Add binary gem for platform aarch64-mingw-ucrt
#3530
+48
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
larskanis
force-pushed
the
aarch64-mingw-ucrt
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ec6e590 to
992c64a
Compare
larskanis
force-pushed
the
aarch64-mingw-ucrt
branch
from
992c64a to
7bfe22c
Compare
2 tasks
`activate` is actually not needed in cross builds.
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
aarch64-mingw-ucrt
branch
from
7bfe22c to
55060ba
Compare
|
I've rebased this onto current |
flavorjones
force-pushed
the
aarch64-mingw-ucrt
branch
from
55060ba to
c55cdba
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem is this PR intended to solve?
I would like to add a precompiled binary gem for Windows on ARM64 platform.
This PR requires the latest rake-compiler-dock from main branch, since current version 1.9.1 doesn't provide
aarch64-mingw-ucrttarget platform.Have you included adequate test coverage?
Yes, a dedicated CI ob.
Does this change affect the behavior of either the C or the Java implementations?
Only C.