Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[r] Push schema accessor down to libtiledbsoma #3079

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

johnkerl
Copy link
Member

Issue and/or context: #2406 #3055 [sc-55682]

Changes:

Notes for Reviewer:

@johnkerl johnkerl force-pushed the kerl/schema-pushdown branch 4 times, most recently from 2998b20 to c0c329f Compare October 1, 2024 03:04
@johnkerl
Copy link
Member Author

johnkerl commented Oct 1, 2024

Update as of 2024-09-30:

  • Fails unit test here
    • Old/new schema comparison fails in check_arrow_schema_data_types in R/utils-arrow.R: value-type binary vs value-type string
  • I've traced this down to this one line
    • TileDB-R's schema evolution (not yet ported to libtiledbsoma) writes value-type binary ([r] Use libtiledbsoma for schema evolution #3057)
    • Later on in the unit-test spot mentioned above that fails to check against value-type readback using the schema getter on this PR (which has been ported to libtiledbsoma)

Update 2024-10-03: resolved by #3100, which has been merged, and this has now rebased on top of.

Copy link
Member

@mojaveazure mojaveazure left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; left one minor comment to future-proof the code. Please remember to bump the develop version, update the changelog, and 🚢

apis/r/R/SOMADataFrame.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@johnkerl johnkerl merged commit c50cb98 into main Oct 3, 2024
14 checks passed
@johnkerl johnkerl deleted the kerl/schema-pushdown branch October 3, 2024 21:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants