Skip to content

Conversation

CDirkx
Copy link
Contributor

@CDirkx CDirkx commented Apr 28, 2021

StaticMutex is a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality as DropGuard. StaticMutex is used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct like DropGuard.

@rustbot label: +T-libs-impl

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 28, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 28, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 28, 2021

📌 Commit 1ac6326 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 28, 2021
m-ou-se added a commit to m-ou-se/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2021
Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead

`StaticMutex` is a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality as `DropGuard`. `StaticMutex` is used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct like `DropGuard`.

`@rustbot` label: +T-libs-impl
jackh726 added a commit to jackh726/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2021
Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead

`StaticMutex` is a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality as `DropGuard`. `StaticMutex` is used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct like `DropGuard`.

``@rustbot`` label: +T-libs-impl
jackh726 added a commit to jackh726/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2021
Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead

`StaticMutex` is a mutex that when locked provides a guard that unlocks the mutex again when dropped, thus provides the exact same functionality as `DropGuard`. `StaticMutex` is used in more places, and is thus preferred over an ad-hoc construct like `DropGuard`.

```@rustbot``` label: +T-libs-impl
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#84484 (Don't rebuild rustdoc and clippy after checking bootstrap)
 - rust-lang#84530 (`test tidy` should ignore alternative `build` dir patterns)
 - rust-lang#84531 (Ignore commented out lines when finding features)
 - rust-lang#84540 (Build sanitizers for x86_64-unknown-linux-musl)
 - rust-lang#84555 (Set `backtrace-on-ice` by default for compiler and codegen profiles)
 - rust-lang#84585 (Add `x.py check src/librustdoc` as an alias for `x.py check src/tools/rustdoc`)
 - rust-lang#84636 (rustdoc: change aliases attribute to data-aliases)
 - rust-lang#84646 (Add some regression tests related to rust-lang#82494)
 - rust-lang#84661 (Remove extra word in `rustc_mir` docs)
 - rust-lang#84663 (Remove `DropGuard` in `sys::windows::process` and use `StaticMutex` instead)
 - rust-lang#84668 (Update books)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ccd04a5 into rust-lang:master Apr 29, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.53.0 milestone Apr 29, 2021
@CDirkx CDirkx deleted the dropguard branch April 29, 2021 08:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants