Skip to content

[Editorial] Fix browsing context links. #88

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mustaqahmed
Copy link
Member

@mustaqahmed mustaqahmed commented Jan 29, 2024

This fixes a part of #87.


Preview | Diff

This fixes a part of w3c#87.
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres self-requested a review January 30, 2024 08:39
Co-authored-by: Marcos Cáceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
index.html Outdated
<a>shadow-including root</a> is the <a>active document</a> of a
[=Document/browsing context=] which is (or has an <a>ancestor
browsing context</a> which is) in focus by a window which is in
<a>shadow-including root</a> is the [=active document=] of a
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marcoscaceres Any clue why ReSpec is still not happy with this PR (see "Generate static HTML" step here)? Perhaps the symbols are not exposed in the source specs? Perhaps I need to "include" other spec definitions here somehow?

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Oh, looks like it's sad about "active document" and some other things.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

There were two instances of active document, so fixed them here: 9e39c46

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants