Performance Analysis

Performance Analysis - Universal RNG Library

Executive Summary

The Universal RNG Library demonstrates exceptional performance characteristics, with AVX2 batch implementations achieving 3-5x speedups over single-mode operation and competitive or superior performance compared to standard library implementations across most bit widths.

🎯 Key Performance Insights

Batch Mode Dominance

• Peak speedup: 4.6x at 128-bit width (AVX2 WyRand)
• Consistent 3-4x improvements across 64-256 bit ranges
• Diminishing returns at 512+ bit widths due to SIMD width limitations

Algorithm Performance Hierarchy

Tier 1: High-Performance Leaders

• AVX2 Xoroshiro128++ (Batch): Best overall performance, peak 1355 M ops/sec
• AVX2 WyRand (Batch): Excellent consistency, strong 128-bit performance

Tier 2: Standard Reference

• Xoroshiro128+ (Reference): Solid baseline, good single-mode performance
• std::mt19937_64: Competitive at lower bit widths, falls behind at scale

Tier 3: Optimization Targets

• AVX2 Single Modes: Significant underperformance vs. reference implementations

📊 Detailed Performance Breakdown

Performance by Bit Width

16-32 Bit: SIMD Overhead Zone

Performance Range: 264-973 M ops/sec
Best: AVX2 Xoroshiro128++ Batch (973 M ops/sec @ 32-bit)
Pattern: Batch modes excel, single modes competitive

64-128 Bit: SIMD Sweet Spot

Performance Range: 162-1355 M ops/sec
Best: AVX2 Xoroshiro128++ Batch (1355 M ops/sec @ 64-bit)
Pattern: Massive batch speedups (3-5x), clear SIMD advantage

256-512 Bit: Scaling Transition

Performance Range: 42-360 M ops/sec
Pattern: Batch advantage diminishes, single-mode competitive

1024 Bit: Memory-Bound Region

Performance Range: 20-96 M ops/sec
Pattern: Algorithm choice becomes critical, memory bandwidth limiting

Speedup Factor Analysis

Bit Width	AVX2 WyRand	std::mt19937_64	Xoroshiro128+
16	3.3x	1.2x	1.0x
32	3.4x	1.3x	1.0x
64	4.6x	0.7x	0.9x
128	4.5x	2.1x	0.9x
256	3.4x	0.8x	0.8x
512	3.3x	0.8x	0.8x
1024	3.8x	1.2x	0.8x

Speedup relative to single-mode baseline

🔍 Performance Bottleneck Analysis

Single-Mode Underperformance

Issue: AVX2 single implementations significantly underperform reference algorithms

Root Causes:

• Function pointer overhead in Universal RNG architecture
• Suboptimal scalar code paths within SIMD implementations
• Missing compiler optimizations in critical loops

Impact: 30-70% performance penalty vs. reference implementations

Batch Mode Scaling Limits

Issue: Diminishing returns at higher bit widths

Analysis:

• 256-bit AVX2 registers become constraining factor
• Memory bandwidth saturation at 1024-bit operations
• Cache coherency overhead increases with data size

🚀 Optimization Opportunities

High-Impact Improvements

1. Single-Mode Optimization

// Current: Function pointer dispatch
auto generator = factory.create(algorithm_type);
result = generator->next();
// Target: Template-based direct dispatch
template<Algorithm A>
constexpr auto optimized_next() { /* direct implementation */ }

2. AVX2 Kernel Enhancement

• Reduce memory copies in batch processing
• Implement aggressive loop unrolling
• Optimize register allocation for hot paths

3. Memory Layout Optimization

• Cache-line aligned buffers for batch operations
• Prefetch instructions for large data sets
• NUMA-aware memory allocation for multi-threaded scenarios

Medium-Impact Improvements

AVX-512 Migration Path

Target Speedups:
- 2x theoretical improvement for 512-bit operations
- 4x potential for 1024-bit with AVX-512F
- Reduced instruction count for complex operations

Compiler Optimization Tuning

# Target flags for maximum performance
-O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -ffast-math -flto

📈 Performance Projections

Short-term Targets (Next Release)

• 2x improvement in single-mode performance
• 1.5x boost in batch mode efficiency
• Parity or better with xoroshiro128+ across all bit widths

Long-term Goals (Future Versions)

• AVX-512 implementations: 2-4x speedup potential
• GPU acceleration: 10-100x for large batch operations
• Algorithmic improvements: Better scaling characteristics

🎯 Benchmark Methodology

Test Environment

• CPU: Modern x86_64 with AVX2 support
• Compiler: GCC/Clang with optimization flags
• Measurement: High-resolution timing across multiple runs
• Validation: Statistical significance testing

Metrics Collected

• Throughput: Operations per second
• Latency: Single operation timing
• Variance: Performance consistency
• Memory: Cache utilization patterns

Quality Assurance

• Warmup phases to eliminate cold cache effects
• Multiple iteration averaging for statistical validity
• Cross-platform validation across different architectures

---

🔧 Performance Tuning Recommendations

For applications prioritizing:

Maximum Throughput → Use AVX2 Batch Mode

• Best for: Bulk random number generation
• Bit widths: 64-256 for optimal performance
• Expected gain: 3-5x over single-mode

Low Latency → Stick with Reference Implementations

• Best for: Interactive applications
• Current limitation: AVX2 single-mode optimization needed
• Workaround: Use standard xoroshiro128+ for now

Memory Efficiency → Choose Bit Width Carefully

• 16-32 bit: Good SIMD utilization
• 64-128 bit: Peak efficiency zone
• 256+ bit: Consider algorithm alternatives

---

Performance analysis based on comprehensive benchmarking suite | Updated: August 2025