CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
failed
Dec 15, 2025 in 0s
Performance Regression: -19.97%
Summary
⚡ 1 improvement
❌ 27 regressions
✅ 1228 untouched
⏩ 621 skipped1
⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Benchmarks breakdown
|
Benchmark |
BASE |
HEAD |
Change |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 128)] |
453.7 µs |
566.4 µs |
-19.9% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2)] |
451.7 µs |
564.3 µs |
-19.96% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 32)] |
451.9 µs |
564.6 µs |
-19.95% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 4)] |
451.4 µs |
564.1 µs |
-19.97% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2048)] |
526.1 µs |
638.8 µs |
-17.65% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 512)] |
506.8 µs |
619.5 µs |
-18.2% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 8)] |
452 µs |
564.7 µs |
-19.95% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 128)] |
465.8 µs |
579 µs |
-19.55% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 2)] |
457.3 µs |
570.4 µs |
-19.83% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 2048)] |
624.1 µs |
737.2 µs |
-15.34% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 32)] |
459.9 µs |
573 µs |
-19.74% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 4)] |
457.9 µs |
571 µs |
-19.8% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 512)] |
535.4 µs |
648.5 µs |
-17.44% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbinview[(100000, 128)] |
464.8 µs |
577.9 µs |
-19.58% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbinview[(100000, 32)] |
459.6 µs |
572.7 µs |
-19.75% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbin[(100000, 8)] |
457.9 µs |
571 µs |
-19.8% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbinview[(100000, 4)] |
457.5 µs |
570.5 µs |
-19.82% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbinview[(100000, 512)] |
534.8 µs |
647.9 µs |
-17.46% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbinview[(100000, 2048)] |
623.9 µs |
737 µs |
-15.34% |
| ❌ |
bench_compare_varbinview[(100000, 8)] |
458.2 µs |
571.3 µs |
-19.79% |
| ... |
... |
... |
... |
... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.