Skip to content

Basic coverage of migwsgi. #98

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

Basic coverage of migwsgi. #98

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

albu-diku
Copy link

@albu-diku albu-diku commented Aug 2, 2024

This PR does the principle things required to allow exercising the
central component responsible for glueing named MiG "functionality"
files to WSGI. Includde is a new wsgisupp.py file that implements
support code allowing exercising WSGI handlers in a readable way.

@albu-diku albu-diku mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2024
@albu-diku albu-diku marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2024 14:36
@albu-diku albu-diku force-pushed the fix/force-recursive-py3 branch from c64af9a to ca47e01 Compare August 14, 2024 11:20
@albu-diku albu-diku force-pushed the test/migwsgi branch 2 times, most recently from dd831a2 to 0b734fc Compare August 16, 2024 11:09
@albu-diku albu-diku force-pushed the fix/force-recursive-py3 branch from a34927d to a40a095 Compare September 23, 2024 13:02
@albu-diku albu-diku changed the base branch from fix/force-recursive-py3 to edge September 23, 2024 13:12
@albu-diku albu-diku force-pushed the test/migwsgi branch 2 times, most recently from ae69a06 to f9859bd Compare October 2, 2024 16:39
@albu-diku albu-diku removed the rebased label Nov 12, 2024
@albu-diku albu-diku force-pushed the test/migwsgi branch 3 times, most recently from ffa18a4 to 38b00ac Compare January 14, 2025 20:20
@albu-diku albu-diku force-pushed the test/migwsgi branch 2 times, most recently from 3bfa12b to 584464f Compare January 24, 2025 10:16
@albu-diku
Copy link
Author

Made a final attempt to add some coverage. I have clearly clearly stated the PR dependencies, which leaves one single commit. From this, I removed basically every change that could be deemed refactoring but was also a source of fear about behaviour change. Any less is not possible and the vast majority of the PR is test code now.

Copy link
Contributor

@jonasbardino jonasbardino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and importantly rather careful about not changing any existing code, as we talked about off list 👍 so I'll go ahead with merging despite the pedantic to minor format issues in my comments.

In terms of the practical merge, I'm not sure if I can actually merge directly in next without causing issues for the sync with our backwards compatible experimental branch name. So I may have to effectively merge there and only rebase into next afterwards as we do for other PRs. Time will tell.

@albu-diku albu-diku force-pushed the test/migwsgi branch 2 times, most recently from 5b421f9 to ff85267 Compare February 5, 2025 19:25
This PR does the principle things required to allow exercising the
central component responsible for glueing named MiG "functionality"
files to WSGI. Included is a new wsgisupp.py file implementing the
support bits to allow exercising WSGI related code in a readable way.
@jonasbardino jonasbardino merged commit ee23463 into next Feb 6, 2025
4 checks passed
@jonasbardino
Copy link
Contributor

Merged through experimental and git rebased onwards to next to keep our backwards compatible branch naming support.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants