Skip to content

Conversation

@onursatici
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Onur Satici <onur@spiraldb.com>
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 6, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5219 will improve performances by ×3.2

Comparing os/validate (4904c9d) with develop (28f5b3d)1

Summary

⚡ 40 improvements
✅ 1278 untouched
🆕 7 new
⏩ 155 skipped2

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.0, 0.25)] 12.1 µs 8.7 µs +39.08%
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.0, 0.95)] 12.1 µs 8.7 µs +38.62%
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.0, 1.0)] 11.5 µs 8.7 µs +32.38%
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 0.25)] 26.4 µs 11.9 µs ×2.2
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 0.95)] 26 µs 11.6 µs ×2.2
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.01, 1.0)] 15.1 µs 11.4 µs +32.67%
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 0.25)] 26.2 µs 11.7 µs ×2.2
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 0.95)] 28.2 µs 13.3 µs ×2.1
decompress_alp[f32, (1000, 0.1, 1.0)] 16.2 µs 12.6 µs +28.69%
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.0, 0.25)] 81.2 µs 27.4 µs ×3
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.0, 0.95)] 81.1 µs 27.4 µs ×3
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.0, 1.0)] 81 µs 27.3 µs ×3
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.01, 0.25)] 97.2 µs 30.8 µs ×3.2
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.01, 0.95)] 98.6 µs 31.4 µs ×3.1
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.01, 1.0)] 85.7 µs 32.2 µs ×2.7
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.1, 0.25)] 102.3 µs 34.1 µs ×3
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.1, 0.95)] 119 µs 40.6 µs ×2.9
decompress_alp[f32, (10000, 0.1, 1.0)] 95.4 µs 40.8 µs ×2.3
decompress_alp[f64, (1000, 0.0, 0.25)] 16.8 µs 11.5 µs +46.2%
decompress_alp[f64, (1000, 0.0, 0.95)] 16.7 µs 11.7 µs +42.94%
... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on develop (84b2f96) during the generation of this report, so 28f5b3d was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

  2. 155 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.88%. Comparing base (28f5b3d) to head (4904c9d).
⚠️ Report is 19 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vortex-io/src/file/object_store.rs 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@onursatici onursatici enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2025 13:46
@onursatici onursatici merged commit ee4b921 into develop Nov 6, 2025
43 of 65 checks passed
@onursatici onursatici deleted the os/validate branch November 6, 2025 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/chore A trivial change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants