Editorial tweaks ac review #1074
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Caught during the AC review for approval of Process 2025
As discussed in w3c#879, as templates for the member agreement evolve over time, each member has their own agreement, and there isn't a singular member agreement. Caught during the AC review for approval of Process 2025
frivoal
added
Type: Editorial improvements
tantek
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense. In the line with "their membership agreement" that this PR fixes, the ", [break]occur." end reads awkwardly. I don't have a specific suggested fix, except to consider an attempt to editorially fix this for grammar as part of this PR fixing "the/their".
|
@tantek, would this work? --- if serious and/or repeated violations,
+++ if serious and/or repeated violations occur,
such as failure to meet the requirements on individual behavior of
(a) this process
and in particular the Code of Conduct, or
(b) their membership agreement, or
--- (c) applicable laws,
--- occur.
+++ (c) applicable laws. |
tantek
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2025
TallTed
reviewed
Jul 15, 2025
Co-authored-by: fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net>
Co-authored-by: fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net>
Co-authored-by: fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net>
Co-authored-by: fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net>
plehegar
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2025
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
|
The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<fantasai> Subtopic: Editorial tweaks collection for AC Review<fantasai> github: https://github.com//pull/1074 <fantasai> florian: This is a pile of unrelated small tweaks that ppl suggested during review <fantasai> ... I think they're all fine, and would like to accept all of them <fantasai> ... One unresolved question, which is comment from TallTed <fantasai> s/.../Florian: <fantasai> ... In the midst of this we have a list of 3 items <fantasai> ... If it was just a sentence, I'd prefer one "or" but since it's a list having multiple it seems multiple "or"s are fine <fantasai> Ian: Any precedents? <Ian> (No preference for "or" handling) <fantasai> Brent: Lean slightly toward Ted's interpretation <fantasai> fantasai: I don't particularly care either way with the number of "or"s <fantasai> florian: Ok, since most ppl don't care, and Brent and Ted want it, let's do it <fantasai> fantasai: Any other comments on this PR? <Ian> +1 to 1074 <fantasai> RESOLVED: Adopt PR 1074 with removal of excess "or"s as noted. |
frivoal
added
the
Closed: Accepted
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains a few minor editorial tweaks proposed in response to comments raised during AC review https://www.w3.org/wbs/33280/Process-2025/results/.
Not only should we fix these going forward for the next iteration of Process, but I would also recommend that the Team consider adopting them into the reviewed Process, according to the provisions of https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#ACReviewAfter.
Preview | Diff