Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update specs for an emergency workaround for sass/dart-sass#2390 #2030

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

nex3
Copy link
Contributor

@nex3 nex3 commented Oct 17, 2024

These are not intended to reflect the correct behavior, but rather the
fact that we need to limit the amount of repetition univerally until
we have time to find a proper solution to the underlying bug.

[skip dart-sass]

These are not intended to reflect the correct behavior, but rather the
fact that we need to limit the amount of repetition univerally until
we have time to find a proper solution to the underlying bug.
@nex3 nex3 requested a review from jathak October 17, 2024 02:41
@nex3
Copy link
Contributor Author

nex3 commented Oct 17, 2024

I'm planning to land this TBR and cut a release tonight so we don't flood users with deprecation warnings for @import.

@ntkme
Copy link
Contributor

ntkme commented Oct 17, 2024

I suppose the dart-sass code change should only impact @import or related syntax, but I'm seeing this PR having some differences in seemingly unrelated deprecations e.g. strict-unary.

@nex3
Copy link
Contributor Author

nex3 commented Oct 17, 2024

That's expected; the original refactor affected how all parse-time deprecations were handled, so this workaround affects them all as well.

@nex3 nex3 merged commit 5a21617 into main Oct 17, 2024
12 checks passed
@nex3 nex3 deleted the limit-repetition branch October 17, 2024 02:58
Copy link
Member

@jathak jathak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants