Skip to content

ci: run distcheck on arm #141346

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

marcoieni
Copy link
Member

@marcoieni marcoieni commented May 21, 2025

Change the distcheck job to run on arm instead of x86 to remove the large runner.
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu is a tier 1 target, so it should be equivalent to x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

This change was discussed in zulip#t-infra/bootstrap > Speed up distcheck.
r? @ghost

try-job: aarch64-gnu-distcheck

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 21, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
ci: run distcheck on arm

try-job: aarch64-gnu-distcheck
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 21, 2025

⌛ Trying commit abdc522 with merge 4d1fb35...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 21, 2025

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label May 21, 2025
@marcoieni marcoieni force-pushed the distcheck-aarch64 branch from abdc522 to b2c4aeb Compare May 21, 2025 14:19
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
ci: run distcheck on arm

try-job: aarch64-gnu-distcheck
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 21, 2025

⌛ Trying commit b2c4aeb with merge 575fd45...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 21, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 575fd45 (575fd45881adfa3e8d4587210aa7e972d42490b8)

@marcoieni marcoieni marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2025 16:26
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 21, 2025
@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

timing looks good
image

r? @Kobzol

@rustbot ready

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented May 22, 2025

Have we tried to run this one before on the x64 4-core free runners? The ARM runners seem to also ony have four cores, are they really so much faster than x64?

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

I tried here. I will try again now just out of curiosity.

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

zoomy!

@marcoieni
Copy link
Member Author

closed in favor of #141382

@marcoieni marcoieni closed this May 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants