You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As it can be seen in the project wiki, the position-controlled joints use as references the output of the joint-trajectory-generator. This means that the CoM reference trajectory is completely neglected.
A better strategy could be to integrate the desired accelerations computed by the balance controller, and use the resulting positions as references for the joint position controller. To do that, the only missing block is a double integrator, which should also handle the switch between torque and position control (i.e. reset the integral when a joint switches to position control).
Do you see anything wrong with this approach @thomasfla ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As it can be seen in the project wiki, the position-controlled joints use as references the output of the joint-trajectory-generator. This means that the CoM reference trajectory is completely neglected.
A better strategy could be to integrate the desired accelerations computed by the balance controller, and use the resulting positions as references for the joint position controller. To do that, the only missing block is a double integrator, which should also handle the switch between torque and position control (i.e. reset the integral when a joint switches to position control).
Do you see anything wrong with this approach @thomasfla ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: