Skip to content

RISC-V: Add RV32E multilibs #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2021
Merged

Conversation

stephanosio
Copy link
Member

@stephanosio stephanosio commented Oct 1, 2021

This commit adds a minimum set of multilibs required to build the RV32E
(embedded) targets:

  • rv32em, ilp32e
  • rv32emc, ilp32e

Note that we build a separate multilib variant for the C (compressed)
extension instead of mapping to the uncompressed variant because the
RV32E instruction set is intended to be used in highly resource-
constrained devices such as microcontrollers.

Signed-off-by: Stephanos Ioannidis root@stephanos.io

This commit adds a minimum set of multilibs required to build the RV32E
(embedded) targets:

* rv32em, ilp32e
* rv32emc, ilp32e

Note that we build a separate multilib variant for the C (compressed)
extension instead of mapping to the uncompressed variant because the
RV32E instruction set is intended to be used in highly resource-
constrained devices such as microcontrollers.

Signed-off-by: Stephanos Ioannidis <root@stephanos.io>
@stephanosio stephanosio force-pushed the rv32e-multilib branch 2 times, most recently from 2f11e2c to aed4ea4 Compare October 28, 2021 08:12
@stephanosio stephanosio removed the DNM label Oct 28, 2021
@stephanosio
Copy link
Member Author

Verified working

@stephanosio stephanosio merged commit 15e25dd into zephyr-gcc-10.3.0 Oct 28, 2021
@stephanosio stephanosio deleted the rv32e-multilib branch October 28, 2021 08:18
stephanosio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
Here during cp_parser_single_declaration for #2, we were calling
associate_classtype_constraints for TPL<T> (the primary template type)
before maybe_process_partial_specialization could get a chance to
notice that we're in fact declaring a distinct constrained partial
spec and not redeclaring the primary template.  This caused us to
emit a bogus error about differing constraints b/t the primary template
and #2's constraints.  This patch fixes this by moving the call to
associate_classtype_constraints after the call to shadow_tag (which
calls maybe_process_partial_specialization) and adjusting shadow_tag to
use the return value of m_p_p_s.

Moreover, if we later try to define a constrained partial specialization
that's been declared earlier (as in the third testcase), then
maybe_new_partial_specialization correctly notices it's a redeclaration
and returns NULL_TREE.  But in this case we also need to update TYPE to
point to the redeclared partial spec (it'll otherwise continue pointing
to the primary template type, eventually leading to a bogus error).

	PR c++/96363

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* decl.cc (shadow_tag): Use the return value of
	maybe_process_partial_specialization.
	* parser.cc (cp_parser_single_declaration): Call shadow_tag
	before associate_classtype_constraints.
	* pt.cc (maybe_new_partial_specialization): Change return type
	to bool.  Take 'type' argument by mutable reference.  Set 'type'
	to point to the correct constrained specialization when
	appropriate.
	(maybe_process_partial_specialization): Adjust accordingly.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec12a.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec13.C: New test.

(cherry picked from commit 97dc78d)
nashif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
…o_debug_section [PR116614]

cat abc.C
  #define A(n) struct T##n {} t##n;
  #define B(n) A(n##0) A(n##1) A(n##2) A(n##3) A(n##4) A(n##5) A(n##6) A(n##7) A(n##8) A(n##9)
  #define C(n) B(n##0) B(n##1) B(n##2) B(n##3) B(n##4) B(n##5) B(n##6) B(n##7) B(n##8) B(n##9)
  #define D(n) C(n##0) C(n##1) C(n##2) C(n##3) C(n##4) C(n##5) C(n##6) C(n##7) C(n##8) C(n##9)
  #define E(n) D(n##0) D(n##1) D(n##2) D(n##3) D(n##4) D(n##5) D(n##6) D(n##7) D(n##8) D(n##9)
  E(1) E(2) E(3)
  int main () { return 0; }
./xg++ -B ./ -o abc{.o,.C} -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -O2 -g -fdebug-types-section -c
./xgcc -B ./ -o abc{,.o} -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -O2
(not included in testsuite as it takes a while to compile) FAILs with
lto-wrapper: fatal error: Too many copied sections: Operation not supported
compilation terminated.
/usr/bin/ld: error: lto-wrapper failed
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

The following patch fixes that.  Most of the 64K+ section support for
reading and writing was already there years ago (and especially reading used
quite often already) and a further bug fixed in it in the PR104617 fix.

Yet, the fix isn't solely about removing the
  if (new_i - 1 >= SHN_LORESERVE)
    {
      *err = ENOTSUP;
      return "Too many copied sections";
    }
5 lines, the missing part was that the function only handled reading of
the .symtab_shndx section but not copying/updating of it.
If the result has less than 64K-epsilon sections, that actually wasn't
needed, but e.g. with -fdebug-types-section one can exceed that pretty
easily (reported to us on WebKitGtk build on ppc64le).
Updating the section is slightly more complicated, because it basically
needs to be done in lock step with updating the .symtab section, if one
doesn't need to use SHN_XINDEX in there, the section should (or should be
updated to) contain SHN_UNDEF entry, otherwise needs to have whatever would
be overwise stored but couldn't fit.  But repeating due to that all the
symtab decisions what to discard and how to rewrite it would be ugly.

So, the patch instead emits the .symtab_shndx section (or sections) last
and prepares the content during the .symtab processing and in a second
pass when going just through .symtab_shndx sections just uses the saved
content.

2024-09-07  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR lto/116614
	* simple-object-elf.c (SHN_COMMON): Align comment with neighbouring
	comments.
	(SHN_HIRESERVE): Use uppercase hex digits instead of lowercase for
	consistency.
	(simple_object_elf_find_sections): Formatting fixes.
	(simple_object_elf_fetch_attributes): Likewise.
	(simple_object_elf_attributes_merge): Likewise.
	(simple_object_elf_start_write): Likewise.
	(simple_object_elf_write_ehdr): Likewise.
	(simple_object_elf_write_shdr): Likewise.
	(simple_object_elf_write_to_file): Likewise.
	(simple_object_elf_copy_lto_debug_section): Likewise.  Don't fail for
	new_i - 1 >= SHN_LORESERVE, instead arrange in that case to copy
	over .symtab_shndx sections, though emit those last and compute their
	section content when processing associated .symtab sections.  Handle
	simple_object_internal_read failure even in the .symtab_shndx reading
	case.

(cherry picked from commit bb8dd09)
nashif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
PR jit/117275 reports various jit test failures seen on
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu due to hitting this assertion
in varasm.cc on the 2nd compilation in a process:

#2  0x00007ffff63e67d0 in assemble_external_libcall (fun=0x7ffff2a4b1d8)
    at ../../src/gcc/varasm.cc:2650
2650          gcc_assert (!pending_assemble_externals_processed);
(gdb) p pending_assemble_externals_processed
$1 = true

We're not properly resetting state in varasm.cc after a compile
for libgccjit.

Fixed thusly.

gcc/ChangeLog:
	PR jit/117275
	* toplev.cc (toplev::finalize): Call varasm_cc_finalize.
	* varasm.cc (varasm_cc_finalize): New.
	* varasm.h (varasm_cc_finalize): New decl.

Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 779c039)
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
nashif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
This crash started with my r12-7803 but I believe the problem lies
elsewhere.

build_vec_init has cleanup_flags whose purpose is -- if I grok this
correctly -- to avoid destructing an object multiple times.  Let's
say we are initializing an array of A.  Then we might end up in
a scenario similar to initlist-eh1.C:

  try
    {
      call A::A in a loop
      // #0
      try
        {
	  call a fn using the array
	}
      finally
	{
	  // #1
	  call A::~A in a loop
	}
    }
  catch
    {
      // #2
      call A::~A in a loop
    }

cleanup_flags makes us emit a statement like

  D.3048 = 2;

at #0 to disable performing the cleanup at #2, since #1 will take
care of the destruction of the array.

But if we are not emitting the loop because we can use a constant
initializer (and use a single { a, b, ...}), we shouldn't generate
the statement resetting the iterator to its initial value.  Otherwise
we crash in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl because it gets the stray decl
D.3048.

	PR c++/117985

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* init.cc (build_vec_init): Pop CLEANUP_FLAGS if we're not
	generating the loop.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array23.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array24.C: New test.

(cherry picked from commit 40e5636)
nashif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
We've been miscompiling the following since r0-51314-gd6b4ea8592e338 (I
did not go compile something that old, and identified this change via
git blame, so might be wrong)

=== cut here ===
struct Foo { int x; };
Foo& get (Foo &v) { return v; }
void bar () {
  Foo v; v.x = 1;
  (true ? get (v) : get (v)).*(&Foo::x) = 2;
  // v.x still equals 1 here...
}
=== cut here ===

The problem lies in build_m_component_ref, that computes the address of
the COND_EXPR using build_address to build the representation of
  (true ? get (v) : get (v)).*(&Foo::x);
and gets something like
  &(true ? get (v) : get (v))  // #1
instead of
  (true ? &get (v) : &get (v)) // #2
and the write does not go where want it to, hence the miscompile.

This patch replaces the call to build_address by a call to
cp_build_addr_expr, which gives #2, that is properly handled.

	PR c++/114525

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* typeck2.cc (build_m_component_ref): Call cp_build_addr_expr
	instead of build_address.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/expr/cond18.C: New test.

(cherry picked from commit 35ce9af)
nashif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
Whenever C1 and C2 are integer constants, X is of a wrapping type, and
cmp is a relational operator, the expression X +- C1 cmp C2 can be
simplified in the following cases:

(a) If cmp is <= and C2 -+ C1 == +INF(1), we can transform the initial
comparison in the following way:
   X +- C1 <= C2
   -INF <= X +- C1 <= C2 (add left hand side which holds for any X, C1)
   -INF -+ C1 <= X <= C2 -+ C1 (add -+C1 to all 3 expressions)
   -INF -+ C1 <= X <= +INF (due to (1))
   -INF -+ C1 <= X (eliminate the right hand side since it holds for any X)

(b) By analogy, if cmp if >= and C2 -+ C1 == -INF(1), use the following
sequence of transformations:

   X +- C1 >= C2
   +INF >= X +- C1 >= C2 (add left hand side which holds for any X, C1)
   +INF -+ C1 >= X >= C2 -+ C1 (add -+C1 to all 3 expressions)
   +INF -+ C1 >= X >= -INF (due to (1))
   +INF -+ C1 >= X (eliminate the right hand side since it holds for any X)

(c) The > and < cases are negations of (a) and (b), respectively.

This transformation allows to occasionally save add / sub instructions,
for instance the expression

3 + (uint32_t)f() < 2

compiles to

cmn     w0, #4
cset    w0, ls

instead of

add     w0, w0, 3
cmp     w0, 2
cset    w0, ls

on aarch64.

Testcases that go together with this patch have been split into two
separate files, one containing testcases for unsigned variables and the
other for wrapping signed ones (and thus compiled with -fwrapv).
Additionally, one aarch64 test has been adjusted since the patch has
caused the generated code to change from

cmn     w0, #2
csinc   w0, w1, wzr, cc   (x < -2)

to

cmn     w0, #3
csinc   w0, w1, wzr, cs   (x <= -3)

This patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64, x86_64, and
i386, and additionally regtested on riscv32.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/116024
	* match.pd: New transformation around integer comparison.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr116024-2.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr116024-2-fwrapv.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/gtu_to_ltu_cmp_1.c: Adjust.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants