Skip to content

Conversation

@ekg
Copy link
Member

@ekg ekg commented Mar 20, 2017

Trying to recover some lost accuracy from the performance refresh.

@ekg
Copy link
Member Author

ekg commented Mar 20, 2017

10M reads with the version here:

human_sim.10M.3ed9402.ROC.1.pdf

human_sim.3ed9402.QQ.1.pdf

Runtimes:

bwa mem paired
[main] Version: 0.7.15-r1142-dirty
[main] CMD: bwa mem -t 32 hs37d5/hs37d5.fa human.10M/sim_1.fq.gz human.10M/sim_2.fq.gz
[main] Real time: 460.096 sec; CPU: 12691.821 sec
  10M 0:07:40 [21.7k/s]
real    7m55.307s
user    210m53.962s
sys     6m9.095s

bwa mem single
[main] Version: 0.7.15-r1142-dirty
[main] CMD: bwa mem -t 32 hs37d5/hs37d5.fa /dev/fd/63
[main] Real time: 561.963 sec; CPU: 12223.657 sec
  10M 0:09:21 [17.8k/s]
real    9m37.149s
user    201m5.182s
sys     7m20.999s

vg ref paired mapping
  10M 1:11:51 [2.32k/s] 
real    72m6.630s
user    2252m9.570s
sys     9m3.661s

vg ref single mapping
  10M 1:17:06 [2.16k/s]
real    77m21.681s
user    2424m24.365s
sys     9m44.287s

vg pan paired mappping
  10M 1:00:54 [2.74k/s]
real    61m10.115s
user    1859m7.811s
sys     10m6.860s

vg pan single mappping
  10M 0:54:36 [3.05k/s]
real    54m51.761s
user    1637m27.120s
sys     9m12.025s

@ekg ekg merged commit 6ef422a into master Mar 20, 2017
@ekg ekg removed the in progress label Mar 20, 2017
@adamnovak adamnovak deleted the runtime-perf branch March 13, 2019 19:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants