[CS] Make sure macro arguments go through coerceCallArguments
#80583
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hamishknight
force-pushed
the
macro-arg-apply
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ae264de to
9c6a1c6
Compare
Previously we would avoid rewriting the arguments in CSApply, but that can result in incorrect behavior in MiscDiagnostics passes, e.g incorrectly treating all closure arguments as escaping. Make sure we rewrite the arguments as we would in regular type-checking. rdar://148665502
hamishknight
force-pushed
the
macro-arg-apply
branch
from
9c6a1c6 to
b82f95b
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci please test source compatibility |
hborla
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2025
xedin
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2025
This was referenced Apr 15, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously we would avoid rewriting the arguments in CSApply, but that can result in incorrect behavior in MiscDiagnostics passes, e.g incorrectly treating all closure arguments as escaping. Make sure we rewrite the arguments as we would in regular type-checking.
rdar://148665502
Resolves #80561