330 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9: #0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500 #1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn Call Trace: rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 check_noncircular+0x132/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0 ? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200 ? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 __cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20 work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20 process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500 worker_thread+0x173/0x330 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller. Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2023
commit 3a42709 upstream. Validate @ioctl_rsp->OutputOffset and @ioctl_rsp->OutputCount so that their sum does not wrap to a number that is smaller than @reparse_buf and we end up with a wild pointer as follows: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88809c5cd45f #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 4a01067 P4D 4a01067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 1260 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] Code: ff ff e8 f3 51 fe ff 41 89 c6 58 5a 45 85 f6 0f 85 14 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 48 8b 42 60 44 8b 42 64 42 8d 0c 00 49 39 4f 50 72 40 <8b> 04 02 48 8b 9d f0 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 50 89 03 48 8b 9d e8 fe ff RSP: 0018:ffffc90000347a90 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: 000000008000001f RBX: ffff88800ae11000 RCX: 00000000000000ec RDX: ffff88801c5cd440 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff82004aa4 RBP: ffffc90000347bb0 R08: 00000000800000cd R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000024 R12: ffff8880114d4100 R13: ffff8880114d4198 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8880114d4000 FS: 00007f02c07babc0(0000) GS:ffff88806ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff88809c5cd45f CR3: 0000000011750000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x181/0x480 ? search_module_extables+0x19/0x60 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? exc_page_fault+0x1b6/0x1c0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 ? smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] cifs_get_fattr+0x16e/0xa50 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 cifs_root_iget+0x163/0x5f0 [cifs] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x5bd/0x780 [cifs] smb3_get_tree+0xd9/0x290 [cifs] vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0x100 ? capable+0x37/0x70 path_mount+0x2d7/0xb80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 __x64_sys_mount+0x11a/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7f02c08d5b1e Fixes: 2e4564b ("smb3: add support for stat of WSL reparse points for special file types") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Robert Morris <rtm@csail.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2023
Due to the cited patch, devlink health commands take devlink lock and this may result in deadlock for mlx5e_tx_reporter as it takes local state_lock before calling devlink health report and on the other hand devlink health commands such as diagnose for same reporter take local state_lock after taking devlink lock (see kernel log below). To fix it, remove local state_lock from mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() before calling devlink_health_report() and take care to cancel the work before any call to close channels, which may free the SQs that should be handled by the work. Before cancel_work_sync(), use current_work() to check we are not calling it from within the work, as mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() itself may close the channels and reopen as part of recovery flow. While removing state_lock from mlx5e_tx_timeout_work() keep rtnl_lock to ensure no change in netdev->real_num_tx_queues, but use rtnl_trylock() and a flag to avoid deadlock by calling cancel_work_sync() before closing the channels while holding rtnl_lock too. Kernel log: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.0.0-rc3_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_30_13_10 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u16:2/65 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888122f6c2f8 (&devlink->lock_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888121d20be0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 mlx5e_rx_reporter_diagnose+0x71/0x700 [mlx5_core] devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_diagnose_doit+0x212/0xa50 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1e9/0x2f0 genl_rcv_msg+0x2e9/0x530 netlink_rcv_skb+0x11d/0x340 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710 netlink_sendmsg+0x788/0xc40 sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0 __sys_sendto+0x1c1/0x290 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdd/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 -> #0 (&devlink->lock_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x2c8a/0x6200 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 mlx5e_health_report+0xc9/0xd7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_reporter_tx_timeout+0x2ab/0x3d0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x1c1/0x280 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&priv->state_lock); lock(&devlink->lock_key#2); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock(&devlink->lock_key#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u16:2/65: #0: ffff88811a55b138 ((wq_completion)mlx5e#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x6e2/0x1340 #1: ffff888101de7db8 ((work_completion)(&priv->tx_timeout_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340 #2: ffffffff84ce8328 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x53/0x280 [mlx5_core] #3: ffff888121d20be0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 65 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc3_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_30_13_10 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_tx_timeout_work [mlx5_core] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d check_noncircular+0x278/0x300 ? print_circular_bug+0x460/0x460 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 ? __stack_depot_save+0x24c/0x520 ? alloc_chain_hlocks+0x228/0x700 __lock_acquire+0x2c8a/0x6200 ? register_lock_class+0x1860/0x1860 ? kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 ? kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 ? ____kasan_slab_free+0x11d/0x1b0 ? kfree+0x1ba/0x520 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 ? devlink_health_report+0x3d5/0x7e0 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2d/0x100 ? bit_wait_io_timeout+0x170/0x170 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 ? kfree+0x1ba/0x520 ? devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x171/0x3a0 devlink_health_report+0x2f1/0x7e0 mlx5e_health_report+0xc9/0xd7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_reporter_tx_timeout+0x2ab/0x3d0 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? mlx5e_reporter_tx_err_cqe+0x1b0/0x1b0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_reporter_timeout_dump+0x70/0x70 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_reporter_dump_sq+0x320/0x320 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x70/0x280 [mlx5_core] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320 ? process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 mlx5e_tx_timeout_work+0x1c1/0x280 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 ? process_one_work+0x1340/0x1340 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Fixes: c90005b ("devlink: Hold the instance lock in health callbacks") Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2023
As &card->tx_queue_lock is acquired under softirq context along the following call chain from solos_bh(), other acquisition of the same lock inside process context should disable at least bh to avoid double lock. <deadlock #2> pclose() --> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock) <interrupt> --> solos_bh() --> fpga_tx() --> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock) This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am developing for irq-related deadlock. To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_bh() on &card->tx_queue_lock under process context code consistently to prevent the possible deadlock scenario. Fixes: 213e85d ("solos-pci: clean up pclose() function") Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2023
If server replied SMB2_NEGOTIATE with a zero SecurityBufferOffset, smb2_get_data_area() sets @len to non-zero but return NULL, so decode_negTokeninit() ends up being called with a NULL @security_blob: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 871 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:asn1_ber_decoder+0x173/0xc80 Code: 01 4c 39 2c 24 75 09 45 84 c9 0f 85 2f 03 00 00 48 8b 14 24 4c 29 ea 48 83 fa 01 0f 86 1e 07 00 00 48 8b 74 24 28 4d 8d 5d 01 <42> 0f b6 3c 2e 89 fa 40 88 7c 24 5c f7 d2 83 e2 1f 0f 84 3d 07 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000063f950 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000004a RDX: 000000000000004a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000000004d R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fce52b0fbc0(0000) GS:ffff88806ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000001ae64000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x181/0x480 ? __stack_depot_save+0x1e6/0x480 ? exc_page_fault+0x6f/0x1c0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? asn1_ber_decoder+0x173/0xc80 ? check_object+0x40/0x340 decode_negTokenInit+0x1e/0x30 [cifs] SMB2_negotiate+0xc99/0x17c0 [cifs] ? smb2_negotiate+0x46/0x60 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 smb2_negotiate+0x46/0x60 [cifs] cifs_negotiate_protocol+0xae/0x130 [cifs] cifs_get_smb_ses+0x517/0x1040 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x5d/0x90 cifs_mount_get_session+0x78/0x200 [cifs] dfs_mount_share+0x13a/0x9f0 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 ? find_nls+0x16/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 cifs_mount+0x7e/0x350 [cifs] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x128/0x780 [cifs] smb3_get_tree+0xd9/0x290 [cifs] vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0x100 ? capable+0x37/0x70 path_mount+0x2d7/0xb80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 __x64_sys_mount+0x11a/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fce52c2ab1e Fix this by setting @len to zero when @off == 0 so callers won't attempt to dereference non-existing data areas. Reported-by: Robert Morris <rtm@csail.mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2023
Validate @ioctl_rsp->OutputOffset and @ioctl_rsp->OutputCount so that their sum does not wrap to a number that is smaller than @reparse_buf and we end up with a wild pointer as follows: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88809c5cd45f #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 4a01067 P4D 4a01067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 1260 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] Code: ff ff e8 f3 51 fe ff 41 89 c6 58 5a 45 85 f6 0f 85 14 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 48 8b 42 60 44 8b 42 64 42 8d 0c 00 49 39 4f 50 72 40 <8b> 04 02 48 8b 9d f0 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 50 89 03 48 8b 9d e8 fe ff RSP: 0018:ffffc90000347a90 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: 000000008000001f RBX: ffff88800ae11000 RCX: 00000000000000ec RDX: ffff88801c5cd440 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff82004aa4 RBP: ffffc90000347bb0 R08: 00000000800000cd R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000024 R12: ffff8880114d4100 R13: ffff8880114d4198 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8880114d4000 FS: 00007f02c07babc0(0000) GS:ffff88806ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff88809c5cd45f CR3: 0000000011750000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x181/0x480 ? search_module_extables+0x19/0x60 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? exc_page_fault+0x1b6/0x1c0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 ? smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] cifs_get_fattr+0x16e/0xa50 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 cifs_root_iget+0x163/0x5f0 [cifs] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x5bd/0x780 [cifs] smb3_get_tree+0xd9/0x290 [cifs] vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0x100 ? capable+0x37/0x70 path_mount+0x2d7/0xb80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 __x64_sys_mount+0x11a/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7f02c08d5b1e Fixes: 2e4564b ("smb3: add support for stat of WSL reparse points for special file types") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Robert Morris <rtm@csail.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2023
With the current bandwidth allocation we end up reserving too much for the USB 3.x and PCIe tunnels that leads to reduced capabilities for the second DisplayPort tunnel. Fix this by decreasing the USB 3.x allocation to 900 Mb/s which then allows both tunnels to get the maximum HBR2 bandwidth. This way, the reserved bandwidth for USB 3.x and PCIe, would be 1350 Mb/s (taking weights of USB 3.x and PCIe into account). So bandwidth allocations on a link are: USB 3.x + PCIe tunnels => 1350 Mb/s DisplayPort tunnel #1 => 17280 Mb/s DisplayPort tunnel #2 => 17280 Mb/s Total consumed bandwidth is 35910 Mb/s. So that all the above can be tunneled on a Gen 3 link (which allows maximum of 36000 Mb/s). Fixes: 582e70b ("thunderbolt: Change bandwidth reservations to comply USB4 v2") Signed-off-by: Gil Fine <gil.fine@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2023
Coverity Scan reports the following issue. But it's impossible that mlx5_get_dev_index returns 7 for PF, even if the index is calculated from PCI FUNC ID. So add the checking to make coverity slience. CID 610894 (#2 of 2): Out-of-bounds write (OVERRUN) Overrunning array esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_rules of 4 8-byte elements at element index 7 (byte offset 63) using index mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_dev) (which evaluates to 7). Fixes: 9bee385 ("net/mlx5: E-switch, refactor FDB miss rule add/remove") Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2023
syzbot found a potential circular dependency leading to a deadlock:
-> #3 (&hdev->req_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784
hci_dev_do_close+0x3f/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:551
hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935
rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345
rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274
vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594
ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb
-> #2 (rfkill_global_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784
rfkill_register+0x30/0x7e3 net/rfkill/core.c:1045
hci_register_dev+0x48f/0x96d net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2622
__vhci_create_device drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:341 [inline]
vhci_create_device+0x3ad/0x68f drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:374
vhci_get_user drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:431 [inline]
vhci_write+0x37b/0x429 drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:511
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2109 [inline]
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:509 [inline]
vfs_write+0xaa8/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:596
ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb
-> #1 (&data->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784
vhci_send_frame+0x68/0x9c drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:75
hci_send_frame+0x1cc/0x2ff net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2989
hci_sched_acl_pkt net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3498 [inline]
hci_sched_acl net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3583 [inline]
hci_tx_work+0xb94/0x1a60 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3654
process_one_work+0x901/0xfb8 kernel/workqueue.c:2310
worker_thread+0xa67/0x1003 kernel/workqueue.c:2457
kthread+0x36a/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:298
-> #0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->tx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3787 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2d32/0x77fa kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5011
lock_acquire+0x273/0x4d5 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5622
__flush_work+0xee/0x19f kernel/workqueue.c:3090
hci_dev_close_sync+0x32f/0x1113 net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:4352
hci_dev_do_close+0x47/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:553
hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935
rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345
rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274
vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594
ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb
This change removes the need for acquiring the open_mutex in
vhci_send_frame, thus eliminating the potential deadlock while
maintaining the required packet ordering.
Fixes: 92d4abd ("Bluetooth: vhci: Fix race when opening vhci device")
Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu <yinghsu@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2023
Calling led_trigger_register() when attaching a PHY located on an SFP
module potentially (and practically) leads into a deadlock.
Fix this by not calling led_trigger_register() for PHYs localted on SFP
modules as such modules actually never got any LEDs.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.7.0-rc4-next-20231208+ #0 Tainted: G O
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:2/43 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffc08108c4e8 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8
but task is already holding lock:
ffffff80c5c6f318 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleanup_module+0x2ba8/0x3120 [sfp]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x88/0x7a0
mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28
cleanup_module+0x2ae0/0x3120 [sfp]
sfp_register_bus+0x5c/0x9c
sfp_register_socket+0x48/0xd4
cleanup_module+0x271c/0x3120 [sfp]
platform_probe+0x64/0xb8
really_probe+0x17c/0x3c0
__driver_probe_device+0x78/0x164
driver_probe_device+0x3c/0xd4
__driver_attach+0xec/0x1f0
bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0xa0
driver_attach+0x20/0x28
bus_add_driver+0x108/0x208
driver_register+0x5c/0x118
__platform_driver_register+0x24/0x2c
init_module+0x28/0xa7c [sfp]
do_one_initcall+0x70/0x2ec
do_init_module+0x54/0x1e4
load_module+0x1b78/0x1c8c
__do_sys_init_module+0x1bc/0x2cc
__arm64_sys_init_module+0x18/0x20
invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc
do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc
el0_svc+0x34/0x80
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124
el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154
-> #2 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x88/0x7a0
mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28
rtnl_lock+0x18/0x20
set_device_name+0x30/0x130
netdev_trig_activate+0x13c/0x1ac
led_trigger_set+0x118/0x234
led_trigger_write+0x104/0x17c
sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x64/0x80
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b4
vfs_write+0x178/0x2a4
ksys_write+0x58/0xd4
__arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc
do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc
el0_svc+0x34/0x80
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124
el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154
-> #1 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x4c/0x13c
led_trigger_write+0xf8/0x17c
sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x64/0x80
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b4
vfs_write+0x178/0x2a4
ksys_write+0x58/0xd4
__arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc
do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc
el0_svc+0x34/0x80
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124
el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154
-> #0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x12a0/0x2014
lock_acquire+0x100/0x2ac
down_write+0x4c/0x13c
led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8
phy_led_triggers_register+0x9c/0x214
phy_attach_direct+0x154/0x36c
phylink_attach_phy+0x30/0x60
phylink_sfp_connect_phy+0x140/0x510
sfp_add_phy+0x34/0x50
init_module+0x15c/0xa7c [sfp]
cleanup_module+0x1d94/0x3120 [sfp]
cleanup_module+0x2bb4/0x3120 [sfp]
process_one_work+0x1f8/0x4ec
worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d8
kthread+0x104/0x110
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
triggers_list_lock --> rtnl_mutex --> &sfp->sm_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&sfp->sm_mutex);
lock(rtnl_mutex);
lock(&sfp->sm_mutex);
lock(triggers_list_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by kworker/u8:2/43:
#0: ffffff80c000f938 ((wq_completion)events_power_efficient){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x150/0x4ec
#1: ffffffc08214bde8 ((work_completion)(&(&sfp->timeout)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x150/0x4ec
#2: ffffffc0810902f8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x18/0x20
#3: ffffff80c5c6f318 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleanup_module+0x2ba8/0x3120 [sfp]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 43 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G O 6.7.0-rc4-next-20231208+ #0
Hardware name: Bananapi BPI-R4 (DT)
Workqueue: events_power_efficient cleanup_module [sfp]
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0xa8/0x10c
show_stack+0x14/0x1c
dump_stack_lvl+0x5c/0xa0
dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
print_circular_bug+0x328/0x430
check_noncircular+0x124/0x134
__lock_acquire+0x12a0/0x2014
lock_acquire+0x100/0x2ac
down_write+0x4c/0x13c
led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8
phy_led_triggers_register+0x9c/0x214
phy_attach_direct+0x154/0x36c
phylink_attach_phy+0x30/0x60
phylink_sfp_connect_phy+0x140/0x510
sfp_add_phy+0x34/0x50
init_module+0x15c/0xa7c [sfp]
cleanup_module+0x1d94/0x3120 [sfp]
cleanup_module+0x2bb4/0x3120 [sfp]
process_one_work+0x1f8/0x4ec
worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d8
kthread+0x104/0x110
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Fixes: 01e5b72 ("net: phy: Add a binding for PHY LEDs")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/102a9dce38bdf00215735d04cd4704458273ad9c.1702339354.git.daniel@makrotopia.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2023
Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep
warning:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
sh/92 is trying to acquire lock:
c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
but task is already holding lock:
c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
6 locks held by sh/92:
#0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178
#1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284
#2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284
#3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8
#4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c
#5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532
Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5
unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48
dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c
__lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0
lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
__irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204
irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4
atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204
irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8
gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248
dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c
__device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c
dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8
dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84
suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8
pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4
state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284
kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4
vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178
ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0)
3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001
3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190
3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26
This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever
a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will
lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent"
IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks
share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue.
Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and
children IRQ
Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller")
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215-lockdep_warning-v1-1-8137b2510ed5@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2023
…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into kvm-master KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.7, part #2 - Ensure a vCPU's redistributor is unregistered from the MMIO bus if vCPU creation fails - Fix building KVM selftests for arm64 from the top-level Makefile
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2024
The Focusrite Scarlett Gen 4 Solo has Air and Phantom Power controls on analogue input #2 (the Gen 3 Solo had these controls on analogue input #1). Add air_input_first and phantom_first device info options to cater for this. These options are similar to the level_input_first option that was added for the Gen 3 Solo, but these new options do not require adjusting the index of the control. Signed-off-by: Geoffrey D. Bennett <g@b4.vu> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/19511f18895b8c094985a4a5691fbc1dc028c108.1703612638.git.g@b4.vu
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2024
[ Upstream commit da75fa5 ] Coverity Scan reports the following issue. But it's impossible that mlx5_get_dev_index returns 7 for PF, even if the index is calculated from PCI FUNC ID. So add the checking to make coverity slience. CID 610894 (#2 of 2): Out-of-bounds write (OVERRUN) Overrunning array esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_rules of 4 8-byte elements at element index 7 (byte offset 63) using index mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_dev) (which evaluates to 7). Fixes: 9bee385 ("net/mlx5: E-switch, refactor FDB miss rule add/remove") Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2024
[ Upstream commit 769bf60 ] syzbot found a potential circular dependency leading to a deadlock: -> #3 (&hdev->req_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 hci_dev_do_close+0x3f/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:551 hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935 rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345 rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274 vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb -> #2 (rfkill_global_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 rfkill_register+0x30/0x7e3 net/rfkill/core.c:1045 hci_register_dev+0x48f/0x96d net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2622 __vhci_create_device drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:341 [inline] vhci_create_device+0x3ad/0x68f drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:374 vhci_get_user drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:431 [inline] vhci_write+0x37b/0x429 drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:511 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2109 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:509 [inline] vfs_write+0xaa8/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:596 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb -> #1 (&data->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1b6/0x1bc2 kernel/locking/mutex.c:599 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:732 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x1c kernel/locking/mutex.c:784 vhci_send_frame+0x68/0x9c drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:75 hci_send_frame+0x1cc/0x2ff net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:2989 hci_sched_acl_pkt net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3498 [inline] hci_sched_acl net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3583 [inline] hci_tx_work+0xb94/0x1a60 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3654 process_one_work+0x901/0xfb8 kernel/workqueue.c:2310 worker_thread+0xa67/0x1003 kernel/workqueue.c:2457 kthread+0x36a/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:298 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&hdev->tx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3787 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2d32/0x77fa kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5011 lock_acquire+0x273/0x4d5 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5622 __flush_work+0xee/0x19f kernel/workqueue.c:3090 hci_dev_close_sync+0x32f/0x1113 net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c:4352 hci_dev_do_close+0x47/0x9f net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:553 hci_rfkill_set_block+0x130/0x1ac net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:935 rfkill_set_block+0x1e6/0x3b8 net/rfkill/core.c:345 rfkill_fop_write+0x2d8/0x672 net/rfkill/core.c:1274 vfs_write+0x277/0xcf5 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x19b/0x2bd fs/read_write.c:650 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:55 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x51/0xba arch/x86/entry/common.c:93 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb This change removes the need for acquiring the open_mutex in vhci_send_frame, thus eliminating the potential deadlock while maintaining the required packet ordering. Fixes: 92d4abd ("Bluetooth: vhci: Fix race when opening vhci device") Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu <yinghsu@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2024
[ Upstream commit b1dfc0f ] Calling led_trigger_register() when attaching a PHY located on an SFP module potentially (and practically) leads into a deadlock. Fix this by not calling led_trigger_register() for PHYs localted on SFP modules as such modules actually never got any LEDs. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc4-next-20231208+ #0 Tainted: G O ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u8:2/43 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffc08108c4e8 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8 but task is already holding lock: ffffff80c5c6f318 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleanup_module+0x2ba8/0x3120 [sfp] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x88/0x7a0 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 cleanup_module+0x2ae0/0x3120 [sfp] sfp_register_bus+0x5c/0x9c sfp_register_socket+0x48/0xd4 cleanup_module+0x271c/0x3120 [sfp] platform_probe+0x64/0xb8 really_probe+0x17c/0x3c0 __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x164 driver_probe_device+0x3c/0xd4 __driver_attach+0xec/0x1f0 bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0xa0 driver_attach+0x20/0x28 bus_add_driver+0x108/0x208 driver_register+0x5c/0x118 __platform_driver_register+0x24/0x2c init_module+0x28/0xa7c [sfp] do_one_initcall+0x70/0x2ec do_init_module+0x54/0x1e4 load_module+0x1b78/0x1c8c __do_sys_init_module+0x1bc/0x2cc __arm64_sys_init_module+0x18/0x20 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc el0_svc+0x34/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 -> #2 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x88/0x7a0 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 rtnl_lock+0x18/0x20 set_device_name+0x30/0x130 netdev_trig_activate+0x13c/0x1ac led_trigger_set+0x118/0x234 led_trigger_write+0x104/0x17c sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x64/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b4 vfs_write+0x178/0x2a4 ksys_write+0x58/0xd4 __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc el0_svc+0x34/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 -> #1 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x4c/0x13c led_trigger_write+0xf8/0x17c sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x64/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x128/0x1b4 vfs_write+0x178/0x2a4 ksys_write+0x58/0xd4 __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xdc do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc el0_svc+0x34/0x80 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf8/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 -> #0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x12a0/0x2014 lock_acquire+0x100/0x2ac down_write+0x4c/0x13c led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8 phy_led_triggers_register+0x9c/0x214 phy_attach_direct+0x154/0x36c phylink_attach_phy+0x30/0x60 phylink_sfp_connect_phy+0x140/0x510 sfp_add_phy+0x34/0x50 init_module+0x15c/0xa7c [sfp] cleanup_module+0x1d94/0x3120 [sfp] cleanup_module+0x2bb4/0x3120 [sfp] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x4ec worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d8 kthread+0x104/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: triggers_list_lock --> rtnl_mutex --> &sfp->sm_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sfp->sm_mutex); lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(&sfp->sm_mutex); lock(triggers_list_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u8:2/43: #0: ffffff80c000f938 ((wq_completion)events_power_efficient){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x150/0x4ec #1: ffffffc08214bde8 ((work_completion)(&(&sfp->timeout)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x150/0x4ec #2: ffffffc0810902f8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x18/0x20 #3: ffffff80c5c6f318 (&sfp->sm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleanup_module+0x2ba8/0x3120 [sfp] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 43 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G O 6.7.0-rc4-next-20231208+ #0 Hardware name: Bananapi BPI-R4 (DT) Workqueue: events_power_efficient cleanup_module [sfp] Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa8/0x10c show_stack+0x14/0x1c dump_stack_lvl+0x5c/0xa0 dump_stack+0x14/0x1c print_circular_bug+0x328/0x430 check_noncircular+0x124/0x134 __lock_acquire+0x12a0/0x2014 lock_acquire+0x100/0x2ac down_write+0x4c/0x13c led_trigger_register+0x4c/0x1a8 phy_led_triggers_register+0x9c/0x214 phy_attach_direct+0x154/0x36c phylink_attach_phy+0x30/0x60 phylink_sfp_connect_phy+0x140/0x510 sfp_add_phy+0x34/0x50 init_module+0x15c/0xa7c [sfp] cleanup_module+0x1d94/0x3120 [sfp] cleanup_module+0x2bb4/0x3120 [sfp] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x4ec worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d8 kthread+0x104/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> Fixes: 01e5b72 ("net: phy: Add a binding for PHY LEDs") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/102a9dce38bdf00215735d04cd4704458273ad9c.1702339354.git.daniel@makrotopia.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2024
[ Upstream commit 1469417 ] Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 #1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 #2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 #3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 #4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c #5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215-lockdep_warning-v1-1-8137b2510ed5@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
lseman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2024
…volume If the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deleted subvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entry This happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new root item as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field, which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root() therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() then finds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causes create_pending_snapshot() to abort. Fix it by checking the source root's refs before attempting the snapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
[ Upstream commit 3f14b37 ] act_ct adds skb->users before defragmentation. If frags arrive in order, the last frag's reference is reset in: inet_frag_reasm_prepare skb_morph which is not straightforward. However when frags arrive out of order, nobody unref the last frag, and all frags are leaked. The situation is even worse, as initiating packet capture can lead to a crash[0] when skb has been cloned and shared at the same time. Fix the issue by removing skb_get() before defragmentation. act_ct returns TC_ACT_CONSUMED when defrag failed or in progress. [0]: [ 843.804823] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 843.809659] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:2091! [ 843.814516] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 843.819296] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S 6.7.0-rc3 #2 [ 843.824107] Hardware name: XFUSION 1288H V6/BC13MBSBD, BIOS 1.29 11/25/2022 [ 843.828953] RIP: 0010:pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.833805] Code: 8b 70 28 48 85 f6 74 82 48 83 c6 08 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 38 bd ff ff 8b 83 c0 00 00 00 48 03 83 c8 00 00 00 e9 62 ff ff ff 0f 0b <0f> 0b e8 8d d0 ff ff e9 b3 fd ff ff 81 7c 24 14 40 01 00 00 4c 89 [ 843.843698] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000cce07c0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 843.848524] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88811a211d00 RCX: 0000000000000820 [ 843.853299] RDX: 0000000000000640 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88811a211d00 [ 843.857974] RBP: ffff888127d39518 R08: 00000000bee97314 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 843.862584] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8881109f0000 R12: 0000000000000880 [ 843.867147] R13: ffff888127d39580 R14: 0000000000000640 R15: ffff888170f7b900 [ 843.871680] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff889ffffc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 843.876242] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 843.880778] CR2: 00007fa42affcfb8 CR3: 000000011433a002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 843.885336] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 843.889809] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 843.894229] PKRU: 55555554 [ 843.898539] Call Trace: [ 843.902772] <IRQ> [ 843.906922] ? __die_body+0x1e/0x60 [ 843.911032] ? die+0x3c/0x60 [ 843.915037] ? do_trap+0xe2/0x110 [ 843.918911] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.922687] ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 [ 843.926342] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.929905] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x60 [ 843.933398] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.936835] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 843.940226] ? pskb_expand_head+0x2ac/0x300 [ 843.943580] inet_frag_reasm_prepare+0xd1/0x240 [ 843.946904] ip_defrag+0x5d4/0x870 [ 843.950132] nf_ct_handle_fragments+0xec/0x130 [nf_conntrack] [ 843.953334] tcf_ct_act+0x252/0xd90 [act_ct] [ 843.956473] ? tcf_mirred_act+0x516/0x5a0 [act_mirred] [ 843.959657] tcf_action_exec+0xa1/0x160 [ 843.962823] fl_classify+0x1db/0x1f0 [cls_flower] [ 843.966010] ? skb_clone+0x53/0xc0 [ 843.969173] tcf_classify+0x24d/0x420 [ 843.972333] tc_run+0x8f/0xf0 [ 843.975465] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x67a/0x1080 [ 843.978634] ? dev_gro_receive+0x249/0x730 [ 843.981759] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x12d/0x260 [ 843.984869] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1cb/0x2f0 [ 843.987957] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq_rep+0xfa/0x1a0 [mlx5_core] [ 843.991170] napi_complete_done+0x72/0x1a0 [ 843.994305] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x28c/0x6d0 [mlx5_core] [ 843.997501] __napi_poll+0x25/0x1b0 [ 844.000627] net_rx_action+0x256/0x330 [ 844.003705] __do_softirq+0xb3/0x29b [ 844.006718] irq_exit_rcu+0x9e/0xc0 [ 844.009672] common_interrupt+0x86/0xa0 [ 844.012537] </IRQ> [ 844.015285] <TASK> [ 844.017937] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 [ 844.020591] RIP: 0010:acpi_safe_halt+0x1b/0x20 [ 844.023247] Code: ff 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 65 48 8b 04 25 00 18 03 00 48 8b 00 a8 08 75 0c 66 90 0f 00 2d 81 d0 44 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 0f 1f 00 89 fa ec 48 8b 05 ee 88 ed 00 a9 00 00 00 80 75 11 [ 844.028900] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000533e70 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 844.031725] RAX: 0000000000004000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 844.034553] RDX: ffff889ffffc0000 RSI: ffffffff828b7f20 RDI: ffff88a090f45c64 [ 844.037368] RBP: ffff88a0901a2800 R08: ffff88a090f45c00 R09: 00000000000317c0 [ 844.040155] R10: 00ec812281150475 R11: ffff889fffff0e04 R12: ffffffff828b7fa0 [ 844.042962] R13: ffffffff828b7f20 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 844.045819] acpi_idle_enter+0x7b/0xc0 [ 844.048621] cpuidle_enter_state+0x7f/0x430 [ 844.051451] cpuidle_enter+0x2d/0x40 [ 844.054279] do_idle+0x1d4/0x240 [ 844.057096] cpu_startup_entry+0x2a/0x30 [ 844.059934] start_secondary+0x104/0x130 [ 844.062787] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x16b/0x16b [ 844.065674] </TASK> Fixes: b57dc7c ("net/sched: Introduce action ct") Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <taoliu828@163.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231228081457.936732-1-taoliu828@163.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
[ Upstream commit ca34d81 ] This reverts commit 4d56a4f. The DMA-fence annotations cause a lockdep warning (see below). As per https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/462170/ it sounds like the annotations don't work correctly. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-rc2+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kmstest/733 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8000819377f0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 but task is already holding lock: ffff800081a06aa0 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x20/0xc0 [tidss] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x5c/0xd0 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1a4/0x32c do_one_initcall+0x84/0x2fc kernel_init_freeable+0x28c/0x4c4 kernel_init+0x24/0x1dc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x70/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 kmalloc_trace+0x38/0x78 __kthread_create_worker+0x3c/0x150 kthread_create_worker+0x64/0x8c workqueue_init+0x1e8/0x2f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x11c/0x4c4 kernel_init+0x24/0x1dc ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1370/0x20d8 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x308 fs_reclaim_acquire+0xd0/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x58/0xf0 kmemdup+0x34/0x60 regmap_bulk_write+0x64/0x2c0 tc358768_bridge_pre_enable+0x8c/0x12d0 [tc358768] drm_atomic_bridge_call_pre_enable+0x68/0x80 [drm] drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable+0x50/0x158 [drm] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x164/0x264 [drm_kms_helper] tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x58/0xc0 [tidss] commit_tail+0xa0/0x188 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1a8/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_commit+0xa8/0xe0 [drm] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9ec/0xc80 [drm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x170 [drm] drm_ioctl+0x234/0x4b0 [drm] drm_compat_ioctl+0x110/0x12c [drm] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x128/0x150 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x38 el0_svc_compat+0x48/0xb4 el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: fs_reclaim --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(dma_fence_map); lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(fs_reclaim); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kmstest/733: #0: ffff800082e5bba0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x118/0xc80 [drm] #1: ffff000004224c88 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: modeset_lock+0xdc/0x1a0 [drm] #2: ffff800081a06aa0 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x20/0xc0 [tidss] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 733 Comm: kmstest Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: Toradex Verdin AM62 on Verdin Development Board (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x98/0x118 show_stack+0x18/0x24 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xac dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x288/0x368 check_noncircular+0x168/0x17c __lock_acquire+0x1370/0x20d8 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x308 fs_reclaim_acquire+0xd0/0xe4 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x58/0x2d4 __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x58/0xf0 kmemdup+0x34/0x60 regmap_bulk_write+0x64/0x2c0 tc358768_bridge_pre_enable+0x8c/0x12d0 [tc358768] drm_atomic_bridge_call_pre_enable+0x68/0x80 [drm] drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable+0x50/0x158 [drm] drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables+0x164/0x264 [drm_kms_helper] tidss_atomic_commit_tail+0x58/0xc0 [tidss] commit_tail+0xa0/0x188 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1a8/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper] drm_atomic_commit+0xa8/0xe0 [drm] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9ec/0xc80 [drm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x170 [drm] drm_ioctl+0x234/0x4b0 [drm] drm_compat_ioctl+0x110/0x12c [drm] __arm64_compat_sys_ioctl+0x128/0x150 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x38 el0_svc_compat+0x48/0xb4 el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 Fixes: 4d56a4f ("drm/tidss: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path") Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230920-dma-fence-annotation-revert-v1-1-7ebf6f7f5bf6@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
[ Upstream commit 9d7c8c0 ] This reverts commit 250aa22. The DMA-fence annotations cause a lockdep warning (see below). As per https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/462170/ it sounds like the annotations don't work correctly. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kmstest/219 is trying to acquire lock: c4705838 (&hdmi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 but task is already holding lock: c11e1128 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x14/0xbc which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x48/0xb4 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1b8/0x2bc do_one_initcall+0x68/0x3b0 kernel_init_freeable+0x260/0x34c kernel_init+0x14/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x70/0xa8 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x3c/0x368 kmalloc_trace+0x28/0x58 _drm_do_get_edid+0x7c/0x35c hdmi5_bridge_get_edid+0xc8/0x1ac drm_bridge_connector_get_modes+0x64/0xc0 drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x170/0x528 drm_client_modeset_probe+0x208/0x1334 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x30/0x548 omap_fbdev_client_hotplug+0x3c/0x6c drm_client_register+0x58/0x94 pdev_probe+0x544/0x6b0 platform_probe+0x58/0xbc really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f4 driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x11c bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xdc __device_attach+0xac/0x20c bus_probe_device+0x8c/0x90 device_add+0x588/0x7e0 platform_device_add+0x110/0x24c platform_device_register_full+0x108/0x15c dss_bind+0x90/0xc0 try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x1e0/0x2c8 __component_add+0xa4/0x174 hdmi5_probe+0x1c8/0x270 platform_probe+0x58/0xbc really_probe+0xd8/0x3fc __driver_probe_device+0x94/0x1f4 driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xc4 __device_attach_driver+0xa4/0x11c bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xdc __device_attach+0xac/0x20c bus_probe_device+0x8c/0x90 deferred_probe_work_func+0x8c/0xd8 process_one_work+0x2ac/0x6e4 worker_thread+0x30/0x4ec kthread+0x100/0x124 ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 -> #0 (&hdmi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x145c/0x29cc lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x258 __mutex_lock+0x90/0x950 mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 drm_bridge_chain_mode_set+0x48/0x5c crtc_set_mode+0x188/0x1d0 omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x2c/0xbc commit_tail+0x9c/0x188 drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x18c drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe8 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9a4/0xc38 drm_ioctl+0x210/0x4a8 sys_ioctl+0x138/0xf00 ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &hdmi->lock --> fs_reclaim --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(dma_fence_map); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(&hdmi->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kmstest/219: #0: f1011de4 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0xf0/0xc38 #1: c47059c8 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: modeset_lock+0xf8/0x230 #2: c11e1128 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x14/0xbc stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 219 Comm: kmstest Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree) unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from check_noncircular+0x164/0x198 check_noncircular from __lock_acquire+0x145c/0x29cc __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0xb4/0x258 lock_acquire.part.0 from __mutex_lock+0x90/0x950 __mutex_lock from mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 mutex_lock_nested from hdmi5_bridge_mode_set+0x1c/0x50 hdmi5_bridge_mode_set from drm_bridge_chain_mode_set+0x48/0x5c drm_bridge_chain_mode_set from crtc_set_mode+0x188/0x1d0 crtc_set_mode from omap_atomic_commit_tail+0x2c/0xbc omap_atomic_commit_tail from commit_tail+0x9c/0x188 commit_tail from drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x158/0x18c drm_atomic_helper_commit from drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe8 drm_atomic_commit from drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x9a4/0xc38 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl from drm_ioctl+0x210/0x4a8 drm_ioctl from sys_ioctl+0x138/0xf00 sys_ioctl from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xf1011fa8 to 0xf1011ff0) 1fa0: 00466d58 be9ab510 00000003 c03864bc be9ab510 be9ab4e0 1fc0: 00466d58 be9ab510 c03864bc 00000036 00466ef0 00466fc0 00467020 00466f20 1fe0: b6bc7ef4 be9ab4d0 b6bbbb00 b6cb2cc0 Fixes: 250aa22 ("drm/omapdrm: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path") Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230920-dma-fence-annotation-revert-v1-2-7ebf6f7f5bf6@ideasonboard.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
lseman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2024
Running the following two commands in parallel on a multi-processor
AArch64 machine can sporadically produce an unexpected warning about
duplicate histogram entries:
$ while true; do
echo hist:key=id.syscall:val=hitcount > \
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/trigger
cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/hist
sleep 0.001
done
$ stress-ng --sysbadaddr $(nproc)
The warning looks as follows:
[ 2911.172474] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2911.173111] Duplicates detected: 1
[ 2911.173574] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 12247 at kernel/trace/tracing_map.c:983 tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408
[ 2911.174702] Modules linked in: iscsi_ibft(E) iscsi_boot_sysfs(E) rfkill(E) af_packet(E) nls_iso8859_1(E) nls_cp437(E) vfat(E) fat(E) ena(E) tiny_power_button(E) qemu_fw_cfg(E) button(E) fuse(E) efi_pstore(E) ip_tables(E) x_tables(E) xfs(E) libcrc32c(E) aes_ce_blk(E) aes_ce_cipher(E) crct10dif_ce(E) polyval_ce(E) polyval_generic(E) ghash_ce(E) gf128mul(E) sm4_ce_gcm(E) sm4_ce_ccm(E) sm4_ce(E) sm4_ce_cipher(E) sm4(E) sm3_ce(E) sm3(E) sha3_ce(E) sha512_ce(E) sha512_arm64(E) sha2_ce(E) sha256_arm64(E) nvme(E) sha1_ce(E) nvme_core(E) nvme_auth(E) t10_pi(E) sg(E) scsi_mod(E) scsi_common(E) efivarfs(E)
[ 2911.174738] Unloaded tainted modules: cppc_cpufreq(E):1
[ 2911.180985] CPU: 2 PID: 12247 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-default #2 1b58bbb22c97e4399dc09f92d309344f69c44a01
[ 2911.182398] Hardware name: Amazon EC2 c7g.8xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 11/1/2018
[ 2911.183208] pstate: 6140000 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 2911.184038] pc : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408
[ 2911.184667] lr : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408
[ 2911.185310] sp : ffff8000a1513900
[ 2911.185750] x29: ffff8000a1513900 x28: ffff0003f272fe80 x27: 0000000000000001
[ 2911.186600] x26: ffff0003f272fe80 x25: 0000000000000030 x24: 0000000000000008
[ 2911.187458] x23: ffff0003c5788000 x22: ffff0003c16710c8 x21: ffff80008017f180
[ 2911.188310] x20: ffff80008017f000 x19: ffff80008017f180 x18: ffffffffffffffff
[ 2911.189160] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff8000a15134b8
[ 2911.190015] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 205d373432323154 x12: 5b5d313131333731
[ 2911.190844] x11: 00000000fffeffff x10: 00000000fffeffff x9 : ffffd1b78274a13c
[ 2911.191716] x8 : 000000000017ffe8 x7 : c0000000fffeffff x6 : 000000000057ffa8
[ 2911.192554] x5 : ffff0012f6c24ec0 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff2e5b72b5d000
[ 2911.193404] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0003ff254480
[ 2911.194259] Call trace:
[ 2911.194626] tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408
[ 2911.195220] hist_show+0x124/0x800
[ 2911.195692] seq_read_iter+0x1d4/0x4e8
[ 2911.196193] seq_read+0xe8/0x138
[ 2911.196638] vfs_read+0xc8/0x300
[ 2911.197078] ksys_read+0x70/0x108
[ 2911.197534] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x38
[ 2911.198046] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x108
[ 2911.198553] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd0/0xf8
[ 2911.199157] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40
[ 2911.199613] el0_svc+0x40/0x178
[ 2911.200048] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158
[ 2911.200621] el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1b0
[ 2911.201115] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The problem appears to be caused by CPU reordering of writes issued from
__tracing_map_insert().
The check for the presence of an element with a given key in this
function is:
val = READ_ONCE(entry->val);
if (val && keys_match(key, val->key, map->key_size)) ...
The write of a new entry is:
elt = get_free_elt(map);
memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);
entry->val = elt;
The "memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;"
stores may become visible in the reversed order on another CPU. This
second CPU might then incorrectly determine that a new key doesn't match
an already present val->key and subsequently insert a new element,
resulting in a duplicate.
Fix the problem by adding a write barrier between
"memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;", and for
good measure, also use WRITE_ONCE(entry->val, elt) for publishing the
element. The sequence pairs with the mentioned "READ_ONCE(entry->val);"
and the "val->key" check which has an address dependency.
The barrier is placed on a path executed when adding an element for
a new key. Subsequent updates targeting the same key remain unaffected.
From the user's perspective, the issue was introduced by commit
c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates"), which
followed commit cbf4100 ("tracing: Add support to detect and avoid
duplicates"). The previous code operated differently; it inherently
expected potential races which result in duplicates but merged them
later when they occurred.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240122150928.27725-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com
Fixes: c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates")
Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
lseman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2024
RCU protection was removed in the commit 2d32777 ("raid1: remove rcu protection to access rdev from conf"). However, the code in fix_read_error does rcu_dereference outside rcu_read_lock - this triggers the following warning. The warning is triggered by a LVM2 test shell/integrity-caching.sh. This commit removes rcu_dereference. ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.7.0 #2 Not tainted ----------------------------- drivers/md/raid1.c:2265 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 no locks held by mdX_raid1/1859. stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1859 Comm: mdX_raid1 Not tainted 6.7.0 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x70 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x153/0x1b0 raid1d+0x1732/0x1750 [raid1] ? lock_acquire+0x9f/0x270 ? finish_wait+0x3d/0x80 ? md_thread+0xf7/0x130 [md_mod] ? lock_release+0xaa/0x230 ? md_register_thread+0xd0/0xd0 [md_mod] md_thread+0xa0/0x130 [md_mod] ? housekeeping_test_cpu+0x30/0x30 kthread+0xdc/0x110 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x28/0x40 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Fixes: ca294b3 ("md/raid1: support read error check") Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/51539879-e1ca-fde3-b8b4-8934ddedcbc@redhat.com
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2024
[ Upstream commit 2b44760 ] Running the following two commands in parallel on a multi-processor AArch64 machine can sporadically produce an unexpected warning about duplicate histogram entries: $ while true; do echo hist:key=id.syscall:val=hitcount > \ /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/trigger cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/raw_syscalls/sys_enter/hist sleep 0.001 done $ stress-ng --sysbadaddr $(nproc) The warning looks as follows: [ 2911.172474] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2911.173111] Duplicates detected: 1 [ 2911.173574] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 12247 at kernel/trace/tracing_map.c:983 tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.174702] Modules linked in: iscsi_ibft(E) iscsi_boot_sysfs(E) rfkill(E) af_packet(E) nls_iso8859_1(E) nls_cp437(E) vfat(E) fat(E) ena(E) tiny_power_button(E) qemu_fw_cfg(E) button(E) fuse(E) efi_pstore(E) ip_tables(E) x_tables(E) xfs(E) libcrc32c(E) aes_ce_blk(E) aes_ce_cipher(E) crct10dif_ce(E) polyval_ce(E) polyval_generic(E) ghash_ce(E) gf128mul(E) sm4_ce_gcm(E) sm4_ce_ccm(E) sm4_ce(E) sm4_ce_cipher(E) sm4(E) sm3_ce(E) sm3(E) sha3_ce(E) sha512_ce(E) sha512_arm64(E) sha2_ce(E) sha256_arm64(E) nvme(E) sha1_ce(E) nvme_core(E) nvme_auth(E) t10_pi(E) sg(E) scsi_mod(E) scsi_common(E) efivarfs(E) [ 2911.174738] Unloaded tainted modules: cppc_cpufreq(E):1 [ 2911.180985] CPU: 2 PID: 12247 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-default #2 1b58bbb22c97e4399dc09f92d309344f69c44a01 [ 2911.182398] Hardware name: Amazon EC2 c7g.8xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 11/1/2018 [ 2911.183208] pstate: 6140000 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2911.184038] pc : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.184667] lr : tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.185310] sp : ffff8000a1513900 [ 2911.185750] x29: ffff8000a1513900 x28: ffff0003f272fe80 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 2911.186600] x26: ffff0003f272fe80 x25: 0000000000000030 x24: 0000000000000008 [ 2911.187458] x23: ffff0003c5788000 x22: ffff0003c16710c8 x21: ffff80008017f180 [ 2911.188310] x20: ffff80008017f000 x19: ffff80008017f180 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 2911.189160] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff8000a15134b8 [ 2911.190015] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 205d373432323154 x12: 5b5d313131333731 [ 2911.190844] x11: 00000000fffeffff x10: 00000000fffeffff x9 : ffffd1b78274a13c [ 2911.191716] x8 : 000000000017ffe8 x7 : c0000000fffeffff x6 : 000000000057ffa8 [ 2911.192554] x5 : ffff0012f6c24ec0 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff2e5b72b5d000 [ 2911.193404] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0003ff254480 [ 2911.194259] Call trace: [ 2911.194626] tracing_map_sort_entries+0x3e0/0x408 [ 2911.195220] hist_show+0x124/0x800 [ 2911.195692] seq_read_iter+0x1d4/0x4e8 [ 2911.196193] seq_read+0xe8/0x138 [ 2911.196638] vfs_read+0xc8/0x300 [ 2911.197078] ksys_read+0x70/0x108 [ 2911.197534] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x38 [ 2911.198046] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x108 [ 2911.198553] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd0/0xf8 [ 2911.199157] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40 [ 2911.199613] el0_svc+0x40/0x178 [ 2911.200048] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 [ 2911.200621] el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1b0 [ 2911.201115] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The problem appears to be caused by CPU reordering of writes issued from __tracing_map_insert(). The check for the presence of an element with a given key in this function is: val = READ_ONCE(entry->val); if (val && keys_match(key, val->key, map->key_size)) ... The write of a new entry is: elt = get_free_elt(map); memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size); entry->val = elt; The "memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;" stores may become visible in the reversed order on another CPU. This second CPU might then incorrectly determine that a new key doesn't match an already present val->key and subsequently insert a new element, resulting in a duplicate. Fix the problem by adding a write barrier between "memcpy(elt->key, key, map->key_size);" and "entry->val = elt;", and for good measure, also use WRITE_ONCE(entry->val, elt) for publishing the element. The sequence pairs with the mentioned "READ_ONCE(entry->val);" and the "val->key" check which has an address dependency. The barrier is placed on a path executed when adding an element for a new key. Subsequent updates targeting the same key remain unaffected. From the user's perspective, the issue was introduced by commit c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates"), which followed commit cbf4100 ("tracing: Add support to detect and avoid duplicates"). The previous code operated differently; it inherently expected potential races which result in duplicates but merged them later when they occurred. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240122150928.27725-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com Fixes: c193707 ("tracing: Remove code which merges duplicates") Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com> Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2024
…volume commit 7081929 upstream. If the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deleted subvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entry This happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new root item as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field, which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root() therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() then finds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causes create_pending_snapshot() to abort. Fix it by checking the source root's refs before attempting the snapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
lseman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
…o HEAD KVM/riscv changes for 6.8 part #2 - Zbc extension support for Guest/VM - Scalar crypto extensions support for Guest/VM - Vector crypto extensions support for Guest/VM - Zfh[min] extensions support for Guest/VM - Zihintntl extension support for Guest/VM - Zvfh[min] extensions support for Guest/VM - Zfa extension support for Guest/VM
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 169410e ] These three bpf_map_{lookup,update,delete}_elem() helpers are also available for sleepable bpf program, so add the corresponding lock assertion for sleepable bpf program, otherwise the following warning will be reported when a sleepable bpf program manipulates bpf map under interpreter mode (aka bpf_jit_enable=0): WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4985 at kernel/bpf/helpers.c:40 ...... CPU: 3 PID: 4985 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.6.0+ #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ...... RIP: 0010:bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? report_bug+0x1ba/0x1f0 ? handle_bug+0x40/0x80 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x65/0xb0 ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50 ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60 ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10 ___bpf_prog_run+0x513/0x3b70 __bpf_prog_run32+0x9d/0xd0 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0xad/0x120 ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0x3e/0x120 bpf_trampoline_6442580665+0x4d/0x1000 __x64_sys_getpgid+0x5/0x30 ? do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 </TASK> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit fc3a553 ] An issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 4206 in libbpf.c (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 #1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706 #2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437 #3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497 #4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16 #5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one () #6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope () #7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir () #8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} () #9 0x00000000005f2601 in main () (gdb) scn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c): if (rel->r_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel->r_offset >= scn_data->d_size) { The scn_data is derived from the code above: scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx); scn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn); relo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr->sh_name); sec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn); if (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don't check whether scn_data is NULL return -EINVAL; In certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file, it is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer Signed-off-by: Mingyi Zhang <zhangmingyi5@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <liuxin350@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Changye Wu <wuchangye@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221033947.154564-1-liuxin350@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 47bf0f8 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-fkuehlin #276 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/8:2/2676 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9435aae95c88 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x52/0x550 but task is already holding lock: ffff9435cd8e1720 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_deferred_list_work+0xe8/0x340 [amdgpu] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&svms->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x97/0xd30 kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x6d/0x3c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1b2/0x5d0 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x86/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x42/0x160 svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker+0x8b/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1426/0x2200 lock_acquire+0xc1/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x80/0x550 __cancel_work_timer+0x109/0x190 svm_range_bo_release+0xdc/0x1c0 [amdgpu] svm_range_free+0x175/0x180 [amdgpu] svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x15d/0x340 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x27a/0x540 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 kthread+0xeb/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work) --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &svms->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&svms->lock); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&svms->lock); lock((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work)); I believe this cannot really lead to a deadlock in practice, because svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker only takes the mmap_read_lock if the BO refcount is non-0. That means it's impossible that svm_range_bo_release is running concurrently. However, there is no good way to annotate this. To avoid the problem, take a BO reference in svm_range_schedule_evict_svm_bo instead of in the worker. That way it's impossible for a BO to get freed while eviction work is pending and the cancel_work_sync call in svm_range_bo_release can be eliminated. v2: Use svm_bo_ref_unless_zero and explained why that's safe. Also removed redundant checks that are already done in amdkfd_fence_enable_signaling. Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <philip.yang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 2a9de42 ] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock: (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0 but task is already holding lock: ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x211/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu] svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0 -> #2 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu] restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu] restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&process->restore_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0 kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu] __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 do_exit+0x322/0xb90 do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80 -> #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510 lock_sync+0x5f/0x90 __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0 __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: srcu --> &info->lock#2 --> (work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); lock(&info->lock#2); lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)); sync(srcu); Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ptr1337
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
commit 2acc59d upstream. When I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression, there is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume. $ cat test.sh prog=bcachefs $prog subvolume create /mnt/data $prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots while true;do $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s) sleep 1s done $ cat /etc/mongodb.conf systemLog: destination: file logAppend: true path: /mnt/data/mongod.log storage: dbPath: /mnt/data/ lockdep reports: [ 3437.452330] ====================================================== [ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G E [ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.454875] but task is already holding lock: [ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.456009] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3437.456553] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3437.457054] -> #3 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}: [ 3437.457507] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.457772] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.458206] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.458498] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.458779] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.459155] -> #2 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3437.459615] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.459878] bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460276] bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460686] notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0 [ 3437.461283] do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0 [ 3437.461555] path_openat+0xa57/0xce0 [ 3437.461836] do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160 [ 3437.462116] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0 [ 3437.462402] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 3437.462701] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.462982] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.463359] -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3437.463843] down_write+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3437.464223] bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.464493] vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0 [ 3437.464653] ksys_write+0x69/0xf0 [ 3437.464839] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.465009] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.465231] -> #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3437.465471] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.465656] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.465822] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.465996] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.466175] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.466352] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.466617] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.466791] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.466957] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.467180] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.467507] Chain exists of: sb_writers#10 --> &c->snapshot_create_lock --> &type->s_umount_key#48 [ 3437.467979] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3437.468223] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3437.468405] ---- ---- [ 3437.468585] rlock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.468758] lock(&c->snapshot_create_lock); [ 3437.469030] lock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.469291] rlock(sb_writers#10); [ 3437.469434] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: [ 3437.469838] #0: ffffa0a02ce00a88 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x1e3/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.470294] #1: ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.470744] stack backtrace: [ 3437.470922] CPU: 7 PID: 35533 Comm: bcachefs Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 [ 3437.471313] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [ 3437.471694] Call Trace: [ 3437.471795] <TASK> [ 3437.471884] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 3437.472035] check_noncircular+0x132/0x150 [ 3437.472202] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.472369] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.472518] ? filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.472683] ? lock_is_held_type+0x97/0x110 [ 3437.472856] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.473025] ? filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.473204] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.473380] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.473555] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.473819] ? lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.474002] ? __fget_files+0x2a/0x190 [ 3437.474195] ? __fget_files+0xbc/0x190 [ 3437.474380] ? lock_release+0xc5/0x270 [ 3437.474567] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.474764] ? __pfx_bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [bcachefs] [ 3437.475090] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.475277] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.475454] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.475691] RIP: 0033:0x7f2743c313af ====================================================== In __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create(), we grab s_umount unconditionally and unlock it at the end of the function. There is a comment "why do we need this lock?" about the lock coming from commit 42d2373 ("bcachefs: Snapshot creation, deletion") The reason is that __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create() calls sync_inodes_sb() which enforce locked s_umount to writeback all dirty nodes before doing snapshot works. Fix it by read locking s_umount for snapshotting only and unlocking s_umount after sync_inodes_sb(). Signed-off-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.