Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardize integration testing #9

Closed
ivankorn opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Standardize integration testing #9

ivankorn opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ivankorn
Copy link
Contributor

ivankorn commented Jul 31, 2019

The integration testing for this module should be standardized based on the module template to use Cloud Build. This should include obviating the need for manual steps.

ingwarr added a commit to ingwarr/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2019
ingwarr added a commit to ingwarr/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2019
@aaron-lane aaron-lane added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 16, 2019
ingwarr added a commit to ingwarr/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2019
ingwarr added a commit to ingwarr/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2019
ingwarr added a commit to ingwarr/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2019
ingwarr added a commit to ingwarr/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2019
@aaron-lane
Copy link
Contributor

Closed in favour of #12 .

pkatsovich pushed a commit to recurly/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2020
…odules/ludo-0.12

Update to Terraform 0.12
pkatsovich pushed a commit to recurly/terraform-google-memorystore that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants