Skip to content

Conversation

@vitallium
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, this pull request adds support for RBS files for the Ruby language. RBS is a language to describe the structure of Ruby programs.

This pull request:

Release Notes:

  • N/A

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed The user has signed the Contributor License Agreement label Aug 4, 2024
@vitallium
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closes zed-industries/extensions#1196

@vitallium vitallium marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2024 18:15
Add support for RBS syntax for the Ruby language
extension. It's heavily based on neovim
tree-sitter queries.
@mrnugget mrnugget self-assigned this Aug 6, 2024
@mrnugget
Copy link
Contributor

mrnugget commented Aug 6, 2024

Thanks!

@mrnugget mrnugget merged commit 45afe9d into zed-industries:main Aug 6, 2024
@vitallium vitallium mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2024
@vitallium vitallium deleted the vs/ruby-add-rbs branch August 6, 2024 13:27
maxdeviant added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
ruby: Bump extension version to v0.1.0 Why not v0.0.9? I think the Ruby
extension is mature, and it's time to release the first minor version.
But I am totally OK with changing it to 0.0.9.

Included changes:

- #15778
- #15762
- #15110
- #15297

Release Notes:

- N/A

---------

Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <elliott.codes@gmail.com>
jcdickinson added a commit to jcdickinson/zed that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
notpeter pushed a commit to zed-extensions/ruby that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Hi, this pull request adds support for RBS files for the Ruby language.
[RBS](https://github.com/ruby/rbs) is a language to describe the
structure of Ruby programs.

This pull request:

- adds a new grammar to the Ruby extension for RBS
https://github.com/joker1007/tree-sitter-rbs
- configures the Ruby extension to use the added grammar.

Release Notes:

- N/A
notpeter pushed a commit to zed-extensions/ruby that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Bump extension version to v0.1.0 Why not v0.0.9? I think the Ruby
extension is mature, and it's time to release the first minor version.
But I am totally OK with changing it to 0.0.9.

Included changes:

- zed-industries/zed#15778
- zed-industries/zed#15762
- zed-industries/zed#15110
- zed-industries/zed#15297

Release Notes:

- N/A

---------

Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <elliott.codes@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla-signed The user has signed the Contributor License Agreement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants